AGENDA AND BUSINESS PAPER
To be held on
Monday
26 November 2018
AT 6.00pm
Cnr Baylis and Morrow Streets,
Wagga Wagga NSW 2650
PO Box 20, Wagga Wagga
Phone: 1300 292 442
Fax: 02 6926 9199
Website: www.wagga.nsw.gov.au
NOTICE OF MEETING
In pursuance of the provisions of the Local Government Act, 1993 and the Regulations there under, notice is hereby given that an Ordinary Meeting of the Council of the City of Wagga Wagga will be held in the Council Chamber, Civic Centre, Corner Baylis and Morrow Streets, Wagga Wagga, on Monday 26 November 2018 at 6.00pm.
Council live streams video and audio of Council meetings. Members of the public are advised that their voice and/or image may form part of the webcast.
Mr Peter Thompson
General Manager
WAGGA WAGGA CITY COUNCILLORS
Mayor Councillor Greg Conkey OAM |
Deputy Mayor Councillor Dallas Tout |
Councillor Yvonne Braid |
Councillor Paul Funnell |
Councillor Dan Hayes |
Councillor Vanessa Keenan |
Councillor Rod Kendall |
Councillor Tim Koschel |
Councillor Kerry Pascoe |
|
|
|
QUORUM
The quorum for a meeting of the Council is a majority of the Councillors of the Council who hold office for the time being who are eligible to vote at the meeting.
COUNCIL MEETING ROOM
Reports submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on Monday 26 November 2018.
Ordinary Meeting of Council AGENDA AND BUSINESS PAPER
Monday 26 November 2018
CLAUSE PRECIS PAGE
PRAYER 3
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY 3
APOLOGIES 3
CONFIRMATIONS OF MINUTES
CM-1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 12 NOVEMBER 2018 3
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 3
PRESENTATIONS
TIDY TOWNS
NSW AUDIT OFFICE – AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MAYORAL MINUTES
MM-1 MAYORAL MINUTE - SAVE OUR RECYCLING CAMPAIGN 4
Councillor Report
CR-1 COUNCILLOR REPORT - DESTINATION NSW STAKEHOLDER FUNCTION 7
CR-2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE REPORT 9
Reports from Staff
RP-1 Presentation from Council's external Auditors - NSW Audit Office on the 2017/18 Financial Statements 11
RP-2 Financial Performance Report as at 31 October 2018 22
RP-3 CANBERRA REGION JOINT ORGANISATION (CRJO) 42
RP-4 Council Meeting Schedule 2019 46
RP-5 COMPLAINT HANDLING 52
RP-6 Draft Planning Proposal LEP18/0008 with Council addendum - reduction to minimum lot size control to Lots 35 - 40 DP 1062621 and Lots 1 - 4, 6 DP 1127328 on Manuka Road and Dandaloo Road, Lake Albert 56
RP-7 PROPOSED APEX BIKE FACILITY AT APEX PARK - LAKE ALBERT 75
RP-8 Draft Wagga Wagga Local Infrastructure Contributions Plan 2018 80
RP-9 Disabled Access to Waterways 87
RP-10 WAGGA WAGGA INLAND WATER SAFETY MANAGEMENT PLAN 94
RP-11 Sporting Hall of Fame 98
RP-12 Parramore Park Car Park resurfacing 103
RP-13 PROPOSED UPDATE TO COUNCIL'S 2018/19 FEES AND CHARGES - WASTE SERVICES 105
RP-14 Proposed Mobile Food Vending Trial 116
Committee Minutes
M-1 RIVERINA REGIONAL LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING - 31 OCTOBER 2018 134
M-2 Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Minutes - 9 November 2018 141
QUESTIONS/BUSINESS WITH NOTICE 153
Confidential Reports
CONF-1 Consideration of RFQ2018-556 Supply of One 4WD Tractor & RFQ2018-557 Supply of One Rotary Multi Deck Mower 154
CONF-2 RFT2018-25 EUNONY BRIDGE STRENGTHENING & WIDENING 155
CONF-3 Major Event Sponsorship Report 156
CONF-4 RFQ2017/529 - Densely Graded Asphalt Supply & Lay 157
Confirmation of Minutes
CM-1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 12 NOVEMBER 2018
That the Minutes of the proceedings of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 12 November 2018 be confirmed as a true and accurate record.
|
1⇩. |
Ordinary Council Meeting - Minutes - 12 November 2018 |
158 |
PRESENTATIONS
· Presentation to Wagga Wagga City Council - Tidy Towns Sustainable Communities Committee from the Tidy Towns Chairperson
· Presentation from NSW Audit Office regarding RP-1 - PRESENTATION FROM COUNCIL'S EXTERNAL AUDITORS - NSW AUDIT OFFICE ON THE 2017/18 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 26 November 2018. MM-1
MM-1 MAYORAL MINUTE - SAVE OUR RECYCLING CAMPAIGN
Analysis: |
Certain licensed waste facilities in NSW are required to pay a contribution to the NSW Government for each tonne of waste received at the facility (referred to as the 'Waste Levy'). The purpose of this motion is to support the ‘Save Our Recycling’ campaign, which is advocating for 100% of the revenue collected from the levy to be reinvested into waste minimisation, recycling and resource recovery. |
That Council: a endorse the Local Government NSW (LGNSW) campaign, Save Our Recycling, to realise the reinvestment of a 100% of the Waste Levy collected each year by the NSW Government in waste minimisation, recycling and resource recovery b make representation to the local State Member, Dr Joe McGirr, in support of this campaign objective - for the NSW Government to commit to reinvest 100% of the Waste Levy in waste minimisation, recycling and resource recovery c make representation to all candidates leading up to the NSW State election scheduled for March 2019 seeking support for the Save Our Recycling campaign d write to the Premier, the Hon Gladys Berejiklian MP, the Opposition Leader, the Hon Michael Daley MP, the Minister for Local Government and the Minister for the Environment, the Hon Gabrielle Upton MP, and the Shadow Minister for the Environment and Heritage, Penny Sharpe MLC, seeking bipartisan support for the 100% reinvestment of the Waste Levy collected each year into waste minimisation, recycling and resource recovery e take a lead role in activating the LGNSW Save Our Recycling campaign locally f endorse the distribution and display of the LGNSW Save Our Recycling information on Council premises, as well as involvement in any actions arising from the initiative g formally advise LGNSW that Council has endorsed the Save Our Recycling advocacy initiative |
Report
I am calling on Councillors to support Local Government NSW (LGNSW) in its advocacy to all those contesting the State election to reinvest 100% of the Waste Levy collected each year into waste management, recycling and resource recovery in NSW.
The Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (POEO Act) requires certain licensed waste facilities in NSW to pay a contribution to the NSW Government for each tonne of waste received at the facility. Referred to as the 'Waste Levy', the contribution aims to reduce the amount of waste being landfilled and promote recycling and resource recovery.
The Waste Levy applies in the regulated area of NSW which comprises the Sydney metropolitan area, the Illawarra and Hunter regions, the central and north coast local government areas to the Queensland border as well as the Blue Mountains, Wingecarribee and Wollondilly local government areas.
In 2016/17, the NSW Government collected $726 million from local government, community, businesses and industry via the Waste Levy, but only committed to use $72 million through its Waste Less Recycle More initiative – or 10% - on waste minimisation and recycling in 2017-18.
Overall the NSW Government’s Waste Less Recycle More initiative allocates $801 million over 8 years (2013-2021) to waste and recycling, however the Waste Levy collected over that same period will be over $4.62 billion.
At a local government level, just 18% of the $300 million collected from the local government sector each year is reinvested in recycling and waste management.
Regardless of how you look at it, the principle remains the same – very little of the Waste Levy is currently used to support waste minimisation, recycling and resource recovery. The remainder is returned to NSW Government’s consolidated revenue.
The reinvestment of the Waste Levy to support waste and resource recovery infrastructure, develop markets and innovative solutions, and undertake other initiatives to encourage reuse and recycling also offers wide-ranging benefits to our communities right across NSW. There is the potential for economic growth, new infrastructure, new technology and new jobs, particularly in our regional areas.
It should be noted that the following motion was unanimously endorsed at the LGNSW 2018 Conference:
That the NSW Government be called upon to ensure that 100% of the levy arising from Section 88 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 be used for waste infrastructure and programs, predominantly by local government and the waste sector, for initiatives such as:
· Development of regional and region-specific solutions for sustainable waste management (e.g. soft plastic recycling facilities, green waste, waste to energy).
· Support innovative solutions to reduce waste and waste transport requirements.
· Protect existing and identify new waste management locations.
· Local community waste recovery and repair facilities.
· Funding a wider range of sustainability initiatives, such as marketing and strategies that promote and support a circular economy.
As previously noted, this is not a party-political issue: the advocacy initiative calls on all parties and candidates to commit to the 100% hypothecation of the Waste Levy to the purpose for which it is collected.
I am recommending that we support this campaign by the NSW local government sector and LGNSW and call on all political parties to commit to the reinvestment of 100% of the Waste Levy collected each year by the NSW Government into waste management, recycling and resource recovery.
Financial Implications
N/A
CR-1 COUNCILLOR REPORT - DESTINATION NSW STAKEHOLDER FUNCTION
Author: Councillor Dan Hayes
Councillor Vanessa Keenan
That Council receive and note the report. |
Report
On 25 October 2018, Councillors Keenan and Hayes attended a two-hour stakeholder function hosted by Destination NSW, the State Government’s Tourism and Major Events Agency.
This event brought together local government representatives, local business and tourism operators to meet the Destination NSW Board.
During the event John Warn, Chairman of Destination NSW spoke briefly about the increasing visitation to regional NSW destinations and the growth and development of tourism in the Riverina Murray region.
During smaller discussions, the board members raised the opportunities that exist with Canberra as it is Wagga’s closest capital city with our closest international airport. This is reflective of discussions that have taken place internally within Wagga Wagga City Council not just with tourism and events but in other areas too. The Destination NSW Chairman is planning on meeting with Canberra Government representatives for further discussions about these opportunities.
This function highlighted the importance of strong linkages with Canberra that Wagga Wagga City Council should continue to build upon via all options available as well as the establishment and fostering of networks within our region. These linkages should include relationships, transport connections and promotions.
The opportunity for business to business relationships to develop through value adding to each other’s product offerings was also evident in conversations with many of the operators in attendance.
Wagga Wagga City Council should continue to be acutely aware of the machinations of Destination NSW to embrace possible new opportunities and link in with future planning.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
POL 025 Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We have leaders that represent us
Risk Management Issues for Council
N/A
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 26 November 2018. CR-2
CR-2 LOCAL GOVERNMENT ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE REPORT
Author: Councillor Greg Conkey OAM
That Council receive and note the report. |
Report
The LGNSW’s Annual Conference was held in Albury from October 21-23.
