Ordinary Meeting of
Council
To be held on
Monday
27 March 2017
AT 6.00pm
Cnr Baylis and Morrow Streets,
Wagga Wagga NSW 2650
PO Box 20, Wagga Wagga
Phone: 1300 292 442
Fax: 02 6926 9199
Website: www.wagga.nsw.gov.au
NOTICE OF MEETING
In pursuance of the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 and the Regulations there under, notice is hereby given that an Ordinary Meeting of the Council of the City of Wagga Wagga will be held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Corner Baylis and Morrow Streets, Wagga Wagga, on Monday 27 March 2017 at 6.00pm.
Mr Robert Knight
Acting General Manager
WAGGA WAGGA CITY COUNCILLORS
Mayor Councillor Greg Conkey OAM |
Deputy Mayor Councillor Dallas Tout |
Councillor Yvonne Braid |
Councillor Paul Funnell |
Councillor Dan Hayes |
Councillor Vanessa Keenan |
Councillor Rod Kendall |
Councillor Tim Koschel |
Councillor Kerry Pascoe |
|
|
|
QUORUM
The quorum for a meeting of the Council is a majority of the Councillors of the Council who hold office for the time being who are eligible to vote at the meeting.
COUNCIL MEETING ROOM
Reports submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on Monday 27 March 2017.
Ordinary Meeting of Council AGENDA AND BUSINESS PAPER
Monday 27 March 2017
ORDER OF BUSINESS:
CLAUSE PRECIS PAGE
PRAYER 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY 3
APOLOGIES 3
CONFIRMATIONS OF MINUTES
CM-1 Ordinary Council Meeting - 27 February 2017 3
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 3
Motions Of Which Due Notice Has Been Given
NOM-1 Notice of Motion - Planning Taskforce 4
Reports from Staff
RP-1 DA16/0728 - Development Application for Four Dwellings with attached Secondary Dwellings and Torrens Title Subdivision 6
RP-2 Code of Meeting Practice 10
RP-3 2017 Australian Local Government Women's Association Annual Conference 13
RP-4 National General Assembly - Call for Motions 18
RP-5 Audit and Risk Committee - Independent Member Remuneration 30
RP-6 POL 100 Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy 32
RP-7 City of Wagga Wagga Cultural Protocols 43
RP-8 Suspension of Alcohol Free and Prohibited Alcohol Consumption Zones for Events 45
RP-9 Membership of Riverina Regional Tourism 48
RP-10 Airport Advisory Committee - Terms of Reference 62
RP-11 Financial Performance Report as at 28 February 2017 74
RP-12 Sale of Land for Unpaid Rates 88
RP-13 Consultation with State and Federal Government 91
RP-14 Hampden Bridge - Final Report 93
RP-15 Integrated Planning and Reporting Performance Report for the Quarter Ended 31 December 2016 95
RP-16 Planning Proposal to amend the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 - Land at Old Bomen Road & East Street, Cartwrights Hill 122
RP-17 Section 356 Donation - Henwood Park Football Club Inc - Request to waive Sewer Charges 140
RP-18 Section 356 Donation Request - Uranqunity Junior Cricket Club 143
RP-19 Venue Naming Sponsorship Proposal 148
RP-20 Economic Development Grants Program 2016/2017 - Recommendations of assessment panel 151
QUESTIONS/BUSINESS WITH NOTICE 160
Confidential Reports
CONF-1 Proposed Sale of Council Property - 34 Johnston Street, Wagga Wagga 161
CONF-2 RFT2017/18 Tree Maintenance Services 162
CONF-3 RFT2017-20 Supply of Passenger & Baggage Screening Services 163
CONF-4 EOI 2017/601 - Energy Performance Contract 164
CONF-5 Appointment of Sister City Community Committee Members 165
CONF-6 Audit and Risk Committee Minutes - 16 February 2017 166
CONF-7 Oasis Aquatic Centre - Natural Gas Supply Agreement 167
CONF-8 Riverina Intermodal Freight and Logistics (RIFL) Hub and Genesee & Wyoming Australia Framework Agreement 168
CONF-9 Solid Waste - Kerbside Waste Contract 169
Confirmation of Minutes
CM-1 Ordinary Council Meeting - 27 February 2017
That the Minutes of the proceedings of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 27 February 2017 be confirmed as a true and accurate record.
|
1⇩. |
Minutes - Ordinary Council Meeting - 27 February 2016 |
185 |
Motions Of Which Due Notice Has Been Given
NOM-1 Notice of Motion - Planning Taskforce
Author: Councillor Kerry Pascoe
Analysis: |
Notice of Motion brought to Council from Councillor Kerry Pascoe. |
That Council receive a report at the 24 April 2017 Ordinary Council, giving an update on the progress of the Planning Taskforce.
|
Key Reasons
In the previous term of Council the Planning Advisory Committee was abolished and replaced by the Planning Taskforce.
The Planning Advisory committee was made up of a group of community stakeholders that conducted regular meetings that were open, transparent and were recorded. Planning staff and Councillors attended the meetings and the minutes of each meeting were formally adopted in Council Meetings.
The Planning Taskforce does not report back to Councillor’s.
In the report back to Councillor’s we request the following details;
1. The composition of the Planning taskforce;
2. Any minutes that are recorded for the meeting of the taskforce members;
3. An update on the progress of the following stated aims of the taskforce;
i. Develop a residential strategy which would look at population forecasts and demand for housing stock and develop growth scenarios based on this analysis
ii. Undertake a Rural Lands Strategy which would look at the sustainability of villages within the local government area and the potential for villages to accommodate growth
iii. Undertake a review of the Local Environmental Plan (LEP)
iv. Undertake a review of Development Control Plan (DCP)
v. Undertake the review of the Development Contribution Plans including Section 94, Section 94A and Section 64
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy
Code of Meeting Practice
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We plan long term
Risk Management Issues for Council
No specific issues identified.
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 March 2017. RP-1
RP-1 DA16/0728 - Development Application for Four Dwellings with attached Secondary Dwellings and Torrens Title Subdivision
Author: Stander, Adriaan
Sector Manager: Somerville, Paul
Analysis: |
The report is for a development application and is presented to Council for decision. The application has been referred to Council as: · the application seeks to vary one numeric control of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 (DCP) by greater than 10%; and · The application is also presented to Council for determination in accordance with Policy ‘Processing development applications lodged by councillors, staff and individuals of which a conflict of interest may arise, or on council owned land policy.’ as the applicant and the landowner is Councillor Pascoe. |
That Council approve DA16/0728 for four dwellings with attached secondary dwellings and Torrens Title subdivision at 12-14 Kellerman Crescent, Boorooma subject to the conditions outlined in the Section 79C Assessment Report for DA16/0728. |
Development Application Details
Applicant |
Pascoe Constructions |
Owner |
Davtil Pty Ltd |
Development Cost |
$1,235,870.00 |
Development Description |
The application is for: 1. The subdivision of Lot 801 and 802 DP 1191265 into four lots, namely Lot 31, Lot 32, Lot 2 and Lot 3. The proposed lots are between 648sqm and 851sqm in size. A reciprocal access easement will be created over Lot 2 and 3 in favour of both lots. A service easement will also be provided over Lot 2 and 3 to accommodate existing services that traverse the site; this includes an electricity easement for overhead power lines that located within the adjacent property to the south (Lot 46 DP 1179795). 2. Four dwellings on the newly created lots. Each dwelling will consist of 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms and an open plan living, dining and kitchen area that leads out onto a covered outdoor area. Each dwelling is provided with a double garage. 3. Secondary dwellings are attached to the principal dwellings on each lot. The secondary dwellings will gain access through the main foyer of the principal dwellings and will each consist of 2 bedrooms, a bathroom and open plan living, dining and kitchen area. |
Key Issues
· Overall the site design is considered acceptable and is in accordance with the adopted master plan for Boorooma.
· The proposed setback requires a variation of the DCP controls. The proposed variation and its justification are supported as the proposed setback will still be able to comply with the overall objectives of the setback controls including complimenting the established built pattern.
Assessment
The proposed subdivision will create an additional 2 lots which would increase the density but still maintaining the minimum lot size requirement of 600sqm generally in accordance with the master plan for Boorooma.
The proposed development is compatible with the existing form and nature of development in the locality. The majority of surrounding development is low density in character and even though the development will result in an increased density the density is still considered appropriate given the context and setting of the site.
With the exception of the front setbacks, the proposed development complies with the LEP and DCP provisions.
The DCP requires a 6m setback on Kellerman Crescent. The dwellings on proposed Lot 31 and Lot 32 are provided with 5.035m and 4.95m setbacks to accommodate the front porches for both dwellings. The remainder of the dwellings are set behind the 6m setback. The proposed setback represents a variation of 17% which is required under the provisions of clause 1.11 of the DCP to be considered by Council.
The proposed setback is supported as it is compatible with the 3m setback of the adjoining house to the north of the development site.
Reasons for Approval
· The proposed development is considered to satisfy the outcomes sought for the R1 – General Residential Zone, particularly by satisfying the two main objectives of the zone which is to provide housing and to add to the variety of housing and density types.
· The variation of the setback control is supported as the proposed setback will still be able to comply with the overall objectives of the setback controls including complimenting the established built pattern.
· The proposed development will contribute to the housing choice in the area while respecting the setting, layout and form of adjoining developments.
Site Location
The subject land is located on the eastern side of Kellerman Crescent, Boorooma and currently consists of two vacant lots of 2,882sqm in total. The land is zoned R1- General Residential and is within a new residential area characterised by a mixture of residential uses and styles.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy
Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP)
Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 (DCP)
Link to Strategic Plan
The Environment
Objective: We plan for the growth of the city
Outcome: We have housing that suits our needs
Risk Management Issues for Council
An approval of the application raises no risk management issue and will not create an undesirable precedent. Refusal of the application may result in an appeal process in the Land and Environment Court which will have to be defended by Council. The reasons for refusal will have to be justified and withstand scrutiny and cross examination in Court.
Internal / External Consultation
See attached s79C report for details of all consultation.
1⇩. |
DA17/0728 - S79C Assessment - Provided under separate cover. |
|
2⇩. |
DA16/0728 - Plans - Provided under separate cover. |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 March 2017. RP-2
Author: Hensley, Ingrid
Acting General Manager: Knight, Robert
Analysis: |
Endorse amended Code of Meeting Practice and place on public exhibition. |
That Council: a alter resolution 16/305 adopted at the Ordinary Council Meeting held 21 November 2016 being: “That Council alter part (a) of resolution 16/276 – COUNCIL MEETING AND COMMITTEE STRUCTURE from 31 October 2016 to read as follows: a endorse Council Meetings to be held monthly b endorse the Draft Code of Meeting Practice and place on public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 28 March 2017 to 24 April 2017 and invite public submissions c receive a further report following the public exhibition period: i addressing any submissions made in respect of the Draft Code of Meeting Practice ii proposing adoption of the Code unless there are any recommended amendments deemed to be substantial and requiring a further public exhibition period |
Key Reasons
At the Ordinary Council Meeting held 31 October 2016, Council was presented with draft amendments to the Code of Meeting Practice and resolved (Res 16/277):
“That Council:
a endorse the following amendments to Council’s Code of Meeting Practice as outlined in this report:
· record a division for every resolution, excluding procedural motions
· amend the Order of Business for Ordinary Council Meetings to include Questions/Business with Notice prior to Closed Council
· amend public address sessions to be held at Ordinary Council Meetings
b receive a further report following the Office of Local Government’s release of the Model Code of Meeting Practice in early 2017”
The Code of Meeting Practice was updated in accordance with the above endorsed amendments and is the current Code in place.
