Agenda and
Business Paper

 

Ordinary Meeting of Council

 

 

 

To be held on
Monday 25 May 2026

at 6:00 PM

 

 

 

Civic Centre cnr Baylis and Morrow Streets,
Wagga Wagga NSW 2650 (PO Box 20)
P 1300 292 442
P council@wagga.nsw.gov.au

wagga.nsw.gov.au

NOTICE OF MEETING

 

The proceedings of all Council meetings in open session, including all debate and addresses by the public, are recorded (audio visual) and livestreamed on Council’s website including for the purpose of facilitating community access to meetings and accuracy of the Minutes.

 

In addition to webcasting council meetings, audio recordings of confidential sessions of Ordinary Meetings of Council are also recorded, but do not form part of the webcast.

 

 

WAGGA WAGGA CITY COUNCILLORS

STATEMENT OF ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS

Councillors are reminded of their Oath or Affirmation of Office made under Section 233A of the Local Government Act 1993 and their obligation under Council’s Code of Conduct to disclose and appropriately manage Conflicts of Interest.

 

QUORUM

The quorum for a meeting of the Council, is a majority of the Councillors of the Council, who hold office for the time being, who are eligible to vote at the meeting.

 

Ordinary Meeting of Council AGENDA AND BUSINESS PAPER

Monday 25 May 2026

ORDER OF BUSINESS:

CLAUSE               PRECIS                                                                                            PAGE

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY                                                                                   3

REFLECTION                                                                                                                         3

APOLOGIES                                                                                                                          3

Confirmation of Minutes

CM-1           CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 11 May 2026                                                                                                                           3

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST                                                                                            3

Reports from Staff

RP-1            DA25/0363 - SELF-STORAGE UNITS AT LOT 1 AND 2 DP 1064692, 20 AND 24 GEORGE STREET, NORTH WAGGA WAGGA                                                                    4

RP-2            RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF MOTION & PETITION - RETICULATED GAS IN NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS                                                                            11

RP-3            RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF MOTION - IMPROVED RIVER ACCESS AND SAFETY AT "THE ROCKS" AT THE WAGGA BEACH PRECINCT                                          30

RP-4            WAGGA WAGGA DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN AMENDMENT - SECTION 6 VILLAGES (NORTH WAGGA NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS)                                                                                                                          36

RP-5            MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - WAGGA LAKE RUN AND RIDE           48

RP-6            DEACCESSIONING AND RELOCATION OF ARTWORKS FROM THE PUBLIC ART COLLECTION                                                                                                     55

RP-7            WAGGA WAGGA RESOURCE RECOVERY AND WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2026-2038                                                                                                           68

RP-8            FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT AS AT 30 APRIL 2026                            75

RP-9            APPROVAL TO PREPARE EXTRACTION LICENCES                                         115

RP-10          2026 AUSTRALIAN LOCAL GOVERNMENT WOMEN'S ASSOCIATION NATIONAL CONFERENCE                                                                                                    119

RP-11          QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE                                                                                121

Committee Minutes

M-1              CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - LOCAL TRANSPORT FORUM - 7 May 2026               126   

Confidential Reports

CONF-1       RFT CT2026044 WHEEL LOADER GWMC                                                          133

CONF-2       EXPRESSION OF INTEREST - LICENCE OF OFFICE SPACE AT 15 BLAKEMORE STREET, WAGGA WAGGA (NGURRA HUB)                                                       134

CONF-3       2025/26 LOAN FACILITY                                                                                     135

CONF-4       PASSENGER & BAGGAGE SCREENING SERVICES WAGGA WAGGA AIRPORT CONTRACT EXTENSION (RFT2017-20)                                                              136

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY

Wagga Wagga City Council acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land, the Wiradjuri people, and pays respect to Elders past, present and future and extends our respect to all First Nations Peoples in Wagga Wagga.

We recognise and respect their cultural heritage, beliefs and continuing connection with the land and rivers. We also recognise the resilience, strength and pride of the Wiradjuri and First Nations communities

 

 

REFLECTION

Councillors, let us in silence reflect upon our responsibilities to the community which we represent, and to all future generations and faithfully, and impartially, carry out the functions, powers, authorities and discretions vested in us, to the best of our skill and judgement.

 

 

APOLOGIES

 

 

Confirmation of Minutes

CM-1              CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES - ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 11 May 2026       

Recommendation That the Minutes of the proceedings of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 11 May 2026 be confirmed as a true and accurate record.

 

 

1⇩.

Minutes – 11 May 2026 Ordinary Council Meeting

137

 

 

DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-1

 

Reports from Staff

RP-1               DA25/0363 - SELF-STORAGE UNITS AT LOT 1 AND 2 DP 1064692, 20 AND 24 GEORGE STREET, NORTH WAGGA WAGGA

Author:          Steven Cook 

Executive:    Julie Costa

         

 

Summary:

The report is for a development application for a self-storage premises comprising eight large self-storage units. The development application is presented to Council for determination.   Consistent with the information made publicly available on Council’s website and referred to in the Community Participation Plan, applications that receive 10 or more objections are referred to Council for determination.   A full assessment of the development application is provided as an attachment to this report. The assessment has considered and addressed all relevant matters raised in the submissions.

 

 

 

That Council refuse DA25/0363 for self-storage units at Lot 1 and 2 DP 1064692, 20 and 24 George Street, North Wagga Wagga, for the reasons contained in the s4.15 Assessment Report.

 

 

Applicant	Mark Phegan
Owner	Mark Phegan
Development Cost	$220,000
Development Description	Self-storage units

 

Key Issues

·   Flooding impacts, including impacts on the evacuation of North Wagga Wagga.

·   Impacts on the character and streetscape of George Street, and the character of North Wagga Wagga generally.

·   Impacts on the amenity of adjoining properties.

·   Stormwater management.

 

 

Site Location

The site, being Lots 1 and 2 DP 1064692, 20-24 George Street, North Wagga Wagga, is located on the north-western side of George Street, approximately 80 metres southwest of its intersection with Marah Street. The site also has frontage to George Lane to the rear.

 

The site is a vacant, flat village lot with no structures or significant vegetation. George Street displays the typical North Wagga Wagga residential character, with kerb and guttering, well‑established street trees, and generally low‑density development. Opposite the site are lightweight dwellings on large lots with established gardens, contributing positively to the streetscape. Nearby, dwellings fronting Marah Street also present a residential character to George Street despite fencing. A vacant lot occupies the opposite corner of George and Marah Streets, appearing to store miscellaneous items, with an earlier consent not acted upon.

 

Land immediately southwest of the site is vacant, followed by a dwelling and, further along, a childcare centre set among landscaped areas. On the opposite side of George Street to the southwest is a mix of dwellings, vacant land, and a former butchery. While some non‑residential uses exist in the wider area, these are generally historical and low scale.

 

Figure 1 - Site Location

Assessment

·   A full assessment considering all relevant matters in detail is contained in the attached Section 4.15 Assessment Report. The following is a summary of the assessment. Not all relevant matters are discussed in this summary.

·   The application is for eight self‑storage units in two buildings with a central driveway, extensive hardstand, 200mm setbacks and a 2.4m security fence. Units are approximately 120m² plus mezzanine, with storerooms internal to six units and external to two.

 

Figure 2 - Perspective Drawing

 

Figure 3 - Site Plan

·   The site is zoned RU5 Village under the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 (WWLEP 2010), where self‑storage is permitted with consent. Thirty submissions were received (29 objections and one in support), raising flooding, character, amenity, stormwater and traffic.

 

 

Amenity, Character and Streetscape

·   The bulk, scale, setbacks and presentation are inconsistent with the low‑density village character and would appear visually dominant to nearby dwellings, particularly 94 and 96 Marah Street.

·   The proposal is inconsistent with the RU5 zone objective to protect and maintain rural village character, and with the objectives and several controls in Section 6.2 of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 (WWDCP 2010).

·   When considered in the context of existing and potential future development in North Wagga Wagga, has the potential to incrementally and progressively change the overall character from a village context to a more industrial area, resulting in unacceptable cumulative impacts.

·   A small number of recent non-residential approvals in North Wagga Wagga have generally occurred in locations where the residential character is less pronounced and were supported on their individual merits.

 

Flooding

·   The site is within the Flood Planning Area (FPA) and is inundated in an approximate 12% AEP (1 in 8 year) flood event, with access cut off before levee overtopping.

·   A development such as self-storage units creates a foreseeable risk that lessees will attempt to return to the units to collect belongings in the event of a flood, increasing the number of people attempting to evacuate, increasing congestion and burden on the State Emergency Service (SES) and responder resources.

·   The SES has not provided a specific statement in favour or against the development, but they have provided following comments:

o “In summary, intensifying development on the land below the Flood Planning Level will increase risk to life”,

o “It is important to note that the SES is opposed to the imposition of development consent conditions requiring private flood evacuation plans rather than the application of sound land use planning and flood risk management”, and

o “The proposed development would further increase the complexity of flood operations for the Wagga Wagga LGA and directly transfer the risk to the SES for warning, evacuation, and potentially rescue. Areas that do not have independent means of evacuation complicate the SES flood response”.

·   The proposal does not satisfy Clause 5.21(2)(c) or (d) of the WWLEP 2010, as the absence of adverse evacuation impacts and appropriate risk‑to‑life measures have not been demonstrated.

·   The proposal is also inconsistent with Section 4.2 of the WWDCP 2010, including the objective to “minimise the public and private costs of flood damage”, and the control which states that “industrial and high impact commercial uses are unsuitable for location at North Wagga”.

 

Stormwater

·   Stormwater is proposed to discharge to the kerb.

·   Insufficient information has been provided to demonstrate that additional runoff can be managed within the constrained North Wagga stormwater network.

 

 

Reasons for Refusal

 

Amenity, Character and Streetscape

A.1      The development is inconsistent with the objective of the RU5 zone in the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 “to protect and maintain the rural village character of the land”.

 

A.2      The development is inconsistent with Objectives O1, O2 and O3 of Section 6.2 of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010.

 

A.3      The development does not comply with controls C2, C7, C9, C10, C15 and C16 of Section 6.2 of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010.

 

A.4      The development is not in keeping with the prevailing built form and low density, village character of the area, and will result in negative impacts on the streetscape and amenity of the area.

 

A.5      The development results in unacceptable impacts on the amenity of surrounding properties, and in particular those at 94 and 96 Marah Street, where the proposed development would appear dominant and overbearing.

 

A.6      When considered in the context of existing and potential future development in North Wagga Wagga, the development has the potential to incrementally and progressively change the overall character of North Wagga Wagga from a village context to a more industrial area, resulting in unacceptable cumulative impacts.

Flooding

A.7      Consent may not be granted because the consent authority is not satisfied in accordance with Section 5.21(2) of the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 that the development:

 

(c)   will not adversely affect the safe occupation and efficient evacuation of people or exceed the capacity of existing evacuation routes for the surrounding area in the event of a flood, and

(d)  incorporates appropriate measures to manage risk to life in the event of a flood.

 

A.8      In considering mandatory matters under Clause 5.21(3) of the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010, consideration of items (a) and (c) raises unresolved concerns in relation to these matters.

 

A.9      The development is inconsistent with objectives (a), (c), and (d) of Section 5.21 of the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010.

 

A.10    In considering mandatory matters under Clause 5.22(3) of the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010, consideration of items (a) and (b) raises unresolved concerns in relation to these matters.

 

A.11    The development is inconsistent with objectives O1, O2, O3 and O4 of Section 4.2 of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010.

 

A.12    The development does not comply with Control C9 of Section 4.2 of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010.

 

A.13    The development:  

(a)  Will result in unacceptable costs as a result of flooding,

(b)            Will likely increase traffic and add to additional traffic congestion impacts in North Wagga Wagga during flood events and evacuations, and

(c)   Contains insufficient measures to manage risk to life and property.     

 

A.14    The development, when considered in the context of existing and potential future development in North Wagga Wagga, has the potential to result in a progressive increase in the number of individuals attempting to evacuate from the area resulting in unacceptable cumulative flooding impacts.

 

A.15    The SES confirms that intensifying development below the Flood Planning Level increases risk to life, that North Wagga Wagga has significant evacuation constraints, and that the proposal would increase evacuation demand and operational complexity. The SES does not support reliance on private evacuation plans or behavioural controls.

Stormwater

A.16    Insufficient detail has been provided as to how additional runoff will be managed within the limited North Wagga Wagga stormwater network, to ensure impacts are acceptable.

N/A

Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010

Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010

Sustainable

Climate action

Embrace sound planning and development to reduce the impacts of natural hazards and climate change.

 

The determination of the application in accordance with the recommendation is not considered to raise risk management issues for Council.

Full details of the notification and consultation that occurred as part of the development application assessment is contained in the attached s4.15 Report.

