Agenda
and
Business Paper
To be held on
Monday 24
March 2025
at 6:00 PM
Civic Centre cnr Baylis and Morrow Streets,
Wagga Wagga NSW 2650 (PO Box 20)
P 1300 292 442
P council@wagga.nsw.gov.au
wagga.nsw.gov.au
NOTICE OF MEETING
The proceedings of all Council meetings in open session, including all debate and addresses by the public, are recorded (audio visual) and livestreamed on Council’s website including for the purpose of facilitating community access to meetings and accuracy of the Minutes.
In addition to webcasting council meetings, audio recordings of confidential sessions of Ordinary Meetings of Council are also recorded, but do not form part of the webcast.
WAGGA WAGGA CITY COUNCILLORS
STATEMENT OF ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS
Councillors are reminded of their Oath or Affirmation of Office made under Section 233A of the Local Government Act 1993 and their obligation under Council’s Code of Conduct to disclose and appropriately manage Conflicts of Interest.
QUORUM
The quorum for a meeting of the Council, is a majority of the Councillors of the Council, who hold office for the time being, who are eligible to vote at the meeting.
Reports submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on Monday 24 March 2025.
Ordinary Meeting of Council AGENDA AND BUSINESS PAPER
Monday 24 March 2025
CLAUSE PRECIS PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY 2
REFLECTION 2
APOLOGIES 2
Confirmation of Minutes
CM-1 CONFIRMATION OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - 10 MARCH 2025 2
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 2
Motions Of Which Due Notice Has Been Given
NOM-1 NOTICE OF MOTION – ADDRESSING ILLEGAL & DANGEROUS MOTORCYCLE ACTIVITY IN WAGGA WAGGA 3
Reports from Staff
RP-1 LEP24/0003 - Planning Proposal - Southern Growth Area Zone 1 6
RP-2 PETITION - RETICULATED GAS IN NEW SUBDIVISIONS 30
RP-3 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT AS AT 28 FEBRUARY 2025 32
RP-4 WAGGA WAGGA DESTINATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 2025-2034 65
RP-5 COMMUNITY ENERGY UPGRADES FUND (CEUF) – OASIS REGIONAL AQUATIC CENTRE 152
RP-6 QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE 155
Confidential Reports
CONF-1 REQUEST FOR RENTAL CREDIT - EASTERN RIVERINA ARTS 159
CONF-2 EXPRESSION OF INTEREST - CAFE/CANTEEN SITES 160
CONF-3 ADDITIONAL REQUEST FOR LICENCE OF COUNCIL LAND TO FACILITATE MARSHALLS CREEK BRIDGE UPGRADE 161
CONF-4 RFT CT2025025 ACTIVE TRAVEL PLAN STATE 1 - FOREST HILL LINK CONSTRUCTION 162
CONF-5 DEED OF AGREEMENT - ROAD FUNDING 163
Wagga Wagga City Council acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land, the Wiradjuri people, and pays respect to Elders past, present and future and extends our respect to all First Nations Peoples in Wagga Wagga.
We recognise and respect their cultural heritage, beliefs and continuing connection with the land and rivers. We also recognise the resilience, strength and pride of the Wiradjuri and First Nations communities
REFLECTION
Councillors, let us in silence reflect upon our responsibilities to the community which we represent, and to all future generations and faithfully, and impartially, carry out the functions, powers, authorities and discretions vested in us, to the best of our skill and judgement.
CM-1 CONFIRMATION OF ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES - 10 MARCH 2025
That the Minutes of the proceedings of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 10 March 2025 be confirmed as a true and accurate record.
|
1⇩. |
Minutes - Council Meeting - 10 March 2025 |
164 |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
NOM-1 |
Motions Of Which Due Notice Has Been Given
NOM-1 NOTICE OF MOTION – ADDRESSING ILLEGAL & DANGEROUS MOTORCYCLE ACTIVITY IN WAGGA WAGGA
Author: Councillor Richard Foley
Summary: |
This motion seeks to combat illegal motorcycle activity in Wagga Wagga through enforcement, physical deterrents, legislative measures, and funding opportunities to enhance public safety. Councillors and the Executive team are scheduled to meet with the Local Police in April to be briefed on local crime trends and issues, however I believe this is a critical issue that needs to start progressing now. |
That Council:
a acknowledges the growing community concern regarding the reckless and unlawful operation of unregistered motorcycles within the Wagga Wagga local government area, particularly in public spaces such as laneways, parks, causeways, stormwater drains, and pedestrian areas
b writes to NSW Police, the Local Area Command, and relevant road safety authorities to explore increased enforcement measures, including:
i targeted police operations to identify and apprehend offenders
ii public awareness campaigns to educate residents on reporting incidents, promoting safer streets, and increasing the use of Crime Stoppers for anonymous reporting
iii investigating the use of CCTV surveillance and license plate recognition technology to support enforcement and identify repeat offenders
c receive a further report within six (6) months, that:
i investigates and reports on the feasibility and implementation of physical deterrents, including but not limited to:
· the installation of barrier systems, fencing, gates, bollards, speed humps, and other access control measures in high-risk areas to prevent motorcycles from unlawfully entering public spaces
· reviewing local road infrastructure and public space designs to minimise access points for illegal riders while ensuring accessibility for pedestrians and emergency services
· conducting site assessments of identified hotspots and providing recommendations for urgent intervention
ii explores legislative and enforcement mechanisms available to Council under the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), Roads Act 1993 (NSW), and Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW), including but not limited to:
· Council’s power to regulate public spaces and enforce local orders prohibiting unauthorised vehicle use in parks and public land
· provisions for traffic control measures, including restricting access to certain roadways and laneways
· enabling Council to issue penalty notices for excessive noise and environmental nuisance caused by illegal motorcycle activity
· the ability to introduce local orders restricting access to specific areas known for illegal motorcycle activity
iii explores funding opportunities at both the state and federal government level to finance infrastructure solutions and enhanced enforcement measures, including but not limited to:
· the NSW Safer Cities Program
· the Federal Black Spot Program (if safety concerns on roads are identified)
· the Local Government Road Safety Program (administered by Transport for NSW)
· Crime Prevention & Community Safety Grants applicable to reducing antisocial behaviour
· potential funding under Community Infrastructure or Public Safety Initiatives from NSW and Commonwealth sources
Report
The growing issue of unregistered and reckless motorcyclists within the Wagga Wagga LGA is causing serious safety concerns. These riders frequently travel at excessive speeds, ride against traffic, and unlawfully enter public spaces such as parks, pedestrian walkways, and stormwater drains. Their dangerous behaviour not only puts lives at risk but also disrupts community amenity and liveability.
Residents and businesses have repeatedly raised concerns about the public safety threats posed by these riders, the persistent noise disturbances at all hours, and the perceived lack of enforcement to curb this escalating issue. While NSW Police play a primary role in law enforcement, Council has a responsibility to manage public spaces effectively and support enforcement efforts through proactive measures.
A comprehensive approach is needed to address this issue. This includes the introduction of physical deterrents such as barriers, fencing, gates, and speed humps to restrict access to high-risk areas. Additionally, enhanced monitoring through CCTV surveillance and number plate recognition technology can assist law enforcement in identifying offenders.
Council must also explore legislative tools under the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), Roads Act 1993 (NSW), and Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 (NSW) to introduce enforceable restrictions and penalties against offenders. Further, seeking funding from state and federal programs, such as the NSW Safer Cities Program and the Federal Black Spot Program, will ensure that necessary infrastructure and enforcement measures can be implemented without imposing financial strain on ratepayers.
This motion proposes a multi-faceted strategy that integrates enforcement, infrastructure improvements, legislative action, and public engagement to deter illegal motorcycle activity and enhance public safety across the Wagga Wagga LGA.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
Code of Meeting Practice
Code of Conduct
Local Government Act 1993
Roads Act 1993
Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997
Link to Strategic Plan
Community leadership and collaboration
Objective: Wagga Wagga has strong community leadership and a shared vision for the future
Our leaders represent our community
Risk Management Issues for Council
N/A
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
RP-1 |
Reports from Staff
RP-1 LEP24/0003 - Planning Proposal - Southern Growth Area Zone 1
Author: Matthew Yeomans
Executive: John Sidgwick
Summary: |
Council is in receipt of a proponent-led planning proposal to rezone land in Zone 1 of the Southern Growth Area (SGA).
The proposal seeks to establish a new community consisting of circa 2,900 dwellings that will be supported by enabling infrastructure and services.
This assessment recommends and confirms that the draft Planning Proposal has strategic merit and site-specific merit. The high-level objectives and intended outcomes are supported.
Whilst there are outstanding documentation requirements, these matters are appropriate to manage, update and complete during the Gateway Determination process.
This report recommends that Council support the proposal in-principle, subject to the changes outlined in this report, and direct staff to lodge the draft Planning Proposal with the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) requesting Gateway Determination. In lodging the draft Planning Proposal to DPHI, staff will request the remaining matters be conditioned on any favourable Gateway Determination and ensure completion prior to formal public exhibition of the proposal. |
That Council:
a endorse Planning Proposal LEP24/0003, subject to the contents of this report.
b write to the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) requesting a gateway determination under s3.34 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act).
c request that the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) include a condition in the Gateway Determination requiring the outstanding matters listed in this report be resolved prior to exhibition of the draft Planning Proposal as outlined in the recommendation made in Section 11 of the Planning Proposal Assessment Report.
d on receipt of a Gateway Determination under section 3.34 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979, Council enact all the requirements of the Gateway Determination and requirements of Schedule 1, clause 4 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979
e delegate authority to the General Manager or their delegate of all functions under section 3.36 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to make the local environmental plan and put into effect the Planning Proposal.
f delegate authority to the General Manager or their delegate to make any variations to the planning proposal, to correct any drafting errors or anomalies to ensure consistency with the Gateway Determination or to address any other matter that may arise during the amendment process.
g receive a further report on the outcome of the public exhibition of the Planning Proposal.
h require the proponent to update the draft Planning Proposal to demonstrate consistency with the Wagga Wagga Recreation, Open Space and Community (ROSC) 2040 Strategy.
i provide in principle support for the development of a contributions plan that addresses the infrastructure required for the Southern Growth Area (SGA) Zone 1 and that Council staff subsequently report this matter to Council with the intent that the planning proposal and draft contribution plan are placed on public exhibition at the same time.
j seek approval from Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) to identify Zone 1 of the Southern Growth Area (SGA) as an Urban Release Area with an infrastructure contribution cap of $30,000.
Planning Proposal Application Details
Applicant: |
Cameron Beames (Rowan Village Pty Ltd) On behalf of: · Rowan Village Pty Ltd (Devcore Property Group Pty Ltd) · Sunnyside Ventures Pty Ltd |
Director: |
Daniel McMillan |
Subject land: |
Street Address: · 7066 Holbrook Road, Rowan NSW 2650, · 456 Plumpton Road, Rowan, NSW 2650 · 474 Plumpton Road, Rowan, NSW 2650 · 16 Lloyd Road, Springvale, NSW 2650 Legal Description: Lot 18 DP1054800, Lot 24, 26, 43, 65 and 66 DP757246, Lot 23 DP1063399, Lot 1 and 2 DP1171894, Lot 23 DP757246, Lot 25 DP757246, Lot 1 DP870056 |
Landowners |
Refer to confidential attachment 1 |
Report
The subject planning proposal seeks to amend the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 (LEP) to:
· Rezone the subject land from RU1 Primary Production zoned land and R5 Large Lot Residential to the following mix of land use zones:
o R1 – General Residential
o R3 – Medium Density Residential
o R5 – Large Lot Residential
o RE1 – Public Recreation
o E1 – Local Centre
o SP2 – Infrastructure (School)
· Remove the minimum lot size of 200 hectares and 2 hectares.
· Apply a minimum lot size of 2,000m2 for the proposed R5 Large Lot Residential zone.
· Amend the ‘Urban Release Area Map’ to include the subject land.
· Amend Clause 5.1 to identify the land to be zoned SP2 and the relevant acquisition authority.
· Amend the ‘Land Reservation Acquisition Map’ to identify the school site.
· Introduce a new local provision to Part 7 (new draft clause 7.14).
· Introduce a new ‘clause application map’ to identify the land to which the clause will apply.
· Introduce a new local provision to Part 7 (new draft clause 7.15)
· Introduce a ‘Dwelling Density Map’ to identify the relevant densities to apply to the subject land.
· Introduce an additional permitted use on a designated part of the site for the purpose of ‘Caravan parks’ to facilitate the development of a manufactured home estate (MHE).
· Introduce an ‘Additional Permitted Uses’ Map to identify the location of the proposed additional permitted use.
The planning proposal is supported by a draft development control plan (DCP) prepared by the proponent. The draft DCP is currently under assessment and will be implemented under a separate process to the planning proposal outlined above.
The planning proposal is also supported by an addendum to clarify certain provisions that require further information or justification for certain aspects of the proponent’s draft Planning Proposal.
2. Context
In May 2023 the then Department of Planning and Environment refused the gateway determination for Sunnyside (LEP21/0001) stating that the proposal should not proceed. Further information regarding the refusal was provided Councillors in a briefing on 4 November 2024.
Subsequently the Rowan Planning Proposal (LEP22/0001) was placed on hold while Council met with the DPHI to understand the required approach for a successful planning proposal Gateway Determination. Council, the Department and the proponents for both Rowan and Sunnyside have continued to collaborate to establish a pathway to approval.
In June 2023, Council and the Department developed a four-step process to facilitate success of a subsequent planning proposal.
This included the following:
1. Strategic planning rationale
2. Precinct wide infrastructure requirements
3. Combined planning proposal
4. Fresh planning proposal
In order to respond to 1). Council prepared a SGA Context Paper. This context paper provided a detailed analysis of the strategic merit for the proposal, including the changing context for housing in Wagga, the projected growth for housing in 2041 and the supportive planning to achieve this. This was reported to the Ordinary Council Meeting of 13 May 2024. 2). is covered in off in further detail in the body to this report. Lastly, the lodgement of a fresh planning proposal in January 2024 incorporating the combined land of Sunnyside Ventures Pty Ltd and DevCore satisfies 3). and 4).
In January 2024 Council received a planning proposal that sought to rezone approximately 350ha of RU1 rural production zoned land and R5 large lot residential zoned land into a variety of R1, R3 and R5 zoned land, supported by RE1 public recreation, E1 local centre and SP2 infrastructure zoned land (the subject of this report). The proposal seeks to deliver an integrated community consisting of approximately 2,900 dwellings, 34ha of open space (including a district park and 4 local parks), active travel network, a local centre, community centre and land for a school. These components are set out within an indicative masterplan for the development (see Figure 1 below).
Figure 1 – Zone 1 Southern Growth Area Indicative Masterplan
The proposal follows an extended period of discussion between Council staff and the proponents (Rowan Village and Sunnyside Ventures) to identify the infrastructure required to service the development. Council staff briefed Councillors on the background to this complex matter in November 2024 and February 2025.
Since lodgement, Council staff have focused attention on key components of the proposal, including the mix of residential dwelling density and diversity across the site, the provision and location of formal and informal open space (including a new district park), details around the proposed seniors housing (Manufactured Homes Estate - MHE), school site and local centre and the proposed planning agreement. A significant package of information updating the planning proposal was lodged with Council in January 2025, responding to feedback provided by Council staff.