Wagga Wagga City Council was represented by the Mayor, Cr Greg Conkey OAM, Deputy Mayor, Cr Dallas Tout, Cr Rod Kendall (who is also on the Board of LGNSW) and Cr Vanessa Keenan while Cr Yvonne Braid attended as a member of the Riverina Water Board.
The official guests at the Conference included the Premier, Gladys Berejiklian (who attended the Welcome Ceremony on the Sunday night), the Minister for Local Government, Gabrielle Upton (who stayed and answered a few questions), the Federal Minister for Local Government, Bridget McKenzie, the Federal Shadow Minister for Local Government, Stephen Jones and the State Shadow Minister for Local Government, Peter Primrose (who stayed for the whole conference).
More than 100 motions were debated on the Monday of the conference.
Three motions put by Council were adopted.
They included urging the State Government to allocate some of the funding from the sale of Snowy Hydro to asset maintenance; urging the State Government to include lay down facilities for adults with disabilities along major highways; and calling on the State Government to review its decision to pass on the responsibility for payment of damages in addition to compensation where a native title claim is determined in favour of a native title interest. Another motion calling for a review of newspaper advertising was lost.
Some of the other motions passed included:
· Calling for additional drought policies and relief packages;
· Lobbying for increasing the number of slots for regional air services into Kingsford Smith International Airport;
· Encouraging the NSW Government to support and fund the Southern Lights Project;
· Calling on the State Government to ensure that 100% of all waste levy revenues be returned to councils to fund waste and recycling initiatives;
· Place the highest priority over the next 12 months to work with all governments to progress development of sustainable, long term solutions to the current recycling crisis;
· Calling on the NSW Government to deliver their climate change policy framework and develop programs with tangible outcomes to meet the aspirational long-term objectives of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050;
· Continue to lobby the NSW Government for a sustainable funding model for libraries;
· Review the remuneration paid to mayors and councillors in order to make the case for increased remuneration and conditions;
· Seeking ongoing funding for Jos.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
POL 113 Councillor Training and Development Policy
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We have leaders that represent us
Risk Management Issues for Council
N/A
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 26 November 2018. RP-1
RP-1 Presentation from Council's external Auditors - NSW Audit Office on the 2017/18 Financial Statements
Author: Carolyn Rodney
Director: Natalie Te Pohe
Analysis: |
Council resolved to sign the 2017/18 Financial Statements at the 29 October 2018 Council Meeting, enabling Council officers to lodge the financial statements with the Office of Local Government (OLG) prior to the 31 October 2018 due date.
Council’s external auditors, NSW Audit Office have completed their Auditor’s Report, and have provided this to Council for their information. Representatives from NSW Audit Office will be presenting to Council at this meeting. |
That Council: a note that no public submissions were received regarding the draft Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2018 b receive the Audited Financial Statement, together with the Auditor’s Reports on the Financial Statements for the year ended 30 June 2018 c receive a presentation from Council’s external auditors, NSW Audit Office |
Report
The Audit Reports for the 2017/18 Financial Statements have now been received and are presented in accordance with section 419 (1) of the Local Government Act 1993.
Representatives from Council’s external auditors, NSW Audit Office will be making a presentation on the 2017/18 Financial Statements and will be available to answer any questions from Councillors.
Council has provided public notice that the Financial Statements and Auditor’s Reports will be presented at this meeting in accordance with section 418 (3) of the Local Government Act 1993 and has invited public submissions on the audited financial statements, of which no submissions were received.
Financial Implications
The 2017/18 financial statements show total income from continuing operations of $146.8M, total expenses from continuing operations of $124.7M, resulting in a preliminary net operating surplus of $22.1M (including capital grants and contributions). The 2016/17 financial year resulted in a net operating surplus of $32.6M, with the main difference in the reduced net result attributable to a reduction in grants and contributions.
As of 30 June 2018 Council held $36.8M in internal reserves, an increase of $1.1M on the previous year. The major internally restricted reserves Council holds are:
Reserve Name |
30 June 2018 Balance |
30 June 2017 Balance |
Increase/ (Decrease) from prior year* |
Plant and Vehicle Replacement |
$3.935M |
$5.894M |
($1.959M) |
Employees Leave Entitlements |
$3.323M |
$3.185M |
$138K |
Fit for the Future |
$5.340M |
$3.033M |
$2.307M |
Grant Commission |
$5.199M |
$4.957M |
$242K |
*Notes on Increases/(Decreases)
· Plant and Vehicle Replacement Reserve – Council experienced delays in fulfilling their plant replacement program during the 2016/17 financial year, and were able to catch up some of the backlog in replacement during the 2017/18 financial year.
· Fit for the Future Reserve – an additional $2.3M has been transferred to this reserve, bringing the balance up to $5.340M. Council’s Fit for the Future submission notes an annual target of identifying efficiencies of $800K to be spent on asset renewals. A detailed program of priority works will be established during the 2018/19 financial year.
Grant Commission Reserve – $5.199M received for the prepayment of the Financial Assistance Grant relating to the 2018/19 financial year. This prepayment occurred in the 2016/17 financial year also.
Policy and Legislation
Local Government Act 1993- Section 413 - Preparation of Financial Reports
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We are accountable and transparent
Risk Management Issues for Council
The NSW Audit Office will provide Council with a final Management Letter by 30 November 2018, with the Interim Management Letter previously discussed at the 10 August 2018 Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee Meeting. The Interim Management Letter identified five issues with two rating as Moderate and three rated as Low. Council officers will undertake the actions that will be identified in the final Management responses.
Internal / External Consultation
The Council’s Community Engagement Strategy and IAP2 considers the community to be “any individual or group of individuals, organisation or political entity with an interest in the outcome of a decision….”
Council’s external auditors, NSW Audit Office have liaised with Council’s Finance division and presented the draft Financial Statements in detail to the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee at the 11 October 2018 Committee meeting.
1. |
WWCC - 2017/18 Financial Statements - Provided under separate cover |
|
2⇩. |
Report on the Conduct of the Audit - NSW Audit Office |
|
RP-2 Financial Performance Report as at 31 October 2018
Author: Carolyn Rodney
Director: Natalie Te Pohe
Analysis: |
This report is for Council to consider and approve the proposed 2018/19 budget variations required to manage the 2018/19 budget and Long Term Financial Plan, and details Council’s external investments and performance as at 31 October 2018. |
That Council: a approve the proposed 2018/19 budget variations for the month ended 31 October 2018 and note the balanced budget position as presented in this report b provide financial assistance of the following amounts in accordance with Section 356 of the Local Government Act 1993: i) Toy Run (Combined Riders Wagga Wagga ) $ 327.00 ii) Ashmont Baptist Church $ 90.00 iii) Wagga Wagga Seventh Day Adventist Church $ 408.50 c note the Responsible Accounting Officer’s reports, in accordance with the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005 (Part 9 Division 3: Clause 203) that the financial position of Council is satisfactory having regard to the original estimates of income and expenditure and the recommendations made above d note details of the external investments as at 31 October 2018 in accordance with section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 |
Report
Wagga Wagga City Council (Council) forecasts a balanced budget position as at 31 October 2018. Proposed budget variations are detailed in this report for Council’s consideration and adoption.
Council has experienced a positive monthly investment performance for the month of October, when compared to budget. This is a result of a larger than expected portfolio balance as well as better than expected interest rates.
Key Performance Indicators
OPERATING INCOME
Total operating income is 32% of approved budget, which is tracking only slightly below budget for the end of October (this percentage excludes capital grants and contributions). An adjustment has been made to reflect the levy of rates that occurred at the start of the financial year. Excluding this adjustment, operating income received is 69%.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Total operating expenditure is 34% of approved budget and is tracking only slightly over budget for the full financial year.
CAPITAL INCOME
Total capital income is 11% of approved budget. It is important to note that the actual income from capital is influenced by the timing of the receipt of capital grants and contributions relating to projects. This income also includes the sale of property, plant and equipment.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
Total capital expenditure including commitments is 18% of approved budget.