 

Mail

Traditional Media

Community Engagement

Digital

Rates notices insert

Direct mail

Letterbox drop

Council news

Media release

Media opportunity

TV/radio advertising

One-on-one meeting(s)

Community meeting(s)

Stakeholder workshop(s)

Drop-in session(s)

Survey/feedback form(s)

Have your Say

Email newsletter

Social media

Website

Inform

x

x

Consult

Involve

Collaborate

Other methods (please list specific details below)

 

 

 

1.	DA25/0363 - Section 4.15 Assessment Report - Provided under separate cover
2.	DA25/0363 - Plans for Assessment - Provided under separate cover
3.	DA25/0363 - Statement of Environmental Effects - Provided under separate cover
4.	DA25/0363 - Flood Assessment Report - Provided under separate cover
5.	DA25/0363 - State Emergency Service Comments (Initial and Additional) - Provided under separate cover
6.	DA25/0363 - Redacted Submissions - Provided under separate cover
7.	DA25/0363 - Applicant Response to Submissions - Provided under separate cover
8.	DA25/0363 - Unredacted Submissions This matter is considered to be confidential under Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, as it deals with: personnel matters concerning particular individuals. - Provided under separate cover

 

 

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-2

 

RP-2               RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF MOTION & PETITION - RETICULATED GAS IN NEW RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS

Author:         Matthew Yeomans 

Executive:    Julie Costa

         

 

Summary:

This report responds to Council’s resolution of 24 March 2025 (Resolution 25/071) regarding the petition received in relation to reticulated gas in new subdivisions and the subsequent Notice of Motion of the Ordinary Council Meeting of 7 April 2025 (Resolution 25/087) concerning gas appliances in homes and health claims.   ​ ​This report outlines the investigations undertaken, key findings and provides options for Council’s consideration.

 

 

That Council:

a       receive and note the report

b       consider the options presented in this report and determine Council’s preferred position regarding reticulated gas infrastructure in new residential development

c        write to the petition organiser advising of the outcome of this report

Council received a petition on 6 March 2025 from William Adlong requesting that Council allow new residential subdivisions the option to proceed without reticulated gas. The petition received contained 198 signatures and was submitted to Council in accordance with Council’s Petitions Management Policy (POL086).

 

This petition was reported to Council’s Ordinary Council Meeting on 24 March 2025 with Council resolving the following:

25/071  RESOLVED:

              On the Motion of Councillors J McKinnon and R Foley 

That Council:

a       receive and note the petition received on 6 March 2025 requesting that Council consider allowing new residential subdivisions to proceed without reticulated gas

b       receive a further report in response to the petition within 3 months

 

At the Ordinary Meeting of 7 April 2025 Council received a Notice of Motion relating to gas appliances in homes and health claims. In response to this Notice of Motion, Council resolved as follows:

25/087  RESOLVED:

                  On the Motion of Councillors R Foley and G Davies

That Council:

a       writes to relevant health authorities and Standards Australia and the Australian Building Codes Board, seeking formal clarification on the following:

i      whether the use of indoor gas appliances certified to Australian Standards (e.g. AS/NZS 5263) and installed in accordance with the National Construction Code (NCC) poses any verified health risk in residential homes and buildings

ii     whether there is any Australian peer-reviewed health research, or any current reviews underway, that support the assertion that indoor gas appliances certified to Australian Standards, present a substantial health risk under normal operating conditions and compliant ventilation systems

b     requests that the relevant agencies confirm whether existing national standards and ventilation requirements in the National Construction Code sufficiently mitigate the alleged risks being promoted by anti-gas advocate groups

c     include any response received to the letters identified in (a) above in the report due back for resolution 25/071 on the petition regarding reticulated gas in new subdivisions

 

As the above Council resolution and Notice of Motion are interrelated, both matters are addressed within this single report. Each matter is discussed below.

 

Response to Council Resolution 25/071 – Reticulated gas connections at subdivision for new development

 

The provision and use of reticulated gas infrastructure and gas appliances within new development is influenced by a range of State and local planning controls, sustainability requirements, and engineering standards. These controls establish the framework within which new residential, commercial and industrial development is assessed and serviced.

 

Background

The following provides an overview of the current legislative and policy environment relating to gas infrastructure and appliances in new development, including relevant State environmental planning policies, local planning controls, and Council engineering standards.

 

Current Legislative and Policy Environment

Legislation/Policy	Overview
Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 (WWLEP)	The WWLEP does not contain any provisions that prohibit or require the installation or supply of gas for any type of development.
Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010	Section 7 of the DCP relates to subdivision and includes controls relating to the servicing of new development. Section 7.2.6 outlines the following objectives and controls: Objectives  O1    Ensure the efficient and cost-effective provision of services.  O2    Share services trenching wherever possible for current and future provision of services and telecommunications.  Controls  C1    Subdivision can only be considered where there are appropriate arrangements for servicing (electricity, gas, water, sewer and communications).  Similar controls are included in the Urban Release Area chapters of the DCP. There are currently no specific objectives or controls that relate to gas servicing for rural or industrial subdivision. The DCP control also references Council’s Engineering Guidelines for Subdivision and Developments which provide additional technical requirements relating to servicing infrastructure.
Engineering Guidelines for Subdivision and Development Standards 2017	The Guidelines reference gas infrastructure only in relation to the allocation of services within nature strips. The guidelines do not explicitly require the provision of reticulated gas infrastructure or gas connections as part of new development.

 

In addition to the statutory planning framework, a number of regional, local and State strategies provide broader policy direction relating to infrastructure planning, sustainability, emissions reduction and energy transition.

 

While these documents do not generally impose direct statutory requirements regarding the provision or prohibition of reticulated gas infrastructure or gas appliances in new development, they establish strategic objectives and policy directions that may inform future planning, infrastructure delivery and decision-making.

 

Strategies/Plans	Overview
NSW Productivity and Equality Commission’s March 2025 Paper “Decarbonising buildings, industry and waste”.	This paper found that eliminating most gas use in buildings is essential to achieving net zero. It supports the use of local planning tools (DCP) to limit new gas connections. The Commission highlights the private and public benefits of electrification and notes the high cost of retrofitting as well as the long term burden of allowing new gas connections.
Riverina Murray Regional Plan 2041	Objective 11 of this plan is to ‘Plan for integrated and resilient utility infrastructure’. This objective speaks to water, telecommunications and electricity. This plan does not make comment about or express a desired direction for the role of gas within future developments.
Local Strategic Planning Statement 2040 (LSPS)	Under the Growing Economy section, Principal 7 is as follows: Growth is supported by sustainable infrastructure. Integrating principles of environmental and financial sustainability will be key to meeting the infrastructure challenge. Infrastructure will be delivered in new and innovative ways that strengthen the city’s resilience to natural hazards and constraints and also in response to economic, financial and engineering challenges. The LSPS includes the following actions: ·    ECON 3 – Develop an Infrastructure Strategy to support and guide decisions regarding infill, intensification (urban fringe) and new release areas ·    ENV 12 - Further consider local opportunities that will contribute to achieving Net Zero through an appropriate local strategy.
Wagga Wagga Community Net Zero Emissions 2050 Roadmap	The strategy does not consider residential subdivisions but does express the desire of Council (as an organisation) to move away from gas where possible. This report states that the generation and use of energy to power and heat our homes, offices and factories makes up approximately 52% of the Wagga Wagga Community's emissions profile. It recognises gas as a polluting fossil fuel and acknowledges that there are healthier, cleaner and cheaper alternatives available. The report makes the following statement: ‘While the grid is expected to continue to decarbonize and become greener in the future, it currently constitutes a significant source of emissions for the community’s electricity usage and the community is responsible for these emissions as a consequence of their energy consumption.’ Action EN04 - Eliminate use of gas in new assets is listed as a potential pathway to reduce emissions in which households, business & industry, and government could participate. Eliminating gas is not a requirement under this plan but is instead a recommendation that can be adopted if so chosen.
NSW Consumer Energy Strategy	Under this strategy, Action 50 is to develop an NSW Gas Decarbonisation Roadmap. The NSW Government has committed to deliver this roadmap by late 2026 and will “provide clarity to communities and industry on fossil gas decarbonisation and the role of gas in the future of the energy system”.

 

Trends and Emerging Policy Context

A number of local government areas across New South Wales have introduced, or are in the process of considering, planning controls relating to residential electrification and the provision of gas infrastructure in new developments. These approaches vary in scope, ranging from the prohibition of gas connections in new residential subdivisions to broader sustainability-based planning controls.

 

Councils that have implemented electrification changes include:

·  City of Sydney

·  City of Canada Bay

·  City of Canterbury-Bankstown

·  Hornsby Shire Council

·  Lane Cove Council

·  City of Newcastle

·  Waverly Council

·  City of Parramatta

·  Blue Mountains City Council

·  North Sydney Council

 

A number of other councils, including Byron Shire Council, Inner West Council and City of Ryde are exploring options relating to electrification (attached).

 

Lane Cove Council has implemented planning controls restricting gas appliances including gas hot water heating units in its broader gas ban. Where outdoor gas appliances such as barbecues require gas, only bottled gas may be used.

 

Financial Considerations

The transition away from gas infrastructure in new development presents both upfront and long-term cost considerations for households and developers.

 

While electric households may achieve lower ongoing energy costs over time, there is generally a higher initial capital cost associated with electric appliance installation compared to gas alternatives. This upfront cost differential may present affordability challenges for some households, particularly those with limited savings or lower incomes.

 

In addition, where gas infrastructure is not provided at the subdivision stage, future retrofitting costs may arise for homeowners if gas appliances are replaced with electric alternatives at a later date.

 

Conversely, continued provision of reticulated gas infrastructure in new subdivisions may contribute to ongoing household energy costs over the life of the dwelling, particularly as energy markets continue to transition and gas prices remain subject to volatility.

 

Environmental considerations

As identified in the Wagga Wagga Community Net Zero Emissions 2050 Roadmap, the generation and use of energy to power and heat our homes, offices and factories makes up approximately 52% of the Wagga Wagga Community's emissions profile.

 

Reducing reliance on gas in new subdivisions has been identified in strategic planning documents as one mechanism to assist in reducing greenhouse emissions over time.

 

Australian Energy Market Commission (AEMC)

On 11 December 2025, the AEMC published its final determination and rule change to update the regulatory framework for gas connections. The rule requires new gas connection customers to pay a cost-reflective upfront charge for their connection, with commencement scheduled for 1 October 2026.

 

The intent of the AEMC rule change is to ensure that the financial risks associated with new gas connections are borne by the connecting customer rather than being socialised across existing consumers, reflecting the expectation of declining long‑term gas demand. Independent modelling by the AEMC indicates that households that fully electrify can significantly reduce total energy costs over time, despite higher upfront appliance costs, particularly as gas connection charges and fixed network costs rise under the revised gas regulatory framework.

 

The National Gas Rules (NGR) were drafted with the expectation of either steady or ongoing growth of gas demand. However, this expectation has been challenged by electrification policies in some jurisdictions and the projected continued decline in average demand for gas from residential and small commercial customers due to customers choosing to electrify and increased energy efficiency.

 

The Australian Energy Market Operator’s (AEMO) latest Gas Statement of Opportunities (GSOO) for the East Coast GSOO projects that distribution connected residential and commercial demand will fall by around 70% over the next 20 years, with a 30% reduction projected in the next 10 years.

 

Parliamentary and Policy Commentary

The Commonwealth Economics References Committee has identified residential electrification as a key mechanism for improving energy efficiency and supporting national emissions reduction objectives. The Committee noted that, with appropriate coordination and policy support, electrification can deliver improved household energy outcomes while contributing to broader decarbonisation goals.

Key recommendations from the Committee include:

·     Encouraging the uptake consumer energy resources, including rooftop solar, home batteries, bi-direction electric vehicle chargers and home energy management systems

·     Supporting participation in aggregated energy systems to improve grid responsiveness

·     Prioritising investment in technologies that extend and improve the system value of rooftop solar, including home batteries and home energy management systems

·     Prioritising how community batteries can spread the benefits of rooftop solar to consumers who are unable to install their own systems, such as renters, apartment dwellers or low-income earners

·     Consideration of cost-effective local tuition for apprentices, such as electrical apprentices

·     Supporting shared energy solutions such as community batteries to improve equity of access.

 

Several submissions identified the challenges and additional costs associated with retrofitting existing residences and replacing gas appliances.

 

The following grid implications of electrification were also identified:

·    Managing the challenge of variable electricity demand.

·    The importance of battery storage in managing grid stability.

·    The investments in grid infrastructure needed to support electrification.

 

AEMO’s electricity system planning explicitly assumes significant electrification of households and transport.

 

Demand variability is already a core design assumption in the Integrated System Plan (ISP) and Electricity Statement of Opportunities, with AEMO’s modelling showing that system‑wide electrification is cheaper than maintaining parallel gas and electricity systems in the long term.

 

While no explicit recommendation was made to prohibit new gas infrastructure for residential developments for the report strongly supports the role of residential electrification in achieving improved energy outcomes and emissions reductions while acknowledging the transitional challenges and equity considerations.

 

Response to Notice of Motion 25/087 – Indoor gas appliances in residential settings

Council wrote to Standards Australia, the Australian Building Codes Board and the NSW Chief Health Officer seeking clarification as per the resolution (a) and (b) above.

The responses have been received and attached. 

 

Summaries of their responses have been provided below.