At the Ordinary Council Meeting held 21 November 2016, Council resolved (Res 16/305):
“That Council alter part (a) of resolution 16/276 – COUNCIL MEETING AND COMMITTEE STRUCTURE from 31 October 2016 to read as follows:
a endorse a schedule of a monthly Council Meeting and the establishment of a monthly Planning Standing Committee for this term of Council
i amend the Code of Meeting Practice to allow Public Addresses at both Council and Standing Committee Meetings
ii receive a further report outlining the Terms of Reference of the Planning Standing Committee”
In line with Council’s resolution, draft amendments were made to the Code of Meeting Practice and presented to the Ordinary Council Meeting held 12 December 2016 that would allow Public Addresses at both Council and Standing Committee Meetings. Consideration of these changes was deferred to the January 2017 meeting.
Consideration of this matter was further deferred to the 27 February 2017, Ordinary Council Meeting, to allow further consultation with Councillors in establishing a Public Forum for Development Application before Council, in place of the adopted Planning Standing Committee.
At the Ordinary Council Meeting held 27 February 2017, Council resolved in part to (Res: 17/033):
a endorse the introduction of the following forums, in addition to the existing public address forum at Council meetings, as methods for the public to address Councillors on matters of interest:
(i) Public Forum – Development Assessment and Policy, and
(ii) Public Access Session
f receive a report at March 2017 Ordinary Council meeting proposing updates to the Code of Meeting Practice as may be required
As a result of the resolution above and the establishment of the Public Forum - Development Assessment and Policy, resolution 16/305 will no longer be enacted. Therefore it is recommended that resolution 16/305 be altered to remove the establishment of a monthly Planning Standing Committee for this term of Council and the additional associated items as below:
i amend the Code of Meeting Practice to allow Public Addresses at both Council and Standing Committee Meetings
ii receive a further report outlining the Terms of Reference of the Planning Standing Committee”
Attached is the draft Code of Meeting Practice for consideration by Council to amend the following:
· Reference to the Public Forum - Development Assessment and Policy. Although this session is not a formal meeting of Council, the Forum has a direct link to Development Applications scheduled for the next available Ordinary Council Meeting and Council Policies or Plans on Public Exhibition as at the date of the Meeting.
· Clarification of process of Service and Operational requests in Section 20 (d) Questions with Notice in accordance with Council’s Provision of Information to and Interaction between Councillors and Staff Policy.
It should also be noted that the purpose of the Public Access Session is to allow a member of the community to address Councillors on matters not included in the agenda of a Council Meeting. Therefore this session is not required to be referenced in the Code of Meeting Practice.
The Office of Local Government is developing a Model Code of Meeting Practice, which is expected for release in 2017. A full review of Council’s Code of Meeting Practice will take place following the release of the Model Code of Meeting Practice.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy
Code of Meeting Practice
POL 089 - Provision of Information to and Interaction Between Councillors and Staff Policy
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We are accountable and transparent
Risk Management Issues for Council
No specific issues identified.
Internal / External Consultation
Office of Local Government
1⇩. |
Draft Code of Meeting Practice - Provided under separate cover |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 March 2017. RP-3
RP-3 2017 Australian Local Government Women's Association Annual Conference
Author: Hensley, Ingrid
Acting General Manager: Knight, Robert
Analysis: |
Endorse representation and appointment of a Councillor to attend the ALGWA Conference in May 2017. |
That Council: a consider Council representation at the 2017 Annual Australian Local Government Women’s Association (ALGWA) Conference to be held from 4 to 6 May 2017 in Penrith b appoint one Councillor as Council’s delegate to attend the ALGWA Conference |
Key Reasons
· Australian Local Government Women’s Association (ALGWA) NSW, is the state's peak representative body for women who are in any way involved or interested in local government. Council has participated in the ALGWA Annual Conference since 2008.
· The theme of the 2017 ALGWA Annual Conference is “Your Adventure Starts Now”.
· The 2017 Conference is scheduled to be held in Penrith from Thursday, 4 May to Saturday, 6 May 2017. The program outline is attached for your information.
Financial Implications
The registration cost per delegate is $1,177.00. Transport and accommodation and incidentals additional to the registration are estimated at $800.00 per delegate.
The conference will be funded from the Councillors’ Conference budget which has an allocation of $30,000 for 2016/17 with $ 20,708 currently available.
Policy
POL 025 – Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors.
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We have leaders that represent us
Risk Management Issues for Council
No specific issues identified.
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
1⇩. |
2017 ALGWA NSW Annual Conference - Program |
|
RP-4 National General Assembly - Call for Motions
Author: Hensley, Ingrid
Acting General Manager: Knight, Robert
Analysis: |
Endorsement of the Mayor’s attendance at the 2017 National General Assembly of Local Government Annual Conference as outlined in the report.
Consideration and endorsement of Motion’s to be submitted to the Australian Local Government Association for the 2017 National General Assembly of the Local Government under this year’s theme, “Building Tomorrow’s Communities’. |
That Council: a endorse submitting a motion/s to the National General Assembly of Local Government Annual Conference on 18 to 21 June 2017 b endorse the Mayor’s attendance at the conference |
Key Reasons
The National General Assembly (NGA) will be held at the National Convention Centre in Canberra from 18 to 21 June 2017.
The Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) Board is calling for motions for the 2017 NGA under this year’s theme, “Building Tomorrow’s Communities’.
This report provides an opportunity for Councillors to consider any motions for submission the ALGA. To be eligible for inclusion in the ALGA business papers, motions must follow the following criteria:
1. be relevant to the work of local government nationally
2. be consistent with the themes of the NGA
3. complement or build on the policy objectives of your state and territory local government association
4. be from a council which is a financial member of their state or territory local government association
5. propose a clear action and outcome
6. bot be advanced on behalf of external third parties that may seek to use the NGA to apply pressure to Board members to gain national political exposure for positions that are not directly relevant to the work of, or in the national interests of, local government
To assist Council in preparing motions, a discussion paper has been prepared by the ALGA. This paper provides background information on the theme and is designed to assist Councils in developing motions.
Motions must be received by the ALGA by 11.59pm on Friday 21 April 2017 via the online form on the NGA website.
Councillors may wish to consider submitting additional motions which align the conference themes.
Council is provided with one vote. Therefore it recommended that the Mayor represent Council at the 2017 National General Assembly.
Financial Implications
The estimated cost of the conference is $2,700 including conference registration, two conference dinners, three nights’ accommodation and associated out of pocket expenses. The conference will be funded from the Councillors’ Conference budget which has an allocation of $30,000 for 2016/17 with $ 20,708 currently available.
Policy
POL 025 Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors Policy.
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We have leaders that represent us
Risk Management Issues for Council
No specific issues identified.
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
1⇩. |
Discussion Paper - "Building Tomorrow’s Communities" |
|
RP-5 Audit and Risk Committee - Independent Member Remuneration
Author: Hensley, Ingrid
Acting General Manager: Knight, Robert
Analysis: |
It is recommended that Council confirm the remuneration fee rate for independent members of the Audit and Risk Committee. |
That Council endorse that remuneration fees for independent external members of Council’s Audit and Risk Committee remain unaltered. |
Key Reasons
At the Ordinary Council Meeting held 23 February 2015, Council resolved (Res 15/039):
That Council endorse that remuneration fees for independent external members of Councils (sic) Audit and Risk Committee remain unaltered for the term of this Council.
The term of the Council at the time of resolution ended upon the local government elections held September 2016. As a result, it is proposed that this Council reconfirm remuneration payable to independent members of Council’s Audit and risk Committee.
In March 2011, Council resolved the fee structure for the external members of the Audit and Risk Committee, based on qualifications, skills and time commitment required with the fees being:
Role |
Payment per meeting attended |
Chairperson |
$500 |
Independent Committee Member |
$400 |
This fee structure has remained unchanged since.
Whilst a review of the Committee’s remuneration is expected over the current term of Council, it is proposed that Council endorse the continuation of the current level of remuneration in the short term.
Financial Implications
The 2016/17 budget for the Audit and Risk Committee is $18,000. There is sufficient budget to allow for the 27 February 2017 appointment for four independent Committee members at the current remuneration fee rates. The future year budgets included in the Long Term Financial Plan are also sufficient to fund these ongoing appointments.
Policy
N/A
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We have leaders that represent us
Risk Management Issues for Council
The Audit and Risk Committee assists Council by monitoring its risk exposure and determining if management systems have appropriate risk management processes in place.
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 March 2017. RP-6
RP-6 POL 100 Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy
Author: Hensley, Ingrid
Acting General Manager: Knight, Robert
Analysis: |
Amendments to Council’s Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy POL 100 are presented to Council for endorsement and placement on public exhibition. |
That Council: a receive the draft POL 100 Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy b endorse the draft POL 100 Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy and place on public exhibition for a period of 28 days and invite public submissions on the draft policy c receive a further report following the public exhibition period: (i) addressing any submissions made in respect of the proposed policy (ii) proposing adoption of the policy unless there are any recommended amendments deemed to be substantial and requiring a further public exhibition period |
Key Reasons
A review of Council’s Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy POL 100 has been undertaken in line with a review of Council’s underlying fraud management framework and recent changes within the organisation.
Council’s fraud management arrangements were assessed against the Fraud Control Improvement Kit developed by the Audit Office of NSW and Australian Standard AS8001-2008 Fraud and Corruption Control. This has resulted in amendments to the Fraud and Corruption Policy, Fraud and Corruption Prevention Framework and development of a Fraud Action Plan for the 2017 calendar year.
The Policy’s objectives below have been amended in line with Council’s risk appetite that there is no appetite for internal fraud, corruption, collusion or theft:
· To promote an organisational culture that will not tolerate any action of fraud or corruption
· To ensure high standards of ethical and accountable conduct
· To protect public funds and assets
· To protect the integrity, security and reputation of Council and its staff
Other changes within the document include high level details of the process for Councillors, staff and members of the public to report any suspicions of wrongdoing.
The attached draft POL 100 Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy, together with the draft Fraud and Corruption Prevention Framework and Fraud Action Plan, were considered by the Audit and Risk Committee at its meeting of 16 February 2017.
To allow community feedback on the Policy, it is recommended that the Policy be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy
POL 100 Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We are accountable and transparent
Risk Management Issues for Council
Council is committed to the formal, systematic and proactive management of risks, including the risk of fraud. The Fraud and Corruption Prevention Policy establishes council’s approach to managing fraud risks and establishes clear objectives to ensure that Council Officials and those that do business with Council are aware of and understand their responsibility for managing that risk.
Internal / External Consultation
Consultation has occurred with the Executive Team and Council’s Audit and Risk Committee.
1⇩. |
Draft POL 100 Fraud and Corruption Policy |
|
RP-7 City of Wagga Wagga Cultural Protocols
Author: Scully, Madeleine
Sector Manager: Summerhayes, Janice
Analysis: |
Council’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Protocols provide a comprehensive resource for Councillors and Council staff to use when liaising, consulting and engaging with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community. The protocols have been significantly revised and updated to align with national best practice. |
That Council: a endorse the revised Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Protocols: A guide for Councillors and Council staff b place on public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 28 March 2017 to 24 April 2017 and invite public submissions on the document c receive a further report following the public exhibition period: i addressing any submissions made in respect of the revised protocols |
Key Reasons
Contemporary Best Practice
Council’s current Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural Protocols were adopted in 2010. During the period since this adoption, community expectations and best practice standards for Local, State and Federal Government in relation to cultural protocols have undergone significant changes. These changes are reflected in the revised protocols and include clear guidance for Councillors and Council staff when liaising, consulting and engaging with the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy
N/A
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Place and Identity
Objective: We are proud of where we live and our identity
Outcome: We have a strong sense of place
Risk Management Issues for Council
No specific issues identified.
Internal / External Consultation
External consultation with local Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community members including Aunty Isobel Reid on behalf of the Mawang Gaway Aboriginal Consultative Group to ensure content is correct, culturally appropriate and in alignment with the Community Protocols document developed by Mawang Gaway.