On 29 May 2024 the Minister for Planning and Public Spaces announced a further investment of $137.9M under the Accelerated Infrastructure Fund (Tranche 3). Council received and accepted a funding offer of $70.79 million of grant funding in June 2024.
The funding is designed to provide critical infrastructure to support sewer upgrades in the Northern Growth Area and the duplication of Plumpton Road North and Plumpton Road South to support the delivery of new homes. The funding for the upgrades of Plumpton Road North and Plumpton Road South is intrinsically linked to the delivery of housing in the south of the city and emphasises the State government’s financial commitment to delivering housing in Wagga Wagga.
Extensive negotiations have been held with the proponents around the detail to be included within a potential planning agreement, with several offers being received over recent months. Whilst these negotiations have resolved the majority of issues in relation to a potential planning agreement, three core matters remain between the parties:
1. The timing for a signed planning agreement;
2. Contributions payable for dwellings developed within the MHE and medium density development and;
3. The timing of upgrades to Holbrook Road.
Given the ongoing uncertainty regarding the collection of contributions and the potential financial exposure to Council, staff recommend a standard approach to contributions through the use of a contributions plan to identify the infrastructure requirements to service Zone 1 of the SGA.
3. Legislative framework
LEPs provide the local statutory framework that guides development and land use decisions throughout NSW. They do this through zoning and development standards, which provide a framework for the way land can be developed and used.
Amendments to LEPs are generally undertaken through the preparation and assessment of planning proposals. A planning proposal is the document that sets out the justification and supporting information to allow an LEP to be made.
Planning proposals are considered and assessed through a process under Division 3.4 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979. The process is supported by the Local Environmental Plan Making Guideline (DPE, August 2023).
The planning proposal describes how amendments to an LEP ‘give effect’ to strategic and site-specific planning outcomes. It is therefore the first step in making the statutory link with strategic plans and amending an LEP.
Where the planning proposal has been initiated by a proponent, council is to review and assess the planning proposal and decide whether to support and submit it to the Department for a Gateway determination.
Section 3.33 sets out matters in relation to the explanation and justification for a proposed instrument (the planning proposal).
(2) The planning proposal is to include the following:
(a) a statement of the objectives or intended outcomes of the proposed instrument,
(b) an explanation of the provisions that are to be included in the proposed instrument,
(c) the justification for those objectives, outcomes and provisions and the process for their implementation (including whether the proposed instrument will give effect to the local strategic planning statement of the council of the area and will comply with relevant directions under section 9.1),
(d) if maps are to be adopted by the proposed instrument, such as maps for proposed land use zones; heritage areas; flood prone land—a version of the maps containing sufficient detail to indicate the substantive effect of the proposed instrument,
(e) details of the community consultation that is to be undertaken before consideration is given to the making of the proposed instrument.
4. Consistency with strategic planning framework
The draft planning proposal has been assessed against the following strategies and plans (in accordance with the LEP Making Guideline).
· Riverina Murray Regional Plan 2041
· Wagga Wagga Local Strategic Planning Statement
· Wagga Wagga Community Strategic Plan
· Wagga Wagga Integrated Transport Strategy
· Wagga Wagga Recreation, Open Space and Community Strategy
· Southern Growth Area Context Paper
· Wagga Wagga Transport Plan (TfNSW)
The draft planning proposal has been assessed against the relevant State Environmental Planning Policies and Ministerial Directions issued under s9.1 of the EP&A Act.
The draft planning proposal has considered environmental, social and economic impacts as well as local, state and commonwealth infrastructure requirements and interests.
The draft planning proposal has considered a range of technical reports and has considered internal and external referral comments from a range of stakeholders.
The assessment has confirmed that there are some inconsistencies; these are justified or can be considered consistent with the resolution of the outstanding technical reports updates that are required to be resolved prior to exhibition of the draft Planning Proposal (discussed in section 0 of this report).
Overall, the draft Planning Proposal is considered to meet the requirements of s3.33(2) of the EP&A Act and the LEP Making Guidelines with respect to determining consistency with the strategic planning framework that applies to this proposal.
5. Infrastructure delivery & funding (contributions)
In areas such as SGA Zone 1, Council collects contributions from developers to ensure new development is supported by the required local infrastructure. Open space, community facilities, active travel and roads infrastructure for example are usually funded under Section 7.11 of the EP&A Act, with contributions collected by Council under a contributions plan.
Sewer and stormwater contributions to fund infrastructure required to support the development are levied under Section 64 of the Local Government Act 1993 and these contributions are detailed in the Development Servicing Plans (DSP).
In May 2023 the Department refused the gateway determination for the original Sunnyside Planning Proposal (LEP21/0001). The refusal outlined a number of reasons why the proposal was not supported, including that the planning proposal did not demonstrate strategic merit with respect to ensuring feasibility of providing infrastructure and services and the identification of staging of development and infrastructure upgrades in the SGA. Further discussions with the Department highlighted the need to deliver precinct wide infrastructure that could be secured, funded and delivered appropriately.
In response to this advice, Council staff and the proponents have identified a list of community facilities, roads, open space, and active travel infrastructure required to support Zone 1 of the SGA to be included in a proposed planning agreement. This includes estimated costs and trigger points in the development for the delivery of this infrastructure and formed the basis of a proposed planning agreement.
Section 7.11 contributions collected under a contributions plan are capped in approved greenfield areas (such as the SGA) to $30,000, unless the contributions plan is approved by the Independent Pricing and Regulatory Tribunal (IPART). By comparison, planning agreements are a voluntary agreement between the parties to provide or fund infrastructure which would usually be in a contributions plan but are not subject to the Section 7.11 contributions cap. They are however, subject to the requirements of Section 7.4 of the EP&A Act.
Section 64 sewer and stormwater contributions have not been included in the proposed planning agreement (if it was to go ahead).
As discussed in Section 2 above, the proponents have made several offers to enter a planning agreement to fund the local infrastructure required to support Zone 1 of the SGA, which would usually be included in a Section 7.11 contributions plan. The most recent offer to enter into a planning agreement for SGA Zone 1 includes developer works and cash contributions which are valued at approximately $38,000 per lot (in 2024/25 dollars, based on lot yield of 2,678[1]).
Attachment 2 includes a table which details the list of infrastructure agreed between the proponent and Council staff required to support SGA Zone 1 and form the basis of the current offer to enter into a planning agreement.
Whilst these negotiations have resolved the majority of issues in relation to a potential planning agreement, three core matters remain between the parties: the timing of a signed planning agreement; contributions payable for dwellings developed within the MHE and medium density development and; the timing of upgrades to Holbrook Road.
These concerns are heightened by the fact that no agreement has been reached with the proponents on the delivery triggers for infrastructure, which could result in later staged infrastructure, such as the planned upgrades to the District Park or Holbrook Road, not being delivered by the proposal. Additionally, the proponents have not agreed to enter into bank guarantees for this infrastructure, potentially leaving council with a significant financial exposure in the event that the proponents do not deliver the required infrastructure to service the SGA.
In the absence of an approved planning agreement Council must develop a contributions plan for the SGA Zone 1 to facilitate the collection of Section 7.11 contributions for the principal subdivision.
Council staff are currently preparing scenarios for a draft contributions plan, which will form the basis of an addendum to the Wagga Wagga Local Infrastructure Contributions Plan. A further report will be presented to Council on this matter prior to the public exhibition of the planning proposal.
6. Key matters
6.1. Zoning
The draft planning proposal proposes to achieve the following zoning across the Zone 1 of the SGA. The proposed zoning map below shows a range of zoning, including commercial, residential (large lot, general and medium density), open space and special purposes (future education).
Figure 2 – Proposed land zoning Source: Urbis
The zoning will be supported by the masterplan shown in Figure 1 above. The proposal will also see a minimum lot size of 2,000m2 applied to the R5 (Large Lot Residential) land.
The draft planning proposal will introduce new local clauses to the LEP to ensure appropriate densities are achieved in key locations and implement the vision of the masterplan across Zone 1.
The draft planning proposal will also introduce administrative changes relating to acquisition authorities, and designating Zone 1 as an ‘urban release area’.
The draft planning proposal seeks an additional permitted use, however for the reasons outlined in this report and the assessment report, this is not supported.
6.2. Density, diversity, distribution
Council and the proponents have sought to agree how 2,900 dwellings will be accommodated within Zone 1 of the SGA. Council staff have focused on the density of residential development to be achieved, how diversity of residential outcomes can be delivered and how these outcomes can be spatially planned across the site.
Whilst the planning proposal seeks the rezoning of land to deliver circa 2,900 dwellings, the proponent has recently indicated that while it is their commercial interest to maximise development outcomes in Zone 1, they cannot commit to the delivery of 2,900 dwellings in Zone 1 and will instead seek to deliver a minimum of 2,515 lots. It is anticipated that some of these lots will be subdivided for medium density, which will increase the overall dwelling yield above this figure.
The yield needs to be as accurate as possible as this is the basis on which Council staff will model the contributions income against costs. The documentation received from the developer mentions 2,900 dwellings, however the most recent offer to enter into a planning agreement references 2,678 lots (which is greater than the minimum lot yield mentioned above).
To ensure the rezoning will deliver 2,900 dwellings, Council staff have investigated a range of mechanisms including a review of potential minimum lot sizes, maximum lot sizes and minimum dwelling yield requirements to secure appropriate outcomes.
A minimum dwelling yield mechanism has been agreed with the proponent as the best mechanism to deliver the desired housing outcomes, however the actual dwelling density calculation remains in contention.
The proponent has put forward three ‘tiers’ of dwelling density, which align with the proposed zoning of R1 – General Residential and R3 – Medium Density Residential. The R3 zone is further split into an ‘inner area’ (dark pink) and ‘outer area’ (light pink). The distribution is agreed. The table below provides a summary of the proposed density rates and the associated yield, noting that Council staff are proposing higher density figures in the R3 zone.
Table 1 – Proposed Densities and yield (lots)
Zoning |
Proponent proposed density |
Proponent min. yield |
Council proposed density |
Council min. yield |
R3 – Medium Density (inner) |
18 dw/ha |
346 |
28 dw/ha |
518 |
R3 – Medium Density (outer) |
12 dw/ha |
454 |
22 dw/ha |
833 |
R1 – General Residential |
10 dw/ha |
1,434 |
10 dw/ha |
1,434 |
R5 – Large Lot Residential |
N/A |
51 |
N/A |
51 |
Seniors Living |
N/A |
230 |
N/A |
230 |
Total |
|
2,515 |
|
3,066 |
Figure 3 – Density areas (including the proponent densities)
This will also be supported by the introduction of a dwelling cap (‘restricted density yield’) on the number of dwellings to be delivered to align with current infrastructure capacity. Further detail regarding the infrastructure capacity has been outlined in this report and the assessment report (Attachment 3)
6.3. Addendum
The draft planning proposal is supported by an addendum, which has been prepared by Council staff.
The addendum was prepared to address the identified gaps in the proponent’s planning proposal and enable additional provisions (such as the restricted dwelling yield).
6.4. Local clause provisions
The draft Planning Proposal seeks to introduce two site-specific additional local provisions:
1. A local provision that enables the delivery of a minimum ‘net dwellings per hectare’, and
2. A local provision that requires that development in Zone 1 is generally in accordance with the ‘Design Principles’ in Appendix A – Urban Design Report (i.e. providing it statutory weight)
Council staff and the proponent have previously discussed the elements that would make up the local clause, however the updated draft Planning Proposal received in January 2025 did not reflect these discussions. Accordingly, staff will include these additional considerations within the addendum.
The second local provision above will also include:
· Objectives to support the intent of the proposed local clause and guide future assessment of development applications in Zone 1.
· Administrative matters to enable appropriate implementation.
· Controls to ensure that development within Zone 1 is consistent with the masterplan and guidelines outlined in the Urban Design Report.
· Provisions which require a detailed masterplan to be prepared for the future commercial zoned land (discussed further below).
The full provisions are outlined in the addendum prepared by Council staff to ensure the entire intent of the clause is realised. The addendum is provided in Attachment 4
6.5. Infrastructure capacity & servicing
As part of the referral process, constraints have been identified regarding sewer and water capacity requirements to service future development in SGA Zone 1.
The developer will require ongoing discussions with Council’s City Engineering department and Riverina Water to agree on a proposed approach to delivering the capacity required to service Zone 1 of the SGA.
Sewer
Currently the Kooringal STP will require a short-term solution to manage peak average dry weather flows (ADWF), but in the long term require upgrades to the entire plant (already identified within Council’s Long Term Financial Plan) to 7ML/day ADWF capacity.
Council’s City Engineering department has advised, at the time of writing, that there is capacity to accommodate the sewage from 440 lots at the Kooringal Sewer Treatment Plant (STP). Budget is proposed in the 2025/26 Council budget to undertake a feasibility study for the temporary storage of wastewater in tanks to create additional capacity for an additional 500-750 dwellings in Zone 1 in advance of a planned upgrade to the Kooringal STP.
The proponent prepared an Infrastructure and Servicing Delivery Plan (ISDP) to inform their planning agreement offer. The ISDP identified that the developer would deliver the lead in sewer infrastructure to the Kooringal STP and that suitable upgrades would be required to the Kooringal STP.
To sustainably manage the capacity constraints mechanisms are in place to ensure that development cannot proceed unless adequate arrangements have been put in place.
Water
Riverina Water has advised that the SGA is serviceable and that they can currently service the first 422 dwellings without any infrastructure upgrades. However additional infrastructure, including a new rising main, storage reservoir and trunk main will be required to service the balance of Zone 1. At the time of writing, Riverina Water has engaged a third-party consultant (Public Works) to undertake a review and update of their hydraulic model and incorporate the additional information relating to the SGA and broader LGA. This review is understood to have a preliminary draft delivered by March 2025.
The update to the model will also detail any upgrades required to existing infrastructure, as well as detailing any new infrastructure requirements. Whilst the updated hydraulic model remains under review, any future servicing capacity and infrastructure requirements beyond Year 1 are not yet known. This includes the cost for any works beyond Year 1 of the development.
Riverina Water has also advised:
· Indicative estimates note that additional capacity to service beyond Year 1 of the SGA growth would be available in approx. 3-5 years from confirmation of the planning approval.
· Timeframes are proposed to be refined once the infrastructure requirements are known and prioritised within existing capital works programs.
· Infrastructure delivery will be dependent on scope, planning requirements such as land acquisition, design and construction.
· Once the hydraulic modelling is complete and a full list of infrastructure requirements is known, Riverina Water will be able to provide more detailed information on the scope of works, the costs involved (both to Riverina Water and the developers) and the timeframe for delivery.”
To sustainably manage the capacity constraints mechanisms are in place to ensure that development cannot proceed unless adequate arrangements have been put in place.
Proposed solution
A dwelling cap (‘restricted dwelling yield’) is recommended to protect the sustainable delivery of infrastructure whilst planning for long term capacity and infrastructure delivery across the precinct. The ‘cap’ would be introduced as part of the dwelling densities clause and would subsequently be removed once infrastructure planning for water and sewer delivery is complete. This would require a future LEP amendment, to remove the cap at an appropriate time.
The current Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan provides existing protection for Urban Release Areas under Clause 6.2 which states:
“Development consent must not be granted for development on land in an urban release area unless the Council is satisfied that any public utility infrastructure that is essential for the proposed development is available or that adequate arrangements have been made to make that infrastructure available when required.”