 

NSW Health

·    NSW Health acknowledged that indoor gas appliances, including those compliant with the Australian Standards produce air pollutants during operation.

·    NSW Health is not aware of any Australian peer reviewed research specifically assessing the impacts of compliant indoor gas appliances and are not undertaking any review of health impacts of residential gas appliances under Australian conditions.

 

Standards Australia

·    Potential health impacts were raised as an issue with Standards Austtralia in March 2024. The committee concluded that compliant appliances that are installed correctly effectively manage associated emissions by way of ventilation requirements.

·    Standards Australia are not aware of any Australian peer reviewed research or current standards reviews that suggest that certified gas appliances that are correctly installed pose substantial health risks in association with compliant ventilation systems.

·    Standards Australia are continuing to monitor stakeholder input and emerging research.

 

Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB)

·    The National Construction Codes (NCC) provisions require building sealing and ventilation in accordance with the Australian Standards.

·    ABCB are not aware of any Australian peer reviewed research relating to risks presented when using gas appliances.

 

Planning framework – gas appliances

The Sustainable Buildings SEPP sets standards for residential ‘BASIX’ development (Building and Sustainability Index) and non-residential sustainability considerations.

 

The Sustainable Buildings SEPP was updated on 1 October 2023 to align with changes to the National Construction Code. The SEPP and remains fuel agnostic and does not prescribe or prohibit the installation of gas appliances in new developments.

 

BASIX is used in NSW to demonstrate compliance with a number of the energy/efficiency requirements under Section J of the National Construction Code.

 

Under the revised Sustainable Buildings SEPP, Councils can opt to prohibit gas appliances in new residential developments however this must be on the basis of health and economic justification to avoid inconsistency with the Sustainable Buildings SEPP.

 

Discussion

The NSW Government has committed to deliver the NSW Gas Decarbonation Roadmap by late 2026, which will provide clarity to communities and industry on fossil gas decarbonisation and the role of gas in the future of the energy system. This reflects a broader policy direction towards lower-emissions and more cost-effective energy sources. Councils may prohibit the installation of gas appliances where this is supported by appropriate health and economic justification.

 

While the strategic and policy framework demonstrates a clear longer terms direction towards reducing reliance on gas, it also recognises the transitional challenges of doing so.

 

These include:

·      Managing the challenge of variable electricity demand.

·      The importance of battery storage in managing grid stability.

·      The investments in grid infrastructure needed to support electrification.

·      Costs and additional red-tape associated with low or disadvantaged households, strata and rental properties moving away from gas.

 

The challenges faced by low‑income households, renters and strata developments in transitioning away from gas largely arise where gas infrastructure has already been embedded in existing housing. Requiring or facilitating reticulated gas in new subdivisions risks replicating these challenges for future residents. Planning new developments to avoid reliance on gas infrastructure can help prevent avoidable long‑term cost and transition pressures as the energy system continues to shift.

 

Investigations also indicate that where gas is not provided in greenfield subdivisions, homeowners will not have the option to connect to the reticulated gas network. In this instance, residents may instead rely on bottled gas which are typically more expensive than reticulated supply.

 

Summary of options for consideration

 

As a result of the analysis and research this report presents three options for Council’s consideration.

 

These options provide alternative policy positions regarding gas infrastructure in new residential development, ranging from introducing prohibitive planning controls to maintaining the existing regulatory position without amendment.

 

The following sets out the options available and the relevant considerations to support each of these positions.

 

Option 1 – Prohibit Gas Connections for residential development

 

That Council:

a       receive and note the report

b       investigate the preparation of relevant planning amendments to require all-electric, gas free new residential development

c        write to the petition organiser advising of the outcome of this report

 

Under this option, Council would prohibit the installation of reticulated gas infrastructure in new subdivisions through appropriate planning amendments, which would effectively require all‑electric development outcomes for new development in greenfield locations.

 

This option does not seek to prohibit gas connections or gas appliances for existing infill development or for development involving alterations and additions (retrofitting), having regard to current cost of living pressures and economic implications of retrofitting, including higher upfront costs compared to all-electric in new builds. Noting that this does not prohibit individuals choosing to retrofit to all-electric development if they chose to.

 

Benefits

·      Provides clear policy direction and certainty for developers and infrastructure provision.

·      Avoids investment in potentially underutilised, long‑lived gas infrastructure (stranded assets).

·      Simpler, more cost-effective subdivision delivery.

·      Avoids homeowners paying the full upfront cost of their connection under new AEMC rules.

·      Maximises potential for lower long‑term household energy costs and avoids need for expensive retrofitting

·      Reduces exposure to indoor combustion-related air pollutants

·      Strong alignment with broader energy system decarbonisation objectives

·      Strongly alignment with the Wagga Wagga Community NZE 2050 Roadmap

·      Represents a proactive implementation mechanism at low cost

 

Risks to Council

·      Potential for challenge if seen to be implemented only on the basis of emissions reduction.

·      Reputational risk - May be perceived as limiting consumer choice.

·      Potential opposition from gas network providers and possibly some developers.

·      Could be perceived as limiting future low‑emissions gas pathways (e.g. green hydrogen).

 

Note: While green hydrogen will play an important role in decarbonising industrial energy use, its application in residential gas networks is expected to be limited, with low‑level blending (~10% by volume) delivering only modest emissions reductions (~5-7%) and introducing uncertainty if relied upon to justify new gas infrastructure.

 

Option 2 – Neither require, nor prohibit gas connections

 

That Council:

a       receive and note the report

b       incorporate changes into the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan (DCP) review currently being undertaken to amend any relevant sections of the DCP to not require gas connections for new residential development (including subdivision), 

c        write to the petition organiser advising of the outcome of this report

 

Under this option Council would not require gas infrastructure but would not prohibit it either. Gas provision would be solely determined by developers and market conditions.

 

Benefits

·        Maintains consumer choice for those who want gas

·        Avoids mandating potentially unnecessary infrastructure

·        Reduces risk of delivering underutilised gas assets

·        Avoids upfront costs for developers where they decide not to provide gas

·        May reduce household costs where all‑electric homes are delivered

·        Neutral planning approach

·        Enables market‑led uptake of electrification

 

Risks to Council

·      The proposed amendments may be interpreted as discouraging gas without formally restricting it and may be perceived as not taking reasonable action to reduce economic, health and environmental risks.

·      May result in inconsistent and mixed outcomes across developments (some gas vs some all‑electric) which could result in uncertainty for utilities in planning networks

·      Would likely result in mixed road reserve infrastructure width requirements

·      Residents would bear upfront connection costs and later retrofit costs where gas is provided

·      Enabling the facilitation of stranded assets that are highly likely to become underutilised and economically inefficient over time.

 

Option 3 – Continue to require gas infrastructure in new subdivisions

 

That Council:

a       receive and note the report

b       write to the petition organiser advising of the outcome of this report.

 

Under this option, Council would continue requiring gas infrastructure as part of subdivision servicing.

 

Benefits

·      Provides certainty and consistency in development outcomes

·      Ensures energy choice for residents

 

Risks

·      Higher upfront subdivision costs for developers and residents

·      Higher ongoing household costs for residents

·      Likely need for costly electrification upgrades over time

 

N/A

Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979

State Environmental Planning Policy (Sustainable Buildings) 2022

Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010

Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010

Petitions Management Policy (POL086)

The Environment

Objective: Future growth and development of Wagga Wagga is planned for in a sustainable manner

Ensure sustainable urban development

 

The report seeks to provide a range of strategic and financial considerations and demonstrates Council’s ability to proactively align with emerging state policies and broader electrification trends. Each option presented for Council’s consideration includes potential benefits and risks associated with each approach and should be read in conjunction accordingly.

From a public health perspective, a decision not to facilitate gas infrastructure in new developments may reduce the likelihood of long‑term population exposure to indoor combustion pollutants and is consistent with a precautionary approach to public health risk management.

From an infrastructure and financial perspective, not requiring gas infrastructure can reduce the risk of facilitating stranded assets that are highly likely to become underutilised and economically inefficient over time, particularly as energy systems transition toward electrification, while simultaneously avoiding unnecessary upfront infrastructure costs for developers and reducing ongoing connection charges and energy costs for households.

In preparing this report, staff engaged with the Development Assessment and Environment teams.

 

Any future planning amendments will be subject to further consideration by Council.

 

 

 

1⇩.	Response - Australian Building Codes Board (ABCB)
2⇩.	Response - NSW Health
3⇩.	Response - Standards Australia
4⇩.	NSW Councils - Gas Changes Table

 

 

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-2

 

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-3

 

RP-3               RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF MOTION - IMPROVED RIVER ACCESS AND SAFETY AT "THE ROCKS" AT THE WAGGA BEACH PRECINCT

Author:         Joshua Walsh 

Executive:    Fiona Piltz

         

 

Summary:

This report responds to the Notice of Motion regarding improved river access and safety at “The Rocks”. It outlines the initial work completed and seeks Council direction on the preferred next steps.

 

 

That Council:

a       receive and note the report

b       consider the options presented in this report and determine Council’s preferred position next steps

At the 9 March 2026 Ordinary Meeting of Council, a Notice of Motion was received requesting staff investigate options to improve river access and safety at “The Rocks”, Wagga Beach, with Council resolving the following:

26/055       RESOLVED:           On the Motion of Councillors R Foley and J McKinnon That Council receives a report from Council staff investigating options to improve river access and safety at The Rocks, Wagga Beach, including: a       potential physical improvements to access (such as installation of steel posts and chain handrails, additional cutting or hammering of steps into the rock surface, construction of a wooden step and handrail structure upstream of the existing rock formation, and any other suitable access treatments) b       appropriate consultation requirements, including engagement with Wiradjuri Elders and representatives of the Wiradjuri community, and c       an assessment of estimated costs, materials, feasibility and associated risks d       appropriate signage measures, including warning of river hazards, advising that only competent swimmers should undertake the float back to the beach, provision of information in English and other relevant languages, and consideration of Wiradjuri language and/or cultural acknowledgements in consultation with Wiradjuri Elders e       any relevant risk management, safety and policy considerations

 

When considering improvements to physical access to the river, it is important to recognise the serious and unpredictable risks associated with natural inland waterways. These include variable water levels, submerged hazards, strong currents, steep drop‑offs and rapidly changing conditions.

 

It is also important to note that formalising or enhancing access points can intentionally or unintentionally increase use of the site. This may attract individuals who do not have the swimming ability, experience or situational awareness required for a natural river environment.

 

Given the potential for increased risk associated with improving access to the river, an updated, site‑specific assessment and audit would be required to determine whether any proposed access works would reduce risk or instead encourage unsafe use.

 

To support any decisions on the matter, staff have approached Royal Life Saving (RLS) for a fee proposal to undertake an updated Inland Waterway Safety Assessment for “The Rocks” and surrounding areas. The assessment would include:

·      site inspection and hazard identification

·      evaluation of environmental and behavioural risks

·      prioritisation of risks based on likelihood and consequence

·      recommended control measures and safety improvements

·      analysis of People Movement Data to understand visitation patterns, seasonal trends, and hourly activity profiles

·      guidance for emergency response planning, monitoring and maintenance

 

Fee Proposal:

·      Option 1: Inland Waterway Safety Assessment – $6,000 + GST

·      Option 2: Additional comparison sites – $531 + GST per site

 

Previous audits of the Riverside Precinct have been undertaken by RLS. Existing safety signage at Wagga Beach and “The Rocks” has been installed in accordance with these recommendations and is considered best practice. “The Rocks” is already identified as a high‑risk location and the current signage reflects this.

 

Figure 1 - Inland Water Safety Assessment – “The Rocks” signage audit

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The approach outlined in this report is consistent with Council’s adopted Inland Water Safety Management Plan, which emphasises risk‑based assessment, evidence‑informed decision‑making and prioritisation of non‑intrusive safety measures where appropriate.

 

Council already undertakes a range of education and awareness activities aligned with the Plan, including provision of life-saving equipment, seasonal water safety messaging and promotion of safe swimming practices. An updated assessment would further support these ongoing efforts.

 

Land Ownership and Cultural Considerations

 

The Riverside Precinct is made up of several parcels of Crown Land of which Council is the appointed Crown Land Manager. In making decisions about the use of Crown Land, Council must consider the implications of the following legislative acts:

 

1.    Native Title Act 1993.

 

Council’s appointed Native Title Managers must assess any proposed act on Crown Land to determine whether there is a valid Native Title pathway that will permit the works to occur. Depending on the proposed works, it is anticipated that Council will be able to determine a valid pathway on the basis that works are consistent with the Public Recreation purposes of the reserve.

 

       Since 30 April 2026, a Native Title Claim has been formally registered over a large part of the Wagga Wagga LGA. In certain circumstances, Council will be required to refer certain works to the Native Title claimants (Southern West Yiradyuri/Wiradyuri/Wiradjuri People) for comment prior to undertaking any works. Depending on the commentary / feedback received, this may impact on any proposed works.