External review with other Local Government areas for bench marking on the development of cultural protocols for Local Government and adherence to National best practice.
During the public exhibition period staff will engage with the community by:
· placing the document on Council’s website
· seeking comment from our registered Your Say users
· utilise social media advertising
· create a Council News story
· issue media releases
· undertake further individual and small group engagement with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander community members
1⇩. |
City of Wagga Wagga Aboriginal Torres Strait Cultural Protocols - Provided under separate cover. |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 March 2017. RP-8
RP-8 Suspension of Alcohol Free and Prohibited Alcohol Consumption Zones for Events
Author: Hamilton, Fiona
Sector Manager: Summerhayes, Janice
Analysis: |
This report is to request that Council suspend the alcohol free and prohibited alcohol consumption zones for specific 2017 events. |
That Council endorse the suspension of the alcohol free and prohibited alcohol consumption zones in the area detailed in the attached map for the following two events: · Gears and Beers – 30 September and 1 October 2017 · Wagga Live – 31 December 2017 |
Key Reasons
This report has been raised by the Events Team in an effort to reduce last minute reports to Council requesting the suspension of alcohol free and prohibited alcohol consumption zones for events where alcohol is being served. Two events have been identified requiring suspension of the alcohol free and prohibited alcohol consumption zones in 2017 as detailed below:
· Gears and Beers is a community event held in the Victory Memorial Gardens. The event will commence on Saturday 30 September 2017 with the arrival of a large number of riders to the City and registrations from 4pm-10:30pm with the main event held on Sunday 1 October 2017 from 11am to 5pm.
· Wagga Live is also a community event which is held within the Civic Precinct to celebrate the commencement of the New Year. This event is held on 31 December 2017.
The public roads surrounding the area where these events are to be held fall within the existing alcohol free and prohibited alcohol consumption zones. Section 645 of Local Government Act 1993 provides Council with the power to cancel or suspend the alcohol free and prohibited alcohol consumption zones during its period of operation, so that Council may respond to a situation which may occur within the zones. Council must pass resolution to suspend or cancel a particular zone.
The recommendation is to suspend the existing alcohol free and prohibited alcohol consumption zones in the area bound by Tarcutta Street, Morrow Street, Fitzmaurice Street, Johnston Street and Ivan Jack Drive (refer to attached map) on the following dates:
· Gears and Beers from 4pm-10:30pm Saturday 31 September and 10am to 9pm Sunday 1 October 2017.
· Wagga Live from 12 noon 31 December 2017 to 1am 1 January 2018.
The Wagga Local Area Licencing Constable (NSW Police) has been advised and further consultation will occur with NSW Police after the Council resolution. Council must publish a public notice of the suspension. There is no requirement to remove the alcohol free signs for the period of the suspension.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy
Part 4 Section 645 of Local Government Act 1993.
Link to Strategic Plan
Safe and Healthy Community
Objective: We are safe
Outcome: We create safe spaces and places
Risk Management Issues for Council
1. Collection of glass and debris after the event
2. Risk of injury due to broken glass
Internal / External Consultation
1. Internal – Finance and City Compliance
2. External – Respective Event Organisers/NSW Police
1⇩. |
Alcohol Free Zone Map |
|
RP-9 Membership of Riverina Regional Tourism
Author: Hamilton, Fiona
Sector Manager: Summerhayes, Janice
Analysis: |
In mid-2016 Destination NSW announced a restructure of regional tourism to ensure the effectiveness of regional marketing, funding and governance of regional tourism entities over the next four years and beyond. This included the establishment of six (6) Destination Networks, funded through the state government with the key mandate of doubling visitation rates across NSW. City of Wagga Wagga falls under the Riverina Murray Destination Network (RMDN).
Riverina Regional Tourism (RRT), the existing regional tourism organisation, is seeking membership funds from all Local Government Area (LGA) members for the 2017/18 financial year with a $27,927 contribution from City of Wagga Wagga to continue its operations under a new entity to be formed by 30 June 2017, despite Destination NSW forming the new Destination Networks to replace existing local tourism boards.
RRT plans to wind up its existing operation and replace with a new entity comprising the same membership base and fee structure, to commence 1 July 1017.
Taste Riverina is a key flagship event for the RMDN region and will continue to be supported this year. Destination NSW has provided $20,000 in funding for that event this year and the RMDN operational staff will provide other marketing and promotional support for the event as well. RRT has requested $5,000 of our membership fee go towards Taste Riverina 2017.
The proposal from RRT is deemed to be a direct duplication of the new Riverina Murray Destination Network’s resources and activities and there are concerns around governance and transparency of process. RRT have requested confirmation of City of Wagga Wagga’s membership intentions by 4 April 2017.
|
That Council: a discontinue with the paid financial membership of RRT (or any proposed new entity) b continue to work collaboratively with LGA’s in the region and RMDN on projects including the support of Taste Riverina 2017 with a $5,000 financial contribution from City of Wagga Wagga in 2017/18 c utilise remaining membership/product development funds for investment in tourism initiatives supported by both our City and the new RMDN, a range of matched funding is available including DNSW event funding, DNSW Tourism Product Development, ARTN Funding and Department of Industry Tourism funding d put forward an Expression of Interest to host the RMDN staff in suitable and available City of Wagga Wagga office space |
Key Reasons
· Duplication of activity and resources – The retention of the existing local tourism board will result in duplication of resources and effort as the new established state network RMDN, which fully funds three full time staff based within the region, their role is to increase visitation through regional campaigns, develop the Destination Management Plan, work with LGAs to improve product and be the conduit through to DNSW. The RMDN does not require any membership fees from Council’s. The proposed function of the new local tourism board will duplicate many of these activities.
· New Entity - RRT are winding up as recommended by the State but have discussed with its members to effectively form an entity operating under the same model, focusing on promoting the Riverina. The entity is yet to be formed and RRT are requesting a membership fee with a determination by Councils by April 4th 2017. Given there is no clear difference to the newly formed Destination Riverina Murray Network we are unable to make a recommendation to invest in a model that is fee paying and appears to duplicated key functions of the Destination Riverina Murray Network.
· Sound governance processes – there is concern over the transparency of how the proposed operating budget of $200,000 would be administered and put in place for the proposal by RRT in establishing a new entity. This is based on the dollar value of the operating budget and requirements on all Councils to undertake open, robust, and transparent procurement processes that ensures accountability to the community.
· State Government Investment - The State Government is demonstrating strong support for the State’s regional tourism industry with unprecedented levels of investment and our efforts should be focussed on the opportunities presented through this avenue rather than expending effort supporting past tourism models that have been ineffective due to a significant proportion of their funding going towards administration rather than core tourism activity.
Financial Implications
The Visitor Economy Product Development budget for the 2017/18 financial year is $27,000. It is proposed for $5,000 to be committed to Taste Riverina 2017 during the 2017/18 financial year, with the remaining $22,000 to be invested in tourism initiatives aligned to the new Destination Management Plan to be undertaken by RDMN in consultation with City of Wagga Wagga.
Policy
N/A
Link to Strategic Plan
Growing Economy
Objective: We are a tourist destination
Outcome: We promote our city and villages
Risk Management Issues for Council
Financial Risk – investment in RRT does not align to the current state government tourism framework and drive, so there is risk that funds invested will not add value.
Negative Perception Risk – risk of negative perception by RMDN and State Government if continue to support out dated/unsupported local tourism board model.
Regulatory/Compliance Risk – obligation to operate in a transparent manner, RRT’s proposal does not demonstrate an open and transparent process in relation to proposed operations.
Internal / External Consultation
· Destination New South Wales
· Riverina Murray Destination Network Chair
· Riverina Regional Tourism
1⇩. |
RRT Proposed Operations 2017/18 |
|
2⇩. |
Destination Network Overview - Provided under separate cover. |
|
3⇩. |
Destination Riverina Murray - Review of RRT Proposal sent to General Managers 13 March 2017 |
|
RP-10 Airport Advisory Committee - Terms of Reference
Sector Manager: Somerville, Paul
Analysis: |
This report presents the outcomes of consultation on the draft Terms of Reference (TOR) with the proposed members of the Airport Advisory Committee (Committee). The report is seeking endorsement of the representation on the Committee and the Terms of Reference for the Committee to enable the Committee to be formed and commence to function. |
That Council: a endorse the attached Terms of Reference (TOR) for the Airport Advisory Committee (Committee) b appoint two Councillors as voting members of the Committee c invite the following organisations to nominate a representative as a voting member of the Committee: · Qantas Airlines · Regional Express Airlines (Rex) · JetGo · Wagga Wagga Business Chamber d invite the Department of Defence to nominate a representative as a non-voting member of the Committee e invite expressions of interest for two aviation industry representatives as non-voting members of the Committee |
Key Reasons
Consultation Process and Feedback
Council has invited feedback on the draft TOR from:
· Qantas
· Rex
· JetGo
· Department of Defence
· Wagga Wagga Business Chamber
The feedback obtained has been as follows:
Qantas
· Confirmed their intent to be represented on the Committee.
· No further feedback relating to the draft Terms of Reference.
· Noted that they would also like to reserve the right to alter their representative for future meetings if there is a more appropriately skilled person based on the objectives of the committee to attend on behalf of Qantas.
Regional Express
· Confirmed their intent to be represented on the Committee
· Increase the scope of the Committee to:
o review the financial performance of each financial year and propose the annual budget of the airport for Council adoption.
o review the operational and financial efficiencies of the airport regarding headcount as well as the operational management structure of the airport.
· There are too many voting members. The bulk (99%) of the budget is provided by Qantas and Rex so we should restrict the voting rights to Qantas, Rex, Councillor representatives and the Business Chamber.
· The minutes of each meeting need to be approved by all voting members.
Jetgo
· Confirmed their intent to be represented on the Committee.
· JetGo has a long history in Regional aviation and look forward to contributing to the future of Wagga Wagga Airport and the broader community.
· Noted that from a procedural nature, it may not be possible for all members to attend every meeting in person but should still have the opportunity to provide agenda items for discussion and review the minutes.
Department of Defence
· Confirmed their intent to be represented on the Committee.
· RAAF Commandant advised that they do not think it would appropriate for the Defence representative to be voting member of the Committee. As part of the federal government they would not be comfortable voting on proposals.
· What they would like to be able to do is participate in the process and provide Defence advice, as the landlord, a major neighbour and a user of the airfield. They would also appreciate the opportunity to provide formal feedback on proposals, limited of course to any Defence-related implications.
Wagga Wagga Business Chamber
· Confirmed their intent to be represented on the Committee
· No further feedback relating to the draft Terms of Reference.
Proposed Changes
A marked up version of the TOR is attached to the report which details the amended draft for Council endorsement.
In summary, taking into consideration the feedback received, the changes are as follows:
Section 3 – Purpose and Objectives, an additional purpose is added:
Provide oversight on the financial performance, annual budget (including fees) and the ten year financial plan for the airport
Section 5 – Function and Role, two additional functions are added:
1. To consider the draft budget and proposed fees for the forthcoming financial year and recommend to Council for public exhibition and adoption.
2. To review the financial performance of the airport and provide recommendations on improving financial performance through increasing passenger numbers and gaining operational efficiencies
Section 6 – Membership
The Department of Defence and Aviation Industry Participants are moved from ‘voting’ members to ‘non-voting’ members.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy
POL 117 – Appointment of Organisation, Community and Individual Citizen Members to Council Committees.
Link to Strategic Plan
Growing Economy
Objective: We are a Regional Capital
Outcome: We have complete and accessible transport networks, building infrastructure, improving road travel reliability, ensure on-time running for public transport
Risk Management Issues for Council
The Committee is established under S355 of the Local Government Act and the authority of the Committee is limited to an advisory capacity only.
Internal / External Consultation
As detailed above.
