
Agenda
and
Business Paper
To be held on
Monday 27
October 2025
at 6:00 PM
Civic Centre cnr Baylis and Morrow Streets,
Wagga Wagga NSW 2650 (PO Box 20)
P 1300 292 442
P council@wagga.nsw.gov.au
wagga.nsw.gov.au
NOTICE OF MEETING
The proceedings of all Council meetings in open session, including all debate and addresses by the public, are recorded (audio visual) and livestreamed on Council’s website including for the purpose of facilitating community access to meetings and accuracy of the Minutes.
In addition to webcasting council meetings, audio recordings of confidential sessions of Ordinary Meetings of Council are also recorded, but do not form part of the webcast.

WAGGA WAGGA CITY COUNCILLORS

STATEMENT OF ETHICAL OBLIGATIONS
Councillors are reminded of their Oath or Affirmation of Office made under Section 233A of the Local Government Act 1993 and their obligation under Council’s Code of Conduct to disclose and appropriately manage Conflicts of Interest.
QUORUM
The quorum for a meeting of the Council, is a majority of the Councillors of the Council, who hold office for the time being, who are eligible to vote at the meeting.
Reports submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council to be held on Monday 27 October 2025.
Ordinary Meeting of Council AGENDA AND BUSINESS PAPER
Monday 27 October 2025
CLAUSE PRECIS PAGE
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF COUNTRY 3
REFLECTION 3
APOLOGIES 3
Confirmation of Minutes
CM-1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 13 OCTOBER 2025 3
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 3
Reports from Staff
RP-1 Renewable Energy Developments: Protections for Prime Agricultural Land and Community Benefit Policy 4
RP-2 LEP21/0002 - Planning Proposal - Lloyd 17
RP-3 PROGRESS REPORT - ESTABLISHMENT OF AIRPORT SPECIAL PURPOSE COMMITTEE 24
RP-4 RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF MOTION - KHAKI WEED 36
RP-5 DA25/0389 - Multi Dwelling Housing 3 x 3 bedroom Dwellings - 34 Kingsford Smith Road (Lot 46 DP1299712) 43
RP-6 Southern Growth Area Zone 1 Section 7.11 Contributions Plan 47
RP-7 MODEL CODE OF MEETING PRACTICE 62
RP-8 2026 COUNCIL MEETING DATES 66
RP-9 Capital Works Program Reset 70
RP-10 Lake Albert Flood Mitigation Options - Feasibility Study 91
RP-11 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY AND COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION PLAN 95
RP-12 DEVELOPMENT POLICY UPDATES 103
RP-13 WAGGA WAGGA CEMETERIES POLICY 133
RP-14 WORK HEALTH, SAFETY WELLBEING POLICY 142
RP-15 MEDIA AND SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY 150
RP-16 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2025 169
RP-17 REQUEST FOR FEE WAIVER 201
RP-18 2025 National Local Roads, Transport and Infrastructure Congress 204
RP-19 RESOLUTIONS AND NOTICES OF MOTIONS REGISTERS 226
RP-20 QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE 228
Committee Minutes
M-1 FLOODPLAIN RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE - 18 SEPTEMBER 2025 231
Confidential Reports
CONF-1 RFT CT2026001 Digester Blowers Narrung Street Sewer Treatment Plant and Kooringal Sewer Treatment Plant 241
CONF-2 Proposed sub-licence - 550 Flakney Road, Big Springs - Mount Flakney Telecommunications Tower 242
CONF-3 LAND ACQUISITIONS FOR ACCELERATED INFRASTRUCTURE FUND - PLUMPTON ROAD DUPLICATION PROJECT AFFECTING PRIVATE LAND 243
CONF-4 PROPOSED CROWN LAND ACQUISITIONS FOR ACCELERATED INFRASTRUCTURE FUND - PLUMPTON ROAD DUPLICATION PROJECT 244
CONF-5 RFT CT2026012 Specialist Signs & Services 245
Wagga Wagga City Council acknowledges the traditional custodians of the land, the Wiradjuri people, and pays respect to Elders past, present and future and extends our respect to all First Nations Peoples in Wagga Wagga.
We recognise and respect their cultural heritage, beliefs and continuing connection with the land and rivers. We also recognise the resilience, strength and pride of the Wiradjuri and First Nations communities
REFLECTION
Councillors, let us in silence reflect upon our responsibilities to the community which we represent, and to all future generations and faithfully, and impartially, carry out the functions, powers, authorities and discretions vested in us, to the best of our skill and judgement.
CM-1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING - 13 OCTOBER 2025
|
That the Minutes of the proceedings of the Ordinary Council Meeting held on 13 October 2025 be confirmed as a true and accurate record.
|
|
1⇩. |
Minutes - Ordinary Council Meeting - 13 October 2025. |
246 |
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-1 |
Reports from Staff
RP-1 Renewable Energy Developments: Protections for Prime Agricultural Land and Community Benefit Policy
Author: Fiona Hamilton
|
Summary: |
This report responds to Council’s resolution of 21 July 2025 (25/199) directing the General Manager to provide an update on the proposed planning amendments to protect prime agricultural land and establish a community benefit policy for electricity generating and storage works. |
That Council receive and note the updates provided in this report.
Report
Council at its meeting on 21 July 2025 resolved (25/199) on the Motion of Councillors R Foley and T Koschel to:
a endorse in principle the proposed planning reforms outlined in the body of this report
b direct the General Manager to immediately commence work on drafting proposed changes to the Wagga Local Strategic Planning Statement, Local Environmental Plan and Development Control Plan, aimed at achieving the protections identified in this report
c note that any proposed planning instrument amendments will be subject to statutory processes and consultation
d request the General Manager treat this as a matter of priority and provide a progress report at an Ordinary Council Meeting in October 2025
e write to the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure to seek support for fast-tracking these local planning protections and ensuring they are considered in State and Regionally Significant Development assessments
f investigate options for a Community Benefit Policy for Electricity Generating and Storage Works
g direct the General Manager to develop a policy which encourages recycling of renewal energy technologies at either the Special Activation Precinct or the Gregadoo Waste Management Centre to the exclusion of other land
As noted at the meeting, Council’s strategic planning framework is anchored by the LSPS Planning for the Future: Wagga Wagga 2040, which establishes the long-term vision for land use and development across the Local Government Area (LGA). Adopted in 2021, the LSPS identifies the protection of valuable agricultural land and the avoidance of land fragmentation as key planning priorities (Principle 11).
The strategic direction of the LSPS is reinforced through Council's more recent Community Strategic Plan, adopted in April 2025, which includes:
• Goal G08: We plan sustainably to protect and enhance the natural environment
o Strategy 8.2: Protect high quality agricultural land
o Strategy 8.5: Plan for land use that respects rural amenity and supports landholders and the economy.
Despite this strong strategic intent, the existing statutory framework does not provide sufficient mechanisms to prevent incompatible land uses, particularly in relation to large-scale renewable energy projects on productive agricultural land.
At this meeting Council also resolved to investigate options for a Community Benefit Sharing Policy for Electricity Generating and Storage Works to ensure that host communities share equitably in the benefits of renewable energy development.
Following the 21 July 2025 Ordinary Meeting of Council staff consulted with both Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD) and Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI) to seek guidance and feedback on the proposed approach. The feedback is summarised below.
DPIRD feedback:
· DPIRD recommended the preparation of a Rural Lands Strategy (RLS) to assist in better identifying valuable agricultural land, what industries are current and emerging, their location and what protective requirements may be useful.
· The current approach selects one issue (electricity generating works) when it could address other uses that impact agricultural land, including residential, commercial, and industrial development.
· DPIRD noted that the specific projects that have raised this concern within the community would not be impacted by the proposed changes, as those projects are proposed on Class 4 land.
DPHI feedback:
· The initial draft WWLEP clause should reference LSC Class 1-3 and BSAL lands, to delineate between ‘prime agricultural land’ and other agricultural land.
· Consent criteria wording and options.
· The Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 requires consideration of section 4.15 for State Significant Development. The section 4.15 heads of consideration include the LEP and DCP. Therefore, should Council amend the planning controls in the WWLEP and DCP, these would be considered as part of regional and state significant development assessments.
By progressing amendments to the LSPS, WWLEP and DCP, Council ensures that the protection of prime agricultural land and the management of renewable energy development impacts are formally embedded within these statutory instruments. This, in turn, means they will be given appropriate weight under of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 in all relevant development assessments, including State and Regionally Significant Development.
This report serves as a progress update to Councillors on these activities:
1. Draft amendment to the Local Strategic Planning Statement.
2. Draft amendment to the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010
3. Review of and updates to the DCP.
4. Drafting of a Community Benefits Sharing Policy.
1. Draft LSPS Amendments
Background
To strengthen recognition of Wagga Wagga’s agricultural base and provide a clearer strategic framework for future land use decisions, a draft amendment to the LSPS has been prepared to introduce Principle 12: Growth protects and values agricultural land and rural productivity.
This proposed principle will formally acknowledge the significance of important agricultural land, in alignment with the NSW Government's Renewable Energy Planning Framework, particularly the Large-Scale Solar Energy Guideline (August 2022), which identifies “important agricultural land” and encourages site selection that avoids this land wherever possible.
At present, the NSW Government has only published specific land use and assessment guidance for large-scale solar energy projects, wind energy and transmission projects. Equivalent guidelines for other renewable energy technologies such as hydrogen or battery storage have not yet been released. As such, Council has relied on the principles and assessment framework within the Large-Scale Solar Energy Guideline as the most contemporary and comprehensive reference available.
The NSW Large-Scale Solar Energy Guideline (the Guideline) states that "while the cumulative risk to both rural land and important agricultural land is relatively low, we must balance the need for renewable energy with the need to safeguard important agricultural land for food and fibre production and to ensure that any use of this land would not have a significant impact on the local and regional agricultural industry".
The Guideline defines important agricultural land as "land mapped as biophysical strategic agricultural land,…land of LSC classes 1 to 3 and farmland mapped as state or regionally significant on the north coast". To ensure consistency with the Guideline, this report adopts the term ‘important agricultural land’ to collectively refer to land previously described as prime or valuable agricultural land.
It is noted that while The Guideline defines important agricultural land as land of LSC classes 1-3 it also states that "where a large-scale solar energy project is located on moderate capability land (LSC Class 4), the applicant must verify the agricultural quality and capability of the land. They should then use the results of this verification process (which should include a soil survey) to design the layout of their project and to avoid impacts on productive land".
The Land and Soil Capability (LSC) assessment scheme evaluates the physical capability of land to sustain different land uses. Class 1 represents land suitable for most agricultural uses, while Class 8 is suitable only for very low-impact uses such as conservation.

Source: The land and soil capability assessment scheme – second approximation, State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage
The LSC dataset can be viewed using eSPADE (NSW’s soil spatial viewer), which contains a suite of soil and landscape information including soil profile data. Many of these datasets have hot-linked soil reports. An alternative viewer is the SEED Map; an ideal way to see what other natural resources datasets (e.g. vegetation) are available for this map area.
BSAL mapping identifies land with high-quality soil and water resources capable of supporting sustained agricultural productivity. BSAL areas in Wagga Wagga are largely along the Murrumbidgee River.
The mapping for both LSC and BSAL is available on the State Government’s Sharing and Enabling Environment Data (SEED) platform.
An overview of the proposed amendment to the LSPS is provided below as an interim update to Council and will require further refinement before progressing further.
Purpose of the amendment
The purpose of this amendment to the LSPS is to provide a clear and binding mechanism to prevent renewable energy developments on sites where community members suffer adverse impacts.
Key features of Principle 12
· Protects agricultural production, rural amenity, and community well-being;
· Provides strategic guidance to inform WWLEP and DCP amendments;
· Protects agriculture land uses, economic growth, and resilient local communities with economies deriving income from agriculture.
Draft Principle 12: Growth protects and values agricultural land and rural productivity
Important agricultural land underpins Wagga Wagga’s economy, rural identity and community wellbeing. Protecting this valuable resource is essential to sustaining local food and fibre production, supporting rural employment and maintaining the unique character of our rural landscape.
Agriculture contributed more than $330 million to the Wagga Wagga economy in 2020/21, driven by strong cereal, livestock, wool and hay production. This demonstrates the sector’s enduring importance to the prosperity and resilience of the local government area.
This sector not only supports local livelihoods but also plays a vital role in the strength and stability of the national economy, contributing significantly to Australia’s food security, exports and regional development.
As growth, climate variability and emerging industries reshape rural areas, Council will aim to ensure that important agricultural land, specifically Land and Soil Capability (LSC) Classes 1–3 and Biophysical Strategic Agricultural Land (BSAL), is protected from incompatible or conflicting land uses, including energy generation and storage infrastructure. Council will also require verification of agricultural quality and land capability for proposals on moderate capability land (LSC Class 4) to inform project design and avoid impacts on productive areas in accordance with the NSW Large-Scale Solar Energy Guideline.
Council recognises that the transition to renewable energy is critical to a sustainable future. However, renewable energy projects must be strategically located to avoid important agricultural land, prevent land use conflict and maintain the social and environmental values of rural communities where possible. The same is also valid in the development and establishment of other residential, commercial, and industrial development.
The protection of important agricultural land from energy generation and storage developments and other incompatible development will also safeguard the visual, environmental and lifestyle qualities that make rural living desirable in the Wagga Wagga Local Government Area. Maintaining appropriate separation between energy developments and rural settlements, lifestyle lots and villages will be a key component of this approach.
In applying this principle, Council aims to:
· Protect important agricultural land of LSC Classes 1–3 and BSAL classification from incompatible development (where it has the statutory power to do so);
· Promote sustainable land management and continued agricultural productivity;
· Guide renewable energy development to suitable locations that do not adversely impact important agricultural land or unrelated residences on neighbouring properties;
· Reinforce the role of rural zones in supporting primary production and rural amenity; and
· Integrate rural land protection into broader sustainability, biodiversity and resilience initiatives.
Council will embed this principle through amendments to the WWLEP and DCP to ensure that energy generation, storage, and other incompatible development on important agricultural land is minimised and appropriately located and that land use decisions reinforce the economic, environmental, and cultural importance of agriculture. Similarly, these policies will also provide protections to unrelated neighbouring residences to ensure these developments are separated from unrelated residences by significant distances.
2. Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 Draft Amendment
Background
An amendment to the WWLEP 2010 is being drafted to take into account proposed Principle 12 of the LSPS and the rural land protection principles in the Large-Scale Solar Energy Guideline (August 2022) and feedback provided by DPHI.
The agricultural land use principles in the Large-Scale Solar Energy Guideline (August 2022) include:
· Applicants should consider the agricultural capability of the land during the site selection process.
· Applicants should avoid siting solar energy projects on important agricultural land as far as possible.
· Agricultural assessment should be proportionate to the quality of the land and the likely impacts of a project.
· Mitigation strategies should be adopted to minimise any significant impacts on agricultural land.
The amendment proposes introducing a new Part 7 clause to manage Electricity Generating Works in Rural Areas. The clause applies to all rural land in the LGA classified as LSC 1–3 or BSAL and provides additional protection for LSC class 4 land.
The clause strengthens protections for Wagga Wagga’s important agricultural land through the following key provisions:
· To ensure important agricultural land (LSC 1–3 and BSAL) is protected for ongoing food and fibre production and from incompatible or inappropriate land uses.
· Development consent must not be granted for electricity generating or energy storage works on land identified as LSC 1–3 or BSAL
· If a large-scale solar energy project is proposed on or adjacent to important agricultural land or located on moderate capability land (LSC Class 4), the applicant must verify the agricultural quality and capability of the land. They should then use the results of this verification process (which should include a soil survey) to design the layout of their project and to avoid impacts on important agricultural land.
· Where an energy generation or storage project must be located on or near agricultural land, a significant distance separation buffer should be established to minimise potential land use conflict.
It is noted that electricity generating works means a building or place used for the purpose of:
a. making or generating electricity, or
b. electricity storage.
A copy of the draft clause is attached to this report for context, noting the draft clause will be subject to further changes as it is revised prior seeking Council’s endorsement to prepare a Planning Proposal.
3. Community Benefits Policy Update
Background
The drafting of a Community Benefit Sharing Policy in response to community concerns regarding the social and environmental impacts of renewable energy developments has commenced.
The draft policy aims to ensure that renewable energy projects deliver tangible, equitable and enduring benefits to host communities, through infrastructure improvements, amenity enhancements and community-led projects.
Objectives
The objectives of this draft policy will be to promote benefit sharing associated with the development of State Significant, Regionally Significant and Local Development Renewable Energy Projects in the Wagga Wagga City Council Local Government Area (LGA) that:
• Secure off-site benefits for the community so that renewable energy development delivers a future sustainable net community benefit;
• Ensure that the wider community share in the benefits resulting from renewable energy development in the LGA;
• Ensure that the costs and benefits of renewable energy development will be equitably distributed within the community and inter-generationally;
• Ensure that community benefit outcomes are determined through appropriate governance processes which include community representation.
Proposed Benefit Thresholds
The State Government released its Benefit Sharing Guideline (November 2024) for large scale renewable energy projects.
The Federal Government has also released guidelines for Community Engagement and Benefit for Electricity Transmission Projects (July 2024). While focused on transmission lines the document is instructive in principles relating to community benefit sharing schemes.
In line with the Government Guidelines, the proposed minimum community benefit threshold for WWCC is:
• $850 per megawatt of capacity per annum for solar energy development for the life of the development (including future modified or recommissioned projects)
• $1050 per megawatt of capacity per annum for wind energy development for the life of the development (including future modified or recommissioned projects)
• $150 per megawatt of capacity per annum or 1% of the capital value whichever is the greater, for energy storage developments (including pumped hydro)
Note: Amounts above are in 2023 dollars and will be adjusted annually for CPI.
Projects that do not deliver community benefits above this threshold are likely to be considered not in the public interest.
Generation and storage projects in Renewable Energy Zones (REZ) pay access fees if they connect to new network infrastructure projects. These access fees help pay for the new network and contribute to dedicated funds for community and employment-related initiatives in each region. EnergyCo is coordinating this funding under a Community and Employment Benefit Program, which will invest millions of dollars into regional communities. Unlike the neighbour or local community benefits, these programs can deliver regional-scale benefits across multiple local government areas. Given Wagga Wagga is not in a REZ, consideration is being given to an additional loading on the community benefit thresholds above.
Wagga Wagga City Council (WWCC) will use the Planning Agreement provisions of the EP&A Act 1979 to deliver the objectives of this policy. A Planning Agreement is a voluntary agreement between Council and a developer, who has made a Development Application or planning proposal, under which the developer is required to dedicate land free of cost; pay a monetary contribution; provide any other material benefit to be used for or applied towards a public purpose.
4. Development Control Plan Updates (DCP)
The DCP review will complement the LSPS and WWLEP amendments by introducing detailed development controls to manage land use compatibility, amenity and environmental outcomes for renewable energy projects.
Early drafting has commenced, with content to include:
· Performance-based criteria aligned with the Large-Scale Solar Energy Guideline (2022);
· Minimum separation distances between energy developments and dwellings; and
· Design standards for visual, traffic and construction management impacts.
Next Steps
To progress the proposed planning response and policy updates, the following next steps are recommended:
|
Item |
Task |
Timeframe |
|
LSPS Amendment
|
Advise and review with DPHI. |
6 months |
|
Stakeholder consultation with key agencies to ensure alignment with current policy direction and frameworks including: · Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure. · Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development. · NSW Renewable Energy Zone Delivery Team. |
||
|
Prepare public exhibition collateral. |
||
|
Undertake public exhibition of the proposed amendment, per the EP&A Act 1979 and the Community Engagement Strategy. |
||
|
Make relevant updates to the LSPS based on submissions and report the finalised LSPS to Council for adoption. |
||
|
WWLEP Amendment |
· Collaborate with DPHI on proposed amendment. · Prepare planning proposal to introduce an additional Part 7 Clause. · Submit planning proposal to DPHI for Gateway Determination. · Pending Gateway Determination, undertake public exhibition of the proposed amendment. · Consider submissions received and make relevant updates to the proposed amendment. · Finalisation and gazettal. |
12-18 months
|
|
DCP update |
· Prepare the draft DCP amendments and schedule with broader DCP project. · Undertake public exhibition of the proposed DCP amendments. · Consider submissions received and make relevant updates to the proposed DCP amendment. · Report the updated DCP to Council for adoption. |
12-18 months |
|
Community Benefit Sharing Policy |
· Draft proposed Policy. · Undertake internal review. · Report to Council meeting · Public exhibition · Endorsement |
6-9 months |
Financial Implications
The preparation of the Planning Proposal, LSPS amendments and associated community engagement activities will require internal staff resources and where necessary external specialist input. Cost will be managed within the existing Strategic Planning budget.
Policy and Legislation
• Wagga Wagga Local Strategic Planning Statement – Planning for the Future: Wagga Wagga 2040
• Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010
• Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010
• Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 (EP&A Act 1979)
• NSW Large Scale Solar Energy Guideline (August 2022)
• NSW Benefit-Sharing Guideline (November 2024)
• National Guidelines for Community Engagement and Benefit for Electricity Transmission Projects (July 2024).
Link to Strategic Plan
Growing
Agriculture and agribusiness focus
Protect high quality agricultural land
Risk Management Issues for Council
Without clearer policy direction and development controls, renewable energy or other incompatible developments may be approved on or adjacent to important agricultural land.
Without updated WWLEP and DCP provisions, development assessments will rely on subjective interpretation and inconsistent application of planning principles.
If Council does not proceed with amendments to the LSPS, WWLEP, and DCP to strengthen the protection of important agricultural land and guide the siting of renewable energy and storage developments Council’s planning framework would remain inconsistent with its own strategic intent expressed in the LSPS (Principle 11) and Community Strategic Plan objectives to protect high-quality agricultural land.
Continued public concern that Council is not adequately protecting important agricultural land or ensuring community benefit from renewable projects.
Internal / External Consultation
Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (DPIRD).
Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI).
Internal stakeholder engagement.
|
1⇩. |
Draft LEP Amendment |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-2 |
RP-2 LEP21/0002 - Planning Proposal - Lloyd
Author: Matthew Yeomans
Executive: Fiona Hamilton
|
Summary: |
Planning Proposal LEP21/0002 seeks to amend the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 to rezone four parcels of land from RU1 Primary Production to R1 General Residential and remove the minimum lot size on one R5 site from 2ha to 1ha.
The Planning Proposal does not adequately consider potential groundwater and salinity impacts and is recommended for refusal. |
That Council:
a receive and note the report
b refuse Planning Proposal LEP21/0002
c notify the applicant of the decision in accordance with the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021
Report
|
Applicant: |
James Laycock (Blueprint Planning) on behalf of: Peter Fitzpatrick – Property Director, Catholic Diocese Wagga Wagga |
|
Landowner: |
Trustees Of the Roman Catholic Church |
|
Subject land: |
The Planning Proposal applies to five land areas that are located within the Lloyd and Springvale as described below and identified in Figure 1: · Part Lot 1044 DP1313395 · Part Lot 1043 DP1313395 · Part Lot 8989 DP1262050 |
The proposal
Planning Proposal LEP21/0002 seeks to amend the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010 to achieve the following:
• Rezone four parcels within Part Lot 1044 DP1313395 and Part Lot 8989 DP1262050 (total 9.55 hectares) from RU1 Primary Production to R1 General Residential and remove the minimum lot size.
• Amend Part Lot 1043 DP1313395 (1.72 hectares), currently zoned R5 Large Lot Residential, to reduce the minimum lot size from 2ha to 1ha.
Site and context
The Planning Proposal applies to five land areas that are located within the Lloyd and Springvale suburbs, south of Wagga Wagga, as identified in Figure 1.