This clause cannot be varied under clause 4.6 of the LEP. This clause aims to ensure that land within an urban release area can accommodate future development and the infrastructure needs arising from increased density. This means government authorities are not burdened by the cost of infrastructure associated with development and avoids the potential for cost-shifting.
The draft Planning Proposal is supported by a broad range of detailed technical reports. The draft Planning Proposal and supporting documentation were referred as part of the assessment process to both internal and external stakeholders.
The outcomes of this referral process identified a range of technical gaps with several of the reports, with these matters raised with the proponent through detailed further information requests.
As part of the assessment of the planning proposal staff have considered the issues raised and have concluded that the outstanding matters should not prevent the planning proposal from being lodged with DPHI for assessment. Council staff consider these issues can be resolved during the gateway process prior to exhibition of the draft Planning Proposal.
The information that remains outstanding is summarised below; the outstanding matters requested to be conditioned as part of a Gateway Determination is outlined in Section 9 of this report.
Detailed assessment of the technical reports is outlined in the relevant sections of the assessment report in Section C and D. A high level overview is provided in the table below.
Table 2 – Outstanding matters
Outstanding matter |
Assessment |
Biodiversity (draft BDAR’s) |
Acceptable for assessment (consistent with written advice received from DPHI). Outstanding matters are to be dealt with during the gateway process prior to exhibition. |
Flooding |
Information lodged was acceptable for assessment. Outstanding matters identified by City Engineering are to be resolved through the preparation of the Development Control Plan |
Strategic Bushfire Study |
Acceptable for assessment. Outstanding matters are to be dealt with during the gateway process prior to exhibition. |
Agricultural land values |
Outstanding matters are to be dealt with during the gateway process prior to exhibition. |
Cultural Heritage |
Acceptable for assessment. Outstanding matters are to be dealt with during the gateway process prior to exhibition. |
Contamination |
Acceptable for assessment. Outstanding matters are to be dealt with during the gateway process prior to exhibition. |
Roads & Traffic |
The proponent will be required to undertake additional trip origin destination modelling so that the provision of infrastructure can adequately address the impacts of development on Plumpton Road and Holbrook Road |
6.7. Additional permitted use
A comprehensive update to the draft Planning Proposal report was received on 21 January 2025 that included a formal request to consider an additional permitted use within the subject site.
The updated report seeks (amongst other matters) to ‘Introduce an additional permitted use on a designated part of the site for ‘Caravan parks’ to facilitate the development of a manufactured home estate’.
The draft Planning Proposal specifically seeks:
The provisions would seek to enable manufactured home estates (through ‘caravan parks’) within certain parts of the R3 zone.
The proposed wording of the additional local provision is provided below:
Schedule 1 Additional permitted Uses
7.XX Use of certain land in the Southern Growth Area – Zone 1
(1) This clause applies to land mapped as ‘X’ on the Clause Application Map
(2) Development for the purpose of a ‘Caravan Parks’ is permitted with consent in ‘Area 1’ development will be only for the purposes of a manufactured home estate
Note: For the purposes of Clause (7.XX), a Caravan Park means a development application for the purposes of a Manufactured Home Estate
The assessment confirms that the additional permitted use is not supported for the following reasons (a fuller description of these matters is outlined in the Planning Proposal Assessment report).
· The application has not had detailed consideration of Ministerial Direction 6.2(2)(b) which requires an assessment of the principles listed in clause 125 State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021.
· The proposal advises that the MHE does not require subdivision, therefore the principal subdivision of the land will create a larger englobo lot.
· Council should not consider an additional permitted use where a legal planning pathway[2] (that is already permitted with consent) is already available under the proposed residential zoning. Introducing an additional provision would be unnecessary and redundant.
· The introduction of the additional permitted use for ‘caravan parks’ presents a potential risk of unintended consequences[3]. Specifically, it opens the door for developments that may not align with the proponent’s intentions for a Residential Land Lease Community (LLC) or Manufactured Home Estate.
· The planning proposal contradicts itself as it asserts that individual development consent would not be required for each dwelling within the MHE, which is characteristic of the Residential Land Lease Community model. However, the proposed wording within the draft Planning Proposal also suggests that, despite the MHE being defined under the Local Government Act 1993, the development would be characterised as a standard residential development application requiring consent for each dwelling's construction.
· This discrepancy introduces confusion about the application process and whether the proposed development aligns with the operational framework of MHEs. A standard residential DA process for each dwelling contradicts the typical approach of MHEs, where individual consents are not usually required.
· Incorporating the matters raised above this creates significant legal complexities and implications with each planning pathway that need to be managed in conjunction with the Development Assessment team. Introducing further legal complexity through an additional permitted use is not recommended. This can include matters such as the characterisation of the land use, interaction of the EP&A Act and LG Act, contributions levies, and post consent approvals pathways.
Accordingly, the introduction of an additional permitted use is not recommended or supported.
Further information regarding the additional permitted use can be found in the Section 5.6 of the assessment report.
6.8. Open space provision and distribution
The Recreation, Open Space and Community Strategy 2040 (ROSC), sets the standards for the provision of open space in Wagga Wagga. A draft Planning Proposal must be supported by a Recreation and Open Space Plan for the development which considers; parks (passive recreation areas), sporting and recreation facilities (active recreation areas) and lineal parks (corridors).
The proposed open space requirement has been met by virtue of the quantum of open space being provided. However, the distribution of this open space does not meet the ROSC requirements. The proposal outlines that four (4) local parks will be provided but these are undersized (LP1 - 0.61ha, LP2 - 0.5ha and LP3 - 0.46ha).
Council must ensure delivery of open space that is consistent with the ROSC and the recommendations of this report reflect this position.
6.9. School infrastructure
Ongoing discussions with the Department of Education have indicated that the land allocation of 3ha is sufficient area for consideration of a primary school. Further detailed analysis is required by the Department to determine whether a high school is required, the future land should this be required has been identified as ‘Investigation Area for Educational Facilities – subject to further review’. Council staff expect that further engagement with the Department will occur as part of the Gateway Determination process.
7. DCP update
A draft site-specific development control plan (draft DCP) has been prepared in support of the Planning Proposal and considers the requirements set out in Clause 6.3(3) of the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010.
The draft DCP provides high level site-specific development controls for the future development in Zone 1. It is intended to be included within Part E (Site specific controls) of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010.
The assessment of a draft DCP is a separate process and does not preclude the ability for the draft Planning Proposal to proceed.
Multiple iterations of the draft DCP are likely to be required throughout the Planning Proposal process. The draft DCP will be reported to Council at a separate point in time.
8. Outcome of assessment and recommendations
This report recommends and confirms that the draft Planning Proposal has strategic merit and site-specific merit. The high-level objectives and intended outcomes are supported.
Whilst it is recognised there are outstanding documentation requirements, this assessment report confirms that these matters are appropriate to manage, update and complete during the Gateway Determination process.
This report recommends that Council support the proposal in-principle and direct staff to lodge the draft Planning Proposal with the DPHI requesting Gateway Determination.
It is recommended that the draft Planning Proposal consider and address the following outstanding matters on receipt of the Gateway Determination and prior to exhibition of the proposal. These matters will be requested to be included as part of the conditions of the Gateway Determination issued by DPHI or pursued by Council in alignment with the Gateway Determination conditions.
1. Biodiversity
1.1. Update the draft BDAR’s for Sunnyside and Rowan to clearly identify how the proposed development adopts the Avoid, Minimise and Offset regime.
1.2. Ensure the draft BDAR’s are consistent with the advice issued by Biodiversity, Conservation and Science Group of the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water (DCCEEW) and echoed by Wagga Wagga City Council.
1.3. The refusal of Sunnyside LEP21/0001 identified the fact that the Biodiversity Conservation Act & Regulation establishes that Council must assess biodiversity values and likely impacts (direct, indirect and prescribed) that include all anticipated development and ancillary works off site. This includes any road upgrades and other utilities or infrastructure that is required to facilitate any future development.
This also includes:
- Likely impacts to proposed retained vegetation and scattered paddock trees;
- Likely impacts on connectivity on and beyond the site, and;
- Cumulative impacts on the same Threatened Species or Endangered Ecological Communities from other projects such as the reduced minimum lot size of land on Gregadoo Road, the Gregadoo Solar farm, the Energy Connect East project and the Dunns Road upgrade.
1.4. The legislation also establishes the primacy of the ‘avoidance hierarchy’. The draft BDAR’s lack sufficient evidence for Council to establish that the avoidance hierarchy has been robustly applied and justified, particularly when there is an SAII entity impacted. Updated reports must address this matter.
1.5. The SGA design should retain enough habitat, so that future development could involve minimal obligation for Biodiversity Offsets, which would represent a positive outcome for Council’s Biodiversity objectives, and also for the Proponents time and costs in meeting this obligation.
This could be achieved through considering the addition of measures like:
· Avoiding all of the moderate condition PCT277 located to the west of the riparian corridor;
· Zoning the higher value environmental areas as C2 Environmental Conservation rather than RE1 Recreation;
· Incorporating appropriate buffer distances between zones to avoid future land use conflict that may result in removal or significant decline.
· Incorporating as much of the lower condition PCT277 into planned open space areas as possible;
· Incorporating as many of the scattered paddock trees into planned open space areas as possible;
· Creating an east-west corridor to allow threatened species movement.
1.6. Council acknowledges that some elements of impact assessment are commonly left until DA stage. However, Council is seeking to establish the key principles around the protection of native vegetation such as the PCT 277 and scattered trees to ensure their incorporation within the design and avoid delays at the development consent stage.
1.7. Council do not support the location of formal sporting facilities within the area identified for moderate value PCT277. The areas for protection need to incorporate an appropriate buffer distance from residential or commercial uses to ensure their ongoing viability and environmental value.
2. Strategic Bushfire Study
2.1. Submit an updated Strategic Bushfire Study (Rowan Village) that assesses the current structure plan layout.
3. Agricultural land values
3.1. An agricultural lands assessment and land use conflict risk assessment (LUCRA) must be prepared to consider the impact of the planning proposals objectives with respect to the agricultural production value of the rural land sought to be rezoned.
3.2. The report must consider the following:
3.2.1. Correspondence from the Department of Primary Industries dated 12/2/2024 (provided under a separate comment).
3.2.2. The potential detrimental impact to agricultural production and/or supply chain threshold of the LGA and/or undermine future opportunities for agribusiness and/or agritourism close to the Wagga Wagga urban area.
3.2.3. The report is to be prepared with regard to any applicable Department of Primary Industries guideline. Liaison with DPI to confirm the correct or applicable guidelines is recommended.
3.2.4. The report must have regard to all objectives, strategies or actions relating to agricultural land protection that is included in the Murray Riverina Regional Plan and Wagga Wagga Local Strategic Planning Statement
3.2.5. Must give consideration and response to Direction 9.1 – Rural Zones and Direction 9.2 – Rural Lands under s9.1 of the EP&A Act.
3.2.6. Any other matter Council or the Department of Primary Industries deems required through subsequent discussions relating to the preparation of this report.
4. Cultural Heritage
4.1. Undertake a second archaeological survey for the Rowan site on a day with good site and weather conditions to achieve ground surface visibility equal or greater than 50%. If additional sites of significance are found and are likely to be impacted, the proposal is to be redesigned, if required, to avoid impacts. The ACHA report is to be amended accordingly.
4.2. Overlay all identified archaeological sites and sites of cultural value of both sites on top of the concept plan to clearly demonstrate that the Planning Proposal avoids and protects Aboriginal sites of significance. Update the ACHA, Urban Design and Structure Plan reports accordingly to clearly identify the sites that are protected using an avoidance and mitigate hierarchy.
4.3. Amend the ACHA report for the Sunnyside site to clearly identify the sites that will be protected and provide details for avoidance of impacts in relation to the culturally modified trees.
4.4. Retain mature trees within the site even if they are not culturally significant.
4.5. Ensure that all recommendations contained in the two ACHA reports and the CVA report are implemented throughout the various approvals and development stages for the Site.
4.6. Update draft ACHA reports to confirm that appropriate investigations were undertaken on Lot 1, DP870056 which is the subject of this draft Planning Proposal.
4.7. Update the draft ACHA report to include Lot 1 and Lot 2, DP1171894 and confirm these areas were investigated as part of the report.
5. Contamination
5.1. Both contamination reports must have regard to Council policy - POL 030 (Contaminated Land Management). Both reports are to be updated to ensure consideration and consistency with Council policy (including certification requirements).
5.2. The Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report requires the following amendments:
5.2.1. The submitted report is a hybrid document that includes a desktop analysis and limited sampling. This is inconsistent with the prescribed requirements for a Preliminary Site Investigation therefore creating inconsistencies with the documentation.
5.2.2. The report contains inconsistent data of soil sample depth, update in accordance with the NEPC
5.2.3. Additional assessment is required for the recreational category to include consideration of the Health Investigation Levels not just Ecological Investigation Levels.
5.3. Submit a Detailed Site Investigation for the entirety of Zone 1 which is prepared in accordance with the relevant guidelines and legislation. The Detailed Site Investigation must take into consideration the recommendations of both the Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report (Sunnyside) and Preliminary Site Investigation (Rowan Village). The proposed zoning plan shows the entirety of the site will be developed either through residential or recreational zoning, therefore it is requested that a DSI is completed before rezoning, to ensure the correct zoning of the potential contaminated land and minimising the risk of finding potential contaminates after rezoning has taken place.
6. Roads & Traffic
6.1. Require provision of trip origin destination model to ensure that the future provision of infrastructure can adequately address the impacts of development on Plumpton Road and Holbrook Road.
7. Recreation & Open Space
7.1. That Council require the proponent to update the draft Planning Proposal to demonstrate consistency with the Wagga Wagga Recreation, Open Space and Community (ROSC) Strategy.
8. Updates to Planning Proposal
8.1. The introduction of an additional permitted use is not recommended or supported.
8.2. That prior to any exhibition, the draft Planning Proposal is updated to remove reference to provisions regarding the additional permitted use (APU) as a result of the recommendation of this report.
Links to the Attachments
1. |
|
|
2. |
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
|
|
11. |
LEP24.0003 - PSI - Preliminary Environmental Assessment Report |
|
12. |
LEP24.0003 - PSI - Preliminary Site Investigation - Rowan Village |
|
13. |
LEP24.0003 - Residential and Retail Market Demand Assessment |
|
14. |
LEP24.0003 - Site and Precinct Stormwater Management Strategy Review |
|
15. |
LEP24.0003 - Social Infrastructure and Open Space Assessment |
|
16. |
|
|
17. |
|
|
18. |
|
|
19. |
|
|
20. |
|
|
21. |
|
Financial Implications
· Infrastructure contributions are essential to fund the local infrastructure required to support the development. These can be collected under contribution plans (including development servicing plans for sewer and stormwater) or under planning agreements.
· Section 64 sewer and stormwater contributions for SGA Zone 1 will be collected based on the current rates of the adjacent areas as identified in the development servicing plans. In 2024/25 dollars this will see approximately $13 million Section 64 Sewer and approximately $12 million Section 64 Stormwater contributions collected (based on a lot yield of 2,678) to fund local sewer and stormwater infrastructure. These figures will be indexed annually on 1 July in accordance with the DSP.
· Given the proposed planning agreement negotiations have ceased, Section 7.11 contributions for SGA Zone 1 for the principal subdivision is proposed to be collected under an addendum to the current LICP.