 

       Finally, there have been broader developments in terms of compensation for Native Title across the country. The recent decision in Yindjibarndi Ngurra Aboriginal Corporation v State of Western Australia & Ors (including Fortescue Limited) reinforced previous decisions relating to the distinction in value between  economic loss (land value) and non-economic loss (cultural harm). In this case, due to the destruction of significant cultural artefacts, the economic loss component ($100,000) was significantly less than the non-economic loss (cultural harm) component ($150,000,000). It is clear from the case that even minor works can cause significant non-economic loss (cultural harm) that far exceed the commercial value of the land impacted.

 

2.    Aboriginal Land Claims Act 1983

 

At the time of undertaking works, Council needs to consider whether the property is subject to an Aboriginal Land Claim. Where there is an Aboriginal Land Claim lodged over a property, Council is not permitted to undertake any works that will “have a physical impact on the land” without the consent of the claimant Aboriginal Land Council.

 

       There has previously been an Aboriginal Land Claim registered over the Riverside Precinct, however Council negotiated the withdrawal of the claim in order to facilitate the development of the precinct. As at 22 April 2026, there is not a current Aboriginal Land Claim lodged over the site. However, this does not prevent a claim being lodged over the site in the future.

 

3.    Crown Land Management Act 2016

 

Any proposed activity on the land must be both consistent with the identified Crown Reserve purpose (Public Recreation) and the terms of any Plan of Management developed for the site.

 

       The latest iteration of the Plan of Management for the Riverside Precinct was developed in 2012. An updated Plan of Management is required following the introduction of the Crown Land Management Act 2016, and Council staff have scheduled to commence review of this Plan of Management in FY2026/27.

 

Unless the legislative requirements of all three Acts can be satisfied, works should not proceed.

 

Cultural Heritage

 

Another major consideration identified through preliminary investigations is the cultural significance of the site. Representatives of a Wiradjuri Women’s Group and other Wiradjuri elders had extensive involvement during the development of the Riverside Precinct.

 

During that project, culturally significant items and areas were identified within the broader precinct, and cultural heritage considerations informed elements of the final design.

 

As part of the current investigation, staff have re‑engaged with members of the Wiradjuri Women’s Group. Representatives have reaffirmed that “The Rocks” is recognised as a traditional birthing site for Wiradjuri/Wiradyuri women and holds ongoing cultural significance.

 

Initial advice from representatives is that any works that disturb or modify the rock formation or surrounding culturally sensitive areas would not be supported which limits the feasibility of some of the options raised.

 

Consideration should also be given to the Native Title issues discussed above, as the identification of the site as a highly significant cultural site may mean that any development activities would render Council liable to significant compensation for non-economic loss (cultural harm).

 

Further, during a recent Elders and Executive meeting, advice was received from the group that the area holds cultural significance and any work in this area would not be supported.

 

 

Option Analysis

 

Option 1 – Proceed with further investigation

 

Council can resolve to continue with additional assessment, consultation and investigation, including commissioning the Royal Life Saving Inland Waterway Safety Assessment and undertaking further cultural and legislative due diligence.

 

Alternate recommendation: That Council endorse further investigation including commissioning the Royal Life Saving Inland Waterway Safety Assessment, undertaking further cultural consultation with Wiradjuri representatives and investigating the access, safety, signage and feasibility matters identified in the original Notice of Motion with a further report to be provided to Council on the outcomes.

 

Option 2 – Explore alternative locations or non‑intrusive solutions

 

Council can resolve to not progress the specific access‑related investigations at “The Rocks” as outlined in the Notice of Motion and instead consider alternative approaches that do not involve intrusive works at the culturally sensitive site. Council would continue with existing signage, monitoring and education measures consistent with the Inland Water Safety Management Plan.

 

This option could also allow staff to make preliminary enquiries into whether alternative locations upstream from “The Rocks” may offer more feasible opportunities for river access. These locations may have different cultural, environmental or safety constraints. Any enquiries would be exploratory only and would not involve physical works.

 

Alternate recommendation: That Council note the interim findings and continue existing non‑intrusive safety, signage and education measures, with staff to make preliminary enquiries into whether alternative upstream locations may offer more feasible opportunities for improved upstream river access.

 

Option 3 – Conclude the matter at this stage

 

Council may determine that, based on cultural constraints, legislative requirements and safety considerations, no further work should proceed.

 

Alternate recommendation: That Council note the interim findings and conclude the matter based on the constraints identified in this interim report.

 

Independent of the Notice of Motion, staff are considering commissioning an updated safety audit for Wagga Beach due to the significant increase in visitation in recent years. This assessment would be part of Council’s ongoing operational due diligence.

 

The cost to undertake the Royal Life Saving Inland Waterway Safety Assessment is $6,000 + GST, with optional comparison sites available at $531 + GST per site.

 

If Council chooses to proceed, the assessment could be funded from existing Recreation and Open Space budget which has adequate funds available this financial year (Job number 19808 – Wagga Inland Water Safety Management Plan).

 

Should Council not endorse further work, no additional expenditure will be required.

 

Native Title Act 1993

Aboriginal Land Rights Act 1983

Local Government Act 1993

Crown Land Management Act 2016

 

Vibrant

Vibrant and activated spaces and opportunities

Plan for and provide suitable open spaces within our community

 

Council has a responsibility to appropriately manage its property assets, including Crown Land of which it is the appointed Crown Land Manager. There are significant statutory obligations that Council has in relation to the management of Crown Land, including consideration of Native Title and Aboriginal Land Rights. Failure to comply with its statutory obligations would potentially leave Council exposed to reputational risk and civil claim.

External consultation has included preliminary engagement with Royal Life Saving NSW and members of the Wiradjuri Women’s Group.

 

Internal consultation has occurred with Property and Strategic Recreation staff to support the initial review of access, safety and operational implications.

 

 

 

 

 

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-4

 

RP-4               WAGGA WAGGA DEVELOPMENT CONTROL PLAN AMENDMENT - SECTION 6 VILLAGES (NORTH WAGGA NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CONTROLS)

Author:         Cameron Collins 

Executive:    Julie Costa

         

 

Summary:

This report seeks approval from Council to place on public exhibition a draft amendment to Section 6 (Villages) of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 relating to non-residential development within the village of North Wagga.   The proposed amendment introduces a revised character statement, village plan, objectives and controls intended to guide the assessment of non-residential development having regard to the unique character, infrastructure constraints and emerging development pressures affecting North Wagga.   A further report will be provided to Council following the public exhibition period addressing any submissions received and recommending any necessary amendments prior to finalisation of the Development Control Plan amendment.

 

 

That Council:

a       place the draft amendments to Section 6 - Villages (North Wagga Non-Residential Development Controls) of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010, as shown in the Attachment (tracked changes version), on public exhibition in accordance with Council’s Community Participation Plan

 

b       receive a further report following the exhibition period addressing any submissions received and recommending any necessary amendments for Council’s consideration prior to finalisation of the Development Control Plan amendment

Background

 

North Wagga is primarily zoned RU5 Village under the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP 2010) and forms a unique village settlement immediately adjoining the Wagga Wagga urban area. Unlike all other village settlements within the local government area, North Wagga functions in close association with the broader urban area of the city and is subject to increasing development pressure arising from its proximity to commercial and industrial lands.

 

Figure 1 – Land use zoning North Wagga – Wagga Wagga LEP 2010

 

 

Historically, North Wagga has exhibited a mixed village character comprising predominantly established residential areas along with a large number of undeveloped or underutilised parcels of land. Longstanding non-residential uses exist throughout the village including the Palm and Pawn Hotel, Black Swan Hotel, North Wagga Public School, North Wagga Community Hall and McPherson Oval. Other non-residential land uses have also been established in differing parts of the village over time.

 

The village is also affected by significant flood-related constraints. North Wagga is located within a ring levee system and is recognised as a high-risk “low flood island” during major riverine flood events. These flood characteristics have historically influenced development patterns within the locality, including limitations on residential expansion leading to the retention of large amounts of undeveloped or underutilised land parcels.

 

These residential limitations are currently imposed under the provisions of the LEP 2010. Clause 7.1 specifically prevents new dwellings from being established in North Wagga unless the dwelling replaces an existing lawful dwelling located within the defined area. This restriction effectively places a cap on the number of dwellings that can exist within the village area to 213 dwellings.

 

An indicative illustration of the extent of the resulting undeveloped/underutilised land is depicted below. As this land is unable to be developed for additional residential purposes, it has and may continue to be subject to future development pressures for alternative non-residential land uses.

 

Figure 2 – Indicative representation of undeveloped or underutilised land in North Wagga

 

Note – This diagram is provided for illustrative purposes only and is based on a desktop assessment and site verification inspection. It is not intended to represent a complete or definitive identification of all land that may be subject to future non-residential development within North Wagga.

 

At the same time, North Wagga is characterised by constrained and variable infrastructure capacity, including:

·    limited formal stormwater infrastructure;

·    a mixture of kerbed and un-kerbed roads;

·    limited drainage capacity in some locations; and

·    road carriageways and transport infrastructure generally not designed for intensive industrial-style activity or frequent heavy vehicle movements.

 

In recent years, Council has experienced increasing pressure for non-residential forms of development within North Wagga, including storage-based development, depot-style activities and yard-based uses. This trend is evident through both development applications lodged with Council and ongoing land use enquiries relating to the potential establishment of non-residential activities within the locality.

 

 

Council has also received feedback and concerns from residents and community stakeholders, including the North Wagga Residents Association, regarding the increasing prevalence of large commercial-style sheds and other forms of non-residential development considered inconsistent with the established village character of North Wagga. In particular, concerns have been raised regarding the scale, visual prominence and operational characteristics of some recently approved developments and the cumulative impact such development may have on the long-term residential character and amenity of the locality.

 

In reviewing these concerns, Council also identified that character impacts within North Wagga are not limited to built form outcomes alone. Some forms of non-residential development may involve limited built form but extensive outdoor storage, hardstand areas, storage yards or operational activity that can similarly result in visual, operational and amenity impacts inconsistent with the village setting and surrounding residential development.

 

While some non-residential development may be compatible with the village setting, Council has identified concerns regarding the cumulative impact of more intensive or operationally focused development on:

·    established residential amenity

·    village character and streetscape presentation;

·    traffic generation and heavy vehicle movements;

·    operational noise, dust and visual impacts;

·    infrastructure capacity; and

·    the gradual transition of parts of North Wagga toward a quasi-industrial or storage-based character.

 

Council has also identified that North Wagga contains areas of differing sensitivity to change. Some parts of the village contain cohesive residential development patterns with established setbacks, streetscape qualities and residential amenity that warrant a greater level of protection from incompatible development.

 

Purpose of the Amendment

 

At present, the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 does not contain detailed locality-specific controls dealing with the assessment of non-residential development within North Wagga. Existing controls within Section 6 (Villages) of the DCP provide broad village planning guidance but do not adequately address the specific planning pressures, land use conflicts, operational impacts and character considerations currently emerging within the locality.

 

In particular, the current DCP framework contains limited guidance regarding:

·    the operational intensity of non-residential development

·    the assessment of outdoor storage areas and storage-yard style development

·    the management of heavy vehicle movements and servicing impacts

·    the relationship between non-residential development and established residential character; and

·    the differing levels of sensitivity to change that exist across the village.

 

As a result, assessment of non-residential development proposals has largely relied on broader merit assessment principles without the benefit of a detailed locality-specific assessment framework.

The purpose of the proposed amendment is therefore to establish a locality-specific planning framework to guide the assessment of non-residential development within North Wagga.

 

The proposed amendment seeks to:

·    introduce a revised North Wagga Village Character Statement

·    introduce a revised North Wagga Village Plan identifying Residential Character Areas (depicted below)

·    establish objectives and controls specifically tailored to non-residential development within North Wagga, including emerging forms of non-residential development such as personal storage uses on vacant or underutilised land; and

·    provide a more consistent and transparent framework for the assessment of non-residential development applications within the locality.

 

Figure 3 – Draft North Wagga Village Plan for incorporation into Section 6 of DCP 2010

 

 

Note - Example streetscape imagery illustrating the differing built form character and streetscape qualities present within Residential Character Areas and other parts of North Wagga is also provided as Attachments to this report.

The amendment also seeks to:

·    protect established village character and amenity

·    recognise differing levels of sensitivity to change across the village

·    ensure that non-residential development remains compatible with the village setting

·    manage the operational impacts of non-residential uses

·    respond to infrastructure and drainage constraints; and

·    provide greater clarity and certainty for applicants, residents and Council when assessing development proposals.

·    Importantly, the amendment does not prohibit non-residential development within North Wagga. Rather, it establishes a framework for assessing the scale, intensity, operation and presentation of development having regard to the specific characteristics and constraints of the locality.

 

The detailed amendments to Section 6 – Villages of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 are provided as an Attachment (tracked changes version) and include:

·      New character statement for North Wagga under subsection 6.1.7;

·      Introduction of the North Wagga Village Plan under subsection 6.2; and

·      Introduction of objectives and controls for North Wagga at the conclusion of subsection 6.2.

 

Relationship to the RU5 Village Zone

 

North Wagga is primarily zoned RU5 Village under the LEP 2010.

 

The RU5 Village zone is intentionally broad in nature and is designed to provide flexibility for a range of land uses, services and facilities associated with rural village settlements. In addition to residential development, the zone permits a variety of non-residential uses with development consent, including light industries, neighbourhood shops, recreation facilities, self-storage units and community uses.