1⇩. |
Airport Advisory Committee - Terms of Reference (FINAL DRAFT) March 2017 |
|
RP-11 Financial Performance Report as at 28 February 2017
Author: Rodney, Carolyn
Sector Manager: Te Pohe, Natalie
Analysis: |
This report is for Council to consider and approve the proposed 2016/17 budget variations required to manage the 2016/17 budget and Long Term Financial Plan, and details Council’s external investments and performance as at 28 February 2017. |
That Council: a approve the proposed 2016/17 budget variations for the month ended 28 February 2017 and note the deficit budget of ($14K) as presented in this report b note the Responsible Accounting Officer’s reports, in accordance with the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 (Part 9 Division 3: Clause 203) that the financial position of Council is satisfactory having regard to the original estimates of income and expenditure and the recommendations made above c note details of the external investments as at 28 February 2017 in accordance with section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 |
Key Reasons
An overall budget deficit of ($14K) is forecast for February 2017 which has resulted in no change to the reported January 2017 deficit.
Council has experienced a positive monthly investment performance for the month of February which is mainly attributable to the continued strong growth period for Council’s Floating Rate Note (FRN) portfolio, with many of these investments trading at a premium.
Financial Implications
OPERATING INCOME
Total operating income is 67% of approved budget which is tracking to budget for the end of February (this percentage excludes capital grants and contributions). An adjustment has been made to reflect the levy of rates which occurred at the start of the financial year. Excluding this adjustment, operating income received is 85%.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Total operating expenditure is 64% of approved budget and is tracking to budget for the full financial year.
CAPITAL INCOME
Total capital income is 17% of approved budget. It should be noted that the actual income from capital is influenced by the timing of the receipt of capital grants and contributions relating to projects.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
Total capital expenditure including commitments is 45% of approved budget. The RIFL Stage 1 contract commitment has been raised for $21M. Excluding this amount the total capital expenditure is 24% of approved budget.
CITY OF WAGGA WAGGA |
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT |
|||||||
|
ORIGINAL |
BUDGET ADJ |
APPROVED BUDGET |
YTD ACTUAL EXCL COMMT'S 2016/17 |
COMMT'S 2016/17 |
YTD ACTUAL + COMMT'S |
YTD % OF BUD |
Revenue |
|
||||||
Rates & Annual Charges |
(60,642,286) |
0 |
(60,642,286) |
(40,757,497) |
0 |
(40,757,497) |
67% |
User Charges & Fees |
(23,631,263) |
57,916 |
(23,573,347) |
(14,574,307) |
0 |
(14,574,307) |
62% |
Interest & Investment Revenue |
(3,406,597) |
0 |
(3,406,597) |
(2,855,506) |
0 |
(2,855,506) |
84% |
Other Revenues |
(3,123,096) |
(32,284) |
(3,155,380) |
(2,086,747) |
0 |
(2,086,747) |
66% |
Operating Grants & Contributions |
(14,779,516) |
(1,377,582) |
(16,157,098) |
(11,419,937) |
85 |
(11,419,852) |
71% |
Capital Grants & Contributions |
(34,768,294) |
(20,776,047) |
(55,544,341) |
(11,756,941) |
0 |
(11,756,941) |
21% |
Total Revenue |
(140,351,052) |
(22,127,997) |
(162,479,049) |
(83,450,935) |
85 |
(83,450,850) |
51% |
|
|
||||||
Expenses |
|
||||||
Employee Benefits & On-Costs |
42,105,886 |
94,622 |
42,200,508 |
26,692,415 |
17,239 |
26,709,654 |
63% |
Borrowing Costs |
3,953,083 |
(157,682) |
3,795,402 |
1,867,992 |
0 |
1,867,992 |
49% |
Materials & Contracts |
2,722,383 |
3,430 |
2,725,813 |
7,070,128 |
1,015,677 |
8,085,805 |
297% |
Depreciation & Amortisation |
32,405,375 |
0 |
32,405,375 |
21,603,583 |
0 |
21,603,583 |
67% |
Other Expenses |
37,493,005 |
3,519,381 |
41,012,387 |
18,083,731 |
1,861,086 |
19,944,817 |
49% |
Total Expenses |
118,679,732 |
3,459,752 |
122,139,484 |
75,317,850 |
2,894,002 |
78,211,852 |
64% |
|
|
||||||
Net Operating (Profit)/Loss |
(21,671,319) |
(18,668,245) |
(40,339,565) |
(8,133,085) |
2,894,087 |
(5,238,998) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating (Profit)/Loss before Capital Grants & Contributions
|
13,096,975 |
2,107,802 |
15,204,776 |
3,623,856 |
2,894,087 |
6,517,943 |
|
|
|
||||||
Cap/Reserve Movements |
|||||||
Capital Exp - Renewals |
24,265,446 |
9,066,396 |
33,331,842 |
7,837,919 |
5,146,820 |
12,984,740 |
39% |
Capital Exp - New Projects |
45,730,456 |
9,288,223 |
55,018,679 |
8,190,665 |
21,648,083 |
29,838,748 |
54% |
Capital Exp - Project Concepts |
8,264,763 |
590,044 |
8,854,807 |
23,251 |
0 |
23,251 |
0% |
Loan Repayments |
2,603,821 |
(173,623) |
2,430,198 |
1,620,131 |
0 |
1,620,131 |
67% |
New Loan Borrowings |
(13,859,917) |
7,992,810 |
(5,867,108) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
Sale of Assets |
(4,982,151) |
2,968,619 |
(2,013,532) |
(2,701,434) |
0 |
(2,701,434) |
134% |
Net Movements Reserves |
(7,945,724) |
(11,050,578) |
(18,996,301) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
Total Cap/Res Movements |
54,076,694 |
18,681,890 |
72,758,584 |
14,970,532 |
26,794,903 |
41,765,435 |
57% |
|
|
||||||
Net Result after Depreciation |
32,405,375 |
13,645 |
32,419,020 |
6,837,446 |
29,688,991 |
36,526,437 |
|
|
|
||||||
Add back Depreciation Expense |
32,405,375 |
0 |
32,405,375 |
21,603,583 |
0 |
21,603,583 |
|
|
|
||||||
Cash Budget (Surplus)/Deficit |
(0) |
13,645 |
13,645 |
(14,766,137) |
29,688,991 |
14,922,854 |
|
Revised Budget Result - Surplus/(Deficit) |
$’000s |
Original 2016/17 Budget Result as adopted by Council Total Budget Variations approved as reported to 27 February 2017 Council Meeting Budget variations for February 2017 |
$0 ($14K)
$0 |
Proposed revised budget result for 28 February 2017 |
($14K) |
The proposed Budget Variations to 28 February 2017 are listed below:
Budget Variation |
Amount |
Funding Source |
Net Impact Fav/ (Unfav) |
|
1 – We are an engaged and involved community |
||||
Alan Turner Depot Security Gate Upgrade |
$21K |
Maintain and Clean Culverts ($7K) Road Reserve Maintenance ($7K) Sewer Mains Plant Hire ($7K) |
Nil
|
|
The Alan Turner Depot requires the supply and installation of electric motors to the existing front entry gates and connection to the access control system. It is proposed to fund the works from existing culvert, road reserve and sewer plant hire budgets. |
||||
Mater Dei Primary School Pedestrian Safety |
$20K |
RMS Grant Funding ($20K) |
Nil
|
|
Council has been successful with RMS Grants for three (3) pedestrian safety projects that were resolved at the Traffic Committee Meeting held on 10 March 2016 and subsequent Council Meetings. The three (3) projects are Mater Dei Primary School ($20K in 2016/17), Kooringal High School ($40K in 2017/18) and Wagga Wagga High School ($50K in 2017/18). The 2017/18 grant funds will be incorporated into the Long Term Financial Plan along with the expenditure programs accordingly. |
||||
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) |
|
|
($14K) |
|
Current Restrictions
CITY OF WAGGA WAGGA |
|||||
RESERVES SUMMARY |
|||||
28 FEBRUARY 2017 |
|||||
|
Approved Changes |
|
|
||
|
CLOSING BALANCE 2015/16 |
ADOPTED RESERVE TRANSFERS 2016/17 |
BUDGET VARIATIONS APPROVED UP TO COUNCIL MEETING 27.02.2017 |
RECOMM CHANGES for Council Resolution |
REVISED BALANCE |
|
|
||||
Externally Restricted |
|
||||
Developer Contributions |
(19,387,519) |
1,683,496 |
2,804,552 |
(14,899,470) |
|
Sewer Fund Reserves |
(21,286,523) |
2,385,453 |
3,526,563 |
(15,374,507) |
|
Solid Waste Reserves |
(12,803,085) |
751,764 |
271,273 |
(11,780,049) |
|
Specific Purpose Unexpended Grants/Cont |
(3,473,810) |
0 |
3,473,810 |
0 |
|
Stormwater Levy Reserves |
(2,537,418) |
(228,466) |
164,020 |
(2,601,864) |
|
Total Externally Restricted |
(59,488,355) |
4,592,247 |
10,240,218 |
0 |
(44,655,889) |
|
|
||||
Internally Restricted |
|
||||
Airport Reserve |
(202,674) |
(65,492) |
(31,851) |
(300,017) |
|
Art Gallery Reserve |
(48,490) |
(3,500) |
17,500 |
(34,490) |
|
Ashmont Community Facility Reserve |
(3,000) |
(1,500) |
0 |
(4,500) |
|
Bridge Replacement Reserve |
(646,667) |
140,000 |
420,000 |
(86,667) |
|
CBD Carparking Facilities Reserve |
(936,300) |
(94,195) |
60,537 |
(969,958) |
|
CCTV Reserve |
(54,476) |
(10,000) |
0 |
(64,476) |
|
Cemetery Perpetual Reserve |
(123,860) |
(89,661) |
200,000 |
(13,521) |
|
Cemetery Reserve |
(308,649) |
(136,637) |
271,552 |
(173,734) |
|
Civic Theatre Operating Reserve |
0 |
(100,000) |
0 |
(100,000) |
|
Civic Theatre Technical Infrastructure Reserve |
(55,450) |
(50,000) |
0 |
(105,450) |
|
Civil Projects Reserve |
(155,883) |
0 |
0 |
(155,883) |
|
Community Amenities Reserve |
(5,685) |
0 |
0 |
(5,685) |
|
Council Election Reserve |
(417,616) |
236,558 |
0 |
(181,058) |
|
Economic Development Incentives Reserve |
(19,500) |
0 |
0 |
(19,500) |
|
Employee Leave Entitlements Gen Fund Reserve |
(3,352,639) |
0 |
0 |
(3,352,639) |
|
Estella Community Centre Reserve |
(230,992) |
0 |
0 |
(230,992) |
|
Family Day Care Reserve |
(135,608) |
14,606 |
0 |
(121,002) |
|
Fit for the Future Reserve |
(952,184) |
388,225 |
(1,945,335) |
(2,509,294) |
|
Generic Projects Saving |
(927,180) |
(116,966) |
103,039 |
(941,106) |
|
Glenfield Community Centre Reserve |
(15,704) |
(2,000) |
0 |
(17,704) |
|
Grassroots Cricket Reserve |
(45,942) |
(15,000) |
0 |
(60,942) |
|
Gravel Pit Restoration Reserve |
(738,010) |
0 |
0 |
(738,010) |
|
Gurwood Street Property Reserve |
(50,454) |
0 |
0 |
(50,454) |
|
Industrial Land Development Reserve |
(328,851) |
0 |
0 |
(328,851) |
|
Information Services / E-Business Reserve |
(378,713) |
0 |
0 |
(378,713) |
|
Infrastructure Replacement Reserve |
(77,488) |
(887) |
28,233 |
(50,142) |
|
Insurance Variations Reserve |
(28,644) |
0 |
0 |
(28,644) |
|
Internal Loans Reserve |
(1,289,806) |
(629,241) |
444,842 |
(1,474,205) |
|
Lake Albert Improvements Reserve |
(113,972) |
0 |
113,789 |
(182) |
|
LEP Preparation Reserve |
(38,665) |
0 |
36,120 |
(2,545) |
|
Livestock Marketing Centre Reserve |
(8,095,560) |
3,215,056 |
1,675,773 |
(3,204,732) |
|
Lloyd Environmental Projects Reserve |
(101,371) |
0 |
0 |
(101,371) |
|
Museum Acquisitions Reserve |
(39,378) |
0 |
0 |
(39,378) |
|
Oasis Building Renewal Reserve |
(122,000) |
(50,000) |
121,000 |
(51,000) |
|
Oasis Plant Reserve |
(1,005,347) |
(110,000) |
0 |
(1,115,347) |
|
Parks & Recreation Projects |
(91,288) |
0 |
86,000 |