WAGGA WAGGA
CITY COUNCIL |
|||||||
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT |
|||||||
|
ORIGINAL |
BUDGET ADJ |
APPROVED BUDGET |
YTD ACTUAL EXCL COMMT'S 2018/19 |
COMMT'S 2018/19 |
YTD ACTUAL + COMMT'S |
YTD % OF BUD |
Revenue |
|||||||
Rates & Annual Charges |
(65,998,971) |
0 |
(65,998,971) |
(22,909,962) |
0 |
(22,909,962) |
35% |
User Charges & Fees |
(26,844,544) |
150,317 |
(26,694,227) |
(8,245,864) |
0 |
(8,245,864) |
31% |
Interest & Investment Revenue |
(2,917,452) |
(205,000) |
(3,122,452) |
(1,408,697) |
0 |
(1,408,697) |
45% |
Other Revenues |
(2,983,104) |
(333,552) |
(3,316,656) |
(1,468,565) |
0 |
(1,468,565) |
44% |
Operating Grants & Contributions |
(13,894,989) |
(1,533,569) |
(15,428,557) |
(2,090,410) |
0 |
(2,090,410) |
14% |
Capital Grants & Contributions |
(36,517,290) |
(16,722,608) |
(53,239,899) |
(6,036,555) |
0 |
(6,036,555) |
11% |
Total Revenue |
(149,156,350) |
(18,644,412) |
(167,800,762) |
(42,160,053) |
0 |
(42,160,053) |
25% |
|
|||||||
Expenses
|
|||||||
Employee Benefits & On-Costs |
44,786,608 |
87,445 |
44,874,053 |
14,421,266 |
14,655 |
14,435,921 |
32% |
Borrowing Costs |
3,752,580 |
(121,277) |
3,631,304 |
872,863 |
0 |
872,863 |
24% |
Materials & Contracts |
32,384,231 |
5,838,613 |
38,222,844 |
9,538,639 |
3,494,491 |
13,033,130 |
34% |
Depreciation & Amortisation |
35,418,997 |
0 |
35,418,997 |
11,806,332 |
0 |
11,806,332 |
33% |
Other Expenses |
12,125,204 |
(2,517,999) |
9,607,205 |
4,396,313 |
110,808 |
4,507,121 |
47% |
Total Expenses |
128,467,621 |
3,286,782 |
131,754,403 |
41,035,413 |
3,619,954 |
44,655,367 |
34% |
|
|
||||||
Net Operating (Profit)/Loss |
(20,688,729) |
(15,357,630) |
(36,046,359) |
(1,124,640) |
3,619,954 |
2,495,315 |
|
|
|||||||
Net Operating (Profit)/Loss before Capital Grants & Contributions |
15,828,561 |
1,364,979 |
17,193,540 |
4,911,916 |
3,619,954 |
8,531,870 |
|
|
|||||||
Capital / Reserve Movements |
|||||||
Capital Exp - Renewals |
33,260,752 |
13,373,398 |
46,634,150 |
4,229,425 |
7,444,469 |
11,673,893 |
25% |
Capital Exp - New Projects |
31,336,485 |
17,374,328 |
50,000,415 |
4,680,812 |
4,214,708 |
8,895,520 |
18% |
Capital Exp - Project Concepts |
25,044,335 |
95,641 |
23,850,375 |
14,562 |
52,079 |
66,640 |
0% |
Loan Repayments |
3,129,777 |
(225,924) |
2,903,853 |
1,043,259 |
0 |
1,043,259 |
36% |
New Loan Borrowings |
(6,108,672) |
1,755,867 |
(4,352,805) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
Sale of Assets |
(952,795) |
(2,701,703) |
(3,654,498) |
(301,981) |
0 |
(301,981) |
8% |
Net Movements Reserves |
(29,602,157) |
(14,313,977) |
(43,916,134) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
Total Cap/Res Movements |
56,107,727 |
15,357,630 |
71,465,356 |
9,666,076 |
11,711,256 |
21,377,332 |
|
|
|||||||
|
ORIGINAL |
BUDGET ADJ |
APPROVED
BUDGET |
YTD ACTUAL EXCL COMMT'S 2018/19 |
COMMT'S 2018/19 |
YTD ACTUAL +
COMMT'S |
YTD % OF BUD |
Net Result after Depreciation |
35,418,997 |
0 |
35,418,997 |
8,541,436 |
15,331,211 |
23,872,647 |
|
|
|||||||
Add back Depreciation Expense |
35,418,997 |
0 |
35,418,997 |
11,806,332 |
0 |
11,806,332 |
33% |
|
|||||||
Cash Budget (Surplus)/Deficit |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(3,264,896) |
15,331,211 |
12,066,315 |
Revised Budget Result - Surplus/(Deficit) |
$’000s |
Original 2018/19 Budget Result as adopted by Council Total Budget Variations approved to date Budget variations for October 2018 |
$0 $0 $0 |
Proposed revised budget result for 31 October 2018 |
$0 |
The proposed Budget Variations to 31 October 2018 are listed below:
Budget Variation |
Amount |
Funding Source |
Net Impact Fav/ (Unfav) |
||
5 – The Environment |
|||||
Jubilee Park Stormwater Upgrade |
$50K |
Section 64 Stormwater DSP Reserve ($50K) |
Nil |
||
Funds are required for the design of the stormwater infrastructure upgrade at Jubilee Park as identified in the City of Wagga Wagga Development Servicing Plan (DSP) – Stormwater November 2007. This project is a priority due to the significant overland flow during relatively minor rain events (10 – 15mm) and the high usage of Jubilee Park. It is proposed to fund the design proportion of the project from the Section 64 Stormwater DSP Reserve. The project construction is budgeted in future years and will be refined once the detailed design is completed. Estimated Completion Date: 2018/19 |
|
||||
SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) |
Nil |
||||
Current Restrictions
RESERVES SUMMARY |
|||||
31 OCTOBER 2018 |
|||||
|
CLOSING BALANCE 2017/18 |
ADOPTED RESERVE TRANSFERS 2018/19 |
BUDGET VARIATIONS APPROVED UP TO COUNCIL MEETING 12.11.18 |
PROPOSED CHANGES for Council Resolution |
REVISED BALANCE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Externally Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
Developer Contributions - Sect 7.11 |
(19,959,750) |
7,405,683 |
2,050,333 |
|
(10,503,733) |
Developer Contributions - Sect 7.12 |
(465,272) |
358,500 |
112,629 |
|
5,857 |
Developer Contributions – S/Water DSP S64 |
(5,478,298) |
500,000 |
46,347 |
50,000 |
(4,881,951) |
Sewer Fund |
(26,204,212) |
4,267,364 |
2,638,508 |
|
(19,298,341) |
Solid Waste |
(20,184,154) |
9,600,364 |
1,155,611 |
|
(9,428,179) |
Specific Purpose Grants |
(3,519,384) |
0 |
3,519,384 |
|
0 |
SRV Levee |
(2,847,382) |
1,807,667 |
892,802 |
|
(146,914) |
Stormwater Levy |
(3,167,296) |
162,032 |
102,841 |
|
(2,902,423) |
Total Externally Restricted |
(81,825,747) |
24,101,610 |
10,518,454 |
50,000 |
(47,155,683) |
|
|
||||
Internally Restricted |
|
||||
Airport |
(63,685) |
(158,452) |
(258,356) |
(552,913) |
|
Art Gallery |
(49,209) |
13,262 |
0 |
(35,947) |
|
Ashmont Community Facility |
(6,000) |
(1,500) |
0 |
(7,500) |
|
Bridge Replacement |
(201,972) |
(100,000) |
0 |
(301,972) |
|
CBD Carparking Facilities |
(863,695) |
160,302 |
31,400 |
(652,592) |
|
CCTV |
(74,476) |
(10,000) |
0 |
(84,476) |
|
Cemetery Perpetual |
(65,479) |
(129,379) |
0 |
(142,900) |
|
Cemetery |
(452,507) |
420 |
(1,191) |
(312,506) |
|
Civic Theatre Operating |
0 |
(55,000) |
55,000 |
0 |
|
Civic Theatre Technical Infrastructure |
(92,585) |
(50,000) |
0 |
(137,675) |
|
Civil Projects |
(155,883) |
0 |
0 |
(155,883) |
|
Community Amenities |
(76,763) |
0 |
0 |
(76,763) |
|
Community Works |
(61,888) |
(59,720) |
0 |
|
(121,608) |
Council Election |
(255,952) |
(76,333) |
5,000 |
(327,285) |
|
Emergency Events |
(220,160) |
0 |
0 |
(191,160) |
|
Employee Leave Entitlements |
(3,322,780) |
0 |
0 |
|
(3,322,780) |
Environmental Conservation |
(131,351) |
20,295 |
0 |
|
(111,056) |
Estella Community Centre |
(230,992) |
178,519 |
0 |
|
(52,473) |
Event Attraction Reserve |
0 |
0 |
(4,421) |
|
(4,421) |
Family Day Care |
(320,364) |
75,366 |
(1,556) |
|
(246,555) |
Fit for the Future |
(5,340,222) |
4,444,014 |
(200,000) |
|
(234,345) |
Generic Projects Saving |
(1,056,917) |
150,000 |
71,253 |
|
(791,611) |
Glenfield Community Centre |
(19,704) |
(2,000) |
0 |
|
(21,704) |
Grants Commission |
(5,199,163) |
0 |
0 |
|
(5,199,163) |
Grassroots Cricket |
(70,992) |
0 |
0 |
|
(70,992) |
Gravel Pit Restoration |
(767,509) |
0 |
0 |
|
(767,509) |
RESERVES SUMMARY
|
|||||
31 OCTOBER 2018 |
|||||
|
CLOSING BALANCE 2017/18 |
ADOPTED RESERVE TRANSFERS 2018/19 |
BUDGET VARIATIONS APPROVED UP TO COUNCIL MEETING 12.11.18 |
PROPOSED CHANGES for Council Resolution |
REVISED BALANCE |
Gurwood Street Property |
(50,454) |
0 |
0 |
|
(50,454) |
Information Services |
(369,113) |
77,858 |
35,000 |
|
(6,256) |
Infrastructure Replacement |
(193,634) |
(68,109) |
15,000 |
|
(246,743) |
Insurance Variations |
(28,644) |
0 |
(71,603) |
|
(100,246) |
Internal Loans |
(518,505) |
(631,470) |
650,137 |
|
(469,921) |
Lake Albert Improvements |
(62,349) |
(21,563) |
58,195 |
|
(19,858) |
LEP Preparation |
(3,895) |
0 |
0 |
|
(2,545) |
Livestock Marketing Centre |
(5,724,767) |
(1,146,762) |
119,813 |
|
(5,773,270) |
Museum Acquisitions |
(39,378) |
0 |
0 |
|
(39,378) |
Oasis Building Renewal |
(209,851) |
(85,379) |
0 |
|
(295,230) |
Oasis Plant |
(1,140,543) |
390,000 |
100,000 |
|
(650,543) |
Parks & Recreation Projects |
(79,648) |
49,500 |
0 |
|
(30,148) |
Pedestrian River Crossing |
(10,775) |
|
0 |
|
0 |
Plant Replacement |
(3,935,062) |
253,958 |
13,000 |
|
(2,637,671) |
Playground Equipment Replacement |
(164,784) |
69,494 |
0 |
|
(95,290) |
Project Carryovers |
(2,006,338) |
402,808 |
0 |
|
(18,376) |
Public Art |
(208,754) |
30,300 |
0 |
|
(113,457) |
Robertson Oval Redevelopment |
(92,151) |
0 |
0 |
|
(92,151) |
Senior Citizens Centre |
(15,627) |
(2,000) |
0 |
|
(17,627) |
Sister Cities |
(36,328) |
(10,000) |
0 |
|
(46,328) |
Stormwater Drainage |
(180,242) |
0 |
0 |
|
(158,242) |
Strategic Real Property |
(475,000) |
401,305 |
(15,655) |
|
(469,350) |
Street Lighting Replacement |
(74,755) |
0 |
18,206 |
|
(56,549) |
Subdivision Tree Planting |
(582,108) |
40,000 |
0 |
|
(542,108) |
Sustainable Energy |
(588,983) |
95,000 |
220,873 |
|
(234,569) |
Traffic Committee |
(21,930) |
0 |
20,138 |
|
(1,792) |
Unexpended External Loans |
(841,521) |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
Workers Compensation |
(40,000) |
0 |
(53,251) |
|
(93,251) |
Total Internally Restricted |
(36,795,390) |
4,244,732 |
806,981 |
0 |
(26,185,145) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restricted |
(118,621,137) |
28,346,342 |
11,325,435 |
50,000 |
(73,340,828) |
Section 356 Financial Assistance Requests
Three Section 356 financial assistance requests have been received for consideration at the 26 November 2018 Ordinary Council meeting.
It should be noted that in the last 12 months no grants or contributions have been provided to any of the three groups who have requested financial assistance in this current report.
Details of the current financial assistance requests are shown below:
· Toy Run (Combined Riders of Wagga Wagga) $327
Pat Combs the 2018 Coordinator Toy Run Committee in his attached letter (Attachment 1) on behalf of the Combined Riders of Wagga Wagga has requested Council’s consideration to the waiving of the hire fees for the staging of their annual Toy Run to be held on the 1 December 2018.
Council’s adopted 2018/19 Delivery Plan and Operational Plan includes a financial assistance contribution of $118 to the Combined Riders of Wagga towards their Toy Run event (contribution hire rate is based on the event finishing at Bolton Park). In 2018, the group has advised they will be using the Wollundry Lagoon Precinct and Civic Theatre external toilets.
The cost for the hire of Civic Precinct area is $245 i.e. $127 more than the Bolton Park hire costs budgeted for.