· The proponent has previously offered to enter into a Planning Agreement, for the amount of $101,646,210 (or $37,956 per lot) to be provided by a combination of works in kind and cash contributions. As Council has been unable to resolve three core matters within the Planning Agreement, it is recommended that Council develop a contributions plan for Zone 1 of the SGA. This will provide council with the certainty of section 7.11 contributions to a value of $80,340,000 (or $30,000 per lot). Applying a contribution plan will lead to a shortfall of infrastructure funding of $21,306,210, with Council to seek alternative forms of funding for this shortfall.
Policy and Legislation
Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979
Environmental Planning & Assessment Regulation 2021
Local Government Act 1993
Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016
Contaminated Lands Management Policy POL030
Developer Infrastructure Agreements Policy POL121
Link to Strategic Plan
The Environment
Objective: Future growth and development of Wagga Wagga is planned for in a sustainable manner
Ensure sustainable urban development
Risk Management Issues for Council
· In the instance that a favorable gateway determination is received, it will require public and agency consultation. Consultation may highlight issues not evident during the assessment.
· Refusal of the subject planning proposal may result in the proponent seeking a rezoning review. This process allows a proponent to request an independent planning panel evaluate and recommend to the Minister whether a proposal should progress to Gateway determination. Council staff have worked extensively to enhance the outcomes proposed by this development. These enhancements could be lost if the matter was reviewed by an independent panel.
· With respect to water and sewer capacity, there is a low risk that approving the rezoning may result in future subdivision/development stages being placed on hold when capacity (dwelling cap) is reached. As explained in this report, Council have existing planning controls in place to ensure that development is not approved without adequate arrangements being in place for infrastructure delivery. Additional controls are also proposed.
· There are several risks associated with introducing additional permitted uses
o Once a use is added to Schedule 1, it may be difficult to remove or restrict it later.
o There are potential for legal risks whereby a future development application for a Land Lease Community is not ‘characterised’ as a ‘manufactured home estate’ (MHE) and the additional permitted use is unnecessary. There are outstanding concerns that early indications around the proposed built form are a typical housing construction method (i.e. slab on ground) rather than moveable dwellings/transportable dwellings. This may result in undesired inconsistencies or legal challenge.
o Aligning infrastructure provision and development contributions to reflect the demand created by any future development of this kind.
o It may bypass the future zoning framework and weaken the integrity of the LEP’s strategic intent.
· A planning agreement is a ‘voluntary’ agreement between the proponent and Council. As such, it can offer to undertake works or pay cash contributions which are higher than can be incorporated in an LICP. While the proposed planning agreement for SGA Zone 1 does not include any Section 7.11 contributions towards the citywide projects listed in the LICP, it does include infrastructure which services an area wider than SGA Zone 1 (Zones 2-4 of the SGA). By comparison, in an LICP only infrastructure with a ‘nexus’ to Zone 1 of the SGA can be included in the infrastructure list for the area. This leaves the potential for a significant shortfall in funding of infrastructure required to support the development of the SGA Zone 1, with alternative funding sources required to meet this shortfall. The extent of any shortfall, along with alternative funding sources, will be presented to council as part of a future Council report. To increase the Section 7.11 contributions cap to $30,000 for SGA Zone 1, the area must be identified and approved as a greenfield area by DPHI.
· To charge Section 7.11 contributions over the cap, contributions plans must be approved by IPART. This would require a review of the costings in the whole LICP.
· It is expected the Section 64 sewer and stormwater contributions for SGA Zone 1 will change when the development servicing plans for the local government area are updated.
· An addendum to the LICP is proposed to collect contributions for the further subdivision of lots in the SGA Zone 1 and for any medium density development. With the proposed planning agreement not proceeding at this point in time, the contributions plan now needs to be developed to be applied to the principal subdivision.
Internal / External Consultation
Internal and external consultation was undertaken following lodgement of the draft Planning Proposal in February and March 2024. External referral responses are included at Attachment 5. Internal and external responses are summarised and discussed in the section 9 of the planning proposal assessment report.
Subject to a favourable gateway determination being issued by the DPHI and the relevant conditions being met, the planning proposal will be placed on public exhibition in accordance with Clause 4, Schedule 1 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979.
The planning proposal will also need to be referred to public authorities who are specified on the Gateway Determination issued by DPHI.
Extensive consultation with internal stakeholders across Council has occurred over a substantial length of time to establish the local infrastructure list required to support the development and the estimated costings. Council staff have also been working with the developers and their consultants during the last twelve months to progress the proposed planning agreement.
|
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
Consult |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
Staff are currently preparing a detailed engagement strategy that will support the Planning Proposal and amendments to the Local Infrastructure Contributions Plan. This will identify how Council will specifically engage with the community and relevant stakeholders regarding the SGA (Zone 1). |
1. |
Land Owners Information This matter is considered to be confidential under Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, as it deals with: personnel matters concerning particular individuals. - Provided under separate cover |
|
2. |
Proposed Planning Agreement - Infrastructure list and costings This matter is considered to be confidential under Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, as it deals with: commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council. - Provided under separate cover |
|
3. |
LEP24.0003 - Planning Proposal Assessment Report - Final - Provided under separate cover |
|
4. |
SGA Zone 1 - Planning Proposal Addendum - Final - Provided under separate cover |
|
5. |
External Referral Responses - Provided under separate cover |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
RP-2 |
RP-2 PETITION - RETICULATED GAS IN NEW SUBDIVISIONS
Author: John Sidgwick
Summary: |
The purpose of this report is to receive and note the petition before receiving a further report at a later date to address the specific request. |
That Council:
a receive and note the petition received on 6 March 2025 requesting that Council consider allowing new residential subdivisions to proceed without reticulated gas
b receive a further report in response to the petition within three months
Report
Council received a petition on 6 March 2025 from William Adlong containing 198 signatures. The petition has been submitted to Council in accordance with Council’s Petitions Management Policy.
The petition was initiated on 24 January 2025 with a closing date of 3 March 2025, and requests that Council that Council allow new subdivisions to proceed without reticulated gas. Below is an extract from the petition with the specific wording:
We request that Wagga Wagga City Council allow new residential subdivisions the option to proceed without reticulated gas. This will reduce the price of land, the new home package, and the cost of livening pressures on new home owners. The resulting benefits include:
· lower capital costs for developers;
· reduced connection fees and other operational costs for householders;
· reduced incidence of asthma and respiratory disease from indoor air pollution;
· alignment with the NSW Net Zero Plan.
As per Council’s policy, only the substance of the petition and the number of signatories are provided in the business paper, however the full petition will be available for viewing by Councillors.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
Petition Management Policy (POL 086)
Link to Strategic Plan
Community leadership and collaboration
Objective: Wagga Wagga has strong community leadership and a shared vision for the future
Plan long term for the future of Wagga Wagga
Risk Management Issues for Council
Council policies are essential to ensure transparent legal, fair and consistent decision making across the Council. They support Council in achieving its corporate objectives and provide a critical guide for staff, councillors and other stakeholders. In the absence of effective policies there is a greater risk of inconsistency, confusion and inefficiency and can lead to non-compliance with the requirements of legislation and regulations.
Internal / External Consultation
Only minimal internal consultation has occurred at this stage. Further discussions with relevant stakeholders will take place before providing a response back to Council.
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
RP-3 |
RP-3 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT AS AT 28 FEBRUARY 2025
Author: Carolyn Rodney
Summary: |
This report is for Council to consider information presented on the 2024/25 budget and Long-Term Financial Plan, and details Council’s external investments and performance as at 28 February 2025. |
That Council:
a approve the proposed 2024/25 budget variations for the month ended 28 February 2025 and note the balanced budget position as presented in this report
b approve the proposed budget variations to the 2024/25 Long Term Financial Plan Capital Works Program including new projects and timing adjustments
c note the Responsible Accounting Officer’s reports, in accordance with the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 (Part 9 Division 3: Clause 203) that the financial position of Council is satisfactory having regard to the original estimates of income and expenditure and the recommendations made above
d note the details of the external investments as at 28 February 2025 in accordance with section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993
e accept the grant funding offers as presented in this report
Report
Wagga Wagga City Council (Council) forecasts a balanced budget position as of 28 February 2025.
Proposed budget variations including adjustments to the capital works program are detailed in this report for Council’s consideration and adoption.
Council has experienced a positive monthly investment performance for the month of February when compared to budget ($431,412 up on the monthly budget). This is mainly due to better than budgeted returns on Council’s investment portfolio, as well as a higher than anticipated investment portfolio balance – which is partly due to Council receiving upfront payment of $48.5M in funding under the Accelerated Infrastructure Fund in June 2024.
Key Performance Indicators
OPERATING INCOME
Total operating income is 68% of approved budget and is tracking close to budget for the month of February 2025. An adjustment has been made to reflect the levy of rates that occurred at the start of the financial year. Excluding this adjustment, operating income received is 87% when compared to budget.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Total operating expenditure is 66% of approved budget and is tracking on budget at this stage of the financial year.
CAPITAL INCOME
Total capital income is 199% of approved budget, which is mainly attributed to the Accelerated Infrastructure Fund (AIF) grant funding that has been received. If this up-front grant funding is not fully spent in this financial year, the income will be reduced and carried over to next financial year for completion of the project.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
Total capital expenditure including commitments is 62% of approved budget. Excluding commitments, the total expenditure is 42% when compared to the approved budget. The capital project budgets have since being reviewed and will be included in the next monthly finance report to accurately reflect the revised timing of the capital works program.
*This table does not include any proposed draft 2025/26 LTFP budget adjustments.
2024/25 Revised Budget Result – (Surplus) / Deficit |
$’000s |
Original 2024/25 Budget Result as adopted by Council Total Budget Variations approved to date Budget Variations for February 2025 |
$0K $0K $0K |
Proposed Revised Budget result for 28 February 2025 - (Surplus) / Deficit |
$0K |
The proposed Operating and Capital Budget Variations for 28 February 2025 which affect the current 2024/25 financial year are listed below.
Budget Variation |
Amount |
Funding Source |
Net Impact (Fav)/ Unfav |
|
4 – Community Place and Identity |
|
|||
Resilient Response – Flood Equipment & Volunteer Training Project |
$96K |
NSW State Reconstruction Authority Grant ($96K) |
Nil |
|
Council has been successful in securing $96,160 in funding from the NSW Government’s Reconstruction Authority’s Supporting Spontaneous Volunteers Program. These funds will be used for the delivery of First Aid, Emergency Preparedness and Flood Response Training along with the purchase of flood equipment that will be allocated to Uranquinty, Oura and North Wagga volunteer response groups. Estimated Completion: 31 December 2025 Job Number: 24331 |
|
|||
5 – The Environment |
|
|||
Currawarna Community Centre Roof Replacement |
$50K |
Buildings Reserve ($50K) |
Nil |
|
Funds are required for the replacement the roof at the Currawarna Community Centre. Works were being undertaken to remove the asbestos ceiling at the Community Centre when it was revealed that the roof structure was in poor condition. Works are required as soon as possible to reduce the time that the Currawarna Community Centre will be out of service. It is proposed to fund the works from the Buildings Reserve. Estimated Completion: 30 June 2025 Job Number: 24439 |
|
|||
Sewer Treatment Works Plant Shed Construction – Narrung Street |
$100K |
Sewer Reserve ($100K) |
Nil |
|
Funds are required for the construction of a new Plant Shed at the Narrung Street Sewer Treatment Works. The existing shed is not fit for purpose. The new shed will allow for sufficient room to safely carry out testing, repairs and rebuilding of equipment, an electrical testing bench, the cleaning of equipment, emergency shower/eye wash station, sufficient ventilation for welding, improved lighting and adequate room for the storage of parts and equipment. It is proposed to fund the variation from the Sewer Reserve. Estimated Completion: 30 June 2025 Job Number: 50444 |
|
|||
The following projects have been presented to Councillors as part of the 2025/26 LTFP Councillor Budget Workshop process and are now being included below for adoption and inclusion in the 10 year Capital Works Program:
Project Title |
2025/26 |
2026/27 |
2027/28 |
2028/29 |
2029/30 |
2030/31 |
Top Dressing Machine Purchase |
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
Historic Council Chambers (HCC) Buildings Upgrade |
123,146 |
|
|
|
|
|
Civic Centre Safety Lights |
151,925 |
|
|
|
|
|
Airport - Runway Lighting Upgrade (increase to budget) |
|
|
|
|
|
3,642,000 |
LMC Hardstand |
2,250,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Glass Gallery Toilet |
|
137,099 |
|
|
|
|
Lighting Community Campaigns |
41,645 |
40,870 |
|
|
|
|
Orchestra Pit Upgrade |
|
277,898 |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
2,566,716 |
535,867 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3,642,000 |
2024/25 Capital Works Summary
Approved Budget |
Proposed Movement |
Proposed Budget |
|
One-off |
$47,736,170 |
$150,000 |
$47,886,170 |
Recurrent |
$37,250,621 |
$0 |
$37,250,621 |
Pending |
$0 |
$0 |
$0 |
Total Capital Works |
$84,986,791 |
$150,000 |
$85,136,791 |
Current Restrictions
RESERVES SUMMARY |
|||||
28 FEBRUARY 2025 |
|||||
|
CLOSING BALANCE 2023/24 |
ADOPTED RESERVE TRANSFERS 2024/25 |
BUDGET VARIATIONS APPROVED UP TO COUNCIL MEETING 24.02.2025 |
PROPOSED CHANGES for Council Resolution* |
BALANCE AS AT 28 FEBRUARY 2025 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Externally Restricted |
|
|
|
|
|
Developer Contributions - Section 7.11 |
(35,346,092) |
3,828,593 |
(820,165) |
|
(32,337,664) |
Developer Contributions - Section 7.12 |
(849,883) |
(28,096) |
104,075 |
|
(773,904) |
Developer Contributions - Stormwater Section 64 |
(8,765,571) |
131,291 |
(910,630) |
|
(9,544,910) |
Sewer Fund |
(52,652,543) |
(276,425) |
(715,252) |
100,000 |
(53,544,220) |
Solid Waste |
(31,897,464) |
2,924,014 |
1,086,621 |
|
(27,886,829) |
Specific Purpose Unexpended Grants & Contributions |
(58,467,746) |
0 |
58,467,746 |
|
0 |
SRV Levee Reserve |
(6,230,711) |
0 |
0 |
|
(6,230,711) |
Stormwater Levy |
(5,505,698) |
2,772,743 |
(2,636,842) |
|
(5,369,797) |
Total Externally Restricted |
(199,715,707) |
9,352,119 |
54,575,552 |
100,000 |
(135,688,036) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internally Restricted |
|
|
|||
Additional Special Variation (ASV) |
(934,841) |
934,841 |
0 |
|
0 |
Airport |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
0 |
Art Gallery |
(15,398) |
(6,000) |
0 |
|
(21,398) |
Bridge Replacement |
(277,544) |
0 |
277,543 |
|
(1) |
Buildings |
(3,386,635) |
77,514 |
466,130 |
50,000 |
(2,792,992) |
CCTV |
(34,995) |
0 |
0 |
|
(34,995) |
Cemetery |
(1,378,480) |
(204,757) |
150,870 |
|
(1,432,366) |
Civic Theatre |
(95,013) |
(21,237) |
30,000 |
|
(86,250) |
Civil Infrastructure |
(11,521,350) |
696,586 |
865,846 |
|
(9,958,917) |
Council Election |
(427,970) |
372,507 |
0 |
|
(55,463) |
Economic Development |
(361,938) |
18,358 |
291,936 |
|
(51,645) |
Emergency Events Reserve |
(252,702) |
(109,381) |
0 |
|
(362,084) |
Employee Leave Entitlements Gen Fund |
(3,607,285) |
0 |
0 |
|
(3,607,285) |
Environmental Conservation |
(116,578) |
0 |
0 |
|
(116,578) |
Event Attraction |
(962,294) |
91,784 |
601,625 |
|
(268,885) |
Financial Assistance Grants in Advance |
(10,947,037) |
0 |
10,947,037 |
|
0 |
Grant Co-Funding |
(500,000) |
180,000 |
140,000 |
|
(180,000) |
Gravel Pit Restoration |
(790,095) |
3,333 |
222,825 |
|
(563,936) |
Information Services |
(2,387,681) |
1,037,601 |
(1,552,626) |
|
(2,902,706) |
Insurance Variations |
(50,000) |
0 |
0 |
|
(50,000) |
Internal Loans |
(7,841,730) |
(149,108) |
(513,153) |
|
(8,503,991) |
Lake Albert Improvements |
(741,740) |
(21,261) |
84,689 |
|
(678,312) |
Library |
(400,985) |
(237,430) |
0 |
|
(638,415) |
Livestock Marketing Centre |
(8,324,132) |
1,013,875 |
2,457,827 |
|
(4,852,431) |
Museum Acquisitions |
(48,476) |
4,378 |
0 |
|
(44,099) |
|
CLOSING BALANCE 2023/24 |
ADOPTED RESERVE TRANSFERS 2024/25 |
BUDGET VARIATIONS APPROVED UP TO COUNCIL MEETING 24.02.2025 |
PROPOSED CHANGES for Council Resolution* |
BALANCE AS AT 28 FEBRUARY 2025 |
Net Zero Emissions |
(262,207) |
(80,157) |
0 |
|
(342,364) |
Oasis Reserve |
(1,201,931) |
476,905 |
(469,018) |
|
(1,194,044) |
Parks & Recreation Projects |
(2,520,071) |
21,556 |
728,274 |
|
(1,770,241) |
Parks Water |
(180,000) |
20,593 |
0 |
|
(159,407) |
Planning Legals |
(61,747) |
(20,000) |
0 |
|
(81,747) |
Plant Replacement |
(6,383,440) |
227,092 |
2,746,150 |
|
(3,410,197) |
Project Carryovers |
(8,548,629) |
0 |
8,508,604 |
|
(40,025) |
Public Art |
(225,215) |
0 |
186,495 |
|
(38,720) |
Service Reviews |
(100,000) |
0 |
0 |
|
(100,000) |
Sister Cities |
(30,590) |
0 |
0 |
|
(30,590) |
Stormwater Drainage |
(110,178) |
0 |
0 |
|
(110,178) |
Strategic Real Property |
(1,949,243) |
50,000 |
(2,127,600) |
|
(4,026,843) |
Subdivision Tree Planting |
(516,648) |
20,000 |
0 |
|
(496,648) |
Unexpended External Loans |
(602,525) |
68,176 |
935 |
|
(533,413) |
Visitors Economy |
(33,394) |
(24,792) |
0 |
|
(58,186) |
Workers Compensation |
(155,010) |
22,500 |
0 |
|
(132,510) |
Total Internally Restricted |
(78,285,726) |
4,463,475 |
24,044,389 |
50,000 |
(49,727,862) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Restricted |
(278,001,433) |
13,815,594 |
78,619,941 |
150,000 |
(185,415,898) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Unrestricted |
(11,426,000) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
(11,426,000) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Investments |
(289,427,433) |
13,815,594 |
78,619,941 |
150,000 |
(196,841,898) |
Investment Summary as at 28 February 2025
In accordance with Regulation 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021, details of Wagga Wagga City Council’s external investments are outlined below.