 

Importantly, the zone objectives seek not only to provide for a range of land uses, but also to protect and maintain the rural village character of the land. Specifically:

·      To provide for a range of land uses, services and facilities that are associated with a rural village.

·      To protect and maintain the rural village character of the land.

 

The breadth of permissible uses within the RU5 zone means that land use permissibility alone does not resolve questions relating to development compatibility, operational intensity, built form outcomes or amenity impacts within North Wagga.

 

While certain non-residential uses may be permissible within the zone, the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 establishes that development consent authorities must also consider:

·    the suitability of a site for development

·    impacts on the natural and built environment

·    impacts on surrounding development and amenity; and

·    applicable provisions of a development control plan.

 

The proposed amendment does not seek to prohibit development that is otherwise permissible within the RU5 Village zone. Rather, the amendment establishes locality-specific objectives and controls intended to guide how permissible development is designed, operated and assessed within the unique context of North Wagga.

 

 

In particular, the amendment seeks to ensure that permissible non-residential development:

·    remains compatible with the village character and residential context of North Wagga

·    responds appropriately to the locality’s infrastructure and drainage constraints

·    avoids unreasonable operational and amenity impacts; and

·    does not contribute to a gradual transition toward an intensive storage, depot or quasi-industrial character inconsistent with the intended function of the village.

 

The proposed controls therefore operate as an assessment framework directed toward managing scale, intensity, operational impacts and character outcomes, rather than restricting land use permissibility established under the LEP.

 

Strategic and Planning Justification

 

Locality-Specific Response

 

North Wagga exhibits planning characteristics that differ substantially from other village settlements within the Wagga Wagga local government area. Its immediate proximity to the urban area, combined with flood constraints, fragmented land patterns and variable infrastructure capacity, creates development pressures and land use conflicts that are not adequately addressed through existing generic village controls.

 

The proposed amendment establishes a locality-specific planning response that recognises these unique characteristics and provides a more appropriate assessment framework for future non-residential development.

 

Protection of Village Character and Amenity

 

A key objective of the amendment is the protection of established village character and amenity within North Wagga, including areas that are specifically characterised by existing residential development.

 

The amendment introduces the concept of Residential Character Areas, identifying parts of the village where a cohesive pattern of residential development and streetscape character is evident and where a higher level of sensitivity to change exists.

 

Note - Two Attachments to this report provide example streetscape imagery illustrating the differing built form character and streetscape qualities present within Residential Character Areas and other parts of North Wagga.

 

The controls establish a differentiated assessment framework whereby:

·    development within, adjoining or opposite Residential Character Areas must demonstrate that it will not result in unacceptable adverse impacts on residential character, amenity or streetscape values;

·    while development in other parts of North Wagga must demonstrate that it will not result in unreasonable adverse impacts on surrounding development or the broader village character.

 

 

This framework recognises that different parts of the village exhibit different character qualities and sensitivities, while ensuring that all development within North Wagga responds appropriately to the broader village context.

 

The amendment also establishes controls relating to:

·    building scale and footprint

·    operational intensity

·    external storage areas and uses; and

·    fencing and streetscape presentation

 

These controls seek to ensure that non-residential development remains compatible with surrounding residential development and does not erode the village character of North Wagga over time.

 

Managing Operational Impacts of Non-Residential Development

 

Council has identified that many recent development pressures within North Wagga relate not simply to the physical form of development, but also to the operational characteristics of non-residential uses.

 

The amendment therefore includes controls directed toward:

·    operational intensity

·    frequency and scale of activities

·    servicing arrangements

·    vehicle movements

·    outdoor storage

·    dust and noise generation; and

·    visual presentation

 

Council has also identified increasing interest in the establishment of personal storage (non-commercial) development on land that does not contain a dwelling, including large sheds, garages and associated outdoor storage areas used for the storage of private goods, vehicles and equipment.

 

While these forms of development may not involve commercial activity, they can nevertheless result in significant built form, outdoor storage and visual impacts that influence residential amenity, streetscape presentation and village character. The proposed amendment therefore includes controls intended to manage the scale, presentation and operational impacts of personal storage development within the context of the village environment.

 

These controls are intended to ensure that non-residential development operates at a scale and intensity compatible with a village environment and surrounding residential development.

 

Importantly, the controls do not prohibit otherwise permissible land uses. Rather, they provide guidance regarding the assessment of operational impacts and compatibility within the specific context of North Wagga.

 

 

Infrastructure Constraints

 

The proposed controls also recognise the infrastructure limitations present within North Wagga.

 

The locality contains constrained stormwater infrastructure, variable drainage conditions and road networks that are generally not designed for intensive industrial or freight-related activity.

 

The amendment therefore introduces controls relating to:

·    stormwater management;

·    surface treatment and dust suppression;

·    drainage impacts;

·    heavy vehicle access; and

·    road network suitability.

 

These controls seek to ensure that development does not create unreasonable impacts on public infrastructure, adjoining land or the operation of the local road and drainage network.

 

Improved Assessment Consistency and Certainty

 

At present, Council assesses non-residential development proposals within North Wagga using broader strategic planning principles and generic DCP provisions. The absence of locality-specific controls can create uncertainty for applicants, residents and Council officers regarding:

·    the scale and intensity of development considered appropriate

·    expectations relating to operational impacts and streetscape outcomes; and

·    how residential character considerations should be balanced against non-residential development opportunities.

 

The proposed amendment provides a clearer and more transparent assessment framework that will assist in improving consistency in development assessment outcomes.

 

Public Exhibition

 

It is recommended that the draft amendment to the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 be placed on public exhibition in accordance with Council’s Community Participation Plan (CPP). The CPP specifies a minimum public exhibition period of 28 days.

 

Public exhibition will provide landowners, residents, stakeholders and the broader community with the opportunity to review and provide feedback on the proposed controls prior to finalisation of the amendment.

 

As part of the exhibition process, notification letters will be issued to all landowners within the defined North Wagga area and to the North Wagga Residents Association. In addition to this a range of consultation and communication methods to inform the community of the exhibition process and opportunities for feedback will be utilised, as outlined in the consultation table later in this report.

 

Conclusion

 

The proposed amendment responds to emerging land use pressures and planning issues within North Wagga by introducing locality-specific objectives, character guidance and development controls for non-residential development.

 

The amendment seeks to balance opportunities for appropriate non-residential development with the need to protect residential amenity, village character and infrastructure capacity.

 

The proposed controls are intended to improve clarity, consistency and transparency in development assessment while recognising the unique planning context of North Wagga.

 

The proposed amendment has been prepared internally by Council staff as part of Council’s strategic planning and development assessment functions.

No significant financial implications are anticipated as a result of the preparation or exhibition of the draft amendment. Costs associated with the public exhibition process and notification are expected to be accommodated within existing operational budgets.

The amendment has not been initiated as a site-specific or applicant-led planning proposal and therefore no fees or contributions are required to be collected from any applicant in relation to the preparation of the amendment.

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979

Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010

Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010

Wagga Wagga Community Participation Plan

 

Sustainable

Sustainable built environment

Balance the built and natural environment in planning decisions.

 

The proposed amendment seeks to provide a clearer and more consistent assessment framework for non-residential development within North Wagga. The amendment is intended to assist in managing risks associated with incompatible land use outcomes, cumulative impacts on residential amenity and village character, and development that may place unreasonable pressure on existing infrastructure and road networks.

 

The amendment also seeks to reduce assessment uncertainty by providing locality-specific objectives and controls tailored to the unique planning context of North Wagga.

 

As the amendment relates to a Development Control Plan, the proposed controls do not alter land use permissibility under the LEP 2010 but instead provide guidance for the assessment of development applications having regard to character, amenity, operational and infrastructure considerations.

 

Public exhibition of the draft amendment will assist in identifying and addressing any issues raised by landowners, residents, industry stakeholders and the broader community prior to finalisation of the amendment.

 

It is recommended that the draft amendment to the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 be placed on public exhibition in accordance with CPP. The CPP specifies a minimum public exhibition period of 28 days.

 

Public exhibition will provide landowners, residents, stakeholders and the broader community with the opportunity to review and provide feedback on the proposed controls prior to finalisation of the amendment.

 

As part of the exhibition process, notification letters will be issued to all landowners within the defined North Wagga area and to the North Wagga Residents Association. In addition to this a range of consultation and communication methods to inform the community of the exhibition process and opportunities for feedback will be utilised, as outlined in the table below.

 

Mail

Traditional Media

Community Engagement

Digital

Rates notices insert

Direct mail

Letterbox drop

Council news

Media release

Media opportunity

TV/radio advertising

One-on-one meeting(s)

Community meeting(s)

Stakeholder workshop(s)

Drop-in session(s)

Survey/feedback form(s)

Have your Say

Email newsletter

Social media

Website

Inform

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Consult

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Involve

Collaborate

 

 

1.	Wagga Wagga DCP 2010 - Amendment to Section 6 Villages - Tracked Changes - Provided under separate cover
2.	North Wagga - Residential Character Area Images - Provided under separate cover
3.	North Wagga - Other Area Images - Provided under separate cover

 

 

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-5

                                                                                                                                     

RP-5               MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - WAGGA LAKE RUN AND RIDE

Author:         Kadison Hofert 

Executive:    Fiona Piltz

         

 

Summary:

The current Memorandum of Understanding between Wagga Wagga City Council and Wagga Lake Run and Ride Inc has expired. It is proposed to renew the agreement for a further five-year period.

 

 

That Council:

a       enter into a Memorandum of Understanding with Lake Run and Ride Incorporated to provide ongoing support of the event for a period of five years commencing in 2026/27

b       allocate a $2,500 annual funding contribution to Wagga Lake Run and Ride for the duration of the Memorandum of Understanding

c        allocate funding for the provision of Council approved Traffic Services contractor to implement all traffic control measures and associated requirements on the day of the event, up to a maximum of $11,000

The Wagga Lake Run and Ride is one of the City’s largest annual participation events and one of the largest free fun run and family cycle events in Australia. The event started in 1972 and promotes a healthy active lifestyle for families.

 

The event attracts in excess of 1,000 registered participants each year and many thousands of spectators along the course. More than 30 volunteers assist on the day and local businesses donate their services for the event.

 

Event start and finish location is Apex Park, Lake Albert on the last Sunday in September. The 5km course uses Eastlakes Drive and then the shared pathway on the western side to do a lap of Lake Albert. The 10km course uses Eastlakes Drive, Lake Albert Road to Lord Baden Powell Drive and returns via the shared pathway on the western foreshores of the lake.  The finish area hosts a Sports, Fitness and Health Expo where cycling, running, fitness and related groups have the opportunity to showcase their offerings.  Local food vendors also provide their services.

 

Council first entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Wagga Lake Run and Ride Committee in 2016. Two successive five‑year MOUs have since been completed, with the most recent agreement commencing in 2021 and now expiring. The Committee is seeking to enter into a third MOU for a further five‑year period.

 

Council has historically supported the event through:

·    developing the traffic control management plan and associated requirements in consultation with the organising committee

·    providing the traffic control barriers and associated requirements on the day of the event

·    assistance with promotion of the event regionally through Council’s event networks

·    contributing $2,000 exclusive of GST funded from the Recreation Programs budget to assist with event costs

·    assistance in setting up in the week leading up to the event

 

The Wagga Lake Run and Ride Committee are now requesting that this support be reformalised via another Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for a period of five (5) years (Attachment 1).

 

The proposed updated Council provisions in the next MOU are: 

·    The provision of a council approved Traffic Services contractor to develop, in consultation with the organising committee and Council staff, suitable Traffic Management/Traffic Control Plans

·    The provision of a council approved Traffic Services contractor to implement all traffic control measures and associated requirements on the day of the Event, with Council covering associated costs up to a maximum of $11,000.

·    Assistance with promotions regionally

·    $2,500 sponsorship

 

Under previous MOUs, the traffic management budget allocation was $5,500. Due to industry wide price increases, actual costs regularly exceeded this amount. It is proposed that the traffic management budget be increased to $11,000 to allow for further expected growth over the proposed MOU period. Recent invoices have typically ranged from $8,000–$9,000.

 

In return for the ongoing support the Wagga Lake Run and Ride Committee are offering the following benefits:

 

Included in the draft 2026/27 Delivery Program under the Section 356 table is a budget amount of $11,000 for Road Closures/Traffic Control, and a further $2,500 for sponsorship for the Lake Run and Ride event. 

 

Job numbers: 35178 – Lake Run and Ride Traffic Control - $11,000

24998 – Lake Run and Ride Sponsorship - $2,500

 

NA

Vibrant

A healthy community

Support initiatives to deliver improved health outcomes for identified groups within our community and address specific needs.

 

The risks associated with the identified elements of the proposed events are related to process, cost and Work Health and Safety.

Internal consultation has been undertaken with Council’s finance team.

 

External consultation has been undertaken with the Lake Run and Ride committee.

 

 

1⇩.

Memorandum of Understanding Lake Run and Ride - WWCC 2026-2031.