It has also been identified that the Toy Run Event is usually supported by Council staff who volunteer their time driving two Council Vehicles on the Toy Run day to help collect toys during the run.
The running costs for the use of the two vehicles has been estimated at no more than $200 for the event.
In total, Council’s requested contribution for the 2018 December event with facility hire and plant, use is approximately $445. Given $118 has been approved by Council, an additional contribution of $327 is required for the 2018 Toy Run.
The above request aligns with Council’s Strategic Plan: “Community Leadership and Collaboration – Outcome: We recognise we all have a role to play”.
· Ashmont Baptist Church $90
A member of the Ashmont Baptist Church has written to Council (Attachment 2) requesting Council’s consideration to the waiver of the fees of $90 for the use of Jack Mission Oval in Ashmont for Christmas Carols on the 14 December 2018.
The Christmas Carols are a free community event conducted by the church.
The above request aligns with Council’s Strategic Plan “Community Place and Identity – Outcome: Groups, programs and activities bring us together “.
· Wagga Wagga Seventh Day Adventist Church $408.50
A member of the Wagga Wagga Seventh Day Adventist Church has written to Council (Attachment 3) requesting Council’s consideration to the waiver of the fees of $408.50 for the use of the Glenfield Community Centre to conduct 19 mental health and education program for community members in response to the effect of the ongoing drought.
The above request aligns with Council’s Strategic Plan “Safe and Healthy Community – Outcome: We have access to health and support services that cater for all our needs.
Financial Implications
The Section 356 financial assistance budget for the 2018/19 financial year is $50,255.50, of which $41,689 is already committed in the adopted Delivery and Operational Plan 2018/19.
A balance of $3,184.50 is currently available for additional fee waiver requests received for the reminder of the year following financial assistance approved at the 29 October 2018 Council meeting.
Unallocated balance of S356 fee waiver financial assistance budget 2018/19 |
$3,184.50 |
Toy Run (Combined Riders of Wagga Wagga) $327 |
($327.00) |
Ashmont Baptist Church |
($90.00) |
· Wagga Wagga Seventh Day Adventist Church $408.50 |
($408.50) |
Total Section 356 Financial Assistance Requests – 29 October 2018 Council Meeting* |
($825.50) |
Balance of Section 356 fee waiver financial assistance budget for the remainder of the 2018/19 Financial Year |
$2,359.00 |
Investment Summary as at 31 October 2018
In accordance with Regulation 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2005, details of Wagga Wagga City Council’s external investments are outlined below:
Institution |
Rating |
Closing Balance |
Closing Balance |
October |
October |
Investment |
Maturity |
Term |
Short Term Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMP |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.95% |
1.45% |
1/06/2018 |
31/05/2019 |
12 |
AMP |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.95% |
0.73% |
5/06/2018 |
2/01/2019 |
7 |
Auswide |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
5/10/2017 |
5/10/2018 |
12 |
Auswide |
BBB- |
1,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
16/10/2017 |
16/10/2018 |
12 |
Auswide |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.70% |
1.45% |
5/12/2017 |
5/12/2018 |
12 |
Police Credit Union |
NR |
2,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
28/02/2018 |
29/10/2018 |
8 |
AMP |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.95% |
1.45% |
17/05/2018 |
13/11/2018 |
6 |
AMP |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.95% |
0.73% |
17/05/2018 |
17/05/2019 |
12 |
Police Credit Union |
NR |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.86% |
1.45% |
28/05/2018 |
28/05/2019 |
12 |
AMP |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.95% |
1.45% |
29/05/2018 |
24/01/2019 |
8 |
Westpac |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.80% |
0.73% |
28/06/2018 |
28/06/2019 |
12 |
Australian Military Bank |
NR |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.01% |
0.73% |
16/07/2018 |
16/07/2019 |
12 |
Suncorp-Metway |
A+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.65% |
1.45% |
31/08/2018 |
30/11/2018 |
3 |
Bankwest |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.76% |
1.45% |
31/08/2018 |
23/04/2019 |
8 |
NAB |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.65% |
0.73% |
7/09/2018 |
7/12/2018 |
3 |
Australian Military Bank |
NR |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.86% |
0.73% |
7/09/2018 |
8/07/2019 |
10 |
Total Short Term Deposits |
|
25,000,000 |
20,000,000 |
2.84% |
14.52% |
|
|
|
At Call Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAB |
AA- |
1,003,176 |
1,001,924 |
1.50% |
0.73% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
NAB |
AA- |
16,715,321 |
12,745,357 |
2.19% |
9.25% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
AMP |
A |
346 |
347 |
2.30% |
0.00% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
CBA |
AA- |
63 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Total At Call Accounts |
|
17,718,906 |
13,747,628 |
2.14% |
9.98% |
|
|
|
Medium Term Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RaboBank |
A+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.16% |
0.73% |
5/06/2017 |
6/06/2022 |
60 |
ING Bank |
A |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
2.75% |
2.18% |
24/08/2017 |
26/08/2019 |
24 |
ME Bank |
BBB |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.28% |
1.45% |
2/09/2014 |
2/09/2019 |
60 |
Rabobank |
A+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.10% |
0.73% |
5/12/2014 |
5/12/2019 |
60 |
BOQ |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
3.10% |
1.45% |
7/07/2017 |
7/07/2020 |
36 |
AMP |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
3.00% |
1.45% |
2/08/2018 |
3/02/2020 |
18 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.00% |
0.73% |
12/08/2016 |
12/08/2019 |
36 |
Rabobank |
A+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.20% |
0.73% |
25/08/2016 |
25/08/2021 |
60 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.00% |
0.73% |
31/08/2016 |
30/08/2019 |
36 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
3.00% |
1.45% |
10/02/2017 |
11/02/2019 |
24 |
Westpac |
AA- |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
3.10% |
2.18% |
10/03/2017 |
10/03/2022 |
60 |
Auswide |
BBB- |
0 |
2,000,000 |
2.95% |
1.45% |
5/10/2018 |
6/10/2020 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.92% |
0.73% |
16/10/2017 |
16/10/2019 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.92% |
1.45% |
6/11/2017 |
6/11/2019 |
24 |
BOQ |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
3.35% |
1.45% |
3/01/2018 |
4/01/2022 |
48 |
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.80% |
0.73% |
5/01/2018 |
6/01/2020 |
24 |
Institution |
Rating |
Closing Balance |
Closing Balance |
October |
October |
Investment |
Maturity |
Term |
Police Credit Union |
NR |
0 |
2,000,000 |
3.05% |
1.45% |
29/10/2018 |
29/10/2020 |
24 |
Australian Military Bank |
NR |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.95% |
0.73% |
29/05/2018 |
29/05/2020 |
24 |
BOQ |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
3.50% |
0.73% |
1/06/2018 |
1/06/2022 |
48 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
3.02% |
1.45% |
28/06/2018 |
28/06/2021 |
36 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.88% |
1.45% |
28/06/2018 |
29/06/2020 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.86% |
1.45% |
16/08/2018 |
17/08/2020 |
24 |
BOQ |
BBB+ |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
3.25% |
2.18% |
28/08/2018 |
29/08/2022 |
48 |
ING Bank |
A |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
2.85% |
2.18% |
30/08/2018 |
14/09/2020 |
24 |
P&N Bank |
BBB |
0 |
1,000,000 |
3.10% |
0.73% |
16/10/2018 |
18/10/2021 |
36 |
Total Medium Term Deposits |
|
39,000,000 |
44,000,000 |
3.10% |
31.94% |
|
|
|
Floating Rate Notes - Senior Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BOQ |
BBB+ |
2,009,400 |
2,014,400 |
BBSW + 110 |
1.46% |
5/08/2014 |
24/06/2019 |
58 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
BBB+ |
1,008,743 |
1,011,267 |
BBSW + 110 |
0.73% |
18/08/2015 |
18/08/2020 |
60 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
BBB+ |
1,008,743 |
1,011,267 |
BBSW + 110 |
0.73% |
28/09/2015 |
18/08/2020 |
59 |
Suncorp-Metway |
A+ |
1,018,351 |
1,012,377 |
BBSW + 125 |
0.73% |
20/10/2015 |
20/10/2020 |
60 |
Rabobank |
A+ |
2,041,840 |
2,047,672 |
BBSW + 150 |
1.49% |
4/03/2016 |
4/03/2021 |
60 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB |
1,004,034 |
1,006,577 |
BBSW + 160 |
0.73% |
22/03/2016 |
22/03/2019 |
36 |
CUA |
BBB |
2,026,100 |
2,012,294 |
BBSW + 160 |
1.46% |
1/04/2016 |
1/04/2019 |
36 |
ANZ |
AA- |
1,012,362 |
1,014,407 |
BBSW + 118 |
0.74% |
7/04/2016 |
7/04/2021 |
60 |
Suncorp-Metway |
A+ |
1,023,280 |
1,017,076 |
BBSW + 138 |
0.74% |
21/04/2016 |
12/04/2021 |
60 |
AMP |
A |
1,012,232 |
1,014,427 |
BBSW + 135 |
0.74% |
24/05/2016 |
24/05/2021 |
60 |
Westpac |
AA- |
1,014,761 |
1,016,926 |
BBSW + 117 |
0.74% |
3/06/2016 |
3/06/2021 |
60 |
CBA |
AA- |
1,020,930 |
1,015,117 |
BBSW + 121 |
0.74% |
12/07/2016 |
12/07/2021 |
60 |
ANZ |
AA- |
2,031,342 |
2,035,952 |
BBSW + 113 |
1.48% |
16/08/2016 |
16/08/2021 |
60 |
BOQ |
BBB+ |
1,517,613 |
1,509,566 |
BBSW + 117 |
1.10% |
26/10/2016 |
26/10/2020 |
48 |
NAB |
AA- |
1,015,031 |
1,009,807 |
BBSW + 105 |
0.73% |
21/10/2016 |
21/10/2021 |
60 |
Teachers Mutual |
BBB |
1,513,535 |
1,505,427 |
BBSW + 140 |
1.09% |
28/10/2016 |
28/10/2019 |
36 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
BBB+ |
1,007,853 |
1,010,597 |
BBSW + 110 |
0.73% |
21/11/2016 |
21/02/2020 |
39 |
Westpac |
AA- |
1,016,071 |
1,010,757 |
BBSW + 111 |
0.73% |
7/02/2017 |
7/02/2022 |
60 |
ANZ |
AA- |
1,009,623 |
1,012,257 |
BBSW + 100 |
0.73% |
7/03/2017 |
7/03/2022 |
60 |
CUA |
BBB |
753,782 |
755,840 |
BBSW + 130 |
0.55% |
20/03/2017 |
20/03/2020 |
36 |
Heritage Bank |
BBB+ |
604,976 |
601,925 |
BBSW + 130 |
0.44% |
4/05/2017 |
4/05/2020 |
36 |
Teachers Mutual |
BBB |
1,005,493 |
1,008,347 |
BBSW + 142 |
0.73% |
29/06/2017 |
29/06/2020 |
36 |
NAB |
AA- |
3,011,202 |
3,017,811 |
BBSW + 90 |
2.19% |
5/07/2017 |
5/07/2022 |
60 |
Suncorp-Metway |
A+ |
1,007,273 |
1,010,367 |
BBSW + 97 |
0.73% |
16/08/2017 |
16/08/2022 |
60 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,010,686 |
2,000,796 |
BBSW + 81 |
1.45% |
30/10/2017 |
27/10/2022 |
60 |
ME Bank |
BBB |
1,509,245 |
1,501,692 |
BBSW + 125 |
1.09% |
9/11/2017 |
9/11/2020 |
36 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,004,488 |
2,009,894 |
BBSW + 80 |
1.46% |
10/11/2017 |
10/02/2023 |
63 |
ANZ |