Institution |
Rating |
Closing
Balance |
Closing
Balance |
February
EOM |
February |
Investment |
Maturity |
Term |
At Call Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAB |
AA- |
238,951 |
108,846 |
4.10% |
0.04% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
CBA |
AA- |
12,916,950 |
13,915,480 |
4.10% |
4.68% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
CBA |
AA- |
7,844,720 |
7,874,036 |
4.15% |
2.65% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Macquarie Bank |
A+ |
9,961,083 |
9,993,494 |
3.90% |
3.36% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
CBA |
AA- |
49,096,507 |
49,277,895 |
4.10% |
16.57% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Total At Call Accounts |
|
80,058,211 |
81,169,750 |
4.08% |
27.29% |
|
|
|
Short Term Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMP |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.67% |
16/12/2024 |
16/09/2025 |
9 |
Suncorp |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.12% |
0.34% |
7/03/2024 |
7/03/2025 |
12 |
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.31% |
0.34% |
3/06/2024 |
3/06/2025 |
12 |
BankVic |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.34% |
0.67% |
26/06/2024 |
26/06/2025 |
12 |
Bank of Sydney |
NR |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.47% |
0.67% |
28/06/2024 |
30/06/2025 |
12 |
NAB |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.30% |
0.34% |
30/07/2024 |
30/07/2025 |
12 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.45% |
0.67% |
2/07/2024 |
2/07/2025 |
12 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.40% |
0.67% |
8/07/2024 |
8/07/2025 |
12 |
Suncorp |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.43% |
0.34% |
10/07/2024 |
10/07/2025 |
12 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.03% |
0.67% |
27/08/2024 |
27/08/2025 |
12 |
ICBC |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.34% |
14/11/2024 |
14/11/2025 |
12 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.11% |
0.67% |
28/11/2024 |
28/11/2025 |
12 |
MyState |
BBB |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.67% |
29/11/2024 |
29/11/2025 |
12 |
MyState |
BBB |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.15% |
0.34% |
4/12/2024 |
4/12/2025 |
12 |
ING Bank |
A |
0 |
1,000,000 |
4.80% |
0.34% |
26/02/2025 |
26/02/2026 |
12 |
Total Short Term Deposits |
|
22,000,000 |
23,000,000 |
5.23% |
7.73% |
|
|
|
Medium Term Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.32% |
0.67% |
28/06/2021 |
29/06/2026 |
60 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.80% |
0.67% |
15/11/2021 |
17/11/2025 |
48 |
BOQ |
A- |
1,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
28/02/2020 |
28/02/2025 |
60 |
Police Credit Union |
NR |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
2.20% |
0.34% |
1/04/2020 |
1/04/2025 |
60 |
ICBC |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.85% |
0.34% |
29/05/2020 |
29/05/2025 |
60 |
ICBC |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.86% |
0.34% |
1/06/2020 |
2/06/2025 |
60 |
ICBC |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.75% |
0.67% |
25/06/2020 |
25/06/2025 |
60 |
ICBC |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.75% |
0.67% |
25/06/2020 |
25/06/2025 |
60 |
ICBC |
A |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
5.07% |
1.01% |
30/06/2022 |
30/06/2027 |
60 |
ICBC |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.50% |
0.67% |
17/08/2020 |
18/08/2025 |
60 |
BoQ |
A- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.25% |
0.34% |
7/09/2020 |
8/09/2025 |
60 |
BoQ |
A- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.25% |
0.67% |
14/09/2020 |
15/09/2025 |
60 |
ICBC |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.20% |
0.34% |
7/12/2020 |
8/12/2025 |
60 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
0.95% |
0.67% |
29/01/2021 |
29/01/2026 |
60 |
NAB |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.08% |
0.34% |
22/02/2021 |
20/02/2026 |
60 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.25% |
0.67% |
3/03/2021 |
2/03/2026 |
60 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.40% |
0.67% |
21/06/2021 |
19/06/2026 |
60 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.32% |
0.67% |
25/06/2021 |
25/06/2026 |
60 |
ICBC |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.32% |
0.34% |
25/08/2021 |
25/08/2026 |
60 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
8/02/2022 |
10/02/2025 |
36 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.40% |
0.67% |
9/03/2022 |
10/03/2025 |
36 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.90% |
0.67% |
11/03/2024 |
11/03/2026 |
24 |
MyState |
BBB |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
2.20% |
0.67% |
2/03/2022 |
3/03/2025 |
36 |
CBA |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
3.99% |
0.67% |
4/05/2022 |
5/05/2025 |
36 |
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.11% |
0.34% |
23/05/2024 |
25/05/2026 |
24 |
BoQ |
A- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.50% |
0.34% |
7/07/2022 |
7/07/2025 |
36 |
CBA |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.25% |
0.34% |
12/08/2022 |
12/08/2025 |
36 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
4.55% |
1.01% |
29/08/2022 |
29/08/2025 |
36 |
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.55% |
0.67% |
2/09/2022 |
2/09/2025 |
36 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.40% |
0.34% |
9/09/2022 |
9/09/2025 |
36 |
ICBC |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.67% |
21/10/2022 |
21/10/2025 |
36 |
AMP |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.80% |
0.34% |
21/11/2022 |
20/11/2025 |
36 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.85% |
0.67% |
16/12/2024 |
16/12/2026 |
24 |
Police Credit Union |
NR |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.75% |
0.67% |
17/02/2025 |
17/02/2027 |
24 |
Police Credit Union |
NR |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.94% |
0.67% |
14/03/2023 |
14/03/2025 |
24 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.00% |
0.67% |
14/03/2023 |
15/03/2027 |
48 |
Hume Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.75% |
0.67% |
31/03/2023 |
31/03/2025 |
24 |
Auswide |
BBB |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.95% |
0.67% |
13/04/2023 |
13/04/2026 |
36 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.67% |
20/04/2023 |
20/04/2027 |
48 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.34% |
26/05/2023 |
26/05/2026 |
36 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.38% |
0.67% |
28/06/2024 |
28/06/2029 |
60 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.37% |
0.67% |
21/08/2023 |
21/08/2025 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.90% |
0.34% |
29/11/2024 |
29/11/2026 |
24 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.45% |
0.34% |
30/11/2023 |
28/11/2025 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.67% |
14/12/2023 |
15/12/2025 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.14% |
0.67% |
3/01/2024 |
5/01/2026 |
24 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.67% |
4/01/2024 |
4/01/2027 |
36 |
Suncorp |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.08% |
0.34% |
8/01/2024 |
8/01/2026 |
24 |
Australian Unity |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.93% |
0.34% |
7/03/2024 |
9/03/2026 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.67% |
23/04/2024 |
24/04/2028 |
48 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.67% |
6/05/2024 |
6/05/2026 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.12% |
0.34% |
24/05/2024 |
24/05/2027 |
36 |
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.26% |
0.34% |
31/05/2024 |
31/05/2028 |
48 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.26% |
0.67% |
6/06/2024 |
6/06/2028 |
48 |
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.34% |
11/06/2024 |
11/06/2026 |
24 |
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.67% |
11/06/2024 |
11/06/2026 |
24 |
BankVIC |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.65% |
0.67% |
27/08/2024 |
27/08/2026 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.63% |
0.67% |
30/08/2024 |
30/08/2026 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.51% |
0.34% |
16/09/2024 |
18/09/2028 |
48 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.45% |
0.67% |
27/09/2024 |
28/09/2026 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.79% |
0.67% |
17/10/2024 |
19/10/2026 |
24 |
Westpac |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.70% |
0.34% |
8/10/2024 |
8/10/2026 |
24 |
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.73% |
0.67% |
21/10/2024 |
21/10/2027 |
36 |
Hume Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.95% |
0.67% |
7/11/2024 |
7/11/2026 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.02% |
0.67% |
14/11/2024 |
16/11/2026 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.00% |
0.34% |
27/11/2024 |
27/11/2026 |
24 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.07% |
0.67% |
28/11/2024 |
28/11/2028 |
48 |
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
4.85% |
1.01% |
16/12/2024 |
16/12/2027 |
36 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.80% |
0.67% |
21/01/2025 |
21/01/2028 |
36 |
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.82% |
0.34% |
30/01/2025 |
29/01/2027 |
24 |
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
0 |
2,000,000 |
4.73% |
0.67% |
10/02/2025 |
10/02/2028 |
36 |
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
0 |
1,000,000 |
4.79% |
0.34% |
4/02/2025 |
4/02/2028 |
36 |
Regional Australia Bank |
BBB+ |
0 |
2,000,000 |
4.71% |
0.67% |
12/02/2025 |
12/02/2027 |
24 |
Hume Bank |
BBB+ |
0 |
2,000,000 |
4.75% |
0.67% |
12/02/2025 |
12/02/2029 |
48 |
Westpac |
AA- |
0 |
2,000,000 |
4.70% |
0.67% |
12/02/2025 |
14/02/2028 |
36 |
ING Bank |
A |
0 |
1,000,000 |
4.77% |
0.34% |
26/02/2025 |
28/02/2028 |
36 |
Total Medium Term Deposits |
|
118,000,000 |
125,000,000 |
4.07% |
42.03% |
|
|
|
Floating Rate Notes - Senior Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB+ |
1,114,314 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
4/02/2020 |
4/02/2025 |
60 |
Macquarie Bank |
A+ |
2,022,616 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
12/02/2020 |
12/02/2025 |
60 |
BOQ Covered |
AAA |
557,335 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
14/05/2020 |
14/05/2025 |
60 |
UBS |
A+ |
1,502,767 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
30/07/2020 |
30/07/2025 |
60 |
CBA |
AA- |
2,009,630 |
2,019,094 |
BBSW + 70 |
0.68% |
14/01/2022 |
14/01/2027 |
60 |
Rabobank |
A+ |
2,003,842 |
2,013,899 |
BBSW + 73 |
0.68% |
27/01/2022 |
27/01/2027 |
60 |
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB+ |
1,012,466 |
1,004,054 |
BBSW + 100 |
0.34% |
10/02/2022 |
10/02/2027 |
60 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,429,032 |
2,409,009 |
BBSW + 72 |
0.81% |
25/02/2022 |
25/02/2027 |
60 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
1,661,982 |
1,668,020 |
BBSW + 98 |
0.56% |
17/03/2022 |
17/03/2025 |
36 |
ANZ |
AA- |
2,038,713 |
2,021,534 |
BBSW + 97 |
0.68% |
12/05/2022 |
12/05/2027 |
60 |
NAB |
AA- |
1,717,602 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
30/05/2022 |
30/05/2025 |
36 |
Suncorp |
AA- |
911,685 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
22/08/2022 |
22/08/2025 |
36 |
ANZ |
AA- |
2,568,453 |
2,545,674 |
BBSW + 120 |
0.86% |
4/11/2022 |
4/11/2027 |
60 |
NAB |
AA- |
2,561,235 |
2,537,836 |
BBSW + 120 |
0.85% |
25/11/2022 |
25/11/2027 |
60 |
Suncorp |
AA- |
1,123,576 |
1,128,630 |
BBSW + 125 |
0.38% |
14/12/2022 |
14/12/2027 |
60 |
CBA |
AA- |
2,030,653 |
2,040,966 |
BBSW + 115 |
0.69% |
13/01/2023 |
13/01/2028 |
60 |
Bank Australia |
BBB+ |
1,941,934 |
1,921,780 |
BBSW + 155 |
0.65% |
22/02/2023 |
22/02/2027 |
48 |
Bendigo-Adelaide Covered |
AAA |
1,019,015 |
1,023,552 |
BBSW + 115 |
0.34% |
16/06/2023 |
16/06/2028 |
60 |
CBA |
AA- |
2,544,843 |
2,523,454 |
BBSW + 95 |
0.85% |
17/08/2023 |
17/08/2028 |
60 |
ANZ |
AA- |
2,128,498 |
2,139,556 |
BBSW + 93 |
0.72% |
11/09/2023 |
11/09/2028 |
60 |
Bank Australia |
BBB+ |
1,663,219 |
1,671,154 |
BBSW + 150 |
0.56% |
30/10/2023 |
30/10/2026 |
36 |
ANZ |
AA- |
2,548,358 |
2,527,544 |
BBSW + 96 |
0.85% |
5/02/2024 |
5/02/2029 |
60 |
ANZ |
AA- |
1,012,288 |
1,017,021 |
BBSW + 98 |
0.34% |
19/03/2024 |
19/03/2029 |
60 |
ING Bank |
A |
505,490 |
507,971 |
BBSW + 95 |
0.17% |
22/03/2024 |
22/03/2027 |
36 |
BoQ |
A- |
1,665,326 |
1,676,096 |
BBSW + 128 |
0.56% |
30/04/2024 |
30/04/2029 |
60 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
813,521 |
805,831 |
BBSW + 100 |
0.27% |
14/05/2024 |
14/05/2027 |
36 |
ANZ |
AA- |
1,514,038 |
1,521,828 |
BBSW + 86 |
0.51% |
18/06/2024 |
18/06/2029 |
60 |
Teachers Mutual |
BBB+ |
913,395 |
918,238 |
BBSW + 130 |
0.31% |
21/06/2024 |
21/06/2027 |
36 |
ING Bank |
A |
2,233,163 |
2,216,157 |
BBSW + 102 |
0.75% |
20/08/2024 |
20/08/2029 |
60 |
CBA |
AA- |
1,520,374 |
1,507,893 |
BBSW + 87 |
0.51% |
22/08/2024 |
22/08/2029 |
60 |
Suncorp |
AA- |
2,417,839 |
2,431,962 |
BBSW + 92 |
0.82% |
27/09/2024 |
27/09/2029 |
60 |
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
752,405 |
755,740 |
BBSW + 96 |
0.25% |
24/10/2024 |
24/10/2028 |
48 |
ANZ |
AA- |
0 |
1,304,161 |
BBSW + 81 |
0.44% |
18/02/2025 |
18/02/2030 |
60 |
Rabobank |
A+ |
0 |
1,303,584 |
BBSW + 85 |
0.44% |
20/02/2025 |
20/02/2030 |
60 |
Total Floating Rate Notes - Senior Debt |
|
52,459,609 |
47,162,239 |
|
15.86% |
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ING Covered |
AAA |
716,804 |
715,776 |
1.10% |
0.24% |
19/08/2021 |
19/08/2026 |
60 |
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
1.50% |
1.01% |
24/08/2021 |
15/12/2026 |
64 |
BoQ |
A- |
1,829,129 |
1,838,076 |
2.10% |
0.62% |
27/10/2021 |
27/10/2026 |
60 |
BoQ |
A- |
2,059,104 |
2,074,872 |
5.30% |
0.70% |
30/04/2024 |
30/04/2029 |
60 |
ANZ |
AA- |
0 |
1,206,075 |
4.65% |
0.41% |
18/02/2025 |
18/02/2030 |
60 |
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.50% |
0.67% |
6/08/2021 |
15/12/2026 |
64 |
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.50% |
0.34% |
14/07/2021 |
15/12/2026 |
65 |
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.30% |
0.67% |
29/04/2021 |
15/06/2026 |
61 |
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.00% |
0.67% |
30/11/2020 |
15/12/2025 |
60 |
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.00% |
0.34% |
20/11/2020 |
15/12/2025 |
61 |
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.00% |
0.67% |
21/10/2020 |
15/12/2025 |
62 |
Total Fixed Rate Bonds |
|
17,605,037 |
18,834,798 |
2.01% |
6.33% |
|
|
|
Managed Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NSW Tcorp |
NR |
2,256,862 |
2,249,429 |
-0.33% |
0.76% |
17/03/2014 |
1/02/2030 |
190 |
Total Managed Funds |
|
2,256,862 |
2,249,429 |
-0.33% |
0.76% |
|
|
|
TOTAL CASH ASSETS, CASH |
|
292,379,719 |
297,416,216 |
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
Council’s investment portfolio is dominated by Term Deposits, equating to approximately 50% of the portfolio across a broad range of counterparties. Cash equates to 27%, with Floating Rate Notes (FRNs) around 16%, fixed rate bonds around 6% and growth funds around 1% of the portfolio.