 

 

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-6

                                                                                                                                     

RP-6               DEACCESSIONING AND RELOCATION OF ARTWORKS FROM THE PUBLIC ART COLLECTION

Author:         Lauren Reynolds 

Executive:    Christine Priest

         

 

Summary:

​On the recommendation of the Public Art Advisory Panel (PAAP) and staff, this report seeks Council’s support to deaccession one public artwork from Council’s Public Art Collection register and relocate two artworks in accordance with POL 109 Public Art Policy.

 

 

​That Council:

 

a       ​authorise the deaccessioning of the artwork #80 Cyclist Bike Rack from Council’s Public Art Collection register and the relocation of artworks #47 Salt and Pepper Bike Rack and #46 Hampden Bridge Bike Rack

 

b       ​authorise Council Officers to dispose of the artwork #80 Cyclist Bike Rack as outlined in this report, and in accordance with POL 109 Public Art Policy​

​Deaccessioning is the administrative process whereby an item is removed from the Public Art Collection register. An official record of the deaccessioning and disposal of artworks from the Public Art Collection will be kept on Council’s Public Art Collection Register maintained by staff. 

​ 

​As part of Council’s public art collection management, it is necessary to manage the existing collection in a sustainable manner. This takes account of maintenance and repair costs, safety, and end of life of the asset. 

​ 

​In March 2026 Council staff undertook annual condition reporting of the Public Art Collection which currently includes 61 artworks. This process involves assessing each artwork for any damage or deterioration of materials and determining a condition rank (1 = excellent, 5= very poor) to be recorded in Council’s asset management system. 

​ 

​At the recent Public Art Advisory Panel (PAAP) meeting, held 1 April 2026, the PAAP reviewed the condition of three public artworks. These three artworks were commissioned as part of the same Expression of Interest process in 2012 for the Fitzmaurice Street Bike Racks project.  

​ 

​The PAAP have made recommendations to Council for each artwork as detailed below: 

1.      Cyclist Bike Rack

Name/Artist/Date	Collection number	Location
​Cyclist Bike Rack  ​Brenton Langsford  ​2014	​PA80	​Underneath the 2WG sign, Fitzmaurice Street

 

​The Cyclist Bike Rack features a green steel cut out of a cyclist supported above two ground plaques, one plaque features the WWCC logo and year of installation, the other plaque links is a sketch of the streetscape and looped shapes referencing the contour of the hills and banks of the river.  

​ 

​The recent condition report noted the following issues:  

·      ​Seal at the base of the front wheel has deteriorated and worn away  

·      ​Mould infestation in plastic components  

·      ​Rusted out sections in the handle bar 

·      ​Substantial deterioration of plastic and brittle rubber in large sections of the handlebar 

·      ​Green base colour has faded and deteriorated  

​ 

​Due to the artworks age the PAAP and Council staff noted the artwork has met its intended lifespan and the current condition of this artwork is commensurate with the following deaccessioning criteria in POL109 Public Art Policy: 

·      ​Damage or serious deterioration in condition 

​ 

​Recommendation:  The PAAP’s recommendation to Council is for the Cyclist Bike Rack to be deaccessioned from the Public Art Collection and be removed from its current location. Council staff are to organise the removal and reinstatement of the footpath. 

​ 

​As stipulated in POL109 Public Art Policy, contact has been made with the artist Brenton Langsford to determine whether he would like to take ownership of the artwork. The artist has advised that he will not take back ownership upon removal and recommended appropriate disposal methods for the materials used. 

 

2.      Salt and Pepper Bike Rack

 

Name/Artist/Date	Collection number	Location
​Salt and Pepper Bike Rack  ​John Wood  ​2014	​ PA47	​Fitzmaurice Street (out the front of Uneke Lounge)

 

​Inspired by Art Deco architecture in Fitzmaurice St and café culture dating back to the 1940s, this bike rack is a pair of corten steel Art Deco salt and pepper shakers joined by a stainless-steel pole.  

​ 

​Upon enquiry, Uneke staff reported the bike rack is not used apart from children swinging on the pole. The artwork is located close to the edge of the footpath/parked cars and is not used regularly as a bike rack. 

​ 

​The artwork is in fair condition with general weathering to be expected from corten steel. It is attached to a concrete pad which is a different colour to the surrounding footpaths and shows more obvious signs of wear and tear than the black asphalt.

 

​

 

Recommendation: The PAAP’s recommendation to Council is for the Salt and Pepper Bike Rack to be removed from its current location with Council staff to organise the removal and reinstatement of the footpath. Due to its fair condition the PAAP recommends an alternate location be found at the Botanic Gardens precinct near the café, zoo, and children’s play area where it will be better utilised as a bike rack.  

​ 

​Contact with the artist John Wood has been made to advise of the intention to relocate the artwork which he is supportive of. 

 

3.      Hampden Bridge Bike Rack

 

Name/Artist/Date	Collection number	Location
​Hampden Bridge Bike Rack  ​Wayne Connors  ​2014	​ PA46	​Fitzmaurice Street, Mr Lawrence/Knights Meats carpark

 

​This stainless-steel bike rack draws inspiration from the architectural details of the Hampden Bridge, with the diagonal beams of the bridge becoming the supports of the bike rack, the backrest of the seat representing the levee bank, and an oval cut out below the seat representing the oval cutouts in the pillars of the bridge.  

​ 

​This artwork is a functional bike rack, with space for four bikes in its design. The rack is regularly graffitied with regular cleaning and maintenance scheduled and in its current location is not easily accessible with a garden bed now installed, removing its functionality on one side. 

​ 

​Recommendation: The PAAP’s recommendation to Council is for the Hampden Bridge Bike Rack to be removed from its current location with Council staff to organise the removal and reinstatement of the grassed area. Due to its reasonable condition the PAAP recommends an alternate location be found at the Riverside: Wagga Beach precinct where it will remain connected to the Murrumbidgee River and will be better utilised as a bike rack.   

​ 

​Staff have attempted to contact the artist Wayne Connors to advise of the intention to relocate the artwork and staff will continue to make efforts to contact the artist to confirm this plan. 

 

​Cost of removal and disposal of the artworks have been estimated to be the following, together with the relocation costs of the Salt and Pepper Bike Rack: 

 

POL 109 Public Art Policy

 

Vibrant

Strong sense of place and identity

Create a sense of identity and pride within our community

 

​The Cyclist Bike Rack was given a 4 rating during the annual public art condition reporting process undertaken by Council staff. This rating  indicates that this asset is in poor condition and will continue to deteriorate without intervention. If left in its current condition it will negatively impact on the public amenity and attractiveness of the CBD. 

​

The Salt and Pepper Bike Rack and Hampden Bridge Bike Rack are in fair condition however underutilised as bike racks in their current locations. The relocation of these two artworks will extend their useable life, increase their use as bike racks and contribute toward the public amenity in their proposed new locations.

 

​Council staff have consulted with relevant Council departments including Property, Parks and Civil Works. As detailed in POL109 Public Art Policy consultation and approval was obtained from the Public Art Advisory Panel as part of this assessment process. 

​ 

​Contact has been achieved or attempted with all artists to advise them of the intention to deaccession or relocate the artworks. Neighbouring properties will be notified of any disruption to the locations ahead of the works being carried out. 

 

 

 

1⇩.	Photos of artworks current condition - Bike racks
2⇩.	Public Art Policy - POL-109

 

 

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-7

                                                                                                                                     

RP-7               WAGGA WAGGA RESOURCE RECOVERY AND WASTE MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 2026-2038

Author:         Andrea Baldwin 

Executive:    Fiona Piltz

         

 

Summary:

This report provides an overview of the results from the public exhibition period between 25 March 2026 and 22 April 2026 and recommendation of adoption for the Wagga Wagga Resource Recovery and Waste Management Strategy 2026-2038.

 

 

That Council:

a       note the submissions and feedback received during the public exhibition between 25 March 2026 and 22 April 2026 for the Wagga Wagga Resource Recovery and Waste Management Strategy 2026-2038

b       adopt the Wagga Wagga Resource Recovery and Waste Management Strategy 2026-2038

The draft Wagga Wagga Resource Recovery and Waste Management Strategy 2026-2038 (Strategy) has been developed in collaboration and engagement with the community and internal stakeholders.

 

In March 2025, a procurement process was initiated seeking a consultancy to develop a Resource Recovery and Waste Management Strategy with a focus on the circular economy for the Wagga LGA. APC Consultants were engaged to deliver a Strategy for the period from 2026 until 2038. 

 

The key priorities within the Strategy are as follows:

·    Priority 1: Avoiding waste and becoming circular

·    Priority 2: Recovering, regenerating and reusing resources

·    Priority 3: Best environmental management of residual waste

 

At the Ordinary Council meeting on 23 March 2026 Council endorsed the draft Strategy to be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 25 March 2026 – 22 April 2026 and invited submissions.

 

The community were provided an opportunity to provide feedback to Council and provide a formal submission via the “have Your Say” page.  During the exhibition period six (6) submissions where received, five (5) via Have Your Say and one (1) via email.

 

Various methods were used to promote and encourage community members to have their say, this included:

·    Social media posts on 26 March 2026 and 18 April 2026

·    Council News article 28 March (print, online and EDM)

·    Listed in the Council Newsprint version 11 April and 18 April

·    Listed in the Council News EDM 28 March, 4 April, 11 April and 18 April

·    Email out to the consultation groups including community members, organisations and business

·    Email out to regular Gregadoo Waste Management Centre waste providers

 

The table below gives an overview of the key comments received in the submissions, along with staff response and recommended amendments.  The full submissions are provided under separate cover.

 

Submission Summary
1	Supportive Visually appealing document with clear direction around future programs. Reference made to including NSW Government Net Zero Targets
	Recommended Changes
	Amendment Recommended Include a reference to NSW Government Net Zero Targets within final copy
2	Supportive Highlighted the need to consider bin configuration options to reduce illegal dumping
	Recommended Changes
	No amendment recommended The Strategy will address kerbside collections contracts and education programs to assist with waste management as generated by the community.
3	Supportive Strong submission in support of the strategy, acknowledging change and transitioning to a more circular economy approach.
	Recommended Changes
	No amendment recommended The Strategy provides a long-term framework and direction, with implementation actions, timelines and targets included to guide delivery over the next 12 years.
4	Supportive Affirming Councils position to model best practice within the waste and resource recovery sector
	Recommended Changes
	No amendment recommended Council agrees that leadership by example is required, the Strategy supports a strong leadership position.
5	Supportive Identified an incorrect logo within the draft submission
	Recommended Changes
	Amendment recommended Incorrect logo used, this will be adjusted to reflect the correct program that Council has supported
6	Supportive Include education on circular economy activities and have partnerships with existing programs within the city
	Recommended Changes
	No amendment recommended The Strategy priorities education, behaviour change and partnerships with community led organisations as part of the transition to a circular economy.

 

From the submissions received the feedback was provided from both the community and business sectors. Minor amendments are recommended as a result of the feedback; these specifically are as follows:

·    Page 12 - Change logo for Bag Muster to Big Bag Recovery

·    Page 15 - Add NSW Government Net Zero targets to list of reference documents

 

It is recommended updating the Strategy to reflect the above two items. These are minor adjustments and do not change the context of the document. 

 

The Strategy has identified key budget requirements for initiatives that will require external support or expertise to complete, annual reviews of key initiatives will form part of the budget approval process. 

 

A key aspect of the Strategy is the development of a Masterplan for the Gregadoo Waste Management Centre, this will be a key deliverable of the Strategy over the next two years.  Many of the implementation items can be undertaken using existing Council resources, thus reducing the overall cost for implementation.

 

The New Waste Strategy Development project has a total budget of $200,000, with $188,362 expended and committed to date, leaving an uncommitted balance of $11,638.

 

Job consolidation number: 70025 – New Waste Strategy Development and Implementation.

 

 

The Resource Recovery and Waste sector is highly regulated.  International, National, State legislation and regional guidance material provide the strategic direction for local government compliance.

 

Council is required to adhere to a number of acts, legislation and strategies. Some of these include:

·    NSW Waste and Sustainable Materials Strategy 2041 – This is the key Strategy to target action for circular transition and change in the resource recovery and waste space.

·    Waste Avoidance and Resource Recovery Act (WARR)

·    NSW Plastic Reduction and Circular Economy Act

·    Protection of Environment Operations Act POEO

 

Sustainable

Circular economy

Promote and support opportunities to develop the circular economy, specifically within our Special Activation Precinct (SAP) and the Gregadoo Waste Management Centre.

 

Through the adoption of a Wagga Wagga Resource Recovery and Waste Management Strategy 2026-2038, this will address the risk exposure for Council. Operational, Corporate, Delivery and Financial risks are present in the absence of a Strategy which consist of the following:

 

Operational Risks

·    Inefficient and inconsistent waste services

·    Lack of clear direction for waste, recycling, organics and landfill operations

·    Services may be reactive rather than planned

·    Noncompliance with regulations and inadequate planning for changing legislation

·    Increased likelihood of breaching EPA requirements, state waste policy or licence conditions

·    Poor planning for landfill closure, transfer stations, fleet replacement and infrastructure upgrades, risk of unplanned disruptions and asset failure.