AA- |
1,505,556 |
1,499,232 |
BBSW + 77 |
1.09% |
18/01/2018 |
18/01/2023 |
60 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
BBB+ |
501,602 |
499,599 |
BBSW + 105 |
0.36% |
25/01/2018 |
25/01/2023 |
60 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB |
1,504,266 |
1,496,127 |
BBSW + 140 |
1.09% |
6/02/2018 |
6/02/2023 |
60 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,001,968 |
2,007,814 |
BBSW + 83 |
1.46% |
6/03/2018 |
6/03/2023 |
60 |
UBS |
A+ |
2,005,088 |
2,011,394 |
BBSW + 90 |
1.46% |
8/03/2018 |
8/03/2023 |
60 |
Heritage Bank |
BBB+ |
1,400,874 |
1,405,498 |
BBSW + 123 |
1.02% |
29/03/2018 |
29/03/2021 |
36 |
ME Bank |
BBB |
1,612,373 |
1,603,453 |
BBSW + 127 |
1.16% |
17/04/2018 |
16/04/2021 |
36 |
ANZ |
AA- |
2,011,666 |
2,002,656 |
BBSW + 93 |
1.45% |
9/05/2018 |
9/05/2023 |
60 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,009,228 |
2,015,174 |
BBSW + 90 |
1.46% |
16/05/2018 |
16/05/2023 |
60 |
CBA |
AA- |
2,010,306 |
2,015,454 |
BBSW + 93 |
1.46% |
16/08/2018 |
16/08/2023 |
60 |
Institution |
Rating |
Closing Balance |
Closing Balance |
October |
October |
Investment |
Maturity |
Term |
Bank Australia |
BBB |
753,123 |
755,458 |
BBSW + 130 |
0.55% |
30/08/2018 |
30/08/2021 |
36 |
CUA |
BBB |
601,432 |
603,145 |
BBSW + 125 |
0.44% |
6/09/2018 |
6/09/2021 |
36 |
AMP |
A |
1,502,436 |
1,505,277 |
BBSW + 108 |
1.09% |
10/09/2018 |
10/09/2021 |
36 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,003,808 |
2,008,954 |
BBSW + 93 |
1.46% |
26/09/2018 |
26/09/2023 |
60 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
BBB+ |
0 |
1,002,115 |
BBSW + 101 |
0.73% |
19/10/2018 |
19/01/2022 |
39 |
Total Floating Rate Notes - Senior Debt |
|
57,642,714 |
58,626,191 |
|
42.55% |
|
|
|
Managed Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NSW Tcorp |
NR |
1,457,599 |
1,402,531 |
-3.78% |
1.02% |
17/03/2014 |
1/10/2023 |
114 |
Total Managed Funds |
|
1,457,599 |
1,402,531 |
-3.78% |
1.02% |
|
|
|
TOTAL
CASH ASSETS, CASH |
|
140,819,219 |
137,776,350 |
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
LESS: RIVERINA REGIONAL LIBRARY (RRL) CASH AT BANK |
|
3,374,250 |
4,435,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
WWCC CASH ASSETS, CASH |
|
137,444,969 |
133,340,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
Council’s investment portfolio is now dominated by Term Deposits, equating to approximately 46% of the portfolio across a broad range of counterparties. Cash equates to 10% of the portfolio with Floating Rate Notes (FRNs) around 43% and growth funds around 1% of the portfolio.
Council’s investment portfolio is well diversified in complying assets across the entire credit spectrum. It is also well diversified from a rating perspective. Credit quality is diversified and is predominately invested amongst the investment grade Authorised Deposit-Taking Institutions (ADIs) (being BBB- or higher), with a smaller allocation to unrated ADIs.
All investments are within the defined Policy limits, as outlined in the Rating Allocation chart below:
Investment Portfolio Balance
Council’s investment portfolio balance has decreased from the previous month’s balance, down from $137.4M to $133.3M.
MONTHLY INVESTMENT MOVEMENTS
Redemptions/Sales – Council redeemed the following investment security during October 2018:
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
Auswide Bank Term Deposit |
$1M |
12 months |
2.67% |
This term deposit was redeemed on maturity and funds were reinvested in a 3‑year term deposit with P&N Bank (see below). |
New Investments – Council purchased the following investment security during October 2018:
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
P&N Bank Term Deposit |
$1M |
3 years |
3.10% |
The P&N Bank rate of 3.10% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this investment term. This term was chosen to fill a maturity gap within Council’s investment portfolio. |
Bendigo-Adelaide Bank Floating Rate Note |
$1M |
3.25 years |
BBSW + 101 |
Council’s independent Financial Advisor advised this Floating Rate Note represented fair value. |
Rollovers – Council rolled the following investment securities during October 2018:
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
Auswide Bank Term Deposit |
$2M |
12 months |
2.67% |
This term deposit was a 12-month investment at 2.67% and was rolled at maturity into a 2-year term deposit at 2.95%. |
Police Credit Union Term Deposit |
$2M |
8 months |
2.70% |
This term deposit was an 8-month investment at 2.70% and was rolled at maturity into a 2-year term deposit at 3.05%. |
MONTHLY PERFORMANCE
Interest/growth/capital gains for the month totaled $271,142, which compares favourably with the budget for the period of $244,709, outperforming budget for the month of October by $26,433. This is mainly due to a larger than expected portfolio balance as well as better than expected interest rates.
Council’s T-Corp Long Term Growth Fund detracted from the overall performance for the month of October following losses suffered in domestic and international markets. Even though the fund was down 3.78% for the month of October, the fund has returned 8.70% per annum since the original investment in March 2014. Overall, the Growth Fund remains Council’s best performing asset over 1-3 years by a considerable margin.
It is important to note Council’s investment portfolio balance is tracking well above what was originally predicted. This is mainly due to the timing of some of the major projects that are either not yet commenced or not as advanced as originally predicted. It is anticipated that over the 2018/19 financial year the portfolio balance will reduce in line with the completion of major projects. This will result in Councils investment portfolio continuing to maintain a higher balance until these projects commence or advance further.
The longer-dated deposits in the portfolio, particularly those locked in above 4% yields, have previously anchored Council’s portfolio performance. It should be noted that the portfolio now only includes two investments yielding above 4% and Council will inevitably see a fall in investment income over the coming months compared with previous periods. Council staff and Council’s Independent Financial Advisor will continue to identify opportunities to lock in higher yielding investments as they become available.
In comparison to the AusBond Bank Bill Index* (1.89%), Council’s investment portfolio returned 2.40% (annualised) for October. Cash and At-Call accounts returned 2.14% (annualised) for this period. These funds are utilised for daily cash flow management and need to be available to meet operating and contractual payments as they come due.
* The AusBond Bank Bill Index is the leading benchmark for the Australian fixed income market. It is interpolated from the RBA Cash rate, 1 month and 3 month Bank Bill Swap rates.
Report by Responsible Accounting Officer
I hereby certify that all of the above investments have been made in accordance with the provision of Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 and the regulations there under, and in accordance with the Investments Policy adopted by Council on 26 February 2018.
Carolyn Rodney
Responsible Accounting Officer
Policy and Legislation
Budget variations are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 052 Budget Policy.
Investments are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 075 Investment Policy.
Local Government Act 1993
Section 625 - How may councils invest?
Local Government (General) Regulation 2005
Section 212 - Reports on council investments
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We are accountable and transparent
Risk Management Issues for Council
This report is a control mechanism that assists in addressing the following potential risks to Council:
· Loss of investment income or capital resulting from ongoing management of investments, especially during difficult economic times
· Failure to demonstrate to the community that its funds are being expended in an efficient and effective manner
Internal / External Consultation
Council’s Community Engagement Strategy and IAP2 considers the community to be “any individual or group of individuals, organisation or political entity with an interest in the outcome of a decision….”
All relevant areas within the Council have consulted with the Finance Division in regards to the budget variations listed in this report.
The Finance Division has consulted with relevant external parties to confirm Council’s investment portfolio balances.
1⇩. |
Section 356 Financial Assistance Request - Combined Riders of Wagga Wagga (Toy Run) |
|
2⇩. |
Section 356 Financial Assistance Request - Ashmont Baptist Church |
|
3⇩. |
Section 356 Financial Assistance Request - Wagga Wagga Seventh Day Adventist Church |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 26 November 2018. RP-3
RP-3 CANBERRA REGION JOINT ORGANISATION (CRJO)
General Manager: Peter Thompson
Analysis: |
Council has been invited to join the Canberra Region Joint Organisation (CRJO) as an associate member. During the course of this calendar year, Wagga Wagga have actively participated in activities and meetings being coordinated by the CRJO as a non-member. The CRJO is professionally managed and Council has received substantial direct benefit through its short association with the organisation. |
That Council: a endorse becoming an associate member of the Canberra Region Joint Organisation b note the update regarding the Riverina Joint Organisation and REROC c approve the budget variation as detailed in the Financial Implications section of this report |
Report
Background
The Canberra region has strong strategic linkages for Wagga Wagga including commerce, transport (particularly airport), tourism and sport. The Canberra Region Joint Organisation (CRJO) provides a forum for Councils, State agencies and other stakeholders to work together at a regional level to identify shared priorities.
The CRJO provides advocacy for Councils and the NSW Government to work together to deliver things that matter the most to regional communities representing a strong commitment to collaborate in the long term to develop and support a shared vision for our regions. The member Councils involved in the CRJO include:
Bega Valley |
Hilltops |
Upper Lachlan |
Eurobodalla |
Queanbeyan-Palerang |
Goulburn Mulwaree |
Snowy Monaro |
Yass Valley |
ACT Government |
Snowy Valleys |
|
|
The CRJO has a vision to be a strong regional voice advocating strategic local government leadership and operates under following guiding principles:
· Cohesive - speaking with one voice on regional issues and valuing equal representation.
· Collaborative - by working transparently and in the spirit of trust across member councils, communities, governments, and with a wide range of partners.