Figure 1 – Subject land (shaded green), proposed for amendment.
Figure 2 – Lloyd suburb boundary.
Four of these land areas are within and one land parcel is adjacent to the ‘Lloyd Urban Release Area’ (see Figure 2) which is an existing growth area of Wagga Wagga that has been developing gradually over the past 15 years.
Further development in this area is dependent on groundwater and salinity impacts which can only be determined once the reassessment threshold is met based on the Lloyd Salinity
Background
The ‘Lloyd Urban Release Area’ is in a ‘recharge’ area which means that the management of groundwater is critical for ensuring downstream ‘discharge’ areas are not adversely impacted by urban salinity (i.e. rising groundwater).
When Lloyd was first rezoned a range of mitigation strategies and an overarching management framework were implemented to reduce the amount of water entering the aquifers and prevent increased salinity in downstream urban discharge areas in Turvey Park and Central Wagga Wagga. This framework is set out in Section 15 of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010.
When recharge occurs at a natural rate, salinity is not an issue; however, excessive recharge raises groundwater levels, bringing salts close to the surface and can cause extensive damage to vegetation and structures otherwise known as ‘urban salinity’.
The original salinity assessments undertaken for the rezoning of Lloyd in 2009-10 were undertaken by E.A Systems Pty Ltd. The EA Systems Report was commissioned to undertake a ‘scientifically defensible investigation to determine the risk to urban salinity associated with the proposed development of Lloyd; and should it be deemed feasible, recommend the conditions upon which approval to progress should be based.’.
The Report sets out the criteria for determining when re-assessment of groundwater impacts (associated with further rezoning of land) should occur is set out in Section 1.2 of that report.
Section 1.2 states that “E.A. Systems recommends a re-assessment of predicted recharge be undertaken when 75% of the land area indicated safe for development (‘blue’ area identified in Figure 3 below) in Lloyd Master Plan Stage 2… has been occupied.”

Figure 3 – Current staging and land availability for development.
Following the initial rezoning of Lloyd in 2010 which released stages one (1) and two (2) with these areas being zoned R1 General Residential under the WWLEP 2010, refer to Figure 4 below.
However, stages three (3) and four (4) remain zoned RU1 Primary Production (identified as ‘Contingency Woodland Offset’ – as per Figure 3 above) under the LEP to act as an urban holding zone until the reassessment process proves that recharge has been successfully controlled.

Figure 4 – Current zoning
Current analysis (attached) has determined that only 33-36% of ‘Stage 2’ has been developed, equating to a shortfall of approximately 743 dwellings.
Rezoning land ahead of this threshold poses significant risk of detrimental groundwater impacts that cannot be reliably assessed until further housing development occurs.
Key considerations
1. Groundwater and Salinity Impacts
The Planning Proposal does not adequately consider potential groundwater and salinity impacts. The Planning Proposal fails to meet the reassessment thresholds set out in the ‘Salinity risk reassessment process and criteria for the Lloyd residential subdivision’ prepared by EA Systems which are embedded within the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010.
The EA Systems Report sets the criteria for determining when re-assessment should occur. Which states that “… re-assessment of predicted recharge be undertaken when 75% of the land area indicated safe for development (‘blue’ area) in Lloyd Master Plan Stage 2… has been occupied.”
This position is supported by independent advice received from:
• AGE Consultants dated 11 January 2024,
• Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water (DCCEEW) dated 23 May 2025 and 11 April 2024,
• Department of Planning and Environment – (DPE – Water) dated 30 November 2023.
2. Strategic Planning Framework
The Council assessment report (attached) concludes that the Planning Proposal does not meet the requirements of section 3.33 of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979 as it is generally inconsistent with:
• Murray Riverina Regional Plan 2041
• Wagga Wagga Local Strategic Planning Statement 2040
• Wagga Wagga Community Strategic Plan 2050
The Planning Proposal has not adequately addressed the following Ministerial Directions of the Environmental Planning & Assessment Act 1979:
o Direction 1.1 (Implementation of Regional Plans),
o Direction 4.1 (Flooding),
o Direction 4.3 (Bushfire),
o Direction 4.4 (Remediation of Contaminated Land)
Primarily, the draft Planning Proposal is not supported as it does not adequately consider potential groundwater and salinity impacts and reassessment thresholds set out in the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010.
Based on the above the draft Planning Proposal does not demonstrate ‘strategic merit’, or ‘site-specific merit’ as defined within the Local Environmental Plan Making Guideline (August 2023) and is recommended for refusal.
Financial Implications
The applicant was charged $23,000 for a Major LEP Amendment - Lodgement of the Application and $23,000 for a Major LEP Amendment - Preparation of the LEP which was paid 9/11/2021 as per Council’s Fees and Charges for a Complex LEP Application.
Policy and Legislation
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010
Wagga Wagga Local Strategic Planning Statement – Wagga Wagga 2040
Link to Strategic Plan
Sustainable
Sustainable built environment
Balance the built and natural environment in planning decisions.
Risk Management Issues for Council
The applicant may appeal Council’s refusal to the NSW Department of Planning, Housing, and Industry. If an appeal was successful and the land was rezoned the likely exacerbation of salinity would result in a potential increased cost to the community in managing urban salinity.
Consultation
As part of the planning proposal assessment consultation was undertaken internally with the Development Assessment and Environment teams.
Council staff also consulted with the Department of Planning,
Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI), Department of Climate Change, Energy,
Environment and Water (DCCEEW) and the Department’s Groundwater
Management & Science Team.
|
1. |
LEP21/0002 - Council Assessment Report - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
2. |
LEP21/0002 - Development Analysis and Assumptions - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
3. |
LEP21/0002 - Planning Proposal Application Package - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
4. |
LEP21/0002 - Subdivision Groundwater Recharge Assessment - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
5. |
LEP21/0002 - AGE Consultants - Independent groundwater salinity assessment - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
6. |
LEP21/0002 - Advice - DPE Water - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
7. |
LEP21/0002 - Advice - DCCEEW - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
8. |
LEP21/0002 - Advice - DCCEEW - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-3 |
RP-3 PROGRESS REPORT - ESTABLISHMENT OF AIRPORT SPECIAL PURPOSE COMMITTEE
Author: Peter Thompson
|
Summary: |
The purpose of this report is to progress the Council resolution in response to the Notice of Motion resolved at the 13 October 2025 Council Meeting regarding the establishment of the Wagga Wagga Airport Special Purpose Committee and to provide an updated Terms of Reference and implementation plan for Council’s consideration. |
That Council:
a receive and note this report
b adopt the updated Terms of Reference for the Wagga Wagga Airport Special Purpose Committee as attached to this report
c appoint three Councillor representatives to the Committee
d approve the commencement of an Expression of Interest process seeking up to five external members with expertise in aviation, infrastructure, regional development, or community leadership
Report
Background
Council on the motion of Councillors R Foley and T Koschel resolved (25/317) to:
a receive a report within two weeks setting out the process to implement a Wagga Wagga Airport Special Purpose Committee
b establish the Committee pursuant to Sections 355 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW)
c adopt the Terms of Reference for the Committee as set out in the body of the report
d prioritise the establishment of this Committee with the intent to have the first meeting before the end of the 2025 calendar year
e determine that the Committee shall operate for a maximum period ending 1 July 2026, unless extended by resolution of Council
f direct that any correspondence received in relation to the Airport is to be referred through the Committee for consideration and advice to Council
The Airport is a strategic regional asset, servicing aviation operations, health transfers, business connectivity, emergency movements and Defence-related activity. Existing operational engagement with Defence and project stakeholders is continuing and Council’s establishment of a formal oversight structure now requires governance alignment to ensure the Committee can function lawfully.
In activating a Section 355 Committee, several technical governance clarifications are required to ensure compliance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice, the Model Code of Conduct and standard committee structures used at Council.
Terms of Reference
To operationalise the Committee as intended by Council, the Terms of Reference have been updated and presented in Council’s standard format and design to ensure consistency with other Section 355 Committees.
The key changes and clarifications applied are outlined below:
|
Section |
Issue Identified |
Update Applied |
|
Authority |
References to Sections 360 and 362 of the Local Government Act 1993 were incorrect – only Section 355 is relevant to committee establishment. |
Legislative reference corrected to Section 355 only. |
|
Membership |
The previous Terms of Reference were ambiguous regarding voting rights and listed several Council staff positions as members, creating uncertainty about the balance between elected representatives, community members and staff participation. |
Updated to establish a core membership model comprising the Mayor, three Councillors, up to five community members, and the General. Other Council staff may attend by invitation to provide technical or specialist advice but are not members of the Committee. Only core members are counted for quorum purposes. |
|
Quorum |
The previous Terms of Reference defined quorum as a “majority of voting members,” but voting categories were unclear. |
Revised to specify that a quorum comprises a majority of the appointed core members of the Committee. This ensures balanced participation between Councillors and community representatives while maintaining Council oversight. |
|
Conflict of Interest |
Clause permitted conflicted members to remain present after declaring an interest –inconsistent with Council’s Code of Conduct. |
Updated to require any member who declares a pecuniary or significant non-pecuniary conflict to leave the meeting for that item, in accordance with the Code of Conduct. |
|
Observers (MPs) |
MPs were previously listed within membership, blurring their formal role and implying decision-making power. |
Clarified that MPs or their delegates may be invited as observers only, with no voting or quorum status. |
|
Reporting |
The Terms of Reference required a “Final Report by 18 May 2026,” an arbitrary deadline not aligned to operational milestones. |
Updated to require regular reporting to Council following each meeting and a final summary report prior to dissolution. |
|
Correspondence (Resolution 25/317 f) |
The resolution directs that all airport correspondence be referred through the Committee, which could delay operational communications with Defence and NSW Ambulance. |
Clarified that correspondence will be tabled through the Committee for visibility, while operational engagement continues under existing delegations to avoid disruption. |
|
Terms of Office |
The previous clause did not specify when member appointments would expire. |
Updated to align with POL117 - Appointment of Organisation, Community and Individual Citizen Members to Council Committees, confirming that all member terms conclude upon Committee dissolution or at the next local government election. |
|
Formatting and Consistency |
The previous Terms of Reference did not align with Council’s current corporate template or style conventions. |
Re-formatted into Council’s standard Terms of Reference design and numbering structure, ensuring consistency across Section 355 Committees. |
Appointment of Core Members
Council is requested to appoint three Councillor representatives in accordance with the updated Terms of Reference.
It is proposed that an Expression of Interest process be initiated to identify up to five external members with expertise in aviation, infrastructure, regional development or community leadership. A shortlisting and recommendation report will be brought back to Council for appointment following the process outlined in POL 117 – Appointment of Organisation, Community and Individual Citizen Members to Council Committees Policy.
These processes will establish the core membership of the Committee.
Proposed Timeline
Council will endeavour to coordinate and convene the first meeting of the Wagga Wagga Airport Special Purpose Committee before the end of the 2025 calendar year. This timeframe allows sufficient opportunity for the appointment of Councillor representatives, the completion of the Expression of Interest process for community members and the finalisation of any administrative and governance arrangements required to support the Committee’s operation. The ongoing meeting frequency and scheduling will be determined by the Committee at its inaugural session, in consultation with Council staff.
Financial Implications
Implementation and coordination of the Committee will be managed within existing staff resources. No additional budget allocation is required at this stage.
Policy and Legislation
NSW Local Government Act – Section 355
Council Policy POL117 – Appointment of Organisation, Community and Individual Citizen Members to Council Committees
Link to Strategic Plan
Growing
Enabling infrastructure
Deliver critical regional transport facilities.
Risk Management Issues for Council
In addition to procedural and governance risks, there is a strategic risk that if Council is not actively engaged in ongoing negotiations and oversight, external decision-makers could progress lease or operational arrangements without alignment to community priorities.
The Wagga Wagga Airport currently operates on a community-benefit, non-commercial model, delivering essential services including emergency health transfers, general aviation, Defence support, and education-related travel.
If operational control or strategic direction were to shift towards a purely commercial operating model, future decisions may not prioritise regional health access, community affordability, emergency services or aviation training functions.
Establishing a dedicated Committee ensures Council maintains structured oversight and advice during this critical decision period, protecting the community-interest focus of airport operations.
Internal / External Consultation
Expressions of Interest for community members will be advertised for a two-week period to support the intent for the Committee to meet before the end of the calendar year.
Consultation will occur with Councillors, relevant staff and external stakeholders during implementation of the Committee and the appointment process for community representatives.
|
|
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
|
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
|
Inform |
|
|
|
x |
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
1⇩. |
Wagga Wagga Airport Special Purpose Committee - Updated Terms of Reference |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-4 |
RP-4 RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF MOTION - KHAKI WEED
Author: Carly Hood
Executive: Janice Summerhayes
|
Summary: |
This report is in response to the August 25 Notice of Motion related to local eradication of the widespread khaki weed (Alternanthera pungens). While full eradication is not considered feasible, the report outlines management actions that can help to reduce populations, minimise spread and protect high-value areas. |
That Council
a receive and note the report
b approve the budget variations as detailed in the Financial Implications section of the report
Report
Council at its meeting of 25 August 2025 resolved on the Motion of R Foley and J McKinnon (25/263) as follows:
That Council:
a recognises the current outbreak of Khaki Weed across Council-owned public lands and recreational areas within the LGA as a rapidly expanding and urgent biosecurity threat requiring immediate action
b notes that under the Biosecurity Act 2015 (NSW), Council has a General Biosecurity Duty (section 22) to take all reasonable and practical measures to minimise the risk of the weed spreading on land under its control, and that failure to act may constitute a breach of this duty, exposing Council to regulatory enforcement action and reputational damage
c strongly encourages all residents and businesses to take prompt Khaki Weed control action on private property to prevent reinfestation
d requests a report be provided in October that outlines;
i. Council’s current program/plan and operational budget to address Khaki Weed on Council-owned land and recreational areas
ii. any additional targeted programming that could take place, including additional budget requirements; and
iii. details of an immediate public awareness campaign.
e request a report be provided by the end of the 2025 calendar year, that outlines Council’s overarching approach to the management of invasive animal and weed species across the organisation, including:
i. existing or proposed plans, strategies or policies
ii. workforce capacity and resourcing (e.g. Weed Officers) and any issues encountered in these roles
iii. processes and practices for identification, containment and treatment on road easements, Crown land and other Council-managed lands
iv. processes for emergency management situations, or assistance to other agencies in emergencies
v. training available to field staff
vi. collaboration and community engagement activities
vii. education and knowledge-building for residents, landowners and stakeholders; and
viii. methods to measure, monitor and evaluate progress or improvement in biosecurity outcomes
This report is in response to parts a,b,c and d of the above resolution. Part e will be subject to an additional report in December.
Weed prioritisation in NSW
Weeds are a major threat to our natural environment and our economy. The NSW Government estimates that invasive weeds cost our agricultural industry around $1.8B a year in lost productivity and control costs. Weed and pest control in NSW is governed by the Biosecurity Act 2015 and coordinated through strategic regional arrangements.
Within NSW, there are three levels of priority given to weeds. This includes:
· State priority weeds
· Regional priority weeds
· Local priority weeds.
Within the State and Regional priorities, weed species are separated into four levels of control classes:
· Prevention
· Eradication
· Containment
· Management.
All listed weeds have undergone a thorough risk assessment process to determine their legal control status. This process includes understanding each weed's:
· Current distribution
· Potential distribution
· Capacity to spread
· Capacity to manage the weed (for both government and private land holders)
· Costs associated with managing the weed.
The weed invasion cost curve (shown below) is used in biosecurity management to describe how the economic and ecological costs of a weed invasion change over time and how these costs relate to the stage of invasion and management response. The cost of effectively controlling a weed species increases dramatically as the invasion progresses, while the likelihood of success decreases.
Governments and land managers use this model to justify funding for biosecurity and surveillance programs, and strategic prioritisation is given to the lower end of the curve as it represents better value for money.