Council’s investment portfolio is well diversified in complying assets across the entire credit spectrum. It is also well diversified from a rating perspective. Credit quality is diversified and is predominately invested amongst the investment grade Authorised Deposit-Taking Institutions (ADIs) (being BBB- or higher), with a smaller allocation to unrated ADIs.
All investments are within the defined Policy limits, as outlined in the Rating Allocation chart below:
Investment Portfolio Balance
Council’s investment portfolio balance increased over the past month, up from $292.38M to $297.42M. This increase is reflective of the third quarter rates instalments being due at 28 February 2025.
Monthly Investment Movements
Redemptions/Sales – Council redeemed/sold the following investment securities during February 2025:
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
Westpac Bank (AA-) Term Deposit |
$2M |
3 years |
2.00% |
This term deposit was redeemed on maturity and these funds were reinvested in a new 3-year Australian Military Bank term deposit (as below). |
BoQ (A-) Term Deposit |
$1M |
5 years |
2.00% |
This term deposit was redeemed on maturity and these funds were reinvested in a new 12-month ING Bank term deposit (as below). |
Newcastle Permanent (BBB+) Floating Rate Note |
$1.1M |
5 years |
BBSW +112bps |
This floating rate note was redeemed on maturity and these funds were reinvested in a new 3-year Australian Military Bank term deposit (as below). |
Macquarie Bank (A+) Floating Rate Note |
$2M |
5 years |
BBSW +84bps |
This floating rate note was redeemed on maturity and these funds were reinvested in a new 2-year Regional Australia Bank term deposit (as below). |
BoQ Covered (AAA) Floating Rate Note |
$550K |
5 years |
BBSW +107bps |
This floating rate note was sold prior to maturity and these funds were used to purchase a new 5-year ANZ Bank floating rate note (as below) and a new 5-year ANZ Bank fixed rate bond (as below). Council recognised a capital gain of $869 on this sale. |
NAB (AA-) Floating Rate Note |
$1.7M |
3 years |
BBSW +90bps |
This floating rate note was sold prior to maturity and these funds were used to purchase a new 5-year ANZ Bank floating rate note (as below) and a new 5-year ANZ Bank fixed rate bond (as below). Council recognised a capital gain of $2,788 on this sale. |
Suncorp Bank (AA-) Floating Rate Note |
$900K |
3 years |
BBSW +93bps |
This floating rate note was sold prior to maturity and these funds were used to purchase a new 5-year ANZ Bank floating rate note (as below) and a new 5-year ANZ Bank fixed rate bond (as below). Council recognised a capital gain of $2,439 on this sale. |
UBS (A+) Floating Rate Note |
$1.5M |
5 years |
BBSW +87bps |
This floating rate note was sold prior to maturity and these funds were used to purchase a new 5-year Rabobank floating rate note (as below). Council recognised a capital gain of $3,240 on this sale. |
New Investments – Council purchased the following investment securities during February 2025:
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
Australian Military Bank (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$1M |
3 years |
4.79% |
The Australian Military Bank rate of 4.79% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was 4.65%. |
Australian Military Bank (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$2M |
3 years |
4.73% |
The Australian Military Bank rate of 4.73% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was 4.65%. |
Regional Australia Bank (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$2M |
2 years |
4.71% |
The Regional Australia Bank rate of 4.71% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was 4.64%. |
Hume Bank (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$2M |
4 years |
4.75% |
The Hume Bank rate of 4.75% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was also 4.75%. |
Westpac Bank (AA-) Term Deposit |
$2M |
3 years |
4.70% |
The Westpac Bank rate of 4.70% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was also 4.70%. |
ING Bank (A) Term Deposit |
$1M |
12 months |
4.80% |
The ING Bank rate of 4.80% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was 4.75%. |
ING Bank (A) Term Deposit |
$1M |
3 years |
4.77% |
The ING Bank rate of 4.77% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was 4.52%. |
ANZ (AA-) Floating Rate Note |
$1.3M |
5 years |
BBSW +81bps |
Council’s independent Investment Advisor advised this Floating Rate Note represented fair value with a view of holding this for at least 2 years. |
Rabobank (A+) Floating Rate Note |
$1.3M |
5 years |
BBSW +85bps |
Council’s independent Investment Advisor advised this Floating Rate Note represented fair value with a view of holding this for 3.5-4 years. |
ANZ (AA-) Fixed Rate Bond |
$1.2M |
5 years |
4.65% |
Council’s independent Investment Advisor advised this Fixed Rate Bond represented fair value with a fixed interest rate. Council will look to hold this investment for at least 2 years, with potential for small capital gains. |
Rollovers – Council rolled over the following investment security during February 2025:
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
Police Credit Union (Unrated) Term Deposit |
$2M |
2 years |
4.75% |
This term deposit was a 2-year investment earning 5.04% and was rolled at maturity into a new 2-year term deposit at 4.75%. The next best rate for this term was 4.74%. |
Monthly Investment Performance
Interest/growth/capital gains/(losses) for the month totalled $1,021,666, which compares favourably with the budget for the period of $590,254 - outperforming budget for the month by $431,412.
Council’s outperformance to budget for February is mainly due to better than budgeted returns on Councils investment portfolio as well as a higher than anticipated investment portfolio balance – which is partly due to Council receiving upfront payment of $48.5M in AIF funding in June 2024.
Council experienced a slight negative return on its NSW T-Corp Managed Fund for the month of February, with the fund returning -0.33% (or -$7,433) as both domestic (-3.79%) and international (-0.75%) shares fell during the month, falling from their recent all-time highs.
On Cash and At‑Call accounts returned 4.10% (annualised) for the month. These funds are utilised for daily cash flow management and need to be available to meet operating and contractual payments as they fall due.
Over the past year, Council’s investment portfolio has returned 4.17%, marginally underperforming the AusBond Bank Bill index by -0.31%. Councils investment portfolio has continued to perform in line with the AusBond Bank Bill Index* over the longer-term time period, returning 3.33% per annum over the past 3 years – slightly underperforming the benchmark by -0.11% over this time.
* The AusBond Bank Bill Index is the leading benchmark for the Australian fixed income market. It is interpolated from the RBA Cash rate, 1 month and 3-month Bank Bill Swap rates.
Report by Responsible Accounting Officer
I hereby certify that all of the above investments have been made in accordance with the provision of Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 and the regulations there under, and in accordance with the Investment Policy adopted by Council on 24 June 2024.
Carolyn Rodney
Responsible Accounting Officer
Policy and Legislation
Budget variations are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 052 Budget Policy.
Investments are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 075 Investment Policy.
Local Government Act 1993
Section 625 - How may councils invest?
Local Government (General) Regulation 2021
Section 212 - Reports on council investments
Link to Strategic Plan
Community leadership and collaboration
Objective: Wagga Wagga City Council leads through engaged civic governance and is recognised and distinguished by its ethical decision-making, efficient management, innovation and quality customer service
Ensure transparency and accountability
Risk Management Issues for Council
This report is a control mechanism that assists in addressing the following potential risks to Council:
· Loss of investment income or capital resulting from ongoing management of investments, especially during difficult economic times
· Failure to demonstrate to the community that its funds are being expended in an efficient and effective manner
Internal / External Consultation
All relevant areas within Council have consulted with the Finance Division in relation to the budget variations listed in this report.
The Finance Division has consulted with relevant external parties to confirm Council’s investment portfolio balances.
1⇩. |
Capital Works Program 2024/25 to 2033/34 |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
RP-4 |
RP-4 WAGGA WAGGA DESTINATION MANAGEMENT PLAN 2025-2034
Author: Kimberly Parker
Executive: Janice Summerhayes
Summary: |
This report summarises the submissions received during the public exhibition of the draft Wagga Wagga Destination Management Plan (Plan) and recommends its adoption by Council. The Plan is a 10-year strategic framework to foster the growth of a robust visitor economy in the Wagga Wagga Local Government Area that also has flow on benefits to the surrounding region. After the first round of extensive consultation the draft Plan was placed on public exhibition for 79 days with 184 submissions received. This report is provided to Council for consideration and adoption. |
That Council:
a receive and note the submissions received during the public exhibition of the draft Wagga Wagga Destination Management Plan 2025-2034
b note the minor changes recommended in the draft Wagga Wagga Destination Management Plan 2025-2034
c adopt the Wagga Wagga Destination Management Plan 2025-2034
Report
The draft Wagga Wagga Destination Management Plan has been developed through collaboration with stakeholders, extensive data analysis and research, which identifies opportunities, establishes a shared vision, and outlines priority projects that will elevate Wagga Wagga as a visitor destination into the future.
At the ordinary council meeting held on Monday 25 November 2024 it was resolved to:
a place the draft Wagga Wagga Destination Management Plan on public exhibition from Friday 29 November 2024 to Sunday 16 February 2025 and invite public submissions during that period
b receive a further report following the public exhibition period:
i addressing any submissions made in respect of the draft Plan
ii proposing adoption of the draft Plan unless there are any recommended amendments deemed to be substantial and requiring a further public exhibition period
Between 29 November 2024 and 16 February 2025, 19 community and industry engagement activities took place across Wagga Wagga Local Government Area (LGA). Community feedback was collected through seven kiosks, an online survey, and 12 agile library or café pop-up sessions. Industry engagement also included an industry workshop, and an online meeting with neighbouring regional councils, and a youth week crew session. These engagements ensured broad participation from residents and stakeholders and resulted in 184 submissions received.
A detailed table of engagement activities is outlined in the consultation section of this report and a summary as follows:
· Physical signage and distribution:
o 99 temporary signs were placed on bins along Baylis and Fitzmaurice Streets.
o 7 static kiosk locations hosted materials, including the Visitor Information Centre, Civic Centre, and Airport.
o 3,000 post cards/flyers were distributed through static kiosks and handed out during pop-up sessions.
o 30 physical copies of the draft plan were made available at pop-up sessions and kiosk sites.
· Digital and media engagement:
o Social media posts on Visit Wagga Wagga and City of Wagga Wagga reached 68,168 people, with 61,995 views, 1,985 interactions, and 74 link clicks.
o "Have Your Say" engagement page recorded 3,551 views
o 3 Council News stories and media releases were published
· Direct communication and newsletters:
o Four industry newsletters were sent to 145 tourism business subscribers, with open rates ranging from 53.8% to 81.1% and click rates between 10.5% and 16.8% with the average being 5% across electronic direct emails (EDMs).
o Additional direct emails and phone calls were also conducted during this period.
The aim of this engagement period was to:
· Present and inform stakeholders and community about the draft Plan
· Provide opportunities for stakeholders and community to participate and offer feedback
· Collect comments and feedback to inform and finalise the plan to recommend for endorsement.
This report outlines the key feedback received on the draft Plan during the public exhibition period. Overall Council received very positive support toward the initiatives outlined in the draft Plan in particular:
· Cycling and walking trails: as a key visitor asset but with feedback requesting continued investment, activation and improved wayfinding signage needed.