· Aligned - with consistency between member Councils and NSW Government on regional strategies and policies.
· Efficient - by avoiding duplication and using resources within and available to member Councils wherever possible.
· Evidenced based - when introducing or transitioning programs and shared services.
· Educative - Challenging and improving as a sector and sharing information and opportunities between participating councils and the ACT.
· Flexible - Opportunities to operate at the sub-regional as well as regional level. Principles to opt in/opt out when deemed appropriate.
· Effective - Delivering real outcomes for the region through collaboration and shared delivery.
The CRJO operates under the following Governance structure:
· Board – Mayors (General Managers may attend; non-voting). Associate Members will attend at the invitation of the Board (non-voting)
· GMAC – General Managers of member and associate member Councils, provide recommendations to the Board through the Executive Officer
· Working Groups - Economic Development, Tourism (in collaboration with DSNSW), Waste Management, Infrastructure
The Canberra Region is a unique and diverse geographic region which stretches from the South-West Slopes, through the Sydney-Canberra Corridor across the Eurobodalla down to the Sapphire Coast and then up to the Snowy Mountains.
Benefits to Wagga Wagga
Wagga Wagga is ideally located and is only a two and a half hours drive from Canberra. The broader Canberra Region also offers a dynamic and diverse range of industries running from the Alpine, through the Tablelands and down to the Coast, contributing to an increasingly influential regional economy.
Wagga Wagga can leverage off the relationship with the CRJO to build a hub and spoke model with Australia’s Capital city and develop a coordinated approach with local government in the Canberra region to progress strategic issues such as freight, transport, tourism and economic development.
Since commencing with CRJO, Wagga Wagga has obtained the following benefits:
· Participation in joint organisation. Although we are not full members, we have nevertheless enjoyed the benefits of working through the JO to coordinate grant applications on a region wide basis.
· The CRJO played a significant role in our engagement with the Canberra Raiders, which led to the offer of a premiership match and the proposed establishment of Riverina Raiders.
· The CRJO has been instrumental in coordinating meetings with Ministers and senior State Government staff, both at CRJO meetings and on a one-on-one basis with the Wagga Wagga Mayor and General Manager.
· The ACT Government and the Canberra Airport are also active participants at CRJO meetings and both these entities offer beneficial links for Wagga Wagga City Council.
· The ability to gain the support of all the Canberra region Councils was a valuable feature of the Qantas Pilot Academy bid.
· The development of a Project Delivery Framework which provides linkages to the State Infrastructure Strategy 2018-2023. This framework is a template that has been populated into project Prospectus documents using a common language and specific project information for all levels of Government (confidential examples attached).
Wagga Wagga will play a key role in NSW freight and logistics in the future, and the CRJO provides a valuable forum to link our Riverina strategies with Canberra, Canberra Airport and the regional Councils surrounding Canberra. The lines of communication and trusting relationships which come from our membership will benefit all parties (both Wagga Wagga and Canberra regional Councils) as we move into the future.
The advantages which come from associate memberships need to be balanced with the additional cost of time commitment.
While we are not a member of a JO, the CRJO associate membership provides us with access to JO discussions and initiatives which are valuable. If we join a JO (other than CRJO) we can withdraw from the CRJO associate membership.
The CRJO have provided invaluable support and connections since our participation, including advocacy for priority projects and setting up meetings with Ministers and key staff.
REROC and the Riverina Joint Organisation
The REROC Board at its February Board meeting resolved to form a JO and adopted a model that allows for the continued operation of REROC, in its current structure side-by-side with the new JO.
Council’s preference was for a stand-alone JO and at the 26 February 2018 Ordinary council meeting resolved to establish a JO with Narrandera, Leeton, Snowy Valleys and any other Council where the Council also seeks to be part of a joint stand-alone organisation. This JO did not proceed with Snowy Valleys resolving to pursue full membership with the CRJO and Narrandera and Leeton have since resolved to join the RAMJO (Riverina and Murray Joint Organisation).
The Riverina Joint Organisation (RJO) was proclaimed in May 2018 with the following member Councils:
Bland |
Coolamon |
Cootamundra-Gundagai |
Greater Hume |
Junee |
Lockhart |
Temora |
|
At this stage, Council remains a member of REROC Inc, but not the RJO. The Mayor and General Manager recently addressed the RJO reaffirming Council’s desire to join a JO consisting of Councils that surround the city (ie REROC Councils), subject to further discussion and conditions. These discussions are continuing.
Council will remain a member of REROC for the remainder of this Financial Year. This membership will be reviewed prior to the renewal for the 2019/20 Financial Year.
Financial Implications
The 2018/19 CRJO associate membership fee is $39,045 (excluding GST).
It is proposed to fund the 2018/19 CRJO associate membership fee from the Council Election Reserve which is projected to exceed the amount required to conduct an election in 2020/21. The associate membership fee will be included in future budgets if Council support this recommendation.
The REROC Contribution fee for 2018/19 was $55,450 (excluding GST).
Policy and Legislation
Local Government Amendment (Regional Joint Organisations) Act 2017 No 65
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We plan long term
Risk Management Issues for Council
There is a risk that Council may not be included in key strategic planning discussions if it is not a member or an associate member of a JO.
Internal / External Consultation
Council has participated in numerous meetings with the CRJO and have held various discussions with REROC member councils and councils in the greater Riverina Murray Planning area.
Workshops have been held with Councillors on 20 August 2018 and 15 October 2018.
1. |
CRJO - Roads Projects Prospectus This matter is considered to be confidential under Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, as it deals with: commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. - Provided under separate cover |
|
2. |
CRJO - Water and Waste Water Projects Prospectus This matter is considered to be confidential under Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, as it deals with: commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it. - Provided under separate cover |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 26 November 2018. RP-4
RP-4 Council Meeting Schedule 2019
Author: Ingrid Hensley
General Manager: Peter Thompson
Analysis: |
The proposed Schedule of Ordinary Council Meetings for the calendar year 2019 has been prepared on the basis of two options being either monthly meetings or fortnightly meetings. Council has been trialling two meetings per month since May of this year. The report provides a schedule for either a return to monthly meetings or the continuation of two monthly meetings according to the preference of Council. |
That Council endorse the schedule of Ordinary Council meeting dates according to the preference of Council which make provision for ongoing two monthly meetings during January 2019 to December 2019, as outlined in the report. |
Report
At the Ordinary Meeting of Council held 26 February 2018, Council resolved to hold two Ordinary Council Meetings per month between May 2018 and December 2018 (inclusive). An amended Code of Meeting Practice was accordingly adopted on 23 April 2018, and fortnightly meetings were scheduled for the remainder of the 2018 calendar year. Prior to that time Ordinary Meetings of Council were held monthly.
It is proposed that Ordinary Meetings of Council continue to be held on the second and fourth Monday of each month (unless something influences scheduling), commencing at 6pm with public addresses to occur at the start of each meeting.
Proposed Ordinary Meeting of Council Schedule for 2019
The following dates are proposed:
Monthly Meetings |
Twice Monthly Meetings |
Tuesday 29 January 2019 (see notes below) |
Tuesday 29 January 2019 (see notes below) |
Monday, 25 February 2019 |
Monday, 11 February 2019 |
Monday, 25 March 2019 |
Monday, 25 February 2019 |
Monday, 29 April 2019 |
Monday, 11 March 2019 |
Monday, 27 May 2019 |
Monday, 25 March 2019 |
Monday, 24 June 2019 |
Monday, 8 April 2019 |
Monday, 22 July 2019 |
Monday, 29 April 2019 Monday, |
Monday, 26 August 2019 |
13 May 2019 |
Monday, 23 September 2019 |
Monday, 27 May 2019 |
Monday, 28 October 2019 |
Tuesday, 11 June 2019 (Meeting on Tuesday due to Queens Birthday Public Holiday) |
Monday, 25 November 2019 |
Monday, 24 June 2019 |
Monday, 16 December 2019 (Amended to three weeks due to Christmas break) |
Monday, 8 July 2019 |
|
Monday, 22 July 2019 |
|
Monday, 12 August 2019 |
|
Monday, 26 August 2019 |
|
Monday, 9 September 2019 |
|
Monday, 23 September 2019 |
|
Tuesday, 8 October 2019 (Meeting on Tuesday due to Labour Day Public Holiday. See also notes below) |
|
Monday, 28 October 2019 |
|
Monday, 11 November 2019 |
|
Monday, 25 November 2019 |
|
Monday, 16 December 2019 (Amended to three weeks due to Christmas break) |
Notes:
· For the January 2019 meeting there is an alternative option of holding the meeting on Tuesday, 29 January 2019, to accommodate the Australia Day Public Holiday. It is noted both dates are in the NSW Public School Holidays.
· The first October meeting has been moved forward one week from 14 October as the 2019 Annual Conference of Local Government NSW is scheduled for 14 - 16 October 2019.
· The Financial Statements will be considered at the Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee on 10 October 2019 and at the Ordinary Meeting of Council on 28 October 2019.
In addition to the schedule of meetings set out above, the Local Government Act 1993 and Council’s adopted Code of Meeting Practice provides the ability for Extraordinary Meetings of the Council in accordance with prescribed provisions.
Fortnightly Meeting Structure
In order to evaluate the trial period of twice monthly meetings a break-down of the content of meetings is provided and from that information the following observations can be made:
· More reports are considered per month by holding two monthly meetings than holding monthly meetings.
· Despite considering more reports over the course of a year, Councillor and staff time taken to consider the reports is less by holding two meetings per month.
|
Two Monthly Meetings* |
Monthly Meetings |
Average number of reports per Ordinary Council meeting |
17 |
29 |
Average number of reports called (not engloboed) |
9 (52%) |
17 (60%) |
Based on averages, total number of reports over 12 months (assumes 22 two monthly meetings and 12 monthly) |
368 |
348 |
Average length of meeting |
61.4 minutes (1 hour) |
154.3 minutes (2 and ½ hours) |
Average number of reports deferred/withdrawn per meeting
Proportion of all reports that end up deferred |
0.8
5% |
1
3% |
Of other Councils classified as URM (Urban Regional Medium) eight meet monthly; six meet twice monthly and two meet three-weekly.
Financial Implications
If Council meets twice monthly instead of monthly, then there are some cost implications. These relate mainly to livestreaming, staffing costs (support, preparation and attendance for the meetings and Reports/Business Papers) and, to a lesser extent, meal arrangements.
There is a cost implication for staff required to attend and support these meetings. The range of ‘ordinary hours’ under the Local Government (State) Award 2017 for staff that would typically be required to assist with Council meetings is from 6.00am to 6.00pm. Hours worked outside of this by direction are payable at an overtime rate. The overtime rate of pay is time-and-a-half for the first two hours and double time thereafter. Overtime is by direction. With prior agreement, employees may elect to be granted Time in Lieu instead of an overtime payment. This clause does not apply to Senior Staff (as defined in the Local Government Act (1993) (NSW)) or to employees engaged under the Award in the Executive Classification (Band 4).