Under the Riverina Regional Strategic Weed Management Plan 2023–2027, Khaki weed is listed as a ‘Local priority’ species of concern. More than 50 other species found on this list are common, widespread weed species such as Patterson’s curse, Bathurst Burr and Privet. Being the lowest priority tier means these weeds do not have a specific control category but are governed instead by a ‘general biosecurity duty’.
This means that all land managers should attempt to manage weeds to the extent that is ‘reasonably practical’. As the local control authority, each Council has discretion as to how much emphasis they place on managing weed species considered to be a ‘Local priority’ weed. Because Khaki weed is considered widespread and abundant throughout NSW, it is not easily eradicated and requires long-term management. The economic return for asset protection and long-term management is quite low, as per the invasion cost curve.
Current actions to address Khaki weed
Council has two distinct teams that work in the weed control space. One is predominantly focused on Council’s role as a regulatory body or ‘local control authority’ undertaking inspections on private properties, public reserves, waterways, saleyards, nurseries and other high-risk pathways. This team also undertakes targeted control works (which may be mechanical removal, spraying, burning or biocontrol) on State and Regional priority weeds. When resource availability allows, widespread weeds may also be targeted, depending on seasonal requirements. This includes spraying for Khaki weed at roadside rest-stops and high pedestrian traffic areas such as some bus stops and naturestrips that are known to have large infestations of Khaki weed.
To help minimise the transportation and spread of weeds, ‘weed hygiene stations’ have been installed in several places along the Wiradjuri Walking Trail to encourage users to clean their shoes and bike tyres of seeds to prevent the further spread of weeds.
In the general management of Council open spaces (parks, reserves, sportsgrounds, roadsides) Council has a team that undertakes routine spraying, targeting problem weeds in these areas to reduce impacts to neighbouring landholders, inconvenience to the public and to enhance the health and quality of the grassed areas. This spraying program includes the use of selective broadleaf herbicides, Khaki weed being one of many weeds that this selective spraying manages. This team has one full-time spray operator that undertakes the majority of weed control activities on council-managed land. Contractors are also used during busy peak times for weed spraying.
Between these two teams, over 10,000 hectares is managed with around $550,000 spent annually for weed management on Council-managed land. In doing so, Council is fulfilling its ‘general biosecurity duty’ obligations.
Over the summer period, Council’s spray operator and contractors are spraying for both Khaki and Cathead (Tribulus terrestris). This can be difficult to time perfectly, as the Khaki weed usually develops and seeds a few weeks prior to the Cathead. In the past, staff have prioritised Cathead control due to the spiny, hard fruit that can easily puncture tyres and be very painful to stand on. Common practice has been to hold off spraying until early December when the Cathead has germinated. Unfortunately, this can result in some Khaki seeding by the time all areas have been addressed.
Feasibility of eradicating Khaki weed
Council has an estimated 500ha or more of land that may be affected by Khaki weed. To eradicate the weed species, a long-term targeted weed-spraying program would need to be completed. This would require Council’s spray operator and an additional three full-time contractors to undertake an intensive regime of spraying for a four-week period each November for at least 10 years to ensure its eradication.
To achieve eradication, a multi-phase application method is used over the four weeks. This includes a pre-emergent herbicide that inhibits the growth, development and maturation of undesirable plants and a post-emergent herbicide to capture any weeds that still emerge following the first application.
Resourcing constraints
The chemical cost for this is estimated at $275,000 for pre-emergent and post-emergent chemicals and $60,000 in labour costs, including council staff overtime and contractor costs for a four-week period. It should be noted that these figures are per year, acknowledging costs would decrease eventually as infestation decreases, however, labour and chemical prices will also increase each year, therefore the estimated cost for a 10-year eradication program is in the range of $2.5 - $3M. This figure is inclusive of the existing weed spray operator’s salary as allocated in the recurrent annual budget.
The highly intensive weed spraying program within the four-week growing period would increase current staff workload with overtime required and fatigue management to be accounted for. This would also divert funds and labour from all other non-selective spraying of sound mounds, active travel paths and edges and prevent work on other widespread weeds including Blackberry, St. John’s Wort, Silverleaf Nightshade and Bathurst Burr that are also generally sprayed during this season.
Council routinely uses regional contractors to assist with weed control, but these also have constraints with increased seasonal workload and availability.
Feasibility of targeted control for Khaki weed
Given the high level of financial and labour resourcing required to eradicate Khaki weed, staff recommend a more measured approach. A smaller-scale spraying program within 50ha of known affected areas and high-traffic pathways, such as public reserves in Glenfield Park, Rawling Park, Settlers Village, Emblem Park and Wiradjuri Reserve would be more realistic and achievable. This would require the existing Council spray operator and support from one full-time contractor during the four-week period.
It should be noted that these figures are per financial year, acknowledging costs would decrease as infestation decreases, however labour and chemical prices will increase each year. Where possible, other weeds that are co-located and have the same control window and treatment method would of course be targeted at the same time, but some other areas or weed types may still be missed during this period.
Public awareness and education
Council staff conduct various activities throughout the year to engage with the community and provide education and advice on weeds. This includes:
· One-on-one discussions with landholders during private property inspections
· Having a permanent stall at the Henty Machinery Field Days
· Partnering with the Agile Mobile Library locations on village visits
· Attending with One Tree for Me events and National Tree Day to support the community with advice on weed identification and control options
· Use of Council’s social media pages, Council News, Sustainable Wagga eNewsletter, and community notice boards to promote weed identification, control and weed hygiene stations.
These extension activities are broadly based and do not tend to target a specific weed. Council staff propose running an additional awareness campaign to assist with the identification of khaki weed and encourage the community to control it on their land in addition to the work Council is undertaking to manage khaki weed on its own land. This could be scheduled to coincide with the start of the growing season for Khaki weed at the start of November and be accommodated within current budgets.
Poor machinery and equipment hygiene is one of the main ways weeds spread, therefore Council staff also propose to develop an updated awareness campaign focused on improving hygiene practices of machinery and equipment such as mowers and excavators, to reduce the spread of weed materials. This information would be targeted at both Council operations and other entities that undertake activities in the road reserve such as Essential Energy, Riverina Water, Transgrid and other works contractors.
There is also an opportunity install up to eight additional ‘weed hygiene stations’ across the city at locations such as Rawlings Park, Silvalite Reserve, Lake Albert and other high traffic areas along the Wiradjuri walking trail. These stations provide both an educational element and a practical means of encouraging users to clean their shoes and bike tyres of seeds to prevent the further spread of weeds. This activity is estimated at a one-off cost of $18,000 ($2,250 per station, including signage) and as detailed in the finance section of this report.
Financial Implications
The recommended option consists of completing the targeted Khaki weed control on 50ha of Council-managed land, costing approximately $42,500 per annum. Utilising existing budgets for spray operations, the proposed targeted method would require an additional $10,000 per financial year to be spent on additional chemical, labour and contractor costs.
The proposed annual increase of $10,000 can be funded through the ‘Parks Operations’ overall 2025/26 cost centre initially and allocated for the remainder of the LTFP during the 2026/27 budget process.
The eight additional weed hygiene stations have an estimated cost of $18,000. This would be a one-off capital request considered as part of the 2026/27 budget process with installation to occur in 2026/27 financial year if successful.
Policy and Legislation
· NSW Biosecurity Act 2015
· Riverina Regional Strategic Weed Management Plan 2023-2027
Link to Strategic Plan
Sustainable
Protect and manage biodiversity
Manage the biodiversity of our natural landscapes and provide education to support the conservation of our environment for future generations.
Risk Management Issues for Council
Although Council currently satisfies its general biosecurity duty, if it does choose to allocate additional resources to control Khaki, it could create an expectation that Council will also provide the same budget and resources to other general biosecurity duty weeds, or alternatively, the perception that Council is ignoring other priority weeds in favour of its focus on Khaki weed.
Internal / External Consultation
Cross-directorate internal consultation has occurred with Infrastructure, Parks Operations and Finance to develop this report.
|
1. |
Riverina Regional Strategic Weed Management Plan 2023-2027 - Provided under separate cover. |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-5 |
RP-5 DA25/0389 - Multi Dwelling Housing 3 x 3 bedroom Dwellings - 34 Kingsford Smith Road (Lot 46 DP1299712)
Author: Emma Molloy
General Manager: Peter Thompson
|
Summary: |
The report is for a development application and is presented to Council for determination. The application has been referred to Council under Section 1.10 of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 (DCP) as the application is for multi dwelling housing and seeks to vary a numerical control by more than 10%.
The details of the variation and justification are contained within the attached Section 4.15 Assessment Report. |
That Council approve DA25/0389 for Multi dwelling Housing 3 x 3 bedroom dwellings at 34 Kingsford Smith Road, Boorooma NSW 2650 (Lot 46 DP1299712) subject to the conditions outlined in the Section 4.15 Assessment Report.
Development Application Details
|
Applicant |
Matt Jenkins Builder Pty Ltd |
|
Owner |
Mr Michael Francis Mazzocchi & Briony Lee Mazzocchi |
|
Development Cost |
$1,516,870.00 |
|
Development Description |
Multi Dwelling Housing 3 x 3-bedroom Dwellings |
Report
Site Location

The subject land is legally known as Lot 46 DP1299712 located at 34 Kingsford Smith Road, Boorooma. The subject site is located on the northern side of Cuthbert Court, on the corner of Cuthbert Court and Kingsford Smith Road. The lot is regular in shape and has an area of 1130m². The site has a fall of 4.5 metres west to east. The surrounding locality is within a developing residential area characterised by low density residential development.
Assessment
The applicant seeks consent to construct Multi dwelling housing comprising of 3 x 3-bedroom dwellings. The development will comprise of:
· 3 x 3 bedroom dwellings with ensuite, main bathroom, open plan living, kitchen and dining, lounge room with attached single garage; and alfresco.
· Retaining walls comprising of:
o a maximum height of 1.5 metres along the northern boundary to retain a site cut.
o a 900mm retaining wall along the eastern boundary to retain fill.
o 1.2 metre high retaining walls along the western boundary and along the western elevation of each dwelling to retain a site cut.