(5,288) |
|
Pedestrian River Crossing (old Riverside) Reserve |
(198,031) |
150,000 |
0 |
(48,031) |
|
Plant Replacement Reserve |
(5,145,588) |
(151,353) |
158,636 |
(5,138,305) |
|
Playground Equipment Replacement Reserve |
0 |
(51,230) |
0 |
(51,230) |
|
Project Carryovers Reserve |
(1,841,669) |
0 |
1,841,669 |
(0) |
|
Public Art Reserve |
(199,713) |
137,579 |
51,424 |
(10,711) |
|
Robertson Oval Redevelopment Reserve |
(86,697) |
0 |
0 |
(86,697) |
|
Senior Citizens Centre Reserve |
(11,627) |
(2,000) |
0 |
(13,627) |
|
Silverlite Reserve |
(29,980) |
0 |
0 |
(29,980) |
|
Sister Cities Reserve |
(30,914) |
(10,000) |
5,000 |
(35,914) |
|
Stormwater Drainage Reserve |
(473,996) |
0 |
290,378 |
(183,618) |
|
Strategic Real Property Reserve |
(5,136) |
0 |
(314,073) |
(319,209) |
|
Street Lighting Replacement Reserve |
(44,755) |
(30,000) |
0 |
(74,755) |
|
Subdivision Tree Planting Reserve |
(195,795) |
40,000 |
0 |
(155,795) |
|
Sustainable Energy Reserve |
(430,442) |
(90,000) |
0 |
(520,442) |
|
Traffic Committee Reserve |
0 |
(50,000) |
0 |
(50,000) |
|
Unexpended External Loans Reserve |
(163,087) |
0 |
0 |
(163,087) |
|
Total Internally Restricted |
(29,995,474) |
2,462,361 |
3,634,233 |
0 |
(23,898,879) |
|
|
||||
Total Restricted |
(89,483,829) |
7,054,608 |
13,874,452 |
0 |
(68,554,769) |
Investment Summary as at 28 February 2017
In accordance with Clause 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, details of Council’s external investments are detailed below:
Institution |
Rating |
Closing Balance |
Closing Balance |
February |
February |
Investment |
Maturity |
Term |
Short Term Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Police Credit Union |
NR |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.87% |
0.90% |
6/12/2016 |
6/12/2017 |
12 |
BOQ |
A- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.75% |
1.80% |
2/09/2016 |
4/04/2017 |
7 |
BOQ |
A- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.80% |
1.80% |
7/12/2016 |
7/07/2017 |
12 |
Bank of Sydney |
NR |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.75% |
1.80% |
30/09/2016 |
29/09/2017 |
12 |
CUA |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.80% |
0.90% |
9/02/2017 |
5/01/2018 |
11 |
NAB |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.74% |
0.90% |
25/10/2016 |
25/05/2017 |
7 |
ME Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
23/02/2016 |
22/02/2017 |
12 |
AMP |
A+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
3.00% |
1.80% |
2/08/2016 |
2/08/2017 |
12 |
BOQ |
A- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.80% |
0.90% |
7/11/2016 |
8/05/2017 |
6 |
Bankwest |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.50% |
1.80% |
3/02/2017 |
4/04/2017 |
2 |
ME Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.80% |
1.80% |
16/12/2016 |
16/10/2017 |
10 |
Total Short Term Deposits |
|
17,000,000 |
16,000,000 |
2.78% |
14.39% |
|
|
|
At Call Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAB |
AA- |
2,228,318 |
2,829,235 |
1.50% |
2.54% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
NAB |
AA- |
13,176,106 |
14,898,632 |
2.19% |
13.40% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
AMP |
A+ |
0 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
AMP |
A+ |
179,894 |
180,231 |
2.15% |
0.16% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Beyond Bank |
BBB+ |
74,386 |
74,443 |
1.00% |
0.07% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
CBA |
AA- |
30,781 |
37,774 |
0.00% |
0.03% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Total At Call Accounts |
|
15,689,485 |
18,020,315 |
2.07% |
16.20% |
|
|
|
Medium Term Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RaboBank |
A+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
6.40% |
0.90% |
23/04/2012 |
24/04/2017 |
60 |
RaboBank |
A+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.90% |
0.90% |
4/06/2012 |
5/06/2017 |
60 |
BOQ |
A- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
6.30% |
0.90% |
22/08/2012 |
22/08/2017 |
60 |
ING Bank |
A- |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
6.00% |
2.70% |
24/08/2012 |
24/08/2017 |
60 |
Hume Building Society |
NR |
1,009,123 |
1,009,123 |
4.10% |
0.91% |
21/08/2014 |
21/08/2017 |
36 |
Banana Coast CU |
NR |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.25% |
0.90% |
3/06/2014 |
2/06/2017 |
36 |
ME Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.28% |
1.80% |
2/09/2014 |
2/09/2019 |
60 |
Rabobank |
A+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.10% |
0.90% |
5/12/2014 |
5/12/2019 |
60 |
Beyond Bank |
BBB+ |
990,000 |
990,000 |
3.70% |
0.89% |
4/03/2015 |
4/03/2018 |
36 |
Beyond Bank |
BBB+ |
990,000 |
990,000 |
3.70% |
0.89% |
11/03/2015 |
11/03/2018 |
36 |
AMP |
A+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
3.10% |
1.80% |
2/06/2015 |
2/06/2017 |
24 |
AMP |
A+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.10% |
0.90% |
13/07/2015 |
13/07/2017 |
24 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.80% |
0.90% |
1/09/2015 |
3/03/2017 |
18 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.00% |
0.90% |
12/08/2016 |
12/08/2019 |
36 |
Rabobank |
A+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.20% |
0.90% |
25/08/2016 |
25/08/2021 |
60 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.00% |
0.90% |
31/08/2016 |
30/08/2019 |
36 |
Police Credit Union |
NR |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.90% |
0.90% |
8/09/2016 |
10/09/2018 |
24 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB+ |
0 |
2,000,000 |
3.00% |
1.80% |
10/02/2017 |
11/02/2019 |
24 |
Total Medium Term Deposits |
|
20,989,123 |
22,989,123 |
4.14% |
20.67% |
|
|
|
Institution |
Rating |
Closing Balance |
Closing Balance |
February |
February |
Investment |
Maturity |
Term |
Floating Rate Notes - Senior Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Macquarie Bank |
A |
3,007,389 |
3,002,181 |
BBSW + 290 |
2.70% |
9/03/2012 |
9/03/2017 |
60 |
CUA |
BBB+ |
1,004,742 |
1,006,540 |
BBSW + 130 |
0.91% |
28/05/2014 |
20/03/2017 |
34 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
1,002,475 |
1,006,493 |
BBSW + 93 |
0.91% |
17/09/2014 |
17/09/2019 |
60 |
BOQ |
A- |
2,005,480 |
2,013,760 |
BBSW + 110 |
1.81% |
5/08/2014 |
24/06/2019 |
58 |
BOQ |
A- |
1,000,039 |
1,002,655 |
BBSW + 107 |
0.90% |
6/11/2014 |
6/11/2019 |
60 |
BOQ |
A- |
1,006,249 |
1,004,813 |
BBSW + 107 |
0.90% |
10/11/2014 |
6/11/2019 |
60 |
ME Bank |
BBB+ |
1,005,587 |
1,000,884 |
BBSW + 100 |
0.90% |
17/11/2014 |
17/11/2017 |
36 |
ME Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,269 |
1,000,464 |
BBSW + 100 |
0.90% |
17/11/2014 |
17/11/2017 |
36 |
Teachers Mutual |
BBB+ |
1,004,669 |
999,719 |
BBSW + 105 |
0.90% |
4/12/2014 |
4/12/2017 |
36 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB+ |
1,006,160 |
1,001,380 |
BBSW + 110 |
0.90% |
27/02/2015 |
27/02/2018 |
36 |
Macquarie Bank |
A |
2,008,181 |
2,007,185 |
BBSW + 110 |
1.80% |
3/03/2015 |
3/03/2020 |
60 |
ANZ |
AA- |
750,110 |
754,344 |
BBSW + 82 |
0.68% |
17/04/2015 |
17/04/2020 |
60 |
Heritage Bank |
BBB+ |
998,220 |
1,000,680 |
BBSW + 115 |
0.90% |
7/05/2015 |
7/05/2018 |
36 |
NAB |
AA- |
1,001,674 |
1,000,809 |
BBSW + 80 |
0.90% |
3/06/2015 |
3/06/2020 |
60 |
Heritage Bank |
BBB+ |
998,220 |
1,000,680 |
BBSW + 115 |
0.90% |
9/06/2015 |
7/05/2018 |
35 |
CBA |
AA- |
1,002,884 |
1,009,125 |
BBSW + 90 |
0.91% |
17/07/2015 |
17/07/2020 |
60 |
Westpac |
AA- |
1,001,700 |
1,007,990 |
BBSW + 90 |
0.91% |
28/07/2015 |
28/07/2020 |
60 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
1,006,200 |
1,003,950 |
BBSW + 110 |
0.90% |
18/08/2015 |
18/08/2020 |
60 |
Credit Suisse |
A |
1,006,690 |
1,002,670 |
BBSW + 105 |
0.90% |
24/08/2015 |
24/08/2018 |
36 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
1,006,025 |
1,004,104 |
BBSW + 110 |
0.90% |
28/09/2015 |
18/08/2020 |
59 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,983 |
2,013,091 |
BBSW + 90 |
1.81% |
30/09/2015 |
28/07/2020 |
58 |
Suncorp-Metway |
A+ |
1,006,976 |
1,011,971 |
BBSW + 125 |
0.91% |
20/10/2015 |
20/10/2020 |
60 |
Westpac |
AA- |
4,027,000 |
4,054,160 |
BBSW + 108 |
3.65% |
28/10/2015 |
28/10/2020 |
60 |
AMP |
A+ |
1,813,500 |
1,818,558 |
BBSW + 110 |
1.64% |
11/12/2015 |
11/06/2019 |
42 |
CBA |
AA- |
1,009,813 |
1,016,339 |
BBSW + 115 |
0.91% |
18/01/2016 |
18/01/2021 |
60 |
BOQ |
A- |
1,001,653 |
1,004,276 |
BBSW + 100 |
0.90% |
5/02/2016 |
5/02/2018 |
24 |
Rabobank |
A+ |
2,043,588 |
2,039,086 |
BBSW + 150 |
1.83% |
4/03/2016 |
4/03/2021 |
60 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB+ |
1,008,074 |
1,010,498 |
BBSW + 160 |
0.91% |
22/03/2016 |
22/03/2019 |
36 |
CUA |
BBB+ |
2,012,088 |
2,017,092 |
BBSW + 160 |
1.81% |
1/04/2016 |
1/04/2019 |
36 |
ANZ |
AA- |
1,011,234 |
1,018,385 |
BBSW + 118 |
0.92% |
7/04/2016 |
7/04/2021 |
60 |
Suncorp-Metway |
A+ |
1,010,361 |
1,016,116 |
BBSW + 138 |
0.91% |
21/04/2016 |
12/04/2021 |
60 |
AMP |
A+ |
1,016,045 |
1,014,327 |
BBSW + 135 |
0.91% |
24/05/2016 |
24/05/2021 |
60 |
Westpac |
AA- |
1,013,660 |
1,019,820 |
BBSW + 117 |
0.92% |
3/06/2016 |
3/06/2021 |
60 |
CBA |
AA- |
1,010,877 |
1,017,539 |
BBSW + 121 |
0.91% |
12/07/2016 |
12/07/2021 |
60 |
ANZ |
AA- |
2,022,255 |
2,020,213 |
BBSW + 113 |
1.82% |
16/08/2016 |
16/08/2021 |
60 |
BOQ |
A- |
1,502,613 |
1,512,746 |
BBSW + 117 |
1.36% |
26/10/2016 |
26/10/2020 |
48 |
NAB |
AA- |
1,001,188 |
1,008,109 |
BBSW + 105 |
0.91% |
21/10/2016 |
21/10/2021 |
60 |
Teachers Mutual |
BBB+ |
1,500,416 |
1,504,143 |
BBSW + 140 |
1.35% |
28/10/2016 |
28/10/2019 |
36 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
1,005,432 |
1,002,921 |
BBSW + 110 |
0.90% |
21/11/2016 |
21/02/2020 |
39 |
Westpac |
AA- |
0 |
1,009,340 |
BBSW + 111 |
0.91% |
7/02/2017 |
7/02/2022 |
60 |
Total Floating Rate Notes - Senior Debt |
|
51,840,719 |
52,959,155 |
|
47.62% |
|
|
|
Managed Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NSW Tcorp |
NR |
1,228,958 |
1,244,899 |
1.30% |
1.12% |
17/03/2014 |
1/02/2022 |
94 |
Total Managed Funds |
|
1,228,958 |
1,244,899 |
1.30% |
1.12% |
|
|
|
TOTAL
CASH ASSETS, CASH |
|
106,748,285 |
111,213,493 |
4.45% |
100.00% |
|
|
|
LESS: RIVERINA REGIONAL LIBRARY (RRL) CASH |
|
3,194,978 |
3,007,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
WWCC CASH ASSETS, CASH |
|
103,553,308 |
108,206,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
Council’s portfolio is dominated by Floating Rate Notes (FRN’s) at approximately 48% across a broad range of counterparties. Cash equates to 16% of Council’s portfolio with Term Deposits around 35% and growth funds around 1% of the portfolio.