There is a small pool of staff to whom the Overtime and TOIL provisions apply for Council Meetings. For this calendar year to date (January to October 2018) there was a direct cost of approximately $7,000 related to staff attending meetings (overtime and TOIL costs). Although there is an impact on staff time as a result of more frequent meetings this mainly relates to preparation and review of Business Papers and reports and preparation and facilitation of the meetings, which is not an additional Overtime or TOIL cost.
There is an additional cost of approximately $250 per meeting for meal arrangements if Council meets more frequently than monthly.
A separate report will be provided to Council on whether to continue the livestreaming service and with further information showing user statistics and costs associated with improving the user experience as provided in the feedback of the service.
However, given the major cost implication for Council in running two meetings per month is the livestreaming of meetings, with each meeting currently costing approximately $1,000 to livestream an overview of the cost implications is provided in this Report. The approximate additional costs to align with the decision in December 2017 to continue with livestreaming until the end of the 2018/19 Financial Year are: 2017/18 - $2,000 and 2018/19 - $5,000. The additional cost of $5,000 to livestream meetings for the remainder of this calendar year was included in the 2018/19 budget and considered at the 25 June 2018 Council meeting.
The current consultation draft of the new Model Code of Meeting Practice for Local Councils in NSW states that all meetings of the council and committees of the council are to be webcast (Clause 5.18)
Livestreaming of the Council meetings requires certain equipment and services. If livestreaming is to continue then funds will need to be set aside in the upcoming Council budget for equipment, including potential audio, video and lighting technology (to provide this service ‘in house’) or funds to continue to engage an external livestreaming provider. The response from the staff and community to date is that they would like to see livestreaming continued but some Staff surveyed have suggested more simplified options of livestreaming, with the intent of minimising cost.
Council does not currently have the necessary equipment, expertise, technology and/or licenses to provide audio and/or video streaming on an ongoing basis. Indicative costings for livestreaming of Council meetings ‘in house’ provided by Council’s Information Technology staff are between approximately $15,000 to $30,000, if cameras are to be purchased. There would also be possible additional costs in the form of ongoing staff resources (approximately $7,000 per annum for meeting attendance) and a possible subscription to a content delivery network, between $3,000 and $14,000 per annum.
It is proposed to discuss the livestreaming options (continue current practice; implement a more simplified option; or discontinue livestreaming altogether) during the Councillor budget workshop being held in early February 2019.
Policy and Legislation
Under Section 365 Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) (the Act), Council is required to meet ten times a year, each time in a separate month, with “year” meaning the period from 1 July to the following 30 June (the financial year). Many councils meet more frequently than this.
To ensure compliance with the provisions of Section 365, the proposed Schedule of Ordinary Meetings of Council for the calendar year 2018 provides for:
a. 11 meetings in the first half of 2019 (making a total of 22 meetings for the 2018/19 financial year, inclusive of the 11 meetings of Council which will have been held in the second half of 2018); and
b. 11 meetings of Council held in the second half of 2019 (making a total of 22 meetings for the 2019/20 financial year, on the basis that a further 11 meetings of Council will be scheduled for the first half of 2020).
Under Section 226(d) of the Act the role of the Mayor includes “to exercise, in cases of necessity, the policy-making functions of the governing body of the council between meetings of the council”. In addition, Council can hold extraordinary meetings outside the normal meeting cycle to consider matters of an urgent nature in accordance with Section 366 of the Act and the Wagga Wagga City Council Code of Meeting Practice.
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We are accountable and transparent
Risk Management Issues for Council
The General Manager has delegation, in consultation with the Mayor, to change a date and/or time of an Ordinary Council meeting if deemed appropriate. This enables changes to be made in a timely manner without the requirement of a separate Council resolution.
Internal / External Consultation
73% of staff surveyed said they preferred Council meetings to be fortnightly. The remaining responses equally preferred a monthly or three-weekly meeting cycle. The main benefit, from the perspective of Council staff, was a faster turnaround of reports followed by increased efficiency for their role. The main challenges identified with fortnightly meetings were more regular reviewing of reports and issues associated with deadlines and quality assurance of reports.
Only a small number of responses were received from the community. All respondents saw it as important how often Council meets to make decisions but indicated it would not impact how frequently they watched or attended a meeting. All respondents preferred the option of fortnightly meetings.
Below is a summary of engagement activities undertaken in addition to internal consultation across relevant areas and externally with other Councils:
Engagement Activity |
Period |
Staff Survey |
2 November until 9 November |
Community survey (Your Say) |
5 November until 11 November |
|
|
Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
|||||||||||||
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news story |
Council News advert |
Media releases |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meetings |
Your Say website |
Community meetings |
Stakeholder workshops |
Drop-in sessions |
Surveys and feedback forms |
Social media |
Email newsletters |
Website |
Digital advertising |
|
TIER |
|||||||||||||||||
Consult |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y |
Y |
|
||||
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 26 November 2018. RP-5
Author: Nicole Johnson
General Manager: Peter Thompson
Analysis: |
An update is provided on the response to the Notice of Motion – Complaints Management Framework made in February 2017. |
That Council note the process underway on the review of Council’s Complaints Management Framework. |
Report
At the 27 February 2017 meeting, Council resolved (Res No 17/027):
That Council receives a report in conjunction with the review of POL 103 Complaints Handling Policy which outlines a strategy and/or improvements to meet the following goals:
a improve the ease in which community members can make complaints especially online
b a clear and simple user guide outlining the complaints process including:
i a way to clearly communicate the process for complaints that cannot be managed immediately
ii explaining the difference between council complaints and Code of Conduct complaints
iii expected timeframes
c explore the need and/or creation of a multi-lingual document
d to create a process in which council can respond to complaints that are not made directly to council eg: social media, traditional media
To commence actioning this Resolution, an internal audit was conducted on Council’s complaints handling arrangements. This audit identified a number of areas for improvement. The Internal Audit Report was considered by Council’s Audit, Risk and Improvement Committee at its December 2017 meeting.
In response, internal stakeholders collaborated to identify improvements to Council’s complaints handling arrangements, including consideration of the items raised in the Resolution and Internal Audit Report.
Key focus areas included:
· The need to provide a consistent organisational understanding and response to customer complaints;
· Consideration of a variety of options, including promotion of how customers can contact Council and what they can contact Council about (in line with the Community Strategic Plan 2040 - Wagga View); and
· Promotion of the role of customer complaints as a valuable tool for Council to further understand and respond to customer expectations.
In undertaking this process it was identified that there was an opportunity to clarify with the community the difference between a complaint and a service request. As a result, information has been developed and placed on the website which highlights these key differences and provides practical examples.
The ease in which community members can make complaints has been improved. The homepage of Council’s website now has a link labelled “compliments and complaints”. Selecting this option takes the customer to a simple form which asks for a description of the complaints and contact details. The link also provides connection to the Complaints Handling Policy and a contact number if the customer would prefer to speak to an officer rather than fill out a form.
The process for managing complaints has also been simplified. In general terms a complaint will be managed by one of three positions, depending upon its nature. The positions are: Manager Risk and Governance; Manager People and Culture and General Manager. It is the responsibility of these three positions to respond to complaints and keep the complainant updated on actioning of the complaint.
Another improvement in simplifying the process is the clarification of whether a concern is a service request or a complaint. This question is answered according to the following simple terms: is the customer seeking information about a Council service or facility, wanting to report a problem or requesting assistance from Council (‘service request’) or is the customer expressing dissatisfaction about Council’s quality and timeliness of service, decisions, policies, procedures and conduct of employees/Councillors (‘complaint’).
While the different types of complaints in the local government context are numerous and complex, the reality is that the complainant doesn’t need to undertake this classification process. The above two tests are all that is required to allocate the concern to the correct area of council for action.
There are currently a range of options that can be utilised by the community when making a complaint, which may be made:
· In person, verbally
· by phone
· in writing
· on-line (complaint and compliments form)
· web chat
· by social media
· through contact with Council officers or Councillors
· by fax or email
· through responses to Voice of the Customer and/or Your Say surveys
Council does not currently monitor complaints that are not directly made to the organisation (for example, ‘letters to the editor’). Council will instead consider strategies to encourage complaints from vulnerable people and people reluctant to raise concerns, for example through reference material made available to the public, including through community engagement opportunities. Resources are focussed on creating clear referral procedures to facilitate a commitment to efficient and fair resolution of complaints. Having a user-friendly procedure for lodging complaints and a simple process for dealing with them is consistent with the Office of Local Government’s recommendations of processes that councils should have in place for managing complaints.
Council’s current Customer Service Charter and Complaints Handling Policy include timeframes for acknowledgment and resolution of complaints. Further opportunities to ensure clarity and consistency of timeframes, to support the actioning, recording, monitoring and reporting of complaints will form part of a review of the Policy. Part of the complaints management process, including the handling of online complaints, includes clear communication of expectations to the complainant, expected timeframes and a contact person within Council.
Council has considered multi-lingual written communications for specific areas, for example safety river signage in English and six other languages. To date there has not been an identified need for multilingual complaint handling material. Consideration of creating multi-lingual documents for other Council material (which may include complaints material) requires identification of Council’s most highly utilised documents and collaboration with external organisations (e.g. Multicultural Council and Red Cross) to understand what documents people may want, and in what languages. Currently, individual multilingual needs have been met on a case-by-case basis, including utilising telephone interpreter services. Council is increasingly creating accessible documents and, in the event that Council’s website is re-designed then multi-lingual functionality will be taken into account, which will be assisted by Council’s complaints information currently being web-based rather than in PDF form. In the interim, use of Google Translate will be considered.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
POL 103 Complaints Handling Policy
Link to Strategic Plan
Community Leadership and Collaboration
Objective: We have strong leadership
Outcome: We are accountable and transparent
Risk Management Issues for Council
Undertaking this process provides an opportunity to understand the nature of customer complaints, including any trends that could lead to improvement opportunities, in addition to ensuring consistency between practice and Council’s adopted policies and procedures.
A review of the efficiency and effectiveness of Council’s complaints handling arrangements includes ensuring that processes are clearly documented and are easy to understand and apply. This will help to minimise risks such as inefficient and untimely handling of complaints, damage to Council’s reputation, inability to meet objectives and unfair or discourteous handling of complaints or failure to adhere to policies and procedures.
Internal / External Consultation
An internal Working Group has been established, to provide input into outcomes to meet these objectives and deliver on outcomes, including to clarify and promote the role of customer complaints as a valuable tool for Council to further understand and respond to customer expectations.