· The subject site is within the R1 General Residential zone under the provision of WWLEP2010 multi dwelling housing is permitted with consent.
· The development seeks a variation to C1 9.3.2 in regard to the maximum allowable site cover. Multi dwelling housing must have a maximum site cover of 40% within the R1 General Residential zone. The development proposes 49%. The variation was justified by the applicant and is supported for the following reasons:
o The design offers flexibility in the internal space to provide both secure storage through the inclusion of a single garage and an additional living area which functions as a multi-use space that can accommodate the changing needs of residents over time.
o Multi-dwelling developments typically have a lower site coverage to accommodate vehicle manoeuvring areas and shared driveways. This development differs in that each dwelling is provided with direct access from Cuthbert Court, similar to a single dwelling.
o This design outcome enables a greater provision of private open space compared to a typical multi-dwelling housing development and the development being consistent with the future character of the area by appearing from the street as three single dwellings.
· The proposed development other than the variation discussed above generally complies with the provisions of the WWLEP2010 and the WWDCP2010.
· One submission was received during the notification period in regard to future character and community cohesion and is addressed in detail within the attached s4.15 assessment report.
· The development is considered to be in the public interest as it directly responds to housing demand and aligns with the strategic objectives of both state and local planning frameworks. It provides a greater diversity of housing options, catering to households of different sizes, incomes, and life stages, thereby supporting social inclusion and housing choice within the community.
Reasons for Approval
· The application is for a Multi dwelling housing comprising of 3 x 3 bedroom units in the R1- General Residential Zone which is permitted with consent.
· The development complies with the requirements of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 and will not compromise the outcomes sought for the Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010.
· An assessment of the application against the relevant sections of the Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010 demonstrates that the proposed development will not cause any significant adverse impacts on the surrounding natural environment, built environment, infrastructure, community facilities or local character and amenity.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy
Wagga Wagga Local Environmental Plan 2010
Wagga Wagga Development Control Plan 2010
Link to Strategic Plan
Growing
Increase housing supply and diversity
Implement initiatives to deliver an increase in housing supply and diversity of housing options to meet the needs of our community.
Risk Management Issues for Council
Approval of the application is not considered to raise risk management issues for Council as the proposed development is generally consistent LEP and DCP controls.
Internal / External Consultation
Full details of the consultation that was carried out as part of the development application assessment is contained in the attached s4.15 Report.
|
|
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
|
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
|
Inform |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consult |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|||||
|
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
|
|
|
1. |
DA25/0389 - SEE - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
2. |
DA25/0389 - Plans - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
3. |
DA25/0389 - Redacted Submission - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
4. |
DA25/0389 - s4.15 Report - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-6 |
RP-6 Southern Growth Area Zone 1 Section 7.11 Contributions Plan
Author: Belinda Maclure
Executive: Fiona Hamilton
|
Summary: |
Council resolved on 24 March 2025 to develop a contributions plan addressing the infrastructure required to support development within the Southern Growth Area Zone 1 (resolution 25/0070) and to report this matter back to Council with the intent that the planning proposal and draft contributions plan are placed on public exhibition at the same time.
The Planning Proposal for Southern Growth Area Zone 1 (LEP24/0003) received Gateway Determination from the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure on 21 August 2025 and a draft contributions plan for Southern Growth Area Zone 1 has now been drafted and is ready to proceed to public exhibition, subject to Council endorsement.
The draft contributions plan for the Southern Growth Area Zone 1 will be publicly exhibited concurrently with the Planning Proposal this calendar year. |
That Council:
a endorse the draft Appendix H Southern Growth Area Zone 1 of the Wagga Wagga Local Infrastructure Contributions Plan 2019 – 2034 to be placed on public exhibition for a minimum period of 28 days and invite public submissions on the draft document.
b receive a further report following the public exhibition and submission period:
i addressing any submission made in respect of the proposed document
ii proposing adoption of the policy unless there are any recommended amendments deemed to be substantial and requiring a further public exhibition period.
Report
Background
The draft Section 7.11 infrastructure contributions plan for Southern Growth Area (SGA) Zone 1 has been developed to support the SGA Zone 1 Planning Proposal (LEP24/0003).
It is anticipated that the development of SGA Zone 1 will enable approximately 2,900 new dwellings across 2,500 lots, accommodating a future population of 6,500 new residents.
The draft infrastructure contributions plan identifies the infrastructure required to support this development, including local open spaces, a district sporting field and community centre, an active travel network, and upgrades to Plumpton Road, Holbrook Road, and Bourke Street. It also includes an amount to partially fund the cost of providing citywide infrastructure.
The draft Appendix H Southern Growth Area Zone 1 (Draft Appendix H) provides further detail on the SGA Zone 1 location, concept and the associated infrastructure items. Draft Appendix H should be read in conjunction with the Wagga Wagga Local Infrastructure Contributions Plan 2019-2034 (LICP). A copy of Draft Appendix H is attached for Council’s consideration.
It is noted that the standard Section 64 Sewer and Stormwater contributions of the adjacent areas will be charged for development in SGA Zone 1 which will be subject to change in line with updates to the Sewer and Stormwater Development Services Plans.
The SGA Zone 1 Planning Proposal (LEP24/0003) was previously considered by Council at the Ordinary Council Meeting of the 24 March 2025. Council resolved that on receipt of the Gateway Determination that Council enact all the requirements of the Gateway Determination including public exhibition.
Preparation for the public exhibition of the planning proposal is currently underway and this report seeks endorsement of the draft contributions plan so that both matters can be publicly exhibited concurrently.
The Development Control Plan (DCP) for SGA Zone 1 will be reported to Council and exhibited separately from the Planning Proposal and contributions plan.
Proposed Infrastructure and Contributions
To support the SGA Zone 1 development, total infrastructure works included in Section 7.11 contributions are estimated at $119.4million which is categorised as follows:
|
Category |
Total Project Cost $m |
AIF Funding |
S7.11 Contribution Applied $m |
|
Roads |
$86.36 |
$49.57 |
$36.79 |
|
Plumpton Rd AIF Debt Servicing Costs |
$6.06 |
|
$6.06 |
|
Active Travel |
$7.74 |
|
$7.74 |
|
Playgrounds |
$2.03 |
|
$2.03 |
|
Land Acquisition* |
$0.9 |
|
$0.9 |
|
Major Park |
$11.58 |
|
$11.58 |
|
Community Centre |
$4.75 |
|
$4.75 |
|
Total |
$119.42 |
$49.57 |
$69.85 |
Table 1 – draft Infrastructure List for SGA Zone 1 by category.
This infrastructure list has been developed with input from key Council stakeholders. The delivery priorities for the infrastructure (refer to Figure H2 in Draft Appendix H) have been informed by the most current staging information provided by the developers involved in SGA Zone 1.
The land acquisition in Table 1 includes the acquisition of land for the Playgrounds, Major Park and Community Centre. An updated land valuation will be undertaken in line with the public exhibition to ensure that the land acquisition value reflects current market prices and provides the evidentiary basis for this cost to support the per-lot contribution rates. This is in line with DPHI guidance, which underscores the need for transparency and accountability in the contributions system.
The infrastructure list includes the component of Plumpton Road upgrades that is intrinsically linked to the delivery of housing in SGA Zone 1 and is not funded through the Accelerated Infrastructure Fund (AIF). As background on 29 May 2024, Council received $70.79million in grant funding under the AIF, to deliver critical road and sewer infrastructure in both the Southern and Northern Growth Areas. The total cost of the Plumpton Road Upgrade is $66.09million with $49.57million or 75% funded through the AIF grant. The remaining $16.5million (25%) is to be funded through S7.11 contributions.
The contributions also include the debt servicing costs associated with borrowing Council’s co-contribution to the project.
The draft contribution plan is based on an estimated yield of 2,500 lots. This results in Section 7.11 infrastructure contributions of $27,940 per lot for precinct-specific infrastructure.
Draft Appendix H includes Section 7.11 contributions which are over the standard cap of $20,000. For this reason, an application has been made to the Minister for Planning, Housing and Infrastructure to have SGA Zone 1 designated as an area permitted to levy contributions up to the $30,000 threshold, consistent with other designated urban release areas across NSW.
It is also expected that each lot developed will contribute a portion towards the 'Other Wagga Wagga' Section 7.11 contribution, which is applied to city wide infrastructure. Assuming the cap for SGA Zone 1 is lifted, an amount of $2060 per lot will be applied, this will result in a total Section 7.11 contribution of $30,000 per lot.
A breakdown of the contributions is provided in Table 2:
|
Total Infrastructure works for SGA Zone 1 to be recovered through S7.11 contributions |
$69,850,328 |
|
Estimated number of Lots in SGA Zone 1 |
2,500 |
|
Calculated Section 7.11 Contribution per lot for precinct specific required infrastructure |
$27,940 |
|
‘Other Wagga Wagga’ Section 7.11 |
$2,060 |
|
Total Section 7.11 contribution per lot |
$30,000 |
Table 2 – Breakdown of draft s7.11 contribution per lot.
Financial Implications
If the proposed increase to the Section 7.11 cap is approved, contributions will be capped at $30,000 per lot. As the cap will have been reached, annual indexation cannot be applied and contributions will not increase with CPI in subsequent years.
Even with the higher cap, the SGA Zone 1 Section 7.11 contribution does not include the full ‘Other Wagga Wagga’ contribution that applies to all other developments across the city. This means that developments within SGA Zone 1 will contribute a reduced amount ($2,060 per lot compared with $12,256 per lot indexed to 2025/26 dollars), resulting in a funding shortfall for citywide projects that provide shared benefits. This creates an equity and funding risk for Council and may impact the delivery of broader infrastructure supporting growth across the LGA.
Council’s co-contribution for the AIF-funded Plumpton Road upgrade and associated financing costs are included in the draft Section 7.11 contributions in Appendix H. If the proposed contributions are not approved, there is currently no alternative funding source identified to deliver or service the project. This presents a financial and delivery risk for Council, potentially delaying critical infrastructure required to support the development and compromising alignment with AIF funding commitments.
When developing a Contributions plan, Council must give consideration both to the value of the infrastructure proposed and the underlying value of land on which the infrastructure will be constructed. Whilst an estimated value has been included in the draft contributions plan, in order to attribute an accurate value to land within the Southern Growth Area, Council staff will seek a valuation from a suitably qualified, independent valuer to ensure that the estimated market value is reflective of current market trends. Cost will be managed through the existing Strategic Planning budget.
Policy and Legislation
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Environmental Planning and Assessment (Local Infrastructure Contributions) Direction 2012
Wagga Wagga Local Infrastructure Contributions Plan 2019 – 2034
Wagga Wagga City Council Development Servicing Plan No 1 Sewerage Services July 2013
Wagga Wagga City Council Development Servicing Plan Stormwater November 2007
Link to Strategic Plan
Growing
Enabling infrastructure
Provide essential infrastructure; including sewer, roads, key housing enabling infrastructure to support growth.
Risk Management Issues for Council
1. Cost escalation due to timing and construction inflation
The infrastructure required to support SGA Zone 1 has been costed in 2025/26 dollars, with delivery scheduled progressively over future development stages. This creates an inherent risk of cost escalation due to changes in project scope or timing, which may affect the accuracy of infrastructure planning and the calculation of contribution rates under Section 7.11.
Council’s ability to apply indexation is also limited by the Section 7.11 contribution cap of $30,000.
2. Funding shortfall if Section 7.11 cap increase is not approved
If the application to increase the Section 7.11 contributions cap is not approved, the projects identified in draft Appendix H of the LICP will need to be reconsidered or potentially deferred. These projects were identified by Council’s internal stakeholders as critical to supporting the SGA Zone 1 development. A reduction in available funding could compromise the delivery of essential infrastructure, affect development feasibility, limit positive community outcomes.
3. Extensive infrastructure program
The SGA Zone 1 infrastructure program is extensive, and the scale of required works increases exposure to risk. The combination of cost escalation, funding limitations and staged delivery over time makes careful monitoring and management essential to ensure infrastructure can be delivered in line with development progress.
Internal / External Consultation
Council’s key internal stakeholders from across the organisation have been engaged with the process to develop the infrastructure list (including the cost) required to support the development of SGA Zone 1.
The delivery priority of the infrastructure list is based on the latest information from the developers of SGA Zone 1 regarding the staging of the development.
The Draft Appendix H of the LICP will be placed on public exhibition with the draft Planning Proposal for SGA Zone 1. This is anticipated to commence in early November 2025.
Staff have removed exhibition dates as we are dependent on the project proponent and DPHI reviews which is somewhat out of the council’s control. It will also cover council in the case that we need to re-exhibit.
|
1⇩. |
Draft Appendix H Southern Growth Area Zone 1 s7.11 Contributions |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-7 |
RP-7 MODEL CODE OF MEETING PRACTICE
Author: David Galloway
General Manager: Peter Thompson
|
Summary: |
The 2025 Model Meeting Code was released on the 29 August 2025.
Councils must adopt a code of meeting practice that incorporates the mandatory provisions of the 2025 Model Meeting Code no later than 31 December 2025.
Under section 361 of the Local Government Act 1993 (the Act), before adopting a new code of meeting practice, councils must first exhibit a draft of the code of meeting practice for at least 28 days and provide members of the community at least 42 days in which to comment on the draft code. |
That Council:
a endorse the draft Code of Meeting Practice and place on public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 28 October 2025 and invite public submissions until 9 December 2025
b receive a further report following the public exhibition and submission period:
i addressing any submission made in respect of the draft Code of Meeting Practice
ii proposing adoption of the draft Code of Meeting Practice unless there are any recommended amendments deemed to be substantial and requiring a further public exhibition period
Report
Following extensive consultation, the Office of Local Government (OLG) released the updated 2025 Model Code of Meeting Practice for Local Councils in NSW in August 2025.
Under section 360 of the Local Government Act 1993 and clause 232 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021, all councils are required to adopt a Code of Meeting Practice that incorporates the mandatory provisions of the 2025 Model Meeting Code by 31 December 2025.
From 1 January 2026, any inconsistent provisions in Council’s current adopted Code will automatically be overridden by the Model Code.
A comprehensive clause-by-clause review of the 2025 Model Meeting Code has been undertaken against Council’s current adopted Code of Meeting Practice. The review process has:
· identified all new mandatory provisions and amendments to existing clauses required to be incorporated
· included
Council-specific inclusions to strengthen and clarify the operation of
mandatory provisions, enhancing governance, transparency, and accountability
considered and provided recommendations on non-mandatory provisions for Council
determination.
Key Changes Introduced in the 2025 Model Meeting Code are outlined below.
|
Area |
Key Changes |
|
Meeting Procedures |
Mayor may call extraordinary meetings without councillor signatures. New process for urgent business requiring recorded reasons for inclusion. |
|
Business Papers |
General Manager must publish business papers from closed meetings once no longer confidential. |
|
Pre-Meeting Briefings |
Prohibited for any agenda business once the Code is adopted. |
|
Public Forums |
Optional for councils, but if held, must be livestreamed and conducted prior to the meeting. Council is awaiting further guidance from the Office of Local Government, however propose to hold the forum immediately prior to the scheduled Council Meeting. |
|
Attendance & Audio-Visual Links |
Councillors may attend by audio-visual link only in cases of ill-health, medical conditions, or unforeseen caring responsibilities. |
|
Livestreaming |
Mandatory from 1 January 2026. Recordings must remain online for 12 months or for the duration of the Council term, whichever is longer. |
|
Conduct & Etiquette |
New non-mandatory requirements for dress standards, standing provisions and prescribed modes of address. |
|
Mayoral Minutes |
May now be submitted on any matter without notice. |
|
Rules of Debate |
Simplified procedures including removal of foreshadowed motions and five-minute minimum speeches. Oral responses to Questions with Notice removed. |
|
Planning Decisions |
Cannot be made without a staff report. If a decision is made contrary to staff recommendations, reasons must be provided. |
|
Disorder & Expulsion |
Expanded definition of disorderly conduct. New provisions requiring Council to authorise the Chair’s power to expel at adoption and each new term. Public may be expelled for disruptions, protest materials, or unauthorised recordings. |
|
Committees |
Councillor-only committees must now comply with the full Code of Meeting Practice. |
The revised draft Code of Meeting Practice incorporates all mandatory provisions and includes Council-specific provisions to support clear meeting procedures, transparent decision-making, and alignment with best practice governance principles.
It is proposed that Council endorse the draft revised Code of Meeting Practice for the purpose of public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 28 October and invite public submissions until 9 December 2025.
Following the exhibition period, a further report will be presented to Council detailing any submissions received and recommending the final Code for adoption prior to 31 December 2025.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
Under section 360 of the Local Government Act 1993 and clause 232 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021:
· Councils must adopt a Code of Meeting Practice that incorporates the mandatory provisions of the 2025 Model Meeting Code by 31 December 2025.
· From 1 January 2026, any provision of Council’s current Code that is inconsistent with the mandatory provisions will be automatically overridden.
· Draft Code must be publicly exhibited for at least 28 days, with 42 days for public submissions under section 361 of the Act.
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Ethical Leadership
Deliver accountable and transparent leadership.
Risk Management Issues for Council
Failure to adopt the Code of Meeting Practice within the prescribed timeframe may result in non-compliance with legislative obligations, leading to governance, reputational, and legal risks. The Code of Meeting Practice provides a regulatory framework that promotes transparency, accessibility, and consistency in decision-making.
Internal / External Consultation
Internal and external consultation was undertaken with the Governance Team, Executive Team, the Office of Local Government through facilitated webinars for Council officers and Councillors, and via a Councillor Workshop.
To ensure transparency and facilitate both internal and external engagement, the following consultation activities will be undertaken during and after the public exhibition period:
· The draft Code will be made available on Council’s website for the duration of the exhibition period.
· A notice will be published in Council News and through the required formal advertisements.
|
|
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
|
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
|
Inform |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Consult |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
|
|
|
1. |
Draft Code of Meeting Practice - Provided under separate cover. |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-8 |
RP-8 2026 COUNCIL MEETING DATES
Author: Nicole Johnson
Executive: Scott Gray
|
Summary: |
Council is required under Section 365 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW) to meet at least 10 times per year (financial year), each time in a different month. This report provides a schedule for the continuation of two monthly meetings according to the current adopted position of Council. Also included is information in relation to alternative Council meeting cycles, with Council to consider two options being the continuation of meetings on Mondays or transitioning to a Wednesday meeting cycle. |
|
That Council endorse Option 1 as the schedule of Ordinary Council Meetings for the period January 2026 to December 2026, providing for two meetings per month, as outlined in the report. |
Report
At its meeting held on 11 November 2024, Council considered the timing of Council meetings when adopting the 2025 Council Meeting Dates. Councillors discussed the officer’s recommendation, which outlined the advantages and challenges of holding meetings on different days of the week.
Considerations included the potential to move meetings from Mondays to Wednesdays to allow additional time for Councillors to ask questions and receive feedback from staff prior to the meeting, providing Councillors with more time to review business papers, allowing greater flexibility for staff and Councillor availability, and supporting improved community access to meeting information.
Following discussion of the options presented, Council resolved to continue holding meetings on Mondays for 2025 and to conduct a workshop in mid-2025 to consider alternate meeting days for 2026.
Scheduling Options
Outlined below are the proposed Ordinary Council Meeting dates for the period January 2026 to December 2026, based on the second and fourth Monday or Wednesday of the month, with a number of exceptions as noted below. A meeting in late January 2026 is required as there are items which have legislative compliance implications if they are not considered by Council in January 2026.
The meeting date proposed for December 2026 lessens the gap between the December and January meeting dates, with January typically being the period of increased staff absence due to planned leave, with a consequent smaller agenda anticipated. The December date proposed also accommodates the legislative requirements for the investment portfolio reporting. It is also proposed that Council Meeting start times move to 6.30pm. This later start time is intended to cater for the new public forum session that will commence at 5.30pm.
The Corporate Calendar and other factors have been checked for any conflicting commitments and any overlapping conference dates including:
· Public Holidays and NSW School holidays
· Adoption of Audited Financial Statements within legislated timeframes
· Financial and investment reporting requirements
· Adoption of IP&R documentation
· The National General Assembly has a tentative date of mid to late June 2026.
· LGNSW Conference has not released dates yet, however its estimated to be held in late November 2026
· One monthly meeting proposed for January 2026 and December 2026 to accommodate the Christmas / New Year Holiday periods
Fortnightly Meeting Cycle
|
Option 2 (Wednesday’s) |
Time |
Comments |
|
|
19 January 2026 |
21 January 2026 |
6:30pm |
Australia Day - 26 January 2026 |
|
9 February 2026 |
11 February 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
23 February 2026 |
25 February 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
9 March 2026 |
11 March 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
23 March 2026 |
25 March 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
13 April 2026 |
15 April 2026 |
6:30pm |
School Holidays – 7 April – 17 April 2026 |
|
27 April 2026 |
29 April 2026 |
6:30pm |
Floodplain Risk Management Conference scheduled for 21 – 24 April |
|
11 May 2026 |
13 May 2026 |
6:30pm |
2026 ALGWA Conference dates not released to date – generally early May |
|
25 May 2026 |
27 May 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
9 June 2026 (Tuesday) |
10 June 2026 |
6:30pm |
King’s Birthday – 8 June 2026 |
|
22 June 2026 |
24 June 2026 |
6:30pm |
NGA date not released to date – generally late June Consider adoption of DPOP and Budget |
|
13 July 2026 |
15 July 2026 |
6:30pm |
School Holidays - 6 July to 17 July 2026 |
|
27 July 2026 |
29 July 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
10 August 2026 |
12 August 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
24 August 2026 |
26 August 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
7 September 2026 |
9 September 2026 |
6:30pm |
LGNSW Water Management Conference date not released to date – generally mid-September |
|
21 September 2026 |
23 September 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
12 October 2026 |
14 October 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
26 October 2026 |
28 October 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
16 November 2026 |
18 November 2026 |
6:30pm |
LGNSW 2026 Conference date not released to date -usually mid/late November Consider adoption of financial statements |
|
30 November 2026 |