· Events, festivals, and food and wine scene: feedback supportive of more opportunities for live entertainment and the showcasing of local talent.
· Riverside: Wagga Beach + Lake Albert: feedback stated both assets as key visitor attractions but there is opportunity for improvement including continued investment in infrastructure upgrades, activations, and events
· First Nations: support for First Nations destination theme with the continued investment in infrastructure, business and product development and destination marketing
· Visitor amenity: further investment required to upgrade aged public amenity at key visitor locations, including Wagga Wagga Airport, rest stops across the LGA and the Visitor Information Centre
· Arts and culture: support for further investment in arts and culture including opportunities for creatives to showcase their talents and increase the promotion of arts and cultural assets to attract visitors.
During the public exhibition period Council received 184 valid submissions and 30 invalid submissions (214 in total). Invalid submissions typically included profanity and drawings, nonspecific to the consultation topic. Attached to this report is every submission received through the public submission process. The table below provides a summary of the comments and suggestions received and any recommended minor amendments to the draft Plan.
The following minor amendments to the draft Plan are recommended:
· Update Objective 1: ‘Transform Wagga Wagga into a recognised regional holiday leisure destination’ to ‘Transform Wagga Wagga into a visitor-attracting destination’ which would be inclusive of all traveller types (p.6).
· Update the Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework graphic to align with framework presented in the draft Community Strategic Plan (p. 15)
· Replace ‘WWCC’ with ‘Wagga Wagga’ in the Visitor Economy Snapshot table to provide clarity (p.23)
· Replace the number of art glass pieces in the national collection from ‘400’ to ‘700 (p.30)
· Fix typo of ‘ameneability’ to ‘amenability’(p.31)
· Minor wording update when referencing investment opportunities to include infrastructure for people of all ages and abilities. Updates include references to accommodation and iconic attractions opportunities (p. 34-35), as well as accommodation investment (p.51)
· Minor wording update to ‘ED06 Bolton Park Masterplan’ as identified projects have been completed or near completion, and to include reference of the implementation of the 20-year plan.
· Minor wording update to ED07 ‘Develop Lake Albert’ to remove reference to developing a Plan of Management as this project is near completion, and replace with ‘support the implementation of the ten-year plan when endorsed by Council’.
· Update to ED08 Sporting infrastructure improvements to update McDonald’s Park to new sponsorship name Geohex Park, and note funding status update for second rugby league field from ‘unfunded’ to ‘funded’
· Update to ED02 Major Convention/Entertainment Centre to remove development of business case as this element of the project has been completed
· Update 2022/23 flight numbers from “3700 passengers weekly” to “3800 passengers weekly” p. 20.
· Minor amendment to ‘Our existing hero product’ for ‘Arts and Culture’ p.30 to include community led history and heritage products.
· Include Create NSW Cultural Tourism in NSW report 2024 & Cultural Tourism in the Eastern Riverina region 2024 report in strategic policy links p.65
· Include image of smoking ceremony/stomping on country image on p.16.
Table 1: Summary table of submission suggestions and recommendations
Submission No. |
Submission summary |
Recommendations |
1, 11, 16, 28, 50, 52, 55, 64, 92, 94, 106, 118, 121, 122, 133, 136, 146, 147, 157, 162 |
Cycling infrastructure and activation – highlighted the great existing assets currently available but requested continued investment, activation and improved wayfinding signage needed. A number of submissions requested investment in cycling and trail experiences. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘PD04 Enhance and develop cycling and trail experiences’ and ‘VD04 Wayfinding and visitor movement plan’. |
5, 10, 19, 24, 56, 94, 104, 106, 113, 115, 119, 121, 127, 136, 155, 162, 164, 165,
|
Investment and attraction of events and festivals – support was received encouraging further investment in events in the Wagga Wagga Local Government Area (LGA). Sporting events, including accessible sports and larger tournaments. Feedback supported investment in music festivals and arts events to be expanded and enhance the cultural experience in the LGA to attract more visitors. Feedback also reflected a need for modern venues including investment in performing arts and large-scale conference venues. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘D02 Events Strategy and Action Plan’, ‘ED08 Sporting infrastructure improvements’, ‘ED07 Major Convention and Entertainment Centre’, and ‘ED06 Civic Theatre Performing Arts Masterplan’.
|
2, 3, 9, 25, 55, 72, 74,103, 105, 112, 113, 117, 119, 133, 140, 141, 148 |
Agritourism and food and wine scene – Comments reflected a desire for more food and wine experiences, greater access to local produce, and opportunities for Farmstay and agritourism development. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘PD08 Agritourism planning support’, ‘PD09 Agritourism precincts’, ‘PD12 Agritourism destination event’ and ‘VD03 Attract accommodation investment’. |
4, 5, 6, 7, 21, 22, 49, 58, 78, 83, 107, 108, 114, 117 |
Riverside: Wagga Beach - feedback stated this asset as a key visitor attraction but there is opportunity to continue investment in infrastructure upgrades, activations, and events. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of “ED03 Activate Riverside: Wagga Beach” and PD06 Seasonal leisure and recreational activities’’ |
8, 44, 45, 71, 96, 104, 132, 133, 137, 142, 146, 147, 157, 164 |
Unlocking hidden gems - noted importance of celebrating Wagga Wagga’s history & heritage, enhancing cultural experiences, increasing bookable tour opportunities, and uncovering hidden gems through activation and promotion for example Wagga Rail Heritage Museum |
Recommend minor amendment to ‘Our existing hero product’ for ‘Arts and Culture’ p.30 to include community led history and heritage products. No other amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘PD10 Unlock hidden gems’, ‘DD04 Destination marketing’, and ‘DD03 Marketing plan’. |
18, 61, 79, 80, 84, 95, 97, 102, 108, 112, 132, 164, 165, 166 |
Business trading hours and night time economy – feedback referenced a limited availability of offerings including food options and activities across the city on Sundays, Mondays and public holidays. There is a desire for CBD activations to attract foot traffic in this precinct with suggestions including pop up events or programs. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘PD11 Build on the 7-day trade and night-time economy’
|
23, 29, 50, 51, 53, 70, 78, 83, 104, 108, 114, 143, 144 |
Seasonal recreation activities -Responses highlighted an opportunity for more activities such as kayak hire, bike hire or other recreational options at key visitor locations including Wagga Beach, Lake Albert and Wiradjuri Trail. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘PD06 Seasonal leisure and recreational activities’ |
8, 27, 30, 54, 57, 75, 100, 104, 105, 116, 123, 140, 158 |
Destination branding and marketing – responses highlighted destination branding should emphasise history and heritage, local identity, and First Nations culture. Further investment in marketing events and promotions that will enhance visibility, attract visitors, and reinforce the City’s unique appeal. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘DD04 Destination marketing’, ‘DD03 Marketing plan’, and ‘DD02 Develop the destination brand’.
|
1, 46, 58, 68, 77, 82, 104, 105, 106, 119, 134, 155 |
Event infrastructure – responses identified opportunities for more investment in public and private event infrastructure to maximise existing assets and attract more events to the city as well as to the rural villages. Styles/types of events varied across all submissions. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘ED01 Event infrastructure improvements’.
|
89, 90, 95, 97, 99, 111, 124, 130, 131, 133, 142, 165 |
Visitor amenity - Comments also reflected a desire for investment for travellers with accessible requirements including considerations for rest stops, parking and general access to attractions. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘VD09 Visitor amenity’.
|
9, 26, 59, 103, 109, 112, 125, 128, 135, 140, 165 |
Tourism business development and learning opportunities – feedback supported the identified strengths and gaps detailed in the draft Plan confirming they aligned with business needs. There was recognition from both residents and businesses that there is a need and a want for support to develop business services and experiences. For example, improvements in customer service, local knowledge, and developing business strategies for diversification. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘PD02 Tourism Industry Development Program’ and ‘PD01 Wagga Wagga Tourism Partner Program’
|
31, 32, 33, 34, 37, 39, 41, 42, 129, 134, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184 |
Airport experience, amenity and connectivity – feedback noted the airport’s critical role as the gateway to the City. There is a need for improved connectivity between transport nodes and key visitor locations. Feedback pointed to the need for upgrading the airport’s facilities and additional service routes. Comments included calls for modern amenities, more efficient check-in and security processes, and an overall improvement in the presentation of the facility to better reflect Wagga Wagga’s destination appeal. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘VDA1 - Airport advocacy’.
|
17, 35, 78, 105, 113, 119, 164, 165 |
CBD activations – feedback noted that public spaces should be activated more, with an emphasis on social gatherings and cultural engagement. Night-time activations and public art were provided as examples of how to enhance the CBD experience. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘PD07 CBD placemaking activations’.
|
48, 86, 87, 93, 106, 108, 110, 169 |
Lake Albert - Feedback highlighted this asset as high value to the community and the need to improve the quality and amenity of this site. One response noted that the Lake Albert Plan of Management is near competition ready for Council endorsement and implementation. |
Recommend a minor amendment to update ‘ED07 Develop Lake Albert’ to remove reference to developing a Plan of Management as this project is near completion, and replace with ‘support the implementation of the ten-year plan when endorsed by Council’.
|
63, 82, 85, 86, 104, 105, 110, 126, 165 |
Water and nature experiences - There is a call for better viewing infrastructure around the river and lake areas, indicating that more seating, viewing platforms, and access points would enhance the experience for visitors. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘VD06 Water access and viewing infrastructure’ and ‘VD07 Iconic infrastructure plan’.
|
105, 120, 122, 124, 137, 142, 165 |
Signs – feedback included the City lacking in a sense of arrival at key gateway points to the city, lack of consistency with signage, the need for improved way finding on foot or on road to navigate the city, attractions and precincts. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘VD04 Wayfinding and visitor movement plan’ and ‘VD05 City gateway and precinct signage’.
|
20, 50, 116, 151, 161, 164 |
First Nations – support for First Nations destination theme with the continued investment in infrastructure, business and product development, and destination marketing. Comments encouraged use of an additional image representing First Nations culture in the plan in addition to existing content. |
Recommend inclusion of an
image on p16 of a smoking ceremony.
|
65, 66, 115, 136, 141 |
Diversify and attract accommodation - Feedback on accommodation emphasised the need for diverse options, including improved facilities for families and visitors. Suggestions included farm-stay experiences, and catering to tourists with varied accessibility needs. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘VD03 Attract accommodation investment’.
|
100, 103, 105, 124 |
Visitor Information Centre and services - Feedback supported developing and improving the Visitor Information Centre and its services to visitors. Comments included the importance of in-person visitor servicing to guide and promote offerings in the city. Accompanying this, it was suggested to invest in creating a memorable and engaging experience at the centre. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘VD02 Visitor servicing expansion’, ‘DD04 Destination marketing’, ‘DD03 Marketing plan’, and ‘VD04 Wayfinding and visitor movement plan’.
|
78, 101, 105, 162 |
Youth in tourism - Feedback on youth tourism opportunities suggests focusing on night-time activities and street-level events to attract young visitors as well provide opportunities for young people to work behind the scenes in events, tourism and creative industries. |
No amendment recommended. Comments are reflective and in support of ‘PD05 Youth in tourism’.
|
140, 169 |
Wording – two submissions suggest updating Objective 1 to be inclusive of all traveller types and not solely leisure traveller types. |
Recommend minor amendment to
wording in Objective 1.
|
167 |
Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework – internal submission requesting to update the Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework graphic to align with framework presented in the draft Community Strategic Plan (p. 15) |
Recommend minor amendment by updating the Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework graphic. |
106 |
Themes - Response suggested that sports should have its own destination theme. |
No amendment recommended. The plan takes a holistic approach to a strategic framework rather than specific themes for event types, the plan focuses on strengthening Wagga Wagga’s overall capacity to attract and host a wide range of high quality events including sports, arts, culture, and business events. |
121 |
Spelling error – submission indicated minor spelling errors. |
Recommend minor amendment to correct ‘ameneability’ to ‘amenability’(p.31) |
169 |
Bolton Park - One response noted that the Bolton Park Masterplan and Tennis Complex had since been completed or near completion. |
Recommend a minor amendment to ‘ED06 Bolton Park Masterplan’ to include reference of the implementation of the 20-year plan. |
169 |
Flight data – One response noted flight data was from 2022/23 and indicated new data for 2023/24 were available |
Recommend a minor amendment to update 2022/23 flight numbers from “3700 passengers weekly” to “3800 passengers weekly” to reflect 2023/24 data p. 20. |
15, 38, 40, 43, 44, 47, 60, 62, 66, 67, 69, 73, 76, 81, 88, 91, 138, 139, 145, 150, 152, 153, 154, 155, 159, 160, 163 |
General appreciation for the city – submissions received spoke positively about the city ranging from trees, parks, attractions, friendly atmosphere, and the people. |
No amendments recommended. |
Invalid submissions |
Written, invalid or ineligible responses were received via the static kiosks. These submissions typically included profanity and drawings, nonspecific to the consultation topic. |
No amendments recommended. |
During the public exhibition period, a total of 184 valid responses were received, as outlined in the table above. Based on this feedback, 14 minor amendments are recommended by staff to finalise the plan for formal adoption and endorsement by Council. Once approved, the plan will move into the implementation phase of the recommended actions based on the 10-year delivery timeline.
Financial Implications
The Plan contains a large proportion of activities that are currently funded through Council’s Long Term Financial Plan (LTFP). It should be noted that the allocated funds do not address all initiatives simultaneously, rather they are prioritised for different projects year to year.
Where projects are not funded, these will be subject to approval through Council's LTFP budget and business planning processes or Council will endeavour to seek federal and state grant funding opportunities in collaboration with local stakeholders.
Policy and Legislation
The Plan will assist in achieving Council’s strategic objectives and plans as listed below:
· Wagga Wagga Community Strategic Plan
· Wagga Wagga Cultural Plan 2020-2030
· Wagga Wagga Reconciliation Action Plan 2022 - 2024
· Wagga Wagga All Abilities Plan 2022 - 2026
· Recreation, Open Space and Community Strategy and Implementation Plan 2040
· Wagga Wagga Events Strategy and Action Plan 2020-2024
Link to Strategic Plan
Growing Economy
Objective: Wagga Wagga is an attractive tourist destination
Facilitate planning and development of visitor-related facilities and services
Risk Management Issues for Council
There are initiatives identified within the draft Plan that are dependent upon sourcing long-term financial funding and will not proceed if funding is not secured.
Risk management will be managed against each action when implemented.
Internal / External Consultation
Promotion and distribution locations
From 29 November 2024 to 16 February 2025, various engagement activities were conducted to reach the community and businesses in Wagga Wagga regarding the draft Plan. Key highlights include:
· Physical signage and distribution:
o 99 temporary signs were placed on bins along Baylis and Fitzmaurice Streets.
o 7 static kiosk locations hosted materials, including the Visitor Information Centre, Civic Centre, and Airport.
o 3,000 post cards/flyers were distributed through static kiosks and handed out during pop-up sessions.
o 30 physical copies of the draft plan were made available at pop-up sessions and kiosk sites.
· Digital and media engagement:
o Social media posts on Visit Wagga Wagga and City of Wagga Wagga reached 68,168 people, with 61,995 views, 1,985 interactions, and 74 link clicks.
o "Have Your Say" engagement page recorded 3,551 views
o 3 Council News stories and media releases were published
· Direct communication and newsletters:
o Four industry newsletters were sent to 145 tourism business subscribers, with open rates ranging from 53.8% to 81.1% and click rates between 10.5% and 16.8% with the average being 5% across electronic direct emails (EDMs).
o Additional direct emails and phone calls were also conducted during this period.