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 26 November 2018. RP-6
RP-6 Draft Planning Proposal LEP18/0008 with Council addendum - reduction to minimum lot size control to Lots 35 - 40 DP 1062621 and Lots 1 - 4, 6 DP 1127328 on Manuka Road and Dandaloo Road, Lake Albert
Author: Adam Wood
Director: Natalie Te Pohe
Analysis: |
The purpose of this planning proposal is to reduce the minimum lot size for Lots 35 – 40 DP 1062621 and Lots 1 – 4, 6 DP 1127328 from 2 ha to 1.5 ha. This proposal originated from landowners of Lot 35 (John and Angela Kjeldsen). The recommendation is to endorse and proceed with the planning proposal. |
That Council: a support the planning proposal LEP18/0008 (and addendum prepared by City Strategy) to amend the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 b submit a planning proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment for Gateway Determination c adopt the planning proposal to amend the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 if no submissions are received d receive a further report after the public exhibition period; i addressing any submissions made in respect of the planning proposal ii proposing adoption of the planning proposal unless there are any recommended amendments deemed to be substantial and requiring a further public exhibition period |
Application Details
Proposal: |
Amendment to the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 to reduce the minimum lot size provisions applicable to Lot 35 DP 1062621 |
Land Owners: |
Lot 35 DP 1062621 – John and Angela Kjeldsen |
Referrals: |
Standard internal referrals |
Description of Proposal
This report relates to Planning Proposal LEP18/0008. The planning proposal as originally submitted by John and Angela Kjeldsen seeks to reduce the minimum lot size provisions applicable to Lot 35 DP 1062621 from from 2 hectares to 1.5 hectares as per the illustration below.
The current minimum lot size of 2 ha does not allow this lot to be subdivided from its current size of 3.14 ha in order to make efficient and suitable use of the disused portion. The intent to reduce the minimum lot size control to allow for this subdivision to occur at Lot 35 DP 1062621 is supported in principle.
An assessment of the application has concluded that the planning proposal may proceed and that the 1.5 hectare provision also be applied to Lots 35 – 40 DP 1062621 and Lots 1 – 4, 6 DP 1127328 as per the image below consistent with the existing subdivision pattern and lot sizes in Dandaloo Road and Manuka Road.
The amended proposal will provide the opportunity to subdivide Lot 35 but will not create an opportunity for the other lots included in the amended proposal to be subdivided. The amended proposal will merely result in a minimum lot size requirement reflective and generally consistent with the existing subdivision pattern in the precinct.
Site and location
The subject land is within the R5 Large Lot Residential Zone. It is bounded to the north, south and west by lands also within the R5 Large Lot Residential Zone. Land to the east is within RU1 Primary Production Zone. The eastern extent of the subject land is located at the present urban limit of Wagga Wagga at this locale. Lands to the immediate north have not been developed to the full extent permitted by current zoning and other planning provisions. Only one title with one dwelling exists on that land at present.
With the exception of Lot 35, the lots along Dandaloo Road and Manuka Road are all between 1.2ha and 2.37ha in size. Lot 35 is the largest lot in this precinct, being 3.13ha in size.
Key issues
The assessment report (attached) has taken into account various considerations relevant to the subject lands. These include:
1. Compatibility of the Planning Proposal with the existing character of the area.
The planning proposal is consistent with the existing character of the area. The area comprising the subject land is characterised by large residential lots maintaining a rural setting. The planning proposal would provide for an additional one lot to be created by subdivision. This would occur at Lot 35 DP 1062621.
Presently Lot 35 DP 1062621 is 3.14ha in size. This is approximately 25% larger than the next largest lot size within the Dandaloo and Manuka Road precinct and approximately double the average size of 1.55ha of all other lots in this precinct. This is not reflective of the pattern of subdivision and development within the precinct. The subdivision of Lot 35 DP 1062621 would produce two lots of a size comparable to this average dimension. This makes efficient use of urban lands in the provision of housing while the new lot remains representative of the existing neighbourhood character and development pattern.
The prepared addendum to the planning proposal applies the minimum lot size of 1.5ha to the entirety of the Dandaloo and Manuka Road precinct. This better clarifies the intent of the planning proposal. As a result, it will be clear within LEP mapping that the Dandaloo and Manuka Road precinct comprises a discrete residential precinct with a consistent pattern of development provided for. The planning proposal seeks to make efficient use of these lands whilst retaining the existing character in this area. Extending the bounds of the planning proposal to the entirety of the Dandaloo and Manuka Road precinct will not create an opportunity for subdivision of new lots other than at Lot 35 DP 1062621.
2. The compatibility of potential development outcomes with the continuing R5 Large Lot Residential Zone objectives.
The planning proposal will change the minimum lot size control applicable to the subject lands only. There will be no substantial change to the landscape setting and scenic qualities to result. No environmentally sensitive locations are existing within the subject lands or nearby to be affected by the development of lands made possible by the planning proposal. The planning proposal upholds the objective to provide residential housing in a rural setting while preserving environmentally sensitive locations and scenic qualities.
The planning proposal does not allow for substantial change in the subdivision pattern of the area. Only one additional lot is able to be created within the subject lands. No significant impediment to the ability to subdivide the subject lands into smaller parcels in future will result.
Conclusion
This assessment has found the planning proposal to be broadly sound, subject to a Council-initiated addendum. The planning proposal will raise the utility of the subject lands in a manner that is responsive to site-specific circumstances and provides consistency with existing strategy. There is sufficient strategic justification to proceed with the planning proposal.
The proposal is supported for the following reasons:
· The planning proposal provides potential for development maximising the available utility of the subject lands, is sympathetic to the surrounding locality and compatible with the land use zoning.
· The planning proposal has achieved an acceptable level of compliance with strategic content as assessed in this report.
· The planning proposal is justified against the requirements of relevant S9.1 Ministerial Directions.
· The investigation of the subject land provided with the application is sufficient to support the planning proposal and forward to the Department of Planning and Environment seeking Gateway Determination.
To comply with the NSW Department of Planning and Environment guidelines and to support the planning proposal, council staff will prepare a proposed timeline as an addendum to the proposal prior to submitting for Gateway Determination.
Financial Implications
In accordance with Council’s 2018/19 Fees and Charges, a Minor LEP Amendment (minor complexity) attracts a total application fee of $7,500. The proponent has paid this fee. There are no requirements to amend the DCP therefore the $2,000 fee for such action is not required to be paid in this instance.
Policy and Legislation
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010
Link to Strategic Plan
The Environment
Objective: We plan for the growth of the city
Outcome: We have sustainable urban development
Risk Management Issues for Council
An approval of the proposal may be subject to public scrutiny during the public consultation process and may put additional pressure on Council to consider the reduction of the minimum lot size requirements throughout the local government area.
Refusal of the application may result in an appeal process. The applicant has the ability to appeal Council’s decision by submitting the planning proposal to the Department of Planning and Environment through a pre-Gateway review process. The reasons for refusal will have to be justified and withstand scrutiny and cross examination.
Internal / External Consultation
Formal public consultation with land owners, the general public and referral agencies will occur after the Gateway Determination. Pre-consultation with owners of lands directly affected by Council’s addendum to the planning proposal has occurred between 26/09/2018 and 26/10/2018. No submissions were received.
1⇩. |
LEP18/0008 - Planning proposal as submitted by John and Angela Kjeldson |
|
2⇩. |
LEP18/0008 - City Strategy Assessment |
|
3⇩. |
LEP18/0008 - Addendum to Planning Proposal, prepared by City Strategy |
|
RP-7 PROPOSED APEX BIKE FACILITY AT APEX PARK - LAKE ALBERT
Author: Glenda Pym
Director: Natalie Te Pohe
Analysis: |
Council has received a request from South Wagga Apex for support in the development of a community bike facility at Apex Park adjacent to Lake Albert. The Facility would include a pump track with skill testing elements and will complement the existing recreational infrastructure within Apex Park while also providing a social gathering space for youth.
The addition of fit for purpose cycling facilities will increase opportunities for youth and family recreational activities in what is already popular recreational space.
Council previously provided South Wagga Apex $1,500 in funding through the annual grants program to assist them in the design of the facilities. |
That Council: a support the proposed South Wagga Apex Bike Facility project for implementation if future grant funding can be secured b provide in-kind assistance to South Wagga Apex for the planning and the submission of funding applications for the Facility c approve the budget variation outlined in the Financial Implications section of this report |
Report
Apex is a volunteer community service organisation with clubs across urban and rural Australia. Apex raises awareness about social justice issues and assists communities in practical ways. South Wagga Apex has contributed over $2.1M and 46,000 hours of service for the benefit of the Wagga Wagga community.
Council has received a request from South Wagga Apex for support in the development of a community bike facility at Apex Park adjacent to Lake Albert in a currently unutilised space. The facility would include a pump track with skill testing elements and will complement the existing recreational infrastructure within Apex Park while also providing a social gathering space for a youth demographic not currently serviced in this area.
The Apex Bike Facility when constructed will be important given its direct links to the Lake Albert shared path and future cycle ways. It has the capacity to be utilised as both a destination and a journey, and could be accessed by car, bike and foot.
South Wagga Apex consider that the proposed Bike Facility will support a broad range of user groups given the location already attracts a wide cross section of the community.
The construction of the Apex Bike Facility would provide significant benefits for the community inclusive of:
· Increased liveability of the city through the provision of active recreational facilities in suburban locations
· The provision of facilities for those members of the community who wish to be active on an informal, casual or spontaneous basis
· The provision of local facilities addressing the identified challenges youth face in regards to accessing formalised recreational activities due to a lack of public transport
· The facility will also increase access to no or low cost active recreation for children and young people who have limited resources, reducing boredom and disengagement.
Completion of project planning documentation and support from Council will allow for grant funding application opportunities. Recently a funding opportunity became available through the Australian Sports Commission’s Community Sport Infrastructure Grant Program. Due to extremely tight timeframes, South Wagga Apex made an application for funding with the understanding that should Council’s endorsement of the project not be forthcoming the application would be withdrawn.
Financial Implications
It is proposed that Council contribute $5,000 from the Renew Recreational Assets annual recurrent budget towards landscaping of the area following construction.
It is proposed that Council contribute in-kind staff time during the planning stage of this project, which would be funded from within existing salary budgets.
Policy and Legislation
This project meets the strategic priorities of partnership collaboration, maximising utilisation and activation of public spaces and improved community health identified in the Recreation, Open Space and Community Strategy and Implementation Plan 2040.
Link to Strategic Plan
Safe and Healthy Community
Objective: We promote a healthy lifestyle
Outcome: We promote participation across a variety of sports and recreation
Risk Management Issues for Council
N/A
Internal / External Consultation
Consultation has been undertaken with South Wagga Apex. South Wagga Apex have consulted with Cycling Australia with regard to future programming at the proposed Bike Facility.
External and internal consultation will be required during the detailed planning phase of the project should appropriate external funding be secured.
1⇩. |
Proposed Apex Bike Park Location |
|
2⇩. |
Lake Albert Bike Facility Concept |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council<