2 December 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
|
14 December 2026 |
16 December 2026 |
6:30pm |
|
Financial Implications
There are costs involved in conducting Council meetings, including the livestreaming of the Council meetings which requires certain equipment and services. Council has an annual budget allocation to conduct the livestreaming of all Council meetings, which is provided by an external contractor.
Policy and Legislation
In accordance with Chapter 12, Part 2, Section 365 of the Local Government Act 1993 (NSW), the Council is required to meet at least 10 times per year (financial year), each time in a different month.
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Ethical Leadership
Deliver accountable and transparent leadership.
Risk Management Issues for Council
N/A
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-9 |
RP-9 Capital Works Program Reset
Author: David Galloway
General Manager: Peter Thompson
|
Summary: |
The purpose of this report is to reset the Capital Works Program, so it better aligns with allocated resources and delivery timeframes. |
That Council:
a receive and note the contents of the report
b adopt the attached revised Capital Works Program
Report
At the Council Meeting on 23 June 2025, Councillors approved the Delivery Program 2025-2029 and Operational Plan 2025/26 allocating the following budgets for one off and recurring capital works.
|
Capital works |
2026 |
2027 |
2028 |
2029 |
Delivery Program Total Budget |
|
One off projects |
87,100,363 |
84,170,199 |
29,019,040 |
22,686,128 |
$222,975,730 |
|
Recurrent programs |
26,147,587 |
26,173,711 |
28,526,886 |
30,476,159 |
$111,324,343 |
|
Total |
113,247,950 |
110,343,910 |
57,545,926 |
53,162,287 |
$334,300,073 |
Since the original Capital Works Program (CWP) budget was approved by Councillors the 2025 carry over process has been completed, and several new projects have been approved.
The approved Capital Works Program as at 30 September 2025 is detailed below.
|
Capital works |
2026 |
2027 |
2028 |
2029 |
Delivery Program Total Budget |
|
One off projects |
$108,950,909 |
$85,880,328 |
$28,863,090 |
$22,679,193 |
$246,373,520 |
|
Recurrent programs |
$35,291,788 |
$27,901,757 |
$29,096,694 |
$30,742,684 |
$123,032,923 |
|
Total |
$144,242,692 |
$113,782,085 |
$57,959,784 |
$53,421,877 |
$369,406,438 |
At the completion of the carry over process it was determined that a review of the CWP would be appropriate.
A pragmatic approach to the review has been taken with the aim to further increase the accuracy of the program across the 4-year Council term. The proposed changes are detailed in the financial implications section of this report.
A copy of the revised 10 Year One Off Capital Works Program is also attached (Attachment 1).
Proposed amendments
Following the reset process the revised CWP for 2025/26 – 2028/29 is detailed below.
|
Capital works |
2026 |
2027 |
2028 |
2029 |
Delivery Program Total Budget |
|
One off projects |
$60,749,267 |
$103,004,739 |
$14,108,086 |
$24,467,317 |
$202,329,409 |
|
Recurrent programs |
$35,329,769 |
$27,901,757 |
$29,096,694 |
$30,742,684 |
$123,070,904 |
|
Total |
$96,079,036 |
$130,906,496 |
$43,204,780 |
$55,210,001 |
$325,400,313 |
|
Directorate |
One off |
Recurring |
Total |
% |
|
Community |
$307,699 |
$545,940 |
$853,639 |
0.89% |
|
Econ, Bus and Workforce |
$24,324,564 |
$978,357 |
$25,182,921 |
26.34% |
|
Governance |
$23,139,698 |
$1,206,872 |
$24,346,570 |
25.34% |
|
Infrastructure |
$12,977,303 |
$32,598,601 |
$45,575,904 |
47.44% |
|
Total |
$60,749,264 |
$35,329,769 |
$96,079,035 |
|
10 largest projects
The following table lists the 10 largest projects in the 2026 CWP, with their proposed revised budget (78% of the total delivery budget) and their actual expenditure as at 30 September 2025.
|
Top 10 Projects |
$ Budget |
$ YTD Actual |
% |
Status |
|
Sthn Growth – Plumpton Road Nth |
$7,957,570 |
$266,682 |
3% |
Planning |
|
Sthn Growth – Plumpton Road Sth |
$7,883,688 |
$220,634 |
3% |
Planning |
|
Nth Growth Sewer Upgrades |
$5,955,326 |
$571,918 |
10% |
Planning |
|
Lake Albert Water Sports and Events |
$4,274,607 |
$1,851,196 |
43% |
Execution |
|
Active Travel – TT26 |
$3,993,821 |
$2,704,495 |
68% |
Execution |
|
Mates Gully Road |
$3,769,137 |
$23,266 |
1% |
Planning |
|
GWMC – Land Acquisition |
$3,632,445 |
$3,611,832 |
99% |
Completed |
|
Sewer Ashmont SPS |
$3,116,614 |
$29,942 |
1% |
Execution |
|
GWMC Plant Shed |
$2,326,750 |
$2,050,136 |
88% |
Execution |
|
Pine Gully Road Corridor |
$1,902,139 |
$1,396,513 |
73% |
Execution |
|
Total |
$44,812,097 |
$12,726,614 |
28% |
|
10 largest projects – recurrent
The following table lists the 10 largest recurrent programs in the 2026 CWP (88% of the total delivery budget) and their actual expenditure as at 30 September 2025.
|
Top 10 Programs |
Project Manager |
$ Budget |
$ YTD Actual |
% |
|
Plant & Equipment |
Daniel Davey |
$9,392,914 |
$2,874,423 |
30% |
|
Pavement Rehab Program |
Krishan Maharaj |
$7,614,731 |
$194,252 |
2% |
|
Sewer Mains Rehab Program |
Ray Graham |
$3,293,393 |
$855,890 |
26% |
|
Reseal Program - Capital Renewal |
Krishan Maharaj |
$2,835,510 |
$52,095 |
1% |
|
Gravel Resheets |
Krishan Maharaj |
$2,067,981 |
$97,271 |
4% |
|
Replacement & Renewal of Sewer Plant, Pumps & Equipment |
Ray Graham |
$1,594,200 |
$471,585 |
29% |
|
Corporate Hardware Capital Purchases |
Reece Hamblin |
$1,206,872 |
$244,616 |
20% |
|
Heavy Patching Program |
Krishan Maharaj |
$1,130,289 |
$113,601 |
10% |
|
Urban Asphalt Program |
Krishan Maharaj |
$1,040,040 |
$497 |
0% |
|
Sewer Manhole Relining |
Ray Graham |
$900,541 |
$0 |
0% |
|
Total |
|
$31,076,476 |
$4,904,234 |
15% |
Financial Implications
The proposed changes and their financial implications are detailed below.
|
Job No. |
Project Title |
Comments |
|
12922 |
Glenfield Road Corridor Works - TT1 |
This project has been delayed due to Inland Rail works in the area. Result: Keep $88,681 in 2027 for planning and move $19m outside of the Delivery Program. |
|
15083 |
Boorooma Street Slip Lane |
This work has been rescheduled due to construction at Mates Gully Rd. Result: Move $289,341 out of 2026 to 2028. |
|
15143 |
Oasis – Point of Sale |
This project is being brought forward following the acquisition of Workout. Result: $115,000 added to the Delivery Program in 2026/27. |
|
17742 |
Stormwater - Murray St Project |
This project has been delayed due to Inland Rail works in the area. Result: Keep $200,000 in 2026 for planning and move $2.9m to 2028. |
|
17866 |
Levee System Upgrade - North Wagga (1 in 20) |
This project is contingent on grant funding. Result: move $7.4m out of 2027 to 2029. |
|
18796 |
Northern Sporting Precinct |
This project is subject to a feasibility review. Slight amendment to planning budget. Result: $213,336 moved from 2027 to 2028. |
|
19545 |
RIFL Stage 2c |
This project has been completed with surplus funds to be transferred to reserve pending final reconciliation. Result: $856,152 removed from CWP. |
|
19601 |
Pine Gully Road Corridor Works - TT2 |
Construction of one of the elements of the project is underway. Bring forward funding to match delivery. Result: $1.3m brought forward to 2026. |
|
19604 |
Gregadoo Road Corridor Works - TT7 |
Work is being done as part of Southern Growth. Move funding out to reflect delivery timeline. Result: $2.4m moved out of 2026 to 2027. |
|
19628 |
Boorooma St Upgrade - TT28 |
This work has been rescheduled due to construction at Mates Gully Rd. Move project planning to the back of the Delivery Program. Result: $200,000 moved out of 2026 to 2028. $4.2m moved out of Delivery Program. |
|
19647 |
Estella New Local Park |
Subject to land availability. Result: No proposed changes, Exec report pending. |
|
20799 |
Stores - Barcoding System/ Shelving |
This project is on hold pending TechOne transition. Result: $30,979 moved out of 2026 to 2027. |
|
21273 |
Lawn Cemetery Master Plan Stage 2A Works |
Project is waiting on the completion of a revised Masterplan. Keep $100,000 planning and move the remaining to 2027. Result: $578,601 moved out of 2026 to 2027. |
|
21777 |
Wiradjuri Walking Track Upgrade |
Project is currently being reviewed. Proposal to go to Executive recommending how to progress with this project. Move funding outside of Delivery Program. Result: no change pending Exec report. |
|
22330 |
Estella Road upgrade |
This work has been rescheduled due to construction at Mates Gully Rd. No confirmed funding source for the project. Move outside of Delivery Program timeline. Result: $700,000 moved out of Delivery Program. |
|
22491 |
RFS Humula Station Capital Works |
RFS have confirmed works are now being completed by Public Works Result: $650,000 moved out of Delivery Program. |
|
22492 |
RFS Aviation Station 2nd Storey |
RFS have confirmed works are now being completed by Public Works. Result: $1m moved out of Delivery Program. |
|
22493 |
RFS Lake Albert Station Capital Works |
RFS have confirmed works are now being completed by Public Works. Result: $1.6m moved out of Delivery Program. |
|
22494 |
RFS Forest Hill Station Capital Works |
RFS have confirmed works are now being completed by Public Works. Result: $1.2m moved out of Delivery Program. |
|
22495 |
RFS Oura Station Capital Works |
RFS have confirmed works are now being completed by Public Works. Result: $900,000 moved out of Delivery Program. |
|
22496 |
RFS Uranquinty Station Capital Works |
RFS have confirmed works are now being completed by Public Works. Result: $800,000 moved out of Delivery Program. |
|
22497 |
RFS Galore Station Solar Upgrade |
RFS have confirmed works are now being completed by Public Works. Result: $40,000 moved out of Delivery Program. |
|
23126 |
Southern Growth Area - Plumpton Road North |
Project delivery cashflow has been revised. Result: $10,000,000 moved out of 2026 to 2027. |
|
23127 |
Southern Growth Area - Plumpton Road South |
Project delivery cashflow has been revised. Result: $10,000,000 moved out of 2026 to 2027. |
|
24348 |
Harris Park Amenities Upgrade |
Project is currently in delivery and will be completed this financial year. Bring forward full funding into 2026. Result: $873,790 added to 2026 program |
|
24377 |
Blake Street Works in Kind |
These works will not be completed in this timeframe. Result: $171,785 moved out of 2026 to 2027. |
|
24721 |
Active Travel Pathway – Plumpton Road |
Project delivery cashflow has been revised. Result: $2,446,208 moved out of 2026 to 2027. |
|
28153 |
Oasis – 50 expansion joints |
This work is not required on this timeline. Result: $79,790 moved out of 2026 to 2027. |
|
28198 |
Oasis Energy Efficiency Upgrade (CEUF) |
Project cashflow has been spread across 2026 - 2028 to better reflect commercial reality. Project delivery will be finalised by 30 June 2027 but cashflow will go across the year. Result: $3m moved out of 2026. |
|
45049 |
LMC - Treatment of Re-use Water |
Moved outside DP timeline as this will be resolved with LMC masterplan. Result: $353,912 moved outside the Delivery Program, waiting on Masterplan. |
|
45096 |
LMC - New circulating road (partial) |
$100,000 kept in this year for planning with the remaining balance moved outside DP timeline as this will be resolved with LMC masterplan. Result: $2.5m moved out of 2026 to outside the Delivery Program, waiting on Masterplan. |
|
45121 |
LMC - Clean, fill and landscape all new works areas |
$30K brought forward to this year as initial works have commenced. Result: Add $30,000 to 2026. |
|
45124 |
LMC - Replace existing cattle/sheep delivery ramps |
Moved outside DP timeline as this will be resolved with LMC masterplan. Result: $1.3m moved outside the Delivery Program, waiting on Masterplan. |
|
45125 |
LMC – Refurbish office |
Work was recently completed in this area so project is not needed on this timeline. Result: $350,000 moved out of 2027 to outside the Delivery Program, waiting on Masterplan. |
|
45138 |
LMC - Hardstand |
The need for this work is being reviewed considering the LMC Masterplan. Result: $2.25m moved out of 2026 to outside the Delivery Program, waiting on Masterplan. |
|
50060 |
Sewer – Forsyth St |
Project is recommended for removal. Result: $785k removed from 2026 CWP. |
|
50199 |
Sewer - Elizabeth Avenue Forest Hill SPS22 - New Assets |
Project is recommended for removal. Result: $1.2m removed from Delivery Program. |
|
50447 |
Northern Growth Area – Sewer Upgrades |
Project delivery cashflow has been revised. Result: $5,000,000 moved out of 2026 to 2027. |
|
70135 |
GWMC - Gas Capture Network Expansion & Gas Powered Evaporator |
$400k brought forward into this year to cover planning work. Remaining balance remains outside DP timeline as timing will be resolved by Masterplan. Result: $400k increase in 26 CWP. |
|
70147 |
GWMC - Domestic Precinct (Transfer Station, Office Relocation, Roadworks) |
Initial concept plan has been completed. $200K brought forward to cover planning. Result: $200k increase in 26 CWP. |
|
70164 |
GWMC - Construction of a new Waste Cell |
Current cell construction is behind schedule delaying this project. Result: $200,000 retained in 2026 for planning with $3m moved to 2027 for delivery. |
|
70178 |
GWMC - Construction of a new Monocell (inc. operational budgets) |
Current cell construction is behind schedule delaying this project. This will also include the deferral of the operational income and expenditure budgets. Result: $200,000 retained in 2026 for planning with $3.4m moved to 2027 for delivery. |
|
70203 |
GWMC Tower Installation |
This works has been held up by Transgrid construction. Result: Moved $200,000 to 2029. |
Policy and Legislation
NSW Local Government Act 1993
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Good governance
Provide professional, innovative, accessible and efficient services.
Risk Management Issues for Council
Delivery Risk
Without resetting the Capital Works Program, there is a high likelihood of project slippage, caused by limited internal delivery capacity, external contractor availability and long-lead procurement items.
Attempting to maintain the current delivery schedule without adjustment increases the risk of non-completion within approved budget and timeframes, leading to carryovers and public dissatisfaction.
Financial Risk
Proceeding with an unadjusted capital program increases the risk of cost escalation due to inflation, supply chain delays, and contracting market pressure.
Misalignment between cash flow timing and grant funding milestones may create short-term funding pressure on Council's unrestricted cash position.
Reputational Risk
Failure to transparently manage community expectations regarding timing of capital delivery may result in negative public commentary, particularly for high-profile projects.
Community perception that projects are being “cut” rather than reset for planned delivery efficiency may generate reputational criticism unless clearly communicated.
Strategic Alignment Risk
Without a structured reset, there is a risk that unfunded or low-priority projects may continue to consume resources ahead of strategic priority projects, causing misalignment with Council’s adopted Delivery Program and Long Term Financial Plan.
Operational Capacity Risk
Continuing with the current capital works program schedule without adjustment may result in staff fatigue, contractor overextension and reduced quality assurance oversight, increasing the risk of defects, reworks and safety incidents.
Internal / External Consultation
Significant internal engagement has been undertaken to prepare this initial revised 10-year capital works program.
As this revision is being made in light of Councils internal delivery capacity, no external engagement is proposed.
|
1⇩. |
Capital Works Reset - One off projects |
|
|
2⇩. |
Capital Works Reset Recurrent Programs |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-10 |
RP-10 Lake Albert Flood Mitigation Options - Feasibility Study
Author: Warren Faulkner
|
Summary: |
This report recommends that Council endorse the draft Lake Albert Feasibility Study completed by Stantec to be placed on public exhibition for review and comment by the community. |
That Council:
a endorse the draft Lake Albert Feasibility Study to be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 29 October 2025 and invite public submissions until 26 November 2025 on the draft document
b receive a further report following the public exhibition and submission period:
i addressing any submission made in respect of the proposed document
ii proposing endorsement of the document unless there are any recommended amendments deemed to be substantial and requiring a further public exhibition period
Report
In March 2022, Council received funding from the then Department of Planning and Environment for the Lake Albert Flood Mitigation Options - Feasibility Study. Subsequently, Stantec was engaged by Council in September 2023 to assess in further detail the feasibility of diverting major flood flows from Stringybark Creek and Crooked Creek into Lake Albert and using Lake Albert to provide additional flood mitigation to the broader area, referred to as the ‘Lake Albert Enhanced Flow Scheme’.
This was first proposed as a flood mitigation option in the Wagga Wagga Major Overland Flow Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan (MOFFRMS&P, WMAwater, 2021).
The Feasibility Study has primarily focused on the following three locations:
· Site 1 (LA01) Lake Albert Outlet Modification
· Site 2 (LA02) Crooked Creek Diversion Modification
· Site 3 (LA03) Stringybark Creek Diversion Modification
Site 1 – Lake Albert Outlet Modification
A levee/berm around the lake is proposed to be both a sheet pile levee for sections and an earth embankment for other sections. The levee is proposed to be contained within the open space reserve between the lake and Lakeside Drive and Lake Albert Road (where the original FRMS&P option was proposed to be road raising). Due to the space limitations for the east side of the lake, sheet piles are the only feasible option at this location. For all other areas where open space with no existing trees is sufficiently wide, an earth embankment should be applied due to the greater cost effectiveness and enhanced visual amenity. Based on Council recommendations no freeboard will be applied above the 1% AEP level for the sheet pile sections of levee, and a 0.3m freeboard will be applied above the 1% AEP level for the earth embankment sections.
The revised lake outlet is proposed to be a two-stage weir for both the north and west outlets, with a low flow weir at both locations to allow the lake to drain to normal operating levels post-flooding and a high flow weir to convey additional flows during rarer flood events.
An earth embankment is proposed for properties near Plunkett Drive south-west of the lake. These works will protect residential properties from the lake back flooding (afflux) and local tributary flows.
Site 2 – Crooked Creek Diversion Modification
After extensive consideration of key issues and opportunities and (critical) constraints of the Crooked Creek site, including preliminary modelling of several selected options, it was concluded that there were no feasible options to modify the Crooked Creek diversion to direct major flows into the Lake. Central to this outcome was the key issue of ecological and environmental impacts channel widening would have on the threatened ecological community (TEC) located along the creek, with any widening requiring the removal of large numbers of native trees.
Furthermore, due to the Main St bridge invert being fixed downstream there was no opportunity for channel lowering or re-grading as there was insufficient fall across the channel length to facilitate channel invert lowering. Finally, modelling showed that any footpath raising to the north to act as an additional berm was not feasible without resulting in adverse impacts for residential properties to the south of the diversion channel. Therefore, for the preferred option, it is proposed that no modification be made to the Crook Creek diversion, and that it remain as per existing conditions.
Site 3 – Stringybark Creek Diversion Modification
The channel modification is proposed to involve lowering of the channel invert to increase capacity, rather than channel widening as was proposed in the FRMS&P option. The extent of channel lowering will be from the outlet of the existing pond near Springvale Drive through Plumpton Road and further downstream, transitioning back to existing grade before the drop structure on the downstream end. This channel modification provides additional capacity to limit the amount of local flooding for residential areas (the channel modification extends further upstream than the FRMS&P option which started at Plumpton Road). The maximum depth of channel lowering is proposed to be 2 metres. The existing Plumpton Road twin culverts (2 x 1.8m pipes) are proposed to be upsized to twin 2.4m W x 2.4m H box culverts to reduce flooding over the road. This upgrade will align with the objectives of the Plumpton Road widening project. No road raising is required for Plumpton Road or the Boat Club access driveway (unlike the FRMS&P option) as these works were not considered feasible and the increased channel capacity upstream of Plumpton Road negates the need for road raising work.
At the downstream end of Stringybark Creek, the existing large culverts are proposed for replacement and lowering to increase the capacity of the channel, and to reduce the velocity of flows to reduce scour risk for the culvert headwall. In addition, a raising of the footpath on the north side of the culvert inlet is proposed to ensure that there is no overtopping of the channel in all events up to and including the 1% AEP. This will improve the flooding risk for the sheds of the recreation clubs on the south-west side of Lake Albert. Current modelling (and observations from the 2012 floods) confirm these sheds are affected by high velocity, high hazard flows from the channel overtopping in rare flood events. This flooding is removed as part of the preferred option.
However, flooding of the sheds and the Boat Club building will increase from lake flooding due to increased flood levels in the lake. To address this, flood protections for the Boat Club, Sailing Club and Bidgee Dragons buildings are proposed that include concrete flood walls around the sheds and buildings combined with flood doors for smaller openings and actuated flood barriers (self-raising barriers) for larger openings of the sheds / building.
The assessment of the final options for this Feasibility Study included preliminary design of the preferred options using site grading and geometry and Flood Modelling in TUFLOW of the preliminary design. The updated TUFLOW models were run for up to five design flood events; the 20%, 10%, 5%, 1% AEP and PMF events and results analysed to assess the impacts of the option on flooding. The post-mitigation flows from the Lake Albert were modelled in the MOFFS East Wagga model as well to simulate impacts of the preferred option. The outcomes of the modelling showed widespread flood level reductions from Lake Albert area down to East Wagga Wagga.
It is recommended that the draft Feasibility Study be placed on public exhibition for review and comment from the community. To view the feasibility Study please see: https://haveyoursay.wagga.nsw.gov.au/lake-albert-flood-mitigation-options-feasibility-study
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications associated with this report.
Policy and Legislation
NSW Flood Prone Land Policy 2021
NSW Flood Risk Management Manual 2023
Link to Strategic Plan
Sustainable
Sustainable built environment
Identify sustainable practices and materials when planning the built environment.
Risk Management Issues for Council
There are no significant risk management issues for Council associated with placing the draft Lake Albert Feasibility Options Study document on public exhibition.
Internal / External Consultation
The draft Feasibility Study has been the subject of internal consultation and has been endorsed by the Floodplain Risk Management Committee at its meeting on 23 February 2021 as outlined in M-1.
A Councillor workshop was held on 20 October 2025.
The Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water has also reviewed the report. The document to be placed on public exhibition has incorporated their feedback.
The Feasibility Study will be placed on public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 29 October 2025 and public submissions can be submitted up until 26 November 2025. The following channels will be utilised.
|
|
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
|
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
|
Inform |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
x |
x |
|
Consult |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
|
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-11 |
RP-11 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY AND COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION PLAN
Author: Michael Casey
Executive: Scott Gray
|
Summary: |
The draft Community Engagement Strategy has been reviewed, with a draft Community Participation Plan also developed and attached for public exhibition from 28 October to 25 November 2025. These documents outline how and when Council will engage with the community in decision-making processes and facilitate participation in planning matters. A further report will be presented following the exhibition period to address submissions and recommend adoption. |
That Council:
a endorse the draft Community Engagement Strategy and draft Community Participation Plan and place on public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 28 October 2025 to 25 November 2025 and invite public submissions during this period:
b receive a further report following the public exhibition period:
i addressing any submissions made with respect to the draft documents
ii proposing adoption of both documents unless there are any recommended amendments deemed to be substantial and requiring a further public exhibition period
Report
Background
Local Government Act 1993 (the Act) Sec 8A (3) Community participation states “Councils should actively engage with their local communities, through the use of the integrated planning and reporting framework and other measures.”
The Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework (IP&R), demonstrated in Figure 1 below comprises a series of interrelated documents that together provide a rigorous, consistent approach to community planning across all NSW local councils, while also ensuring alignment with regional and state priorities.
The IP&R framework allows local councils to navigate these complexities in a meaningful and purposeful way and to:
· integrate community priorities into council strategies and plans
· support community and stakeholders to play an active role in shaping the future of their community
· articulate the community’s vision and priorities
· assign resourcing to support delivery of the vision and priorities, while also balancing aspirations with affordability
· maintain accountability and transparency by regular monitoring and reporting.
The IP&R framework also provides a pathway for elected representatives to:
· work directly with their community to identify long-term priorities for local identity, growth and lifestyle
· understand the range of services the community wants, the service standards they expect and the infrastructure that will be required
· have meaningful conversations about the cost of meeting community expectations. Allocate resources within council’s means and map out a 4-year strategy to deliver key priorities, projects and services
· set appropriate rates, fees and charges and monitor the council’s progress in delivering priorities, projects and services through the Operational Plan
· report to the community on their success in achieving these goals
· be assured that their council is meeting planning, consulting and reporting requirements under other laws.