Consultation activities
Date |
Location |
Stakeholder Group |
Type of engagement |
29 November 2024 – 16 February 2025 |
Kiosks: · Airport · Civic Centre · Civic Theatre · Museum of the Riverina – Botanic Gardens site · Art Gallery · Visitor Information Centre |
Community |
Written submissions |
29 November 2024 – 16 February 2025 |
Have your say engagement website |
Community |
Online survey |
4 December 2024 |
Magpies Nest Restaurant |
Tourism industry |
Industry event |
14 January 2025 |
Galore Hall, Galore |
Community |
Agile library pop up stall |
15 January 2025 |
The Perennial, Kooringal |
Community |
Café pop up stall |
16 January 2025 |
Uranquinty rest stop, Uranquinty |
Community |
Agile library pop up stall |
17 January 2025 |
The Brew, Turvey Park |
Community |
Café pop up stall |
21 January 2025 |
Kyeamba Street, Mangoplah |
Community |
Agile library pop up stall |
21 January 2025 |
Wagga Wagga City Library |
Wagga Youth Crew |
Meeting |
22 January 2025 |
Larry’s Café, Wagga Wagga |
Community |
Café pop up stall |
24 January 2025 |
Gobbagombalin Park, Gobbagombalin |
Community |
Agile library pop up stall |
28 January 2025 |
Sydney Street, Tarcutta |
Community |
Agile library pop up stall |
29 January 2025 |
Infuso Café, Mount Austin |
Community |
Café pop up stall |
29 January 2025 |
Online |
Wagga Wagga Tourism Partner Program Regional Councils including Lockhart, Temora, Narrandera, Snowy Valleys, Greater Hume, Cootamundra-Gundagai, Junee, and Coolamon. |
Online meeting |
30 January 2025 |
Townhouse, Wagga Wagga |
Tourism businesses & organisations |
Industry workshop |
3 February 2025 |
Oura Hall, Oura |
Community |
Agile library pop up stall |
12 February 2025 |
Ladysmith Public School, Ladysmith |
Community |
Agile library pop up stall |
12 February 2025 |
Mate Street, Humula |
Community |
Agile library pop up stall |
|
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
Inform |
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
Consult |
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
||||
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
N/A |
1⇩. |
Wagga Wagga Destination Management Plan |
|
2⇩. |
Draft Destination Management Plan - Public Exhibiton Responses |
|
3. |
Draft Wagga Wagga Destination Management Plan - Public exhibition responses This matter is considered to be confidential under Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, as it deals with: personnel matters concerning particular individuals. - Provided under separate cover |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
RP-5 |
RP-5 COMMUNITY ENERGY UPGRADES FUND (CEUF) – OASIS REGIONAL AQUATIC CENTRE
Author: Jacqueline Collins
Executive: Fiona Piltz
Summary: |
Wagga Wagga City Council has been successful in securing $2,500,000 in funding through the Community Energy Upgrades Fund – Australian Government Department of Industry, Science and Resources. |
That Council:
a authorise the General Manager or their delegate to negotiate to enter into a funding agreement with the Australian Government Department of Industry, Science and Resources for the development and construction of the Oasis Regional Aquatic Centre Energy Efficiency Upgrades
b approve the budget variations as detailed in the financial implications section of this report
c authorise the affixing of Council’s Common Seal to all relevant documents as required
Report
The Oasis Regional Aquatic Centre is a vibrant and engaging facility serving as a recreation hub for families and individuals of all ages. The Community Energy Upgrade project has been in planning for many years and was initially identified during the development of Council’s Corporate Net Zero plan. This plan will see the replacement of pool and air heating systems with electric heat pumps as well as upgrades to the facilities building management systems and electronic control valves.
Implementing this project will not only significantly reduce carbon emissions it will also allow the replacement of plant that is currently reaching end of life and in need of renewal. It will also reduce the impact of condensation damage and patron discomfort within the pool hall due to high humidity levels.
During 2023 Council engaged BECA, a specialist aquatic services engineering company, to investigate the facility and determine the most cost-effective way to deliver this project. This project is based on their outcomes.
Financial Implications
Modelling shows that there will be an expected $72,000 per annum in energy cost savings once the project is implemented when compared to the renewal of the plant using existing energy solutions. This model considers energy cost, current energy usage and the probable energy usage if the plant was functioning correctly. Currently many electronic control systems are unable to be fully utilised as their components have reached end of life. This results in reduced energy costs but increased levels of patron discomfort and impact on the built structures due to reductions in fresh air intakes and higher levels of condensation and humidity.
A key consideration of any future tender for this project will be for the prospective contractors to demonstrate the energy usage and cost impact of their solution.
The following table illustrates the funding model for Oasis Aquatic Centre Upgrade and the financial implications.
Funding Source |
Amount ($) |
Wagga Wagga City Council |
$ 5,850,000 |
Community Energy Upgrades Fund Program |
$ 2,500,000 |
Total |
$ 8,350,000 |
The Wagga Wagga City Council contribution of $5,850,000 comprises of existing LTFP identified Oasis projects ($4,509,869), Section 7.11 Recoupment funds ($728,805), Oasis Reserve ($300,000) and the Net Zero Emissions Reserve ($311,326).
It is proposed to allocate $100,000 this financial year, and then until the tender is awarded and the timing of the project implementation ascertained through the tender process, the remaining to be split over the 2025/26 and 2026/27 financial year.
Policy and Legislation
Community Strategic Plan 2040
Recreation, Open Space and Community Strategy 2040
Wagga Wagga Community Net Zero Emissions 2050 Roadmap
Corporate Net Zero 2040 Strategy
Link to Strategic Plan
Safe and Healthy Community
Objective: Our community embraces healthier lifestyle choices and practices
Promote access and participation for all sections of the community to a full range of sports and recreational activities
Risk Management Issues for Council
Risk Management Issues for council has been outlined in the CEUF Oasis Aquatic Centre Upgrades Project Management Plan and will ensure all identified risks are monitored and actioned appropriately. The Project Steering Committee will meet regularly to mitigate identified and new risks can be captured in the risk and issues log during the Execution phase.
The Project Steering Committee will adhere to Council’s adopted Risk Management Framework.
Project Specific Risks may include:
· Cost overruns
· Procurement of major plant and equipment delays
· Construction/installation delays
· Site Shutdowns and the community response
· Construction disruptions and noise
Internal / External Consultation
Internal and external consultation has been undertaken through the Bolton Park Masterplan and the Recreation, Open Space and Community Strategy 2040.
Community consultation will be undertaken with assistance from the Communication and Engagement Team, the Oasis management and staff under the guidance of the Regional Activation City Growth and Regional Assets team.
|
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
Inform |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
Consult |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
||||
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
X |
|||||||
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
N/A |
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
RP-6 |
RP-6 QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE
Author: Scott Gray
Summary: |
This report is to respond to questions with notice raised by Councillors in accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice. |
That Council receive and note the report. |
Report
The following questions with notice were received prior to the meeting, in accordance with the Code of Meeting Practice.
Councillor Foley
|
Do Council rangers have delegated authority to issue fines under protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997? Yes, Council Regulatory & Compliance staff have the following delegation: Authority to act in accordance with, and exercise Councils functions, powers and duties under the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and associated Regulations.
If Council rangers are provided with CCTV footage of illegally dumping on Council or other open private land, will they take action of given the evidence of substantial wrongdoing? Section 143 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 has applicable provisions if there is clear evidence of illegal waste disposal and clear identification of the offender’s vehicle. Council can then request vehicle registration details from NSW Police or Transport for NSW and issue a penalty infringement notice to the registered owner of the vehicle.
If footage is provided of multiple illegal dumping in the Glenfield Scout Hall area, will appropriate action be taken? Section 143 of the Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 has applicable provisions if there is clear evidence of illegal waste disposal at the Glenfield Scout Hall area and clear identification of the offender’s vehicle. Council can then request vehicle registration details from NSW Police or Transport for NSW and issue a penalty infringement notice to the registered owner of the vehicle.
|
Councillor Foley
Does Council own the South Wagga tennis courts including the run-down clubhouse? |
Council is the Crown Land Manager for the South Wagga Tennis Site inclusive of the building. Staff have had discussions previously on the potential renewal of the club house. However no funding is currently identified to allow this project to proceed. The site is also impacted by an unformed crown road which will be the subject of a future Council report recommending closure. |
Councillor Foley
What are the current facts and state of affairs in relation to the Michael Slater Oval sign at Bolton Park, in particular the graffiti of the sign? Please clarify where Council stands in relation to that matter? |
Council resolved in 2024 to rename Michael Slater Oval. Following an EOI process and subsequent internal and Councillor discussions no position was able to be formed in relation to the renaming. The naming will be subject to a future Councillor workshop in mid-2025. In relation to graffiti, staff are not aware of the person or persons who have placed alternative messages on the sign. Given there is no current position on the future naming the oval, the naming sign has been removed until such time a future name is considered and endorsed by Council. |
Councillor Koschel
Do the large inflatable clowns erected on private property advertising the Moscow Circus require development consent? If this is allowed without consent, can local businesses do the same? |
The inflatable clowns would be considered to be signage. The requirement for development consent for signage depends on their location and the relevant planning controls.
Under State Environmental Planning Policy (Industry and Employment) 2021, third-party advertising signage is prohibited in certain zones, including residential zones. In these zones, development consent cannot be granted for third-party advertising signage.
Some forms of signage may be allowed as exempt development under State Environmental Planning Policy (Exempt and Complying Development Codes) 2008, which provides an alternative pathway that does not require development consent. This SEPP includes provisions for temporary event signs, which may allow certain advertising for events such as a circus, subject to meeting specified criteria. These criteria include restrictions on sign size, placement, duration, and the need for landowner consent. Notably, temporary event signs are not permitted as exempt development in residential zones where the signage is advertising a commercial or retail event.
Beyond temporary event signs, most other forms of signage that are exempt under the SEPP relate to business identification signs, which are limited to displaying the name of a business, building, or occupation located on the same site. Inflatable structures are not explicitly listed as exempt development, meaning they would generally require development consent unless they qualify under an applicable exempt category.
Based on these planning controls, it is likely that the signage in question required development consent, and in some cases, may not have been permissible at all. The same rules would apply to other businesses or organisations seeking to display similar signage.
No complaints were received regarding the clowns and no compliance action was taken due to higher priority issues and the need to allow 28 days for Moscow Circus to respond to a Notice of Intent to issue an Order. This would have exceeded the time that the Moscow Circus was in town. Council will write to Moscow Circus advising them of requirements if they intend to return to Wagga Wagga in future. It should be noted that Council has received heavy criticism in the past for taking compliance action on circus advertising (including clowns). |
Councillor McKinnon
Does Council have local regulations against live animals being used for circuses or entertainment? |
No, Council does not have any regulations or policies related to this. The welfare of animals in circuses is governed by the NSW Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1979 and the NSW Exhibited Animals Protection Act 1986 and any complaints would be made to the RSPCA. |
Councillor Parkins
Can Council do anything about minors riding motorcycles loudly on Bourke Street? |
Any illegal activity associated with trail bikes being stolen and being used to flee from a scene is to be notified to Police as the lead agency for such matters or if being ridden in a dangerous manner or in breach of road rules. Noting this has become a community concern the Local Police announced on Wednesday 12 March through the media they have launched the ‘Dob in an Illegal Trailbike Rider’, which is a campaign to encourage residents to report to Police. The Police have said they are using specially trained officers for responding to this sort of illegal activity. Trail bike rider sightings can be reported through the Police Assistance Line on 131 444, Crime Stoppers on 1800 333 000 or Wagga Police at 6922 2599.
From purely a noise perspective The Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 and associated regulations have noise provisions that could apply to the Police, the EPA and Council to undertake regulatory action, but noise provisions can be difficult to enforce as reports need to include the vehicle registration, make model and colour plus details of the incident. NSW EPA also have a specific online reporting portal for noisy vehicles:
https://apps.epa.nsw.gov.au/MvReportingApp/NoisyReporting.aspx |
Councillor Tanner
Could Council explain why Burke Street in Mangoplah is an unmaintained road, when there are people living on it? |
Burke Street in Mangoplah is listed as an unmaintained road within Councils current road hierarchy. It is one of approximately 30kms of unsealed road from across the Local Government Area that Council has this hierarchy allocated to.
Those roads that are classified as unmaintained within the current road hierarchy are generally those that are considered low risk and are therefore given a lower priority to other unsealed roads. |
Councillor Tanner
Does Council shift green waste from the Gregadoo Waste Management Centre to the west i.e Hay, Carrathool? |
Council undertook a competitive tender process for the acceptance and processing of Council’s Food Organics and Garden Organics (FOGO). This contract is currently in place until the 30 June 2025, with the option of three (3) one year extensions, of which Council is actioning its first year extension at present as per the contract.
All food and garden material as collected under the domestic kerbside collection service is bulked up at the Gregadoo Waste Management Centre and then transported in B double vehicles to Wormtech, located in Carrathool. |
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
Code of Meeting Practice
Link to Strategic Plan
Community leadership and collaboration
Objective: Our community is informed and actively engaged in decision making and problem-solving to shape the future of Wagga Wagga
Ensure our community feels heard and understood
Risk Management Issues for Council
N/A
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
CONF-1 |
Confidential Reports
CONF-1 REQUEST FOR RENTAL CREDIT - EASTERN RIVERINA ARTS
Author: Matthew Dombrovski
Executive: Fiona Piltz
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(d) (i) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
CONF-2 |
CONF-2 EXPRESSION OF INTEREST - CAFE/CANTEEN SITES
Author: Matthew Dombrovski
Executive: Fiona Piltz
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(c) information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and
(d) (i) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
CONF-3 |
CONF-3 ADDITIONAL REQUEST FOR LICENCE OF COUNCIL LAND TO FACILITATE MARSHALLS CREEK BRIDGE UPGRADE
Author: Matthew Dombrovski
Executive: Fiona Piltz
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(c) information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business; and
(d) (ii) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council.
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
CONF-4 |
CONF-4 RFT CT2025025 ACTIVE TRAVEL PLAN STATE 1 - FOREST HILL LINK CONSTRUCTION
Author: Ben Creighton
Executive: Fiona Piltz
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(d) (i) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 24 March 2025 |
CONF-5 |
CONF-5 DEED OF AGREEMENT - ROAD FUNDING
Author: Matthew Dombrovski
General Manager: Fiona Piltz
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(d) (i) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
[1] This lot yield is included in the staging plan received with the latest offer to enter into a planning agreement on 23 January 2025 – see section 6.2.
[2] The ‘seniors living’ site is proposed to be zoned R3 – Medium Density. Both ‘multi-dwelling housing’ and ‘seniors housing’ (e.g. independent living units) are permitted with consent in this zone. A land lease community could be developed under these existing land use definitions and permissibility’s without the need to seek an additional permitted use.
[3] Long term risks of the land being uses for caravan park purposes, where there is a clear intent that this is not what is sought by the proponent. The additional permitted use will sit with the land until such time as an amendment is made to the LEP to remove it. This is not typically undertaken, so the additional permitted use will likely remain with the land in perpetuity.