Council’s investment portfolio is well diversified in complying assets across the entire credit spectrum. It is also well diversified from a rating perspective. Credit quality is diversified and is predominately invested amongst the investment grade ADIs (BBB- or higher), with a smaller allocation to unrated ADIs.
All investments are well within the defined Policy limits, as outlined in the Rating Allocation chart below:
Investment Portfolio Balance
Council’s investment portfolio balance has increased from the previous month’s balance, up from $103.6M to $108.2M. This is reflective of the third quarter rates instalment being due on 28 February 2017.
MONTHLY INVESTMENT MOVEMENTS
Redemptions/Sales – Council redeemed the following investment securities during February 2017:
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
ME Bank Term Deposit |
$1M |
12 months |
3.10% |
This term deposit was redeemed for cashflow purposes. |
New Investments – Council purchased the following investment securities during February 2017:
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
Newcastle Permanent Term Deposit |
$2M |
2 years |
3.00% |
The Newcastle Permanent rate of 3.00% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this investment term. This term was chosen to fill a maturity gap within the portfolio. |
Westpac Floating Rate Note |
$1M |
5 years |
BBSW + 111 |
Council’s independent Financial Advisor CPG, advised that this Floating Rate Note represented an attractive offer and is likely to be one of the highest returning investments over the medium term. |
Rollovers – Council rolled over the following investment securities during February 2017:
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
CUA Term Deposit |
$1M |
12 months |
3.15% |
This term deposit was a twelve (12) month investment at 3.15% and was rolled at maturity into an eleven (11) month term deposit at 2.80%. This investment term was chosen to ensure a maturity gap was filled. |
Bankwest Term Deposit |
$2M |
2 months |
2.55% |
This term deposit was a two (2) month investment at 2.55% and was rolled at maturity into a two (2) month term deposit at 2.50%. This investment term was chosen to ensure a maturity gap was filled and to align with proposed cash outflows. |
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE
Interest/growth/capital gains for the month totaled $379,733 which compares favourably with the budget for the period of $257,250 – out performing budget for the February month by $122,483. This is mainly attributable to the continued strong growth period for Council’s Floating Rate Note (FRN) portfolio with many of these investments continuing to trade at a premium.
It should be noted that the capital market value of these FRN investments will fluctuate from month to month and that Council continues to receive the coupon payments and the face value of the investment security when sold or at maturity.
It is also important to note that Council’s investment portfolio balance is currently over $108M, which is tracking above what was originally predicted. This is mainly due to timing of some of the major projects, either not yet commenced or not as advanced as originally predicted. It is anticipated that over the coming months the portfolio balance will reduce with the construction of major projects.
Council’s portfolio performance continues to be anchored by the longer-dated deposits in the portfolio, particularly those locked in above 4% yields. It is to be noted that the average deposit yield will inevitably fall as some of the longer-dated deposits mature throughout the 2017 calendar year.
In comparison to the AusBond Bank Bill Index* (+1.98%pa), Council’s investment portfolio in total returned 4.45% for February. Short term deposits returned 2.78%. These funds are utilised for daily cash flow management and need to be available to meet operating and contractual payments as they come due.
* The AusBond Bank Bill Index is the leading benchmark for the Australian fixed income market. It is interpolated from the RBA Cash rate, 1 month and 3 month Bank Bill Swap rates.
Report by Responsible Accounting Officer
I hereby certify that all of the above investments have been made in accordance with the provision of Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 and the regulations there under, and in accordance with the Investments Policy adopted by Council on 26 August 2013.
Carolyn Rodney
Responsible Accounting Officer
Policy
Budget Variations are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 052 Budget Policy.
Investments are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 075 Investment Policy.
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We are accountable and transparent
Risk Management Issues for Council
No specific issues identified.
Internal / External Consultation
All relevant areas within Council have consulted with the Finance Division in regards to the budget variations listed in this report.
The Finance Division has consulted with relevant external parties to confirm Council’s investment portfolio balances.
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 March 2017. RP-12
RP-12 Sale of Land for Unpaid Rates
Author: Rodney, Carolyn
Sector Manager: Te Pohe, Natalie
Analysis: |
In accordance with section 713(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, councils have the ability to sell properties with outstanding rates balances in excess of 5 years. This report lists all properties whose rates are in excess of 5 years, with the properties categorised into either “potential sale” or “arrangements/other”. |
That Council: a continue to discuss and negotiate with property holders whose outstanding rates are greater than 5 years in an effort to arrange an agreed payment plan b if an agreed payment plan with ratepayers is not able to be achieved, or is not adhered to, then pursuant to Section 713 of the Local Government Act 1993, sell the land and properties detailed in this report to recover unpaid Rates, Annual Charges, Interest and Extra Charges c authorise the affixing of the Council seal to the Transfer documents in order to effect the transfer of ownership for properties sold by Council at the public auction for unpaid rates and charges |
Key Reasons
In accordance with section 713(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, councils have the ability to sell properties with outstanding rates balances in excess of 5 years:
713 Sale of land for unpaid rates and charges
(2) A council may, in accordance with this Division:
(a) sell any land (including vacant land) on which any rate or charge has remained unpaid for more than 5 years from the date on which it became payable
Council last undertook a sale of land for unpaid rates in 2010. Management are looking into this process being conducted on an annual basis.
Table 1: The proposed sale of land process
Step |
Task |
Timeframe |
1 |
Identification of properties whose rates accounts are outstanding for greater than 5 years |
January 2017 |
2 |
Review notes against the properties, determine which category each property is (as per Table 1 above) |
February 2017 |
3a |
Send Final Letters out to Properties who have been categorised as “likely sales”. |
February 2017 |
3b |
Send notification letters out to adjoining owners for properties where owners are uncontactable |
March 2017 |
4 |
Obtain Council resolution for approval to list properties for sale under a Council Public Notice |
27 March 2017 |
5 |
General Manager certifies properties have greater than 5 years rates owing |
April 2017 (at the latest, the day before public auction) |
6 |
Public Notice – Newspaper and Gazette (section 715) |
April 2017 |
7 |
Public Auction to be held (being not more than 6 months and not less than 3 months from the publication in a newspaper of the advertisement and a convenient place for the sale) |
September 2017 (5 months from public notice) |
Table 2: Categorisation of properties with rates outstanding greater than 5 years (See Confidential Attachment A provided under separate cover for a detailed listing of property locations and owners):
5 Year Rates Outstanding |
Number |
Total Amount Owing As at 03/03/2017 |
Potential Sale of Properties |
||
Final Warning Letter sent and potential sale |
9 |
$121,938.81 |
Uncontactable owners, small parcels of land (laneways between properties etc). To notify adjoining owners of sale of property – potential sale |
11 |
$34,801.13 |
Total - Potential Sale of Properties |
2 |
$156,739.94 |
Arrangements/Other |
|
|
Prior payment arrangements negotiated. Continue to work with these 2 ratepayers# |
2 |
$34,117.47 |
Final Warning Letter sent. Contact has been made by land owner. Payment arrangement negotiated# |
3 |
$ 51,122.43 |
Further investigation required - undefined properties, change of property types, Bushfire shed etc. |
4 |
$12,423.41 |
Total – Arrangements/Other |
9 |
$97,663.31 |
Total Properties Rates outstanding greater than 5 years |
29 |
$254,403.25 |
# Staff will continue to monitor the five (5) payment arrangements agreed to over the coming months. If any of the agreed payments are not received, properties will be added back into the sale of land process in next years’ annual process.
Prior to the Public Action, Council staff have, and will continue to work with the property owners (who make contact with Council) with the objective of either full payment of the outstanding account, or putting in place a satisfactory arrangement, which is allowable under Section 715 of the Local Government Act 1993:
715 Notice of proposal to sell land
(2) If, before the time fixed for the sale:
(a) all rates and charges payable (including overdue rates and charges) are paid to the council, or
(b) an arrangement satisfactory to the council for payment of all such rates and charges is entered into by the rateable person,
the council must not proceed with the sale.
Financial Implications
Council officers have attempted all available recovery action methods for the outstanding debts. A sale of land for unpaid rates is considered to be the last remaining avenue available to Council to recover these outstanding amounts. The rates received from the sale of properties will reduce Council’s rates outstanding percentage (the percentage of rates outstanding versus the total rates collectible), which was 5.91% at 30 June 2016.
All proceeds of sale are paid to the Council and in accordance with Section 718 of the Local Government Act 1993 are to be discharged in the following order:
a) Reimbursement of all Council expenses associated with the sale, then:
b) Discharge of any rate or charge in respect of the land due to the Council, or any other rating authority, and any debt in respect of the land (being a debt which the Council has notice) due to the Crown.
Should insufficient funds be recovered to satisfy all rates, charges and debts, then a pro-rata of funds to debts occurs with all debts then deemed satisfied.
Surplus funds (if any) are held within Council’s Trust Fund (separate bank account) pending discharge to persons having interest in the properties. Where no claim is forthcoming, the balance of sale proceeds is remitted to the State Government in accordance with the Unclaimed Moneys Act.
Policy
N/A
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We are accountable and transparent
Risk Management Issues for Council
The proposed sale of properties for outstanding rates is a contentious issue, with the potential for negative local media reports. Council officers have documented all correspondence (if any) between the Council and the property owner and as highlighted earlier, the selling of property is the last resort.