·    Risk of workplace health and safety incidents

 

Corporate Risks

·    Misalignment with Council Plan, Climate Strategy, Circular Economy goals, and State Government policy.

·    Reputational damage

·    Community perception that Council is not managing waste sustainably or responsibly.

·    Poor accountability and transparency, no documented rationale for service levels

 

Delivery Risks

·    Residents expect improved recycling, food and garden organics (FOGO), and waste reduction initiatives.

·    Risk of dissatisfaction, complaints, and political pressure.

·    Infrastructure projects (transfer stations, bin rollouts, education programs) lack a coordinated roadmap.

·    Missed partnership and grant opportunities

·    Poor data and performance monitoring

·    No framework for targets, KPIs, or reporting (e.g. diversion from landfill, contamination rates).

·    Escalating waste management costs

·    No long-term financial modelling for disposal fees, landfill levies, or infrastructure investment.

 

Financial Risk

·    Risk of investing in infrastructure that becomes obsolete or non-compliant with future policy.

·    Poor sequencing of capital works.

·    Missed opportunities for resource recovery income streams (recyclables, organics processing, energy from waste).

·    Future remediation, landfill closure, and rehabilitation costs not strategically planned or funded.

·    Potential fines or penalties for non-compliance.

The Wagga Wagga Resource Recovery and Waste Management Strategy 2026-2038 has been developed in collaboration and engagement with the community and internal stakeholders.

 

This process included a comprehensive mix of engagement activities, comprising facilitated consultation sessions, targeted one-on-one meetings with a broad range of stakeholders (including internal teams), as well as community outreach through social media platforms and structured surveys. These activities were designed to capture key trends, insights, data and informed feedback from stakeholders and the wider community. The input received through this engagement process has been carefully considered and incorporated into the draft Strategy to ensure it reflects stakeholder priorities and community expectations.

 

Mail

Traditional Media

Community Engagement

Digital

Rates notices insert

Direct mail

Letterbox drop

Council news

Media release

Media opportunity

TV/radio advertising

One-on-one meeting(s)

Community meeting(s)

Stakeholder workshop(s)

Drop-in session(s)

Survey/feedback form(s)

Have your Say

Email newsletter

Social media

Website

Inform

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Consult

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Involve

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

x

Collaborate

x

x

x

 

1⇩.	Wagga Waste City Council Resource Recovery and Waste Management Strategy - Provided under separate cover
2.	Exhibition Submissions - Redacted
3.	Exhibition Submissions This matter is considered to be confidential under Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, as it deals with: personnel matters concerning particular individuals. - Provided under separate cover

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-7

                                                                                                                                     

Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 25 May 2026

RP-8

                                                                                                                                     

RP-8               FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT AS AT 30 APRIL 2026

Author:          Carolyn Rodney 

 

Summary:

This report is for Council to consider information presented on the 2025/26 budget and Long Term Financial Plan, and details Council’s external investments and performance as at 30 April 2026.

 

 

That Council:

a       approve the proposed budget variations and note the balanced budget position as presented in this report

b       approve the proposed budget variations to the Long Term Financial Plan Capital Works Program including new projects and timing adjustments

c        approve the Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS) for the quarter ending 31 March 2026

d       note the Responsible Accounting Officer’s reports, in accordance with the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 (Part 9 Division 3: Clause 203) that the financial position of Council is satisfactory having regard to the original estimates of income and expenditure and the recommendations made above

e       note the details of the external investments as at 30 April 2026 in accordance with section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993

f        accept the grant funding offers as presented in this report

Wagga Wagga City Council (Council) forecasts a balanced budget position as of 30 April 2026.

 

Proposed budget variations including adjustments to the capital works program are detailed in this report for Council’s consideration and adoption.

 

The Quarterly Budget Review Statement (QBRS) has been included as an attachment in this report and includes a summary of Council’s financial performance for the quarter ending 31 March 2026. The recommended changes that have been included in the QBRS have already been adopted at previous meetings of Council.

 

Council has experienced a positive monthly investment performance for the month of April when compared to budget ($535,147 up on the monthly budget). This is mainly due to better than budgeted returns on Council’s investment portfolio, as well as a higher than anticipated investment portfolio balance – which is partly due to Council receiving upfront payment of $48.5M in funding under the Accelerated Infrastructure Fund in June 2024.

 

Key Performance Indicators

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

Total operating income is 98% of approved budget and is exceeding the budget due to the rates and annual charges being raised at the start of the year. Excluding the rates amount, operating income received is 95% when compared to budget which is as a result of increased interest on investments.

 

OPERATING EXPENSES

Total operating expenditure is 84% of approved budget and is tracking slightly over budget at this stage of the financial year. This is in relation to commitments that have been raised for the full 2025/26 financial year.

 

CAPITAL INCOME

Total capital income is 240% of approved budget, which is mainly attributed to the Accelerated Infrastructure Fund (AIF) grant funding that has been received. This income will be reduced and carried over to next financial year for completion of the project in line with the project budget.

 

CAPITAL EXPENDITURE

Total capital expenditure including commitments is 118% of approved budget. This mainly relates to the raising of the full amount of the AIF contract against the multi-year budget. Excluding commitments, the total expenditure is 54% when compared to the approved budget.

 

 

*Please note that Council has recently reviewed the 2026/27 Long Term Financial Plan, with the draft plan currently on public exhibition.  The above table is the current adopted position and not the draft plan not yet adopted.

 

 

 

2025/26 Revised Budget Result – (Surplus) / Deficit	$’000s
Original 2025/26 Budget Result as adopted by Council Total Budget Variations approved to date Budget Variations for April 2026	$0K $0K $0K
Proposed Revised Budget result for 30 April 2026 - (Surplus) / Deficit	$0K

 

The proposed Operating and Capital Budget Variations for 30 April 2026 which affect the current 2025/26 financial year are listed below.

 

 

2025/26 Capital Works Summary

 

Capital Works	Approved Budget	Proposed Movement	Proposed Budget
One-off	$49,773,480	$388,040	$50,161,520
Recurrent	$38,403,602	($67,020)	$38,336,582
Total Capital Works	$88,177,082	$321,020	$88,498,102

 

 

 

Current Restrictions

 

RESERVES SUMMARY
30 APRIL 2026
	CLOSING BALANCE 2024/25	ADOPTED RESERVE TRANSFERS 2025/26	BUDGET VARIATIONS APPROVED UP TO COUNCIL MEETING 13.04.2026	PROPOSED CHANGES for Council Resolution*	BALANCE AS AT 30 APRIL 2026
Externally Restricted
Developer Contributions - Section 7.11	(34,255,170)	240,743	1,853,473		(32,160,955)
Developer Contributions - Section 7.12	(1,249,835)	(28,052)	20,000		(1,257,887)
Developer Contributions - Stormwater Section 64	(10,009,058)	(802,931)	31,000	100,000	(10,680,989)
Sewer Fund	(61,473,248)	(299,197)	(266,945)	190,000	(61,849,390)
Solid Waste	(35,184,093)	2,571,122	4,308,559		(28,304,413)
Specific Purpose Unexpended Grants & Contributions	(64,727,816)	0	64,727,816		0
SRV Levee Reserve	(6,230,711)	0	164,118		(6,066,593)
Stormwater Levy	(5,711,474)	2,343,245	(1,957,647)		(5,325,876)
Total Externally Restricted	(218,841,407)	4,024,930	68,880,374	290,000	(145,646,103)
Internally Restricted
Airport	0	(246,893)	(728,747)		(975,641)
Art Gallery	(22,548)	0	0		(22,548)
Bridge Replacement	(1,272,343)	0	115,438		(1,156,905)
Buildings	(3,872,876)	306,774	809,823		(2,756,279)
CCTV	(16,374)	0	0		(16,374)
Cemetery	(1,405,926)	(205,658)	(13,923)		(1,625,507)
Civic Theatre	(95,013)	(57,388)	30,000		(122,401)
Civil Infrastructure	(13,477,978)	2,580,634	728,627		(10,168,717)
Council Election	(27,411)	(127,418)	0		(154,829)
Economic Development	(718,754)	0	(1,640,337)		(2,359,092)
Emergency Events Reserve	(337,706)	(82,188)	0		(419,894)
Employee Leave Entitlements Gen Fund	(3,986,868)	0	0		(3,986,868)
Environmental Conservation	(116,578)	0	0		(116,578)
Event Attraction	(490,685)	32,500	56,000		(402,185)
Financial Assistance Grants in Advance	(6,769,742)	0	6,769,742		0
Grant Co-Funding	(313,076)	180,000	133,076		0
Gravel Pit Restoration	(647,804)	3,333	102,863		(541,608)
Information Services	(3,722,935)	136,696	449,247		(3,136,992)
Insurance Variations	(50,000)	0	0		(50,000)
Internal Loans	(9,200,817)	1,441,477	(713,098)		(8,472,438)
Lake Albert Improvements	(727,876)	601,887	85,713		(40,276)
Library	(632,518)	(191,447)	0		(823,965)
Livestock Marketing Centre	(8,155,294)	3,181,495	(3,270,503)	(1,000,000)	(9,244,302)
Museum Acquisitions	(67,114)	0	0		(67,114)

 

 

 

 

 

Investment Summary as at 30 April 2026

In accordance with Regulation 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021, details of Wagga Wagga City Council’s external investments are outlined below.

 