Figure 1 – Integrated Planning and Reporting Framework
Community Engagement Strategy
The Community Engagement Strategy (CES) is a key component of Council’s Integrated Planning and Reporting (IP&R) Framework, that provides structure to guide Council’s individual engagement activities.
While community engagement does not replace the decision-making powers of elected Councillors, it does enhance Councils capacity to make well-informed, sustainable decisions that clearly demonstrate community buy-in and support.
Council’s approach to community engagement is guided by the International Association of Public Participation’s Spectrum of Participation and the Principles of Social Justice. Each engagement approach varies based on need and impact and follows the process outlined below.

Community Participation Plan
The Community Participation Plan (CPP) details how and when the Council will undertake community engagement when exercising its role as a planning authority.
In developing the CPP, Sec 2.23 (2) of the EPA Act requires Council to consider the following elements:
· the community has a right to be informed about planning matters that affect it.
· planning authorities should encourage effective and on-going partnerships with the community to provide meaningful opportunities for community participation in planning.
· planning information should be in plain language, easily accessible and in a form that facilitates community participation in planning.
· the community should be given opportunities to participate in strategic planning as early as possible to enable community views to be genuinely considered.
· community participation should be inclusive and planning authorities should actively seek views that are representative of the community.
· members of the community who are affected by proposed major development should be consulted by the proponent before an application for planning approval is made.
· planning decisions should be made in an open and transparent way and the community should be provided with reasons for those decisions (including how community views have been taken into account).
· community participation methods (and the reasons given for planning decisions) should be appropriate having regard to the significance and likely impact of the proposed development.
Council’s approach to community engagement is guided by the minimum standards outlined in the CPP and the significance and impact of each matter. The CPP provides details of how Council will approach each of the following areas:

While the CPP outlines minimum statutory requirements, Council routinely exceeds these by:
· Extending public exhibition periods for significant developments.
· Expanding notification areas beyond the minimum radius.
· Using signage, media releases, online platforms and direct engagement.
Council has also included the following section regarding Major Development Pathways to provide clarity for the community.
Major Development Pathways
State Significant Development (SSD)
SSD refers to large-scale proposals considered to be of state-level economic, social or environmental importance, such as hospitals, educational facilities or large industrial projects. These are assessed via the NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure (DPHI).
State Significant Infrastructure (SSI)
SSI projects include key infrastructure such as highways, water pipelines, rail corridors and transmission lines. These are assessed by the Minister for Planning or their delegate and follow a streamlined pathway under the EP&A Act.
Council's Role in SSD and SSI
While Council is not the consent authority for SSD/SSI, it still:
· Makes formal submissions in the initial scoping phases and during the exhibition period
· Represents local views to State agencies
· Manages local impacts where relevant
Regionally Significant Development (RSD)
RSDs are assessed by Council staff but determined by the Southern Regional Planning Panel. Examples include:
· Developments over $30 million in value.
· Proposals on Council-owned land.
· Developments with regional impacts (e.g. employment generation, environmental sensitivity).
Council is responsible for exhibition and notification under the CPP, with reports presented to the Panel incorporating public submissions. The CES ensures this process is transparent and accessible.
Community Survey
In February 2024, Council engaged Micromex Research to conduct a Community Research survey in preparation for the development of the Community Strategic Plan.
As part of the engagement residents were surveyed on a range of topics and asked to rate both their level of satisfaction and the relative level of importance. These results were then benchmarked against four comparative regional councils to provide an indication of how Wagga Wagga City Council (WWCC) was performing.
The results include the following two relevant measures:
|
Measure |
Importance |
Satisfaction |
||
|
WWCC |
Var. to bench |
WWCC |
Var. to bench |
|
|
Community input into Council decision making |
85% |
-1% |
74% |
-3% |
|
Provision of Council information to the community |
82% |
-4% |
67% |
-5% |
Respondents were also asked to provide feedback on how Council could improve their communication. The primary improvements included:
· more advertising / informing residents about what is happening
· more direct mail
· more transparency and honesty
· being more responsive
· utilising social media
· being proactive with communication
· providing more consultation opportunities
Both documents have been developed by taking into account the feedback received through the community survey and the consistent feedback from the community regarding the desire for greater transparency and visibility in planning matters.
Financial Implications
There are no financial implications for Council associated with this update.
Policy and Legislation
Sec 402A or the Local Government Act 1993 states “A council must establish and implement a strategy (called its community engagement strategy) for engagement with the local community when developing its plans, policies and programs and for the purpose of determining its activities (other than routine administrative matters)”
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) Sec 2.23 (1) Community participation plans – preparation states “A planning authority to which this Division applies is required to prepare a community participation plan about how and when it will undertake community participation when exercising relevant planning functions”
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) Sec 2.23 (4) Community participation plans – preparation states “A council need not prepare a separate community participation plan if it includes all the matters required under this section in its plan and strategies under the Local Government Act 1993, section 402A”
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Engaged Community
Provide real opportunities for our community to engage.
Risk Management Issues for Council
Regulatory challenge
The draft Community Engagement Strategy (CES) and Community Participation Plan (CPP) addresses the requirements of the Local Government Act 1993, Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, and NSW IP&R Guidelines (2021) relating to legislative compliance and service delivery. Failure to adhere to the CES and the CPP may expose Council to legal or regulatory challenge.
Council reputation
Poorly scoped and conducted engagement activities could damage Council’s reputation, increase complaints and result in service delivery that is inconsistent with the priorities established in the Community Strategic Plan, Wagga Wagga 2050.
Community expectations
The CPP details minimum standards for engagement which may differ to individual community member expectations. Increasing the standard levels of engagement comes at an additional time and cost and may have detrimental impact on activity levels.
Internal / External Consultation
Internal consultation was undertaken with relevant service areas to prepare the draft documents for exhibition.
To ensure transparency and facilitate engagement a community engagement plan has been developed that incorporates the following consultation activities:
· community drop in sessions
· community meetings at villages
· stakeholder workshops with the building and planning industry
· the documents will also be promoted through Council’s social media channels and direct communication channels, such as through Council’s weekly Council News email and publication in the Weekend Advertiser.
· the draft document will be made available on Council’s Have Your Say site
|
|
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
|
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
|
Inform |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
Consult |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
x |
x |
x |
|
x |
x |
x |
x |
|
|
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
|
|
|
1. |
Community Engagement Strategy 2025 - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
2. |
Community Participation Plan 2025 - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-12 |
RP-12 DEVELOPMENT POLICY UPDATES
Author: Cameron Collins
General Manager: Peter Thompson
|
No submissions were received in relation to the three policies.
During the Council meeting held on 25 August 2025, questions were raised regarding the necessity of the provision in Policy POL 045 that requires Councillor representatives or members of the Southern Regional Planning Panel to declare any conflict of interest in Council-related development applications and to refrain from participating in their assessment or determination.
Subject to a further amendment to Policy POL 045 addressing this matter, it is recommended that the policy be adopted.
Adoption of the policies POL 046 and POL 049 as exhibited is recommended.
|
That Council:
a note that no public submissions were received during the exhibition period on the draft Council-related Development Application Conflicts of Interest Management Policy (POL 045), Processing Development Applications Lodged by Councillors, Staff and Individuals Policy (POL 046) and the Swimming Pool Safety Policy (POL 049)
b adopt the draft Council-related Development Application Conflicts of Interest Management Policy (POL 045)
c adopt the draft Processing Development Applications lodged by Councillors, Staff and individuals Policy (POL 046)
d adopt the draft Swimming Pool Safety Policy (POL 049)
Report
As previously reported to Council on 25 August 2025, three planning and development-related policies have been reviewed as part of Council’s scheduled policy review program to ensure they remain current, effective, and compliant with legislative requirements.
Council-related Development Application Conflicts of Interest Management Policy (POL 045)
Policy POL 045 has been updated to clarify its scope and intent in managing conflicts where Council acts as both the applicant and the consent authority. The policy Procedural has been expanded to outline how the General Manager identifies and manages conflict risks across all stages of the development process.
The policy now details risk factors and thresholds that may trigger external assessment or referral to a Planning Panel and management strategies have been outlined for the assessment, determination, and enforcement phases. Exemptions have also been introduced for low-risk development types valued under $5 million, such as internal fit-outs and signage. Legislative references and related policies have been updated to align with current regulatory requirements.
During the Council meeting held on 25 August 2025, questions were raised regarding the necessity of the management control and strategy contained in Policy POL 045 that requires Councillor representatives or members of the Southern Regional Planning Panel to declare a conflict of interest in Council related development applications and to refrain from participating in their assessment or determination. The relevant part of the management control and strategy is contained at page 3 of the draft policy and is highlighted in bold below:
2. Determination
(a) …
(b) Council-related development with a CIV exceeding $5,000,000 shall be determined by the Southern Regional Planning Panel in accordance with the requirements of State Environmental Planning Policy (Planning Systems) 2021. Councillor representatives/members of the Southern Regional Planning Panel shall declare a conflict of interest in the matter and shall not participate in the assessment or determination of the application.
As required under Clause 66A of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, the Policy has been prepared in accordance with the Department’s Council-related Development Application Conflict of Interest Guidelines. These guidelines do not include any requirement for a Councillor representative member (or other Council representative member) to declare a conflict of interest in Council related development applications that are to be determined by a Regional Planning Panel.
Furthermore, the Sydney District and Regional Planning Panels Operational Procedures (Sydney District and Regional Planning Panels Operational Procedures – September 2022) do not automatically exclude Councillor representative members (or other Council representative members) from participating in the determination of such applications. Rather, the procedures require each member to consider if they have an actual, potential or reasonably perceived conflict and, if so, declare the conflict and take any appropriate action.
This particular provision of the Policy requiring Councillor representatives/members to not participate in the assessment or determination of the application was originally discussed in a Councillor workshop (on 29/5/2023) prior to the final adoption of the original Policy in August 2023. On this basis, it appears that the inclusion of the clause was a deliberate decision of the Council at the time, likely intended as an additional provision to remove any perceived conflict of interest.
Noting that:
1. There is no requirement under the Department’s Council-related Development Application Conflict of Interest Guidelines for the policy to include any requirement for a Councillor representative member (or other Council representative member) to declare a conflict of interest in Council related development applications that are to be determined by a Regional Planning Panel; and
2. Procedural requirements for declarations of interest in Planning Panel applications are already established under the Sydney District and Regional Planning Panels Operational Procedures;
It is recommended that Council adopt the Council-related Development Application Conflicts of Interest Management Policy (POL 045) as exhibited, subject to an amendment to delete the management control and strategy requiring that Councillor representatives or members of the Southern Regional Planning Panel declare a conflict of interest for any Council-related development applications and not participate in the assessment or determination of such applications. This amendment removes the existing provision in the policy that prevents Councillor representatives or members from participating in the assessment and determination of Council-related development applications.
Processing Development Applications lodged by Councillors, Staff and Individuals Policy (POL 046)
Policy POL 046 has been updated to clarify development application processing responsibilities based on the applicant’s relationship to Council, including staff, relatives, Councillors, and the General Manager. The policy now recognises the mandatory conflict of interest declarations via the NSW Planning Portal in relation to both the applicant and the landowner and the responsibility of staff with respect to these declarations to determine the applicability of this policy.
The policy also continues to specify delegation levels for determining applications, depending on the applicant’s position and the potential for conflict of interest. However, minor amendments have been made to clarify the delegations of the General manger and senior staff for determining certain applications under this policy.
This amended policy was publicly exhibited from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 with an invitation for public submissions until 6 October 2025. No submissions were received.
It is recommended that the policy as exhibited be adopted.
Swimming Pool Safety Policy (POL 049)
Policy POL 049 has been updated to clarify upgrade requirements for older pools so as to comply with AS 1926.1–2012. The scope of the policy has also been amended to clarify specific exclusions for Crown land and properties owned or managed by public authorities. Detailed responsibilities have also been added to outline Council’s role in inspection, certification, and enforcement activities.
New sections have been introduced to address requirements for new swimming pools, including fencing, registration, and occupation certificates; standards for existing pool barriers and historical exemptions; and processes related to water quality, water disposal, fencing setbacks, and exemptions.
The policy also outlines Council’s responsibilities in administering the state-wide pool registration system and conducting compliance audits. Legislation and standards have been updated to reference multiple versions of AS 1926 and other relevant codes.
This amended policy was publicly exhibited from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 with an invitation for public submissions until 6 October 2025. No submissions were received.
It is recommended that the policy as exhibited be adopted.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
- Local Government Act 1993
- Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- Swimming Pool Act 1992
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Ethical Leadership
Provide strategic direction and leadership for our region to deliver key community priorities.
Risk Management Issues for Council
Council policies are essential to ensure transparent, legal, fair and consistent decision making across the Council. They support Council in achieving its corporate objectives and provide a critical guide for staff, councillors and other stakeholders. In the absence of effective policies there is a greater risk of inconsistency, confusion and inefficiency and can lead to non-compliance with the requirements of legislation and regulations.
Internal / External Consultation
Public exhibition was for a period of 28 days from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 and invite public submissions until 6 October 2025 on the draft Policies, with no submissions received during this period.
Community engagement during the exhibition period included:
· The draft policy was made available on Council’s website for the duration of the exhibition period.
· A public notice was published in Council News and through the required formal advertisements in accordance with legislative requirements.
|
· |
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
|
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
|
Inform |
|
|
|
× |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
× |
|
Consult |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
|
1⇩. |
Marked-Up - Development Application Conflicts of Interest Management Policy (POL 045) |
|
|
2⇩. |
Development Application Conflicts of Interest Management Policy (POL 045) |
|
|
3⇩. |
Processing Development Applications Lodged by Councillors, Staff and Individuals Policy (POL 046) |
|
|
4⇩. |
Swimming Pool Safety Policy (POL 049) |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-13 |
RP-13 WAGGA WAGGA CEMETERIES POLICY
Author: Henry Pavitt
|
Summary: |
The draft Wagga Wagga Cemeteries Policy (POL 039) was publicly exhibited from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 and invite public submissions until 6 October 2025. No submissions were received. Adoption of the policy as exhibited is recommended. |
That Council:
a note no public submissions were received during the exhibition period on the draft Wagga Wagga Cemeteries Policy (POL 039)
b adopt the draft Wagga Wagga Cemeteries Policy (POL 039)
Report
As previously reported to Council on 25 August 2025, the Wagga Wagga Cemeteries Policy has been reviewed as part of Council’s scheduled policy review program to ensure it remains legislatively compliant, operationally effective, and aligned with current statutory requirements.
The policy has been updated to incorporate recent amendments to the Cemeteries and Crematoria Act 2013 and Regulation 2022, including the addition of Council’s cemetery operator licence details, expanded funeral booking procedures, and enhanced recognition of religious and cultural practices. It also refines burial site selection processes, introduces detailed procedures for the interment and scattering of ashes, and expands cremation procedures to clarify documentation requirements, medical responsibilities, and prohibited coffin contents.
The policy further updates memorial and tribute guidelines, includes provisions on natural burials, introduces new requirements for exhumations and removal of cremated ashes, and updates legislative references to reflect current regulatory instruments. Most changes clarify existing practices and are expected to have minimal impact on the community.
Accordingly, it is recommended that Council adopt the draft Wagga Wagga Cemeteries Policy (POL 039) as exhibited.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
- Wagga Wagga Cemeteries Policy (POL 039)
- Cemeteries and Crematoria Act 2013
- Cemeteries and Crematoria Regulation 2022
- Local Government Act 1993
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Ethical Leadership
Provide strategic direction and leadership for our region to deliver key community priorities.
Risk Management Issues for Council
Council policies are essential to ensure transparent, legal, fair and consistent decision making across the Council. They support Council in achieving its corporate objectives and provide a critical guide for staff, councillors and other stakeholders. In the absence of effective policies there is a greater risk of inconsistency, confusion and inefficiency and can lead to non-compliance with the requirements of legislation and regulations.
Internal / External Consultation
Public exhibition was for a period of 28 days from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 and invite public submissions until 6 October 2025 on the draft Policies, with no submissions received during this period.
Community engagement during the exhibition period included:
· The draft policy was made available on Council’s website for the duration of the exhibition period.
· A public notice was published in Council News and through the required formal advertisements in accordance with legislative requirements.
· Notification of policy circulated within the local industry.
|
· |
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
|
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
|
Inform |
|
x |
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
|
Consult |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
|
1⇩. |
Wagga Wagga Cemeteries Policy |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-14 |
RP-14 WORK HEALTH, SAFETY WELLBEING POLICY
Author: Fiona Piltz
|
Summary: |
The draft Work Health, Safety Wellbeing Policy (POL 080) was publicly exhibited from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 and invite public submissions until 6 October 2025. Two submissions were received. Adoption of the policy as exhibited is recommended. |
That Council:
a note two public submissions were received during the exhibition period on the draft Work Health, Safety Wellbeing Policy (POL 080)
b adopt the draft Work Health, Safety Wellbeing Policy (POL 080)
Report
The policy has been comprehensively updated to reflect a holistic approach encompassing physical and psychological health, with the title amended accordingly and operational responsibility transferred to the People and Culture division. Key changes include a strengthened commitment statement aligned with ISO 45001, expanded objectives on consultation, training, and injury management, and clearly defined roles and responsibilities for all organisational levels.
The policy now incorporates a structured WHS Management System aligned with WHS legislation and ISO 45001, introduces behavioural and operational expectations with consequences for non-compliance, and updates references to current legislation and the Local Government (State) Award 2025. The document has also been reformatted and reworded for clarity, consistency, and alignment with Council’s current policy standards.
Council received two submissions during this period (Attachment 1). A summary of the points raised in the submissions is provided below.
|
Submission Summary |
Comment |
|
Suggestion that the WHS Policy be updated to include explicit reference to volunteers. The respondent noted that volunteers are not currently mentioned alongside workers, councillors, and visitors, and proposed that volunteers be afforded the same considerations and responsibilities outlined for councillors. |
The suggestion to include volunteers as a separate category in the Work Health and Safety Policy is not being adopted. Under the Work Health and Safety Act and Regulations, volunteers are regarded as workers when undertaking unpaid activities for Council. As such, their health and safety are already covered under the existing provisions for workers within the Policy. |
|
Formatting and spelling |
Spelling and formatting updated as provided in submission |
Accordingly, it is recommended that Council adopt the adopt the draft Work Health, Safety Wellbeing Policy (POL 080) as exhibited.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
Local Government (State) Award 2025
Occupational Health and Safety (OH&S) management systems
Work Health and Safety Act 2011
Work Health and Safety Regulation 2017
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Engaged Community
Deliver timely, clear and accessible sharing of information with our community.
Risk Management Issues for Council
Council policies are essential to ensure transparent, legal, fair and consistent decision making across the Council. They support Council in achieving its corporate objectives and provide a critical guide for staff, councillors and other stakeholders. In the absence of effective policies there is a greater risk of inconsistency, confusion and inefficiency and can lead to non-compliance with the requirements of legislation and regulations.
Internal / External Consultation
Public exhibition was for a period of 28 days from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 and invite public submissions until 6 October 2025 on the draft Policies, with no submissions received during this period.
Community engagement during the exhibition period included:
· The draft policy was made available on Council’s website for the duration of the exhibition period.
· A public notice was published in Council News and through the required formal advertisements in accordance with legislative requirements.
|
· |
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
|
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
|
Inform |
|
|
|
× |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
× |
|
Consult |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Involve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
Collaborate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other methods (please list specific details below) |
|
1⇩. |
Work Health, Safety Wellbeing Policy (POL 080) |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-15 |
RP-15 MEDIA AND SOCIAL MEDIA POLICY
Author: Michael Casey
Executive: Scott Gray
|
Summary: |
The draft Media Policy (POL 090) and the draft Social Media Policy (POL 065) was publicly exhibited from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 and invite public submissions until 6 October 2025. No submissions were received. Adoption of the policy as exhibited is recommended. |
That Council:
a note that no public submissions were received during the exhibition period of the draft Media Policy (POL 090) and draft Social Media Policy (POL 065)
b adopt the draft Media Policy (POL 090)
c adopt the draft Social Media Policy (POL 065)
Report
As previously reported to Council on 25 August 2025, a review was undertaken of the Media Policy (POL 090) and a new Social Media Policy (POL 065) was developed in line with the NSW Office of Local Government’s Model Media and Social Media Policies.
The Media Policy has been updated to remove all social media provisions, clarify spokesperson roles, reinforce requirements for accurate and consistent information, and outline protocols for issuing official statements.
The new Social Media Policy establishes a clear framework for Council’s social media use, including authorised users, moderation and security protocols, behavioural standards linked to the Code of Conduct, guidance for Councillors in both official and personal capacities, and procedures for managing content, blocking and banning.
At this meeting Council resolved to place the draft policies on public exhibition for a period of 28 days from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 and invite public submissions until 6 October 2025. No submissions were received during the exhibition period.
Accordingly, it is recommended that Council adopt the draft Media Policy (POL 090) and the draft Social Media Policy (POL 065) as exhibited.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
Local Government Act 1993 (NSW)
Model Code of Conduct for Local Councils in NSW
Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009
State Records Act 1998
Privacy and Personal Information Protection Act 1998
NSW OLG Model Media Policy (2022)
NSW OLG Model Social Media Policy (2022)
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Good governance
Provide professional, innovative, accessible and efficient services.
Risk Management Issues for Council
The adoption of updated and dedicated media and social media policies helps reduce reputational, legal and operational risks by ensuring that only authorised representatives comment publicly on Council matters, clarifying behavioural standards for all Council officials and staff, establishing consistent moderation procedures for public interactions and aligning communication practices with contemporary standards and public expectations.
Internal / External Consultation
Public exhibition was for a period of 28 days from 26 August 2025 until 23 September 2025 and invite public submissions until 6 October 2025 on the draft Policies, no submissions were received during the exhibition period.
Community engagement during the exhibition period included:
· The draft policy was made available on Council’s website for the duration of the exhibition period.
· Social media post (FB and Instagram) 12 September
· Listed in the print Council News “Have your say” ad 6, 13, 20 September
· Listed in Council News email 30 August, and 6, 13, 20 & 27 September, and 4 October.
|
|
|
Traditional Media |
Community Engagement |
Digital |
||||||||||||
|
Rates notices insert |
Direct mail |
Letterbox drop |
Council news |
Media release |
Media opportunity |
TV/radio advertising |
One-on-one meeting(s) |
Community meeting(s) |
Stakeholder workshop(s) |
Drop-in session(s) |
Survey/feedback form(s) |
Have your Say |
Email newsletter |
Social media |
Website |
|
|
Inform |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consult |
|
|
|
x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
x |
|||
|
1⇩. |
Social Media Policy (POL 065) |
|
|
2⇩. |
Media Policy (POL 090) |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-16 |
RP-16 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE REPORT AS AT 30 SEPTEMBER 2025
Author: Carolyn Rodney
|
Summary: |
This report is for Council to consider information presented on the 2025/26 budget and Long-Term Financial Plan, and details Council’s external investments and performance as at 30 September 2025. |
That Council:
a approve the proposed budget variations and note the balanced budget position as presented in this report
b approve the proposed budget variations to the Long Term Financial Plan Capital Works Program including new projects and timing adjustments
c note the Responsible Accounting Officer’s reports, in accordance with the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021 (Part 9 Division 3: Clause 203) that the financial position of Council is satisfactory having regard to the original estimates of income and expenditure and the recommendations made above
d note the details of the external investments as at 30 September 2025 in accordance with section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993
e adjust the sale price of the Gregadoo Waste Management Centre compactor down from the previously reported $200,000 trade in price advised at the 5 June 2023 Council meeting
Report
Wagga Wagga City Council (Council) forecasts a balanced budget position as of 30 September 2025.
Proposed budget variations including adjustments to the capital works program are detailed in this report for Council’s consideration and adoption.
Council has experienced a positive monthly investment performance for the month of September when compared to budget ($360,970 up on the monthly budget). This is mainly due to better than budgeted returns on Council’s investment portfolio, as well as a higher than anticipated investment portfolio balance – which is partly due to Council receiving upfront payment of $48.5M in funding under the Accelerated Infrastructure Fund in June 2024.
Key Performance Indicators

OPERATING INCOME
Total operating income is 25% of approved budget which is on track to budget for the month of September 2025. An adjustment has been made to reflect the levy of rates that occurred at the start of the financial year. Excluding this adjustment, operating income received is 67% when compared to budget.
OPERATING EXPENSES
Total operating expenditure is 30% of approved budget and is tracking over budget at this stage of the financial year. This is in relation to commitments that have been raised in the 1st quarter of 2025 for the full 2025/26 financial year.
CAPITAL INCOME
Total capital income is 93% of approved budget, which is mainly attributed to the Accelerated Infrastructure Fund (AIF) grant funding that has been received. This income will be reduced and carried over to next financial year for completion of the project in line with the project budget.
It is important to note that the actual income from capital is influenced by the timing of the receipt of capital grants and contributions in relation to expenditure and milestones incurred on grant funded projects.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
Total capital expenditure including commitments is 17% of approved budget. Excluding commitments, the total expenditure is 8% when compared to the approved budget. There will be a Capital Project Budget Reset Report presented to Council which will adjust/reduce the current project budgets for the 2025/26 financial year.