Internal / External Consultation
The Finance division have discussed the proposed sale of properties with Management.
1. |
Confidential Attachment A - Sale of Land for Unpaid Rates This matter is considered to be confidential under Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, as it deals with: discussion in relation to the personal hardship of a resident or ratepayer. |
|
RP-13 Consultation with State and Federal Government
Author: Kell, Tristan
Sector Manager: Te Pohe, Natalie
Analysis: |
In response to resolution part b contained in report NOM-2 Notice of Motion – Conference Centre Project from the 30 January 2017 Council Meeting it was resolved: That Council receives: a a Councillor workshop on the impact of the proposed clay target building to the current plans for a multi-purpose stadium at Equex, master plan for Bolton Park, and the recently approved PCYC building, as well as any other future plans impacting upon a conference centre b a report that examines strategies on how to work more closely with State and Federal members to avoid replication of facilities and allow planning to occur that can factor in all options This report is in response to the resolutions. |
That Council: a notes that two Councillor workshops were held on 13 and 20 February 2017 in response to resolution part a contained in report NOM-2 Notice of Motion – Conference Centre Project from the January 30 2017 Council Meeting b notes that the General Manager or their delegate will arrange bi-monthly meetings with the Offices of Mr Michael McCormack, MP and Mr Daryl Maguire, MP to ensure a coordinated planning approach for Wagga Wagga c notes that Council officers will continue to liaise with state and federal government agencies to ensure alignment of local strategies and projects to regional and national priorities d notes that further reports via Councillor Bulletin updates will be provided in relation to ongoing communication with state and federal agencies |
Key Reasons
· Ensure that future investments and commitments by all tiers of government align with strategic priorities.
· To ensure that the Council does not become financially burdened by Federal or State grants provided to not for profit organisations where Council is expected to contribute.
· That Council assess the strategic merit of any proposed district or regional facility proposed to ensure that it is consistent with Council’s Community Strategic Plan and other key strategies moving forward.
Financial Implications
As mentioned in this report, the Council needs to ensure that it appropriately considers all funding requirements on their merits and alignment to strategic direction. Consideration should be made without expectation or the requirement to contribute to not for profit developments in order to minimise future financial burden.
Policy
N/A
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We plan long term
Risk Management Issues for Council
Without alignment or discussion regarding Federal and State priorities, there is a risk of disconnect and possible duplication of facilities that may not necessarily support the strategic way forward for the city.
Internal / External Consultation
Two Councillor workshops were held, the first on 13 February and the second on the 20 February.
Ongoing consultation will be required with Councillors to ensure improved communication between all tiers of government is achieved.
Council officers have been working, and will continue to work in collaboration with NSW Government Agencies, Department of Planning and Department of Family and Community Services in relation to local strategies correlating with Regional and State Priorities.
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 March 2017. RP-14
RP-14 Hampden Bridge - Final Report
Author: Kell, Tristan
Sector Manager: Te Pohe, Natalie
Analysis: |
Concept plans for the Hampden Bridge Legacy Project have been developed and require approval to allow progress of the project to detailed design phase. |
That Council approve the attached concept design so that the project can progress to detailed design. |
Key Reasons
At its meeting 18 November 2013, Council resolved the following:
e proceed with the development of concept plans for the Hampden Bridge Legacy Project in order to commemorate the social, historical and engineering significance of the Hampden Bridge, noting that the project is currently unfunded
f receive a further report detailing the concept plans and cost estimates for the Hampden Bridge Legacy Project in accordance with item e as referred to in the above prior to proceeding with detailed design and delivery
The Hampden Bridge Legacy Project has been proposed in order for Council to commemorate the social, historical and engineering significance of the Hampden Bridge, on behalf of the community.
The Legacy Project, which will include the rehabilitation/restoration of the northern and southern sides of the bridge crossing and inclusion of commemorative/interpretive items, will ensure Council meets the requirement of the Heritage Impact Study.
Just as importantly, the development of the Legacy Project concept will ensure significant heritage items and bridge material can be displayed for all the community, without jeopardising the strict parameters for the management and distribution of bridge timber.
Financial Implications
The total Legacy project budget is $364,600 funded from an Office of Environment and Heritage grant ($81,200) and General Purpose Revenue ($283,400).
Costs expensed and committed to date have been $17,856.99, with $346,743.01 budget remaining.
Policy
N/A
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Place and Identity
Objective: We are proud of where we live and our identity
Outcome: We value our heritage
Risk Management Issues for Council
Should Council not approve this recommendation there is a risk that this project will not proceed in accordance with external funding grants.
Internal / External Consultation
Community consultation as recommended in the Interpretation Strategy has been carried out with the following internal groups:
· Museum of the Riverina
Community consultation as recommended in the Interpretation Strategy has been carried out with the following external groups:
· Heritage Engineers Riverina Branch
· Engineers Australia Heritage Engineers Committee
· Wagga Wagga District Historical Society Executive
1⇩. |
Hampden Bridge Legacy Project - Site Plan - Provided under separate cover. |
|
2⇩. |
Hampden Bridge Legacy Project - Materials and finishes - Provided under separate cover. |
|
3⇩. |
Hampden Bridge Legacy Project - Planting - Provided under separate cover. |
|
4⇩. |
Hampden Bridge Legacy Project - Details - Provided under separate cover. |
|
5⇩. |
Hampden Bridge Legacy Project - Details - Provided under separate cover. |
|
6⇩. |
Hampden Bridge Legacy Project - Specification - Provided under separate cover. |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 March 2017. RP-15
RP-15 Integrated Planning and Reporting Performance Report for the Quarter Ended 31 December 2016
Author: Smith, Nicole
Sector Manager: Te Pohe, Natalie
Analysis: |
The attached progress report is a summary document capturing Council’s performance against the adopted Combined Delivery Program and Operational Plan 2016/17, covering the period 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2016. |
That Council accept the Integrated Planning and Reporting Quarterly Performance Report for the quarter ended 31 December 2016. |
Key Reasons
Integrated Planning and Reporting Quarterly Performance Report
Integrated Planning and Reporting (IP&R) is the planning and reporting framework that Council uses to work towards achieving the community’s vision.
The framework ensures councils illustrate their various plans together, to understand how they interact in planning for the future. The framework opens the way for council and our community to have important discussions about funding priorities, service levels and shaping local identity and to plan in partnership for a more sustainable future. Another important element of the IP&R framework is reporting and monitoring our performance.
A summary of Council’s performance as at 31 December 2016 is provided in the graphs below
Further detail on Council’s performance is provided in the attached quarterly performance report.
Financial Implications
All programs are managed through the 2016/17 Annual Budget and Long Term Financial Plan with monthly budget reviews and reporting to the Council.
Policy
The general provisions of Council’s Policy POL 001 – Asset Management Policy are applied in the operational activities of the Council.
While not Policy specifically, it is worth highlighting the legislative requirements surrounding Integrated Planning and Reporting. Specifically relevant are the following sections of the Local Government Act 1993:
404 Delivery program
(5) The general manager must ensure that regular progress reports are provided to the council reporting as to its progress with respect to the principal activities detailed in its delivery program. Progress reports must be provided at least every 6 months
406 Integrated planning and reporting guidelines
(1) The Departmental Chief Executive is to establish integrated planning and reporting guidelines (referred to in this Chapter as the guidelines) for the purposes of this Chapter.
(2) The guidelines can impose requirements in connection with the preparation, development and review of, and the contents of, the community strategic plan, resourcing strategy, delivery program, operational plan, community engagement strategy, annual report and state of the environment report of a council.
(4) A council must ensure that the requirements of the guidelines are complied with.
The Integrated Planning and Reporting Guidelines (Attachment 2) for local government in NSW also refers to the legislative requirement of reporting every six months, however does not impose additional reporting requirements to mandate quarterly reporting for example.
It should therefore be noted that as the Council is being provided reports on a quarterly basis, this is beyond the legislative requirements however Officers believe that quarterly reporting is a more appropriate timeframe in order to ensure that both the Council and the community are better informed on the progress and therefore performance throughout the financial year.
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We are accountable and transparent
Risk Management Issues for Council
No specific issues identified.
Internal / External Consultation
Engagement with all stakeholders across the community and within Council is a critical success factor.
1⇩. |
Quarterly Progress Report - Combined 2016/17 Delivery Program and Operational Plan - 1 July 2016 - 31 December 2016 - Provided under separate cover |
|
2⇩. |
Integrated Planning and Reporting Guidelines for local government in NSW |
|
RP-16 Planning Proposal to amend the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 - Land at Old Bomen Road & East Street, Cartwrights Hill
Author: McDonald, David
Sector Manager: Te Pohe, Natalie
Analysis: |
This report is for a Planning Proposal to amend the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010. The planning proposal was placed on public exhibition. There were three written submissions. This report provides a summary of the submissions and is referred to Council to adopt the planning proposal as exhibited. |
That Council: a receive and note the report on public exhibition of the proposed amendment to the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 b adopt the planning proposal as exhibited c use Council’s delegated authority to gazette the plan and notify the Department of Planning & Environment of the decision |
Key Reasons
Council on 7 December 2015 considered the planning proposal to rezone the deferred area to RU1 Primary Production and to amend the minimum lot size to 200 hectares. Council then on 26 April 2015 approved a development application for 23 lots where a condition of the approval was to rezone the deferred area from RU1 Primary Production to R5 Large Lot Residential.
The planning proposal was sent to the Department of Planning and Environment on 3 November 2016. Gateway Determination was then issued on 28 November 2016 where Council was authorised to place the planning proposal on public exhibition.
· This is the final deferred matter to be dealt with in the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010.
· This planning proposal provides certainty for residents and land owners in Cartwrights Hill.
· The planning proposal minimises the potential for conflict between existing and future residents and the Bomen Industrial Estate.
· The planning proposal is consistent with the Draft Riverina-Murray Regional Plan as regionally significant land is protected from potential land use conflicts.
· Limited residential opportunities will protect future growth in the Bomen industrial area.
· The planning proposal is consistent with Council’s Spatial Plan 2013 – 2043 as residential opportunities and potential land use complaints are reduced.
The planning proposal contains two items. Item 1 amends the Land Application Map to remove the deferred matter status, rezones Deferred Matter Area 1 to R5 Large Lot Residential and amends the minimum lot size for Deferred Matter Area 1 to 1 hectare. The Cartwrights Hill Precinct Map for noise and odour is extended to include Deferred Area 1. Item 2 amends the Land Application Map to remove the deferred matter status, rezones Deferred Matter 2 to RU1 Primary Production and amends the minimum lot size to 200 hectares. The Cartwrights Hill Precinct Map for noise and odour is extended to include Deferred Matter Area 2.
A copy of the planning proposal is attached.
The planning proposal was placed on public exhibition from 21 January 2017 to 18 February 2017.
Three submissions were received. Below is a summary of the submissions and officer comments.
Submission |
Issue |
Council Officer Response |
1 |
The submission queries why the land is subject to extra noise and odour assessment. The recent Land and Environment Court case has shown that the land between Bomen Road and Old Bomen Road is not affected by either noise or odour. Any such impact from neighbouring industry would be unlawful. |
The Department of Planning & Environment in a letter dated 12 February 2015 advised that a new clause be inserted in the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan that requires Council to consider noise and odour impacts from the Bomen Industrial Estate & sewage treatment facility when assessing development in the residential area of Cartwrights Hill. Clause 7.8 was included in the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 as part of Amendment No. 13. Extending the Cartwrights Hill Precinct map protects the industrial area, whilst still providing development opportunities.
Extending the Cartwrights Hill Precinct Map for noise and odour is consistent with advice from the Department of Planning & Environment. |
2 |
The resident’s land is zoned RU6 Transition. This provides a transition between rural and other uses and minimises the potential for conflict between uses within the zone and uses within adjoining zones.