Institution	Rating	Closing Balance Invested 31/03/2026 $	Closing Balance Invested 30/04/2026 $	April EOM Current Yield %	April EOM % of Portfolio	Investment Date	Maturity Date	Term (months)
At Call Accounts
CBA	AA-	8,769,395	8,149,291	4.10%	2.63%	N/A	N/A	N/A
CBA	AA-	29,578,270	29,679,079	4.15%	9.59%	N/A	N/A	N/A
Macquarie Bank	A+	10,397,746	10,431,450	3.90%	3.37%	N/A	N/A	N/A
CBA	AA-	49,668,123	49,289,149	4.10%	15.93%	N/A	N/A	N/A
Total At Call Accounts		98,413,533	97,548,970	4.09%	31.52%
Short Term Deposits
Bank of Sydney	NR	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.22%	0.65%	30/06/2025	30/06/2026	12
State Bank of India	BBB-	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.50%	0.32%	2/06/2025	2/06/2026	12
State Bank of India	BBB-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.30%	0.65%	25/06/2025	25/06/2026	12
ICBC	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.24%	0.32%	10/07/2025	10/07/2026	12
Bank of Sydney	NR	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.17%	0.65%	18/08/2025	18/08/2026	12
ICBC	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.50%	0.65%	28/11/2025	30/11/2026	12
Police Credit Union	NR	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.50%	0.32%	28/11/2025	30/11/2026	12
P&N Bank	BBB+	3,000,000	3,000,000	4.80%	0.97%	15/12/2025	15/12/2026	12
Total Short Term Deposits		14,000,000	14,000,000	4.43%	4.52%
Medium Term Deposits
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	1.32%	0.65%	28/06/2021	29/06/2026	60
ICBC	A	3,000,000	3,000,000	5.07%	0.97%	30/06/2022	30/06/2027	60
NAB	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	1.40%	0.65%	21/06/2021	19/06/2026	60
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	1.32%	0.65%	25/06/2021	25/06/2026	60
ICBC	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	1.32%	0.32%	25/08/2021	25/08/2026	60
ING Bank	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	5.11%	0.32%	23/05/2024	25/05/2026	24
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.06%	0.65%	2/09/2025	4/09/2028	36
P&N Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.85%	0.65%	16/12/2024	16/12/2026	24
Police Credit Union	NR	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.75%	0.65%	17/02/2025	17/02/2027	24
P&N Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.00%	0.65%	14/03/2023	15/03/2027	48
Auswide	BBB	2,000,000	0	0.00%	0.00%	13/04/2023	13/04/2026	36
P&N Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.20%	0.65%	20/04/2023	20/04/2027	48
P&N Bank	BBB+	1,000,000	1,000,000	5.20%	0.32%	26/05/2023	26/05/2026	36
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.38%	0.65%	28/06/2024	28/06/2029	60
ING Bank	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.90%	0.32%	29/11/2024	29/11/2026	24
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.93%	0.65%	5/01/2026	5/01/2029	36
P&N Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.10%	0.65%	4/01/2024	4/01/2027	36
Bank Australia	BBB+	1,000,000	1,000,000	5.25%	0.32%	9/03/2026	9/03/2028	24
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.10%	0.65%	23/04/2024	24/04/2028	48
NAB	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.10%	0.65%	6/05/2024	6/05/2026	24
ING Bank	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	5.12%	0.32%	24/05/2024	24/05/2027	36
ING Bank	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	5.26%	0.32%	31/05/2024	31/05/2028	48
ING Bank	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.24%	0.32%	3/06/2025	4/06/2029	48
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.26%	0.65%	6/06/2024	6/06/2028	48
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	1,000,000	1,000,000	5.20%	0.32%	11/06/2024	11/06/2026	24
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.20%	0.65%	11/06/2024	11/06/2026	24
BankVic	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.00%	0.65%	26/06/2025	26/06/2028	36
BankVic	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.65%	0.65%	27/08/2024	27/08/2026	24
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.63%	0.65%	30/08/2024	30/08/2026	24
ING Bank	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.51%	0.32%	16/09/2024	18/09/2028	48
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.45%	0.65%	27/09/2024	28/09/2026	24
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.79%	0.65%	17/10/2024	19/10/2026	24
Westpac	AA-	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.70%	0.32%	8/10/2024	8/10/2026	24
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.73%	0.65%	21/10/2024	21/10/2027	36
Hume Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.95%	0.65%	7/11/2024	7/11/2026	24
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.02%	0.65%	14/11/2024	16/11/2026	24
ING Bank	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	5.00%	0.32%	27/11/2024	27/11/2026	24
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.07%	0.65%	28/11/2024	28/11/2028	48
P&N Bank	BBB+	3,000,000	3,000,000	4.85%	0.97%	16/12/2024	16/12/2027	36
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.80%	0.65%	21/01/2025	21/01/2028	36
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.82%	0.32%	30/01/2025	29/01/2027	24
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.73%	0.65%	10/02/2025	10/02/2028	36
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.79%	0.32%	4/02/2025	4/02/2028	36
Regional Australia Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.71%	0.65%	12/02/2025	12/02/2027	24
Hume Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.75%	0.65%	12/02/2025	12/02/2029	48
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.70%	0.65%	12/02/2025	14/02/2028	36
ING Bank	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.77%	0.32%	26/02/2025	28/02/2028	36
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.62%	0.65%	3/03/2025	3/03/2028	36
State Bank of India	BBB-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.65%	0.65%	14/03/2025	15/03/2027	24
State Bank of India	BBB-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.65%	0.65%	31/03/2025	31/03/2027	24
ING Bank	A	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.81%	0.32%	1/04/2025	1/04/2030	60
State Bank of India	BBB-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.25%	0.65%	5/05/2025	5/05/2027	24
State Bank of India	BBB-	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.25%	0.32%	29/05/2025	31/05/2027	24
State Bank of India	BBB-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.15%	0.65%	25/06/2025	25/06/2027	24
State Bank of India	BBB-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.15%	0.65%	2/07/2025	2/07/2027	24
State Bank of India	BBB-	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.05%	0.32%	7/07/2025	7/07/2027	24
ING Bank	A	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.18%	0.65%	8/07/2025	9/07/2029	48
Regional Australia Bank	BBB+	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.00%	0.32%	30/07/2025	30/07/2027	24
Westpac	AA-	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.00%	0.32%	12/08/2025	14/08/2028	36
Arab Bank Australia	NR	2,000,000	2,000,000	3.95%	0.65%	22/08/2025	24/08/2027	24
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.05%	0.65%	27/08/2025	27/08/2027	24
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	3,000,000	3,000,000	4.07%	0.97%	29/08/2025	29/08/2028	36
Police Credit Union	NR	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.06%	0.32%	8/09/2025	8/09/2027	24
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.08%	0.32%	9/09/2025	11/09/2028	36
BankVic	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.09%	0.65%	15/09/2025	15/09/2028	36
Australian Military Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.05%	0.65%	16/09/2025	16/09/2027	24
BankVic	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.15%	0.65%	21/10/2025	21/10/2027	24
Police Credit Union	NR	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.55%	0.32%	14/11/2025	15/11/2027	24
Police Credit Union	NR	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.56%	0.65%	17/11/2025	17/11/2028	36
Westpac	AA-	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.45%	0.32%	20/11/2025	20/11/2028	36
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.53%	0.65%	28/11/2025	28/11/2028	36
Westpac	AA-	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.66%	0.32%	4/12/2025	4/12/2028	36
Westpac	AA-	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.64%	0.32%	8/12/2025	8/12/2027	24
P&N Bank	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.90%	0.65%	15/12/2025	15/12/2027	24
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.79%	0.65%	15/12/2025	15/12/2028	36
Police Credit Union	NR	1,000,000	1,000,000	4.76%	0.32%	8/01/2026	10/01/2028	24
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.82%	0.65%	29/01/2026	31/01/2028	24
BankVic	BBB+	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.05%	0.65%	26/02/2026	26/02/2029	36
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	4.90%	0.65%	2/03/2026	2/03/2029	36
Westpac	AA-	1,000,000	1,000,000	5.18%	0.32%	9/03/2026	9/03/2028	24
NAB	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.15%	0.65%	10/03/2026	10/03/2028	24
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.22%	0.65%	11/03/2026	12/03/2029	36
Westpac	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	5.35%	0.65%	17/03/2026	19/03/2029	36
Total Medium Term Deposits		141,000,000	139,000,000	4.53%	44.92%
Floating Rate Notes
Newcastle Permanent	BBB+	1,008,751	1,012,626	BBSW + 100	0.33%	10/02/2022	10/02/2027	60
NAB	AA-	2,538,824	2,549,355	BBSW + 120	0.82%	25/11/2022	25/11/2027	60
Suncorp	AA-	1,114,284	1,119,263	BBSW + 125	0.36%	14/12/2022	14/12/2027	60
CBA	AA-	2,041,846	2,026,531	BBSW + 115	0.65%	13/01/2023	13/01/2028	60
Bank Australia	BBB+	1,921,948	1,930,008	BBSW + 155	0.62%	22/02/2023	22/02/2027	48
Bendigo-Adelaide Covered	AAA	1,014,135	1,018,820	BBSW + 115	0.33%	16/06/2023	16/06/2028	60
CBA	AA-	2,533,756	2,545,576	BBSW + 95	0.82%	17/08/2023	17/08/2028	60
ANZ	AA-	2,121,521	2,131,669	BBSW + 93	0.69%	11/09/2023	11/09/2028	60
Bank Australia	BBB+	1,671,206	1,655,861	BBSW + 150	0.54%	30/10/2023	30/10/2026	36
ANZ	AA-	2,539,201	2,551,592	BBSW + 96	0.82%	5/02/2024	5/02/2029	60
Suncorp	AA-	1,008,894	1,014,279	BBSW + 98	0.33%	19/03/2024	19/03/2029	60
ING Bank	A	502,671	504,641	BBSW + 95	0.16%	22/03/2024	22/03/2027	36
BoQ	A-	1,683,657	1,671,583	BBSW + 128	0.54%	30/04/2024	30/04/2029	60
Bendigo-Adelaide	A-	808,261	811,463	BBSW + 100	0.26%	14/05/2024	14/05/2027	36
ANZ	AA-	1,511,418	1,519,217	BBSW + 86	0.49%	18/06/2024	18/06/2029	60
Teachers Mutual	BBB+	907,207	910,815	BBSW + 130	0.29%	21/06/2024	21/06/2027	36
ING Bank	A	2,228,820	2,239,888	BBSW + 102	0.72%	20/08/2024	20/08/2029	60
CBA	AA-	1,515,824	1,523,876	BBSW + 87	0.49%	22/08/2024	22/08/2029	60
Suncorp	AA-	2,413,643	2,427,345	BBSW + 92	0.78%	27/09/2024	27/09/2029	60
Bendigo-Adelaide	A-	759,939	754,909	BBSW + 96	0.24%	24/10/2024	24/10/2028	48
ANZ	AA-	1,311,312	1,318,145	BBSW + 81	0.43%	18/02/2025	18/02/2030	60
Rabobank	A+	1,310,331	1,317,286	BBSW + 85	0.43%	20/02/2025	20/02/2030	60
The Bank of Nova Scotia	A+	2,016,877	2,027,581	BBSW + 140	0.66%	21/03/2025	21/03/2030	60
Suncorp	AA-	1,009,372	1,015,454	BBSW + 93	0.33%	21/05/2025	21/05/2030	60
Macquarie Bank	A+	1,414,334	1,406,156	BBSW + 82	0.45%	17/07/2025	17/07/2030	60
Total Floating Rate Notes		38,908,032	39,003,937		12.60%
Fixed Rate Bonds
ING Covered	AAA	740,533	743,308	1.10%	0.24%	19/08/2021	19/08/2026	60
Northern Territory Treasury	AA-	3,000,000	3,000,000	1.50%	0.97%	24/08/2021	15/12/2026	64
BoQ	A-	1,885,439	1,873,182	2.10%	0.61%	27/10/2021	27/10/2026	60
BoQ	A-	2,030,121	1,981,782	5.30%	0.64%	30/04/2024	30/04/2029	60
ANZ	AA-	1,176,573	1,178,954	4.65%	0.38%	18/02/2025	18/02/2030	60
The Bank of Nova Scotia	A+	1,961,409	1,965,612	5.23%	0.64%	21/03/2025	21/03/2030	60
Macquarie Bank	A+	1,646,146	1,648,057	4.37%	0.53%	17/07/2025	17/07/2030	60
Northern Territory Treasury	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	1.50%	0.65%	6/08/2021	15/12/2026	64
Northern Territory Treasury	AA-	1,000,000	1,000,000	1.50%	0.32%	14/07/2021	15/12/2026	65
Northern Territory Treasury	AA-	2,000,000	2,000,000	1.30%	0.65%	29/04/2021	15/06/2026	61
Total Fixed Rate Bonds		17,440,222	17,390,895	2.86%	5.62%
Managed Funds
NSW Tcorp	NR	2,409,087	2,507,110	4.07%	0.81%	17/03/2014	N/A	N/A
Total Managed Funds		2,409,087	2,507,110	4.07%	0.81%
TOTAL CASH ASSETS, CASH EQUIVALENTS & INVESTMENTS		312,170,874	309,450,911		100.00%

 

Council’s investment portfolio is dominated by Term Deposits, equating to approximately 49% of the portfolio across a broad range of counterparties. Cash equates to 32%, with Floating Rate Notes (FRNs) around 12%, fixed rate bonds around 6% and growth funds around 1% of the portfolio.

 

 

Council’s investment portfolio is well diversified in complying assets across the entire credit spectrum. It is also well diversified from a rating perspective. Credit quality is diversified and is predominately invested amongst the investment grade Authorised Deposit-Taking Institutions (ADIs) (being BBB- or higher), with a smaller allocation to unrated ADIs.

All investments are within the defined Policy limits, as outlined in the Rating Allocation chart below:

 

Investment Portfolio Balance

 

Council’s investment portfolio balance decreased over the past month, from $312.17M down to $309.45M. This decrease is a result of a number of contract payments being made during the month.

 

 

Monthly Investment Movements

 

Redemptions/Sales – Council redeemed the following investment security during April 2026:

 

 

New Investments – Council did not purchase any investment securities during April 2026.

 

Rollovers – Council did not roll over any investment securities during April 2026.

 

 

Monthly Investment Performance

 

Interest/growth/capital gains/(losses) for the month totalled $1,221,429, which compares favourably with the budget for the period of $686,282 - outperforming budget for the month by $535,147.

 

Council’s outperformance to budget for April is mainly due to better than budgeted returns on Councils investment portfolio as well as a higher than anticipated investment portfolio balance – which is partly due to Council receiving upfront payment of $48.5M in AIF funding in June 2024. For the 2025/26 financial year to date, Council has accrued $1,555,675 on this AIF funding received. As the project progresses and the funding is spent, the monthly interest will reduce.

 

Council experienced a positive return on its NSW T-Corp Managed Fund for the month of April, with the fund returning +4.07% (or $98,022) as domestic (+2.18%) and international (9.68%) shares rebounded strongly this month, as the market looked beyond the conflict in the Middle East.

 

 

In comparison to the AusBond Bank Bill Index* of 4.24% (annualised), Council’s investment portfolio returned approximately 4.56% (annualised) for the month of April – outperforming the benchmark for the month.

 

Over the past year, Council’s investment portfolio has returned 4.20%, outperforming the AusBond Bank Bill index by 0.41%. Council’s investment portfolio has continued to perform in line with the AusBond Bank Bill Index* over the longer-term time period, returning 4.06% per annum over the past 3 years – slightly underperforming the benchmark by -0.11% over this time.

 

* The AusBond Bank Bill Index is the leading benchmark for the Australian fixed income market. It is interpolated from the RBA Cash rate, 1 month and 3-month Bank Bill Swap rates.

Report by Responsible Accounting Officer

 

Budget variations are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 052 Budget Policy.

 

Investments are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 075 Investment Policy.

 

Local Government Act 1993

Section 625 - How may councils invest?

 

Local Government (General) Regulation 2021

Section 212 - Reports on council investments

 

Community leadership and collaboration

Objective: Wagga Wagga City Council leads through engaged civic governance and is recognised and distinguished by its ethical decision-making, efficient management, innovation and quality customer service

Ensure transparency and accountability

 

This report is a control mechanism that assists in addressing the following potential risks to Council:

·        Loss of investment income or capital resulting from ongoing management of investments, especially during difficult economic times

·        Failure to demonstrate to the community that its funds are being expended in an efficient and effective manner

All relevant areas within Council have consulted with the Finance Division in relation to the budget variations listed in this report.

 

The Finance Division has consulted with relevant external parties to confirm Council’s investment portfolio balances.

 

 

1⇩.	Quarterly Budget Review Statement - March 2026
2⇩.	Capital Works Program 2025/26 to 2034/35