The property when purchased in 1986 was zoned 2a General (Urban Living Area). This was the main residential classification for the City in the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2005.
Council’s moratorium on development in Bomen has prevented the land being subdivided into six 1 hectare residential lots or 30 small residential blocks.
The rezoning from 2a to RU6 was unfair, especially as the adjoining land is now being rezoned to R5 Large Lot Residential.
The resident maintains that the area is free from noise and or noise incidents.
The resident requests Council to include the property in the planning proposal, and to rezone the land to R5 Large Lot Residential with a 1 hectare minimum lot size. |
Council has prepared a planning proposal in response to a request by the Department of Planning and Environment in February 2015.
The request included advice that Amendment No. 13 is approved subject to areas remaining “deferred matters” and that Council is to prepare a planning proposal to rezone the “Deferred Matter Areas” currently in the LEP with adequate justification for the zoning.
In response to this request, a planning proposal was prepared dealing with the remaining “deferred matters” in the LEP and received Gateway Determination.
The importance of rezoning these areas is to bring them into the 2010 LEP as they are currently zoned by the 1985 LEP.
The sole purpose of the Cartwrights Hill Planning Proposal that received gateway determination was to remove the “deferred matters” from the 2010 LEP.
The land that the submission refers to was originally a “deferred matter” under the 2010 LEP and was rezoned to RU6 Primary Production as part of Amendment No. 13 in February 2015.
As a result of this amendment, any further consideration of zoning would require an application by the land owner to adequately justify their rezoning request.
At this stage if Council resolved to include the land identified in the submission, City Officers would be required to amend the planning proposal and seek a revised Gateway Determination.
If the revised planning proposal was given gateway, the planning proposal would be required to be re-exhibited.
This would add approximately 6 months to the process. In addition, there may be requirements to undertake acoustic and odour assessments to consider this site which will add to the processing times.
|
3 |
The land in 1986 was zoned Residential 2a. Subsequently the land was rezoned to RU6 Transition Zone with a 200 hectare minimum lot size that restricted further development or subdivision.
The RU6 zone was a buffer against future noise and odour impacts from an expanded Bomen Industrial Sewage Treatment Facility, but there was no consideration if an increased buffer would be required. The RU6 zone did not consider Land Acquisition implications and alternative compatible zoning and lot size options.
There are no detrimental noise and odour impacts on the land north of old Bomen Road.
The subject land should have a similar R5 zoning and a 1 hectare minimum lot size. The planning proposal needs to be altered to include the land. Zoning the land to R5 with a 1 hectare minimum lot size would only allow an additional 6 lots. |
Council resolved to prepare a planning proposal to rezone the remaining deferred areas in the LEP.
The planning proposal has been given gateway approval for the deferred matters only.
Any consideration of land outside the deferred areas would require a revised gateway determination and re-exhibition of the planning proposal.
It must be noted that the land referred to in the submission was rezoned in February 2015.
As the land identified in submission 2 and 3 is zoned pursuant the existing 2010 LEP.
Should the proponent wish to pursue a change in zoning and minimum lot size this could occur through a separate planning proposal.
|
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010
Link to Strategic Plan
The Environment
Objective: We plan for the growth of the city
Outcome: We have sustainable urban development
Risk Management Issues for Council
There are no specific issues.
Internal / External Consultation
Internal consultation has been undertaken with the LEP Working Group.
Public exhibition occurred in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act, 1979.
1⇩. |
Planning Proposal - Provided under separate cover. |
|
2⇩. |
Letter to Residents |
|
3⇩. |
Letter of Submission 1 |
|
4⇩. |
Letter of Submission 2 |
|
5⇩. |
Letter of Submission 3 |
|
RP-17 Section 356 Donation - Henwood Park Football Club Inc - Request to waive Sewer Charges
Author: Katsoolis, Craig
Sector Manager: Te Pohe, Natalie
Analysis: |
The Henwood Park Football Club Inc. is seeking Council’s consideration for the waiver of the Minimum Non Residential Sewer Charge associated with the lease of the small club house located behind the Playgroup building on the corner of Forest and Hume Streets, Lake Albert.
Given the very low water usage and Not for Profit status of the club the request is supported by Council officers. |
That Council: a waive sewer charges of $1,163.42 to the Henwood Park Football Club Inc. in accordance with Section 356 of the Local Government Act 1993 b Provision be made in Council’s draft Delivery and Operation Plan 2017/18 (Proposed S356 Donations) for the ongoing waiver of the sewer charges related to the Rawlings Park club house located at the corner of Forest and Hume Street, Lake Albert |
Key Reasons
The Henwood Park Football Club currently leases a small club house situated at Rawlings Park at Lake Albert. The Club pays an annual licence fee of $514.80 including GST for the period November 2016 to November 2017.
A minimum Non-residential Sewer charge of $474.00 is charged to the Club for 2016/17. The club has unpaid prior period sewer and interest charges of $689.42.
The club house generates only a very small water usage of 2 to 3 kilolitres per quarter (there is no toilet in the building – hand basin only) which at $2.00 per kilolitre equates to approximately $4.00 to $6.00 in quarterly volume charges. Under Best Practice Non Residential Sewer charging a minimum charge of $118.25 per quarter is applied (equivalent to the minimum residential sewer charge).
Given the very small impact the club’s activities have on Council’s sewer operations and the not for profit status of the club the donation request is supported as it aligns with Council’s Strategic goal of “We have an Active and Healthy Community”.
Financial Implications
It is proposed to fund the above $1,163.42 donation from the Sewer Reserve, Account Number 50134 - Sewer Integrated Pricing Policy that holds a 2016/17 budget allocation of $23,022 with year to date expenditure to 28 February 2017 of $1,942.61.
The number of requests for financial assistance for sewer charges following the introduction of Best Practice Non Residential sewer charging in 2012/13 has been relatively low being mainly from community groups that operate from community halls. The level of requests will continue to be monitored to ensure that the Sewer Fund remains sustainable.
Policy
POL 078 Donations under Section 356 of the Local Government Act 1993.
Link to Strategic Plan
Safe and Healthy Community
Objective: We promote a healthy lifestyle
Outcome: We promote participation across a variety of sports and recreation
Risk Management Issues for Council
Other local sporting groups may wish to apply for financial assistance for sewer charges. As noted in the report, the club’s request will have negilble impact on Council’s sewer operations given the limited facilities onsite.
Internal / External Consultation
Relevant internal stakeholders were consulted with in the assessment of this request.
1⇩. |
Henwood Park Football Club - Section 356 Donation |
|
RP-18 Section 356 Donation Request - Uranqunity Junior Cricket Club
Author: Katsoolis, Craig
Sector Manager: Te Pohe, Natalie
Analysis: |
A petition has been received along with a written request from the Uranquinty Junior Cricket Club, requesting Council’s Sportsground user fees of $18.00 per child be waived for the participation in the Milo Cricket Program at the Uranquinty Oval.
There are currently 32 local children registered to play in the above program and ground fees would total $576.
A one off contribution of $374.40 is proposed toward the grounds fees given the limited number of sessions booked (9) and the inaugural status of the Junior cricket program in the Village of Uranquinty. |
That Council provide a once-off donation of $374.40 to the Uranquinty Junior Cricket Club in accordance with section 356 of the Local Government Act 1993 on the basis of the inaugural status of the junior cricket program and limited sessions booked. |
Key Reasons
The President of the Uranquinty Junior Cricket Club Mr Andrew Bell has written to Council on behalf of the club requesting Council’s consideration to the waiving of the Council ground hire fees of $18.00 per junior/per season.
The Uranquinty Junior Cricket Club is promoting the participation of local Uranquinty children in the Milo Junior Cricket program. Details of the program can be located on the play cricket website: http://www.playcricket.com.au/learn/t20-blast
The Milo T20 Blast Cricket program is described on the cricket website as:
“MILO T20 Blast is a super fun, social, safe, cricket program for boys and girls. The program is much shorter than traditional cricket, with a maximum of 90 minutes playing time. All the equipment is supplied and the games take place at the same venue each week, at a local cricket club or community centre.”
Mr Bell’s letter has attached a petition containing 20 signatures from parents representing 32 local children.
The attached petition notes:
1) “We pay all fees to CRICKET NSW no fees are paid to Uranquinty Junior Cricket Club
2) Our club raises money to give the children their participation medallion
3) Our Club does not have the money to pay these fees and could fold if we were made to”
The fee applied for the Club’s ground hire of Uranquinty Oval is $18.00 per junior/per season (Item No 131 page 30 of Council’s adopted 2016/17 Fees and Charges).
The club has booked Uranquinty Oval for 9 separate 2 hour sessions from 2 December 2016 to the 31 March 2017.
The club could have elected to pay a casual ground fee of $79.00 per booking however for 9 sessions this would equate to a ground fee charge of $711.
The season charge as applied is the lowest fee that can be applied under the current adopted Council Fees and Charges structure:
i.e. $18 per season x 32 (players) = $576.
Council’s current sports ground hire arrangements provide for two (2) season booking sessions – Winter 1 April to 30 September and summer from 1 October to 30 March.
A sporting group could book a sports ground for up to six (6) months and thus use the ground 26 times and pay the $18 fee for the season:
i.e. this works out to be 69 cents per week per player.
The Uranquinty Junior Cricket is contributing a higher per player charge by only using the oval 9 times in the season charge:
i.e. 9 sessions @$18.00 per player = $2.00 each per session
It is suggested that given this is the first time the club has promoted this junior cricket program that Council consider a donation toward the ground fees of $1.30 per player i.e. a one-off overall donation $1.30 x 9 (sessions) x 32 (players) =$374.40.
Each junior would be required to contribute $6.20 per the 9 sessions:
i.e. equates to 69 cents per session.
Discussions with Council’s Recreation Officers indicate that they do not support the waiving of ground fees for sporting groups as it could set a precedent for other junior sporting clubs to request ground fee waivers.
It is readily acknowledged that this junior cricket program promotes many beneficial outcomes for young people in Uranquinty however the application of grounds fees should be standard across all sporting group users throughout Wagga Wagga.
Financial Implications
Council in 2015/16 received $4,862,000 in grants, fees and charges for recreational and cultural activities (approximate contribution of 25% toward actual costs) and expended $18,960,000 on providing those facilities and activities - a shortfall of $13,538,000 which is significant.
Whilst this request from the Junior Cricket Club is modest – Council must be mindful not to set a precedent as waiving fees for all sport ground users would place significant strain on Council’s ability to provide existing recreational and cultural facilities to their current standard.
It is proposed should Council approve the suggested donation towards the ground fees that the Junior Cricket Club be advised that the donation is one off for the introduction of the junior cricket program into the Village of Uranquinty and suggest the club should ensure it budgets for the $18 per junior ground fees for any future junior cricket programs.
If this donation request is approved by Council at the 27 March 2017 meeting, this will leave $449 uncommitted for the remainder of the 2016/17 financial year.
Project Name & Component |
Existing Budget |
Expenditure/ Committed to Date |
Effect on LTFP
|
S356 Donations |
$54,064 |
$53,240 |
Nil |
Policy
POL 078 Donations under Section 356 of the Local Government Act 1993
POL 086 Petitions Management Policy
Link to Strategic Plan
Safe and Healthy Community
Objective: We promote a healthy lifestyle
Outcome: We promote participation across a variety of sports and recreation
Risk Management Issues for Council
The risk associated with the adoption of the proposed recommendation is that this may set a precedent for other sports groups to seek a waiver of fees, however given this is the inaugural year of the program and there are limited sessions, the risk appears to be minimal if it is a once-off waiver.
Internal / External Consultation
Relevant internal stakeholders were consulted with in the assessment of this request.
1⇩. |
Section 356 Donation request - Uranquinty Junior Cricket Club (Petition - names not shown) |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 March 2017.