2025/26 Revised Budget Result – (Surplus) / Deficit |
$’000s |
|
Original 2025/26 Budget Result as adopted by Council Total Budget Variations approved to date Budget Variations for September 2025 |
$0K $0K $0K |
|
Proposed Revised Budget result for 30 September 2025 - (Surplus) / Deficit |
$0K |
The proposed Operating and Capital Budget Variations for 30 September 2025 which affect the current 2025/26 financial year are listed below.
|
Budget Variation |
Amount |
Funding Source |
Net Impact (Fav)/ Unfav |
|
|
2 - Sustainable |
|
|||
|
Bushfire Hazard Mitigation |
$86K |
Rural Fire Service (RFS) Grant Funding ($86K) |
Nil |
|
|
Council has been successful in securing funds from the RFS for Bushfire Hazard Mitigation. These funds will allow Council Officers to undertake Asset Protection Zone Maintenance at 16 locations for fire trail maintenance. Estimated Completion: 30 June 2026 Job Consolidation: 16639 |
|
|||
|
3 - Growing |
|
|||
|
Pavement Rehabilitation Heavy Patching Urban Asphalt |
$1,779K |
Civil Infrastructure Reserve ($1,175K) Kerb & Gutter Replacement ($604K) |
Nil |
|
|
The 2025/26 Reseal and Rehabilitation Programs have a substantial volume of Kerb & Gutter works scheduled across multiple sites. Additional funds of $1,175K are required for Kerb & Gutter Replacement as these works are critical to maintaining Council’s road and drainage infrastructure, ensuring community safety, effective stormwater management, and prolonging the life of road pavements. It is proposed to fund the variation from the Civil Infrastructure Reserve. The existing Kerb & Gutter Replacement budget of $604K along with the additional funds from the reserve will be distributed across all Pavement Rehabilitation, Heavy Patching & Urban Asphalt budgets in 2025/26 and will be used for Kerb & Gutter works at the specific locations. Estimated Completion: 30 June 2026 Job Consolidation: 16532, 30044 & 16531. |
|
|||
|
Washout Bay Construction |
$150K |
Sewer Reserve ($75K) Stormwater Maintenance ($75K) |
Nil |
|
|
Funds are required for the construction of a Washout Bay for Council’s Combo Jetter Truck. In the past Council have used a drying bed with an overflow into the stormwater system for materials collected by Council’s high pressure Combo Jetter Truck. A dedicated concrete pad and solid separation system is proposed for construction at Council’s Alan Turner Depot to ensure industry standards are met. The funding of the variation is to be split between the Solid Waste Reserve and existing Stormwater Maintenance budgets. Estimated Completion: 30 June 2026 Job Consolidation: 24870 |
|
|||
|
LMC Pump Replacement |
$40K |
LMC Reserve ($40K) |
Nil |
|
|
The Livestock Marketing Centre (LMC) utilises two variable speed pumps to supply recycled water to the site for wash down activities on a weekly basis to meet Biosecurity and EPA requirements and maintain service delivery. The pumps are rapidly approaching end of life with recent failures in the units. Replacement is required to ensure compliance is maintained for the business. It is proposed to fund the variation from the LMC Reserve. Estimated Completion: 30 June 2026 Job Number: 45013 |
|
|||
|
LMC Consultancy |
$100K |
LMC Reserve ($100K) |
Nil |
|
|
Funds are required to improve systems and procedures at the Livestock Marketing Centre (LMC) to ensure operational sustainability and compliance. The processes to be reviewed include the maintenance work order system, gap analysis of policies and procedures, process mapping of critical processes at LMC, sales and euthanasia. It is proposed to fund the variation from the LMC Reserve. Estimated Completion: 30 June 2026 Job Number: 11 45000 7230 |
|
|||
|
4 – Vibrant |
|
|||
|
Soil Bay Construction |
$25K |
Parks & Recreation Reserve ($25K) |
Nil |
|
|
Funds are required for the construction of a Soil Bay at the Equex Centre. The Soil Bay is required to ensure that Council has adequate amounts of Portland Soil, that is used to maintain 6 wicket tables across the Local Government Area. Council’s current supplier is ceasing trade over the next 12 months so it is proposed to construct the Soil Bay and purchase a considerable amount to guarantee supply (the purchase of the soil will be funded from existing operational budgets). The soil must stay dry and be stored correctly. This will ensure that Council has enough to maintain the wicket tables to an appropriate standard and also allows time to develop a plan to start changing the wickets to a new and readily available soil. It is proposed to fund the variation from the Parks & Recreation Reserve. Estimated Completion: 30 June 2026 Job Consolidation: 24871 |
|
|||
2025/26 Capital Works Summary
|
Approved Budget |
Proposed Movement^ |
Proposed Budget |
|
|
One-off |
$108,950,904 |
$215,000 |
$109,165,904 |
|
Recurrent |
$35,291,788* |
$1,175,195 |
$36,466,983 |
|
Total Capital Works |
$144,242,692 |
$1,390,195 |
$145,632,887 |
*During a review that was undertaken by Council Officers it was deemed that an item under job consolidation 23110 Library Acquisitions was deemed operating and not capital. This has resulted in a reduction of $37,982 to the Recurrent Capital Works budget.
^The budget adjustments included in the ‘Proposed Movement’ column relate to the proposed budget adjustments in this report only, and do not include the budget adjustments that have been proposed in the Capital Works Program Reset report being presented at the same meeting.
Gregadoo Waste Management Centre Compactor
Council at its 5 June 2023 Council meeting resolved:

After the 5 June 2023 Council meeting, staff at the time determined that there was a preference to hold the older landfill compactor due to previous lag time experienced when staff had to hire an alternative compactor when the compactor was out of service. A recent review has determined that a different type of unit can be hired when required that is more readily available and does not have the lag time. It is now appropriate to sell the older compactor.
The reason for presenting this back to Council is that the resolution noted the trade in price of $200,000. The market price for the compactor has since decreased as the trade in offer was almost two years ago. Staff are in the process of securing a buyer through an auction house, with the final sale price representing today’s market value.
Current Restrictions
Investment Summary as at 30 September 2025
In accordance with Regulation 212 of the Local Government (General) Regulation 2021, details of Wagga Wagga City Council’s external investments are outlined below.
|
Institution |
Rating |
Closing
Balance |
Closing
Balance |
September
EOM |
September |
Investment |
Maturity |
Term |
|
At Call Accounts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NAB |
AA- |
135,355 |
49,909 |
3.60% |
0.02% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
CBA |
AA- |
21,916,684 |
22,038,949 |
3.60% |
7.10% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
CBA |
AA- |
14,140,224 |
14,185,221 |
3.65% |
4.57% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Macquarie Bank |
A+ |
10,186,070 |
10,217,122 |
3.40% |
3.29% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
CBA |
AA- |
49,930,484 |
49,903,197 |
3.60% |
16.07% |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
|
Total At Call Accounts |
|
96,308,816 |
96,394,397 |
3.59% |
31.05% |
|
|
|
|
Short Term Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMP |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
16/12/2024 |
16/09/2025 |
9 |
|
Bank of Sydney |
NR |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.22% |
0.64% |
30/06/2025 |
30/06/2026 |
12 |
|
ICBC |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.32% |
14/11/2024 |
14/11/2025 |
12 |
|
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.11% |
0.64% |
28/11/2024 |
28/11/2025 |
12 |
|
MyState |
BBB |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.64% |
29/11/2024 |
29/11/2025 |
12 |
|
MyState |
BBB |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.15% |
0.32% |
4/12/2024 |
4/12/2025 |
12 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.80% |
0.32% |
26/02/2025 |
26/02/2026 |
12 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.32% |
7/03/2025 |
9/03/2026 |
12 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.00% |
0.64% |
10/03/2025 |
10/03/2026 |
12 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.00% |
0.64% |
17/03/2025 |
17/03/2026 |
12 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.50% |
0.32% |
2/06/2025 |
2/06/2026 |
12 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.30% |
0.64% |
25/06/2025 |
25/06/2026 |
12 |
|
ICBC |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.24% |
0.32% |
10/07/2025 |
10/07/2026 |
12 |
|
Bank of Sydney |
NR |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.17% |
0.64% |
18/08/2025 |
18/08/2026 |
12 |
|
Total Short Term Deposits |
|
22,000,000 |
20,000,000 |
4.74% |
6.44% |
|
|
|
|
Medium Term Deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.32% |
0.64% |
28/06/2021 |
29/06/2026 |
60 |
|
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.80% |
0.64% |
15/11/2021 |
17/11/2025 |
48 |
|
ICBC |
A |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
5.07% |
0.97% |
30/06/2022 |
30/06/2027 |
60 |
|
BoQ |
A- |
1,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
7/09/2020 |
8/09/2025 |
60 |
|
BoQ |
A- |
2,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
14/09/2020 |
15/09/2025 |
60 |
|
ICBC |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.20% |
0.32% |
7/12/2020 |
8/12/2025 |
60 |
|
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
0.95% |
0.64% |
29/01/2021 |
29/01/2026 |
60 |
|
NAB |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.08% |
0.32% |
22/02/2021 |
20/02/2026 |
60 |
|
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.25% |
0.64% |
3/03/2021 |
2/03/2026 |
60 |
|
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.40% |
0.64% |
21/06/2021 |
19/06/2026 |
60 |
|
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.32% |
0.64% |
25/06/2021 |
25/06/2026 |
60 |
|
ICBC |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.32% |
0.32% |
25/08/2021 |
25/08/2026 |
60 |
|
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.90% |
0.64% |
11/03/2024 |
11/03/2026 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.11% |
0.32% |
23/05/2024 |
25/05/2026 |
24 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.06% |
0.64% |
2/09/2025 |
4/09/2028 |
36 |
|
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
0 |
0.00% |
0.00% |
9/09/2022 |
9/09/2025 |
36 |
|
ICBC |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.64% |
21/10/2022 |
21/10/2025 |
36 |
|
AMP |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.80% |
0.32% |
21/11/2022 |
20/11/2025 |
36 |
|
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.85% |
0.64% |
16/12/2024 |
16/12/2026 |
24 |
|
Police Credit Union |
NR |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.75% |
0.64% |
17/02/2025 |
17/02/2027 |
24 |
|
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.00% |
0.64% |
14/03/2023 |
15/03/2027 |
48 |
|
Auswide |
BBB |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.95% |
0.64% |
13/04/2023 |
13/04/2026 |
36 |
|
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.64% |
20/04/2023 |
20/04/2027 |
48 |
|
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.32% |
26/05/2023 |
26/05/2026 |
36 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.38% |
0.64% |
28/06/2024 |
28/06/2029 |
60 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.90% |
0.32% |
29/11/2024 |
29/11/2026 |
24 |
|
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.45% |
0.32% |
30/11/2023 |
28/11/2025 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.64% |
14/12/2023 |
15/12/2025 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.14% |
0.64% |
3/01/2024 |
5/01/2026 |
24 |
|
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.64% |
4/01/2024 |
4/01/2027 |
36 |
|
Suncorp |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.08% |
0.32% |
8/01/2024 |
8/01/2026 |
24 |
|
Australian Unity |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.93% |
0.32% |
7/03/2024 |
9/03/2026 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.64% |
23/04/2024 |
24/04/2028 |
48 |
|
NAB |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.10% |
0.64% |
6/05/2024 |
6/05/2026 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.12% |
0.32% |
24/05/2024 |
24/05/2027 |
36 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.26% |
0.32% |
31/05/2024 |
31/05/2028 |
48 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.24% |
0.32% |
3/06/2025 |
4/06/2029 |
48 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.26% |
0.64% |
6/06/2024 |
6/06/2028 |
48 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.32% |
11/06/2024 |
11/06/2026 |
24 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.20% |
0.64% |
11/06/2024 |
11/06/2026 |
24 |
|
BankVic |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.00% |
0.64% |
26/06/2025 |
26/06/2028 |
36 |
|
BankVic |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.65% |
0.64% |
27/08/2024 |
27/08/2026 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.63% |
0.64% |
30/08/2024 |
30/08/2026 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.51% |
0.32% |
16/09/2024 |
18/09/2028 |
48 |
|
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.45% |
0.64% |
27/09/2024 |
28/09/2026 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.45% |
0.64% |
17/10/2024 |
19/10/2026 |
24 |
|
Westpac |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.70% |
0.32% |
8/10/2024 |
8/10/2026 |
24 |
|
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.73% |
0.64% |
21/10/2024 |
21/10/2027 |
36 |
|
Hume Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.95% |
0.64% |
7/11/2024 |
7/11/2026 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.02% |
0.64% |
14/11/2024 |
16/11/2026 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
5.00% |
0.32% |
27/11/2024 |
27/11/2026 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
5.07% |
0.64% |
28/11/2024 |
28/11/2028 |
48 |
|
P&N Bank |
BBB+ |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
4.85% |
0.97% |
16/12/2024 |
16/12/2027 |
36 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.80% |
0.64% |
21/01/2025 |
21/01/2028 |
36 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.82% |
0.32% |
30/01/2025 |
29/01/2027 |
24 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.73% |
0.64% |
10/02/2025 |
10/02/2028 |
36 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.79% |
0.32% |
4/02/2025 |
4/02/2028 |
36 |
|
Regional Australia Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.71% |
0.64% |
12/02/2025 |
12/02/2027 |
24 |
|
Hume Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.75% |
0.64% |
12/02/2025 |
12/02/2029 |
48 |
|
Westpac |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.70% |
0.64% |
12/02/2025 |
14/02/2028 |
36 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.77% |
0.32% |
26/02/2025 |
28/02/2028 |
36 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.62% |
0.64% |
3/03/2025 |
3/03/2028 |
36 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.65% |
0.64% |
14/03/2025 |
15/03/2027 |
24 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.65% |
0.64% |
31/03/2025 |
31/03/2027 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.81% |
0.32% |
1/04/2025 |
1/04/2030 |
60 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.25% |
0.64% |
5/05/2025 |
5/05/2027 |
24 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.25% |
0.32% |
29/05/2025 |
31/05/2027 |
24 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.15% |
0.64% |
25/06/2025 |
25/06/2027 |
24 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.15% |
0.64% |
2/07/2025 |
2/07/2027 |
24 |
|
State Bank of India |
BBB- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.05% |
0.32% |
7/07/2025 |
7/07/2027 |
24 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.18% |
0.64% |
8/07/2025 |
9/07/2029 |
48 |
|
Regional Australia Bank |
BBB+ |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.00% |
0.32% |
30/07/2025 |
30/07/2027 |
24 |
|
Westpac |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
4.00% |
0.32% |
12/08/2025 |
14/08/2028 |
36 |
|
Arab Bank Australia |
NR |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
3.95% |
0.64% |
22/08/2025 |
24/08/2027 |
24 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
4.05% |
0.64% |
27/08/2025 |
27/08/2027 |
24 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
4.07% |
0.97% |
29/08/2025 |
29/08/2028 |
36 |
|
Police Credit Union |
NR |
0 |
1,000,000 |
4.06% |
0.32% |
8/09/2025 |
8/09/2027 |
24 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
0 |
1,000,000 |
4.08% |
0.32% |
9/09/2025 |
11/09/2028 |
36 |
|
BankVic |
BBB+ |
0 |
2,000,000 |
4.09% |
0.64% |
15/09/2025 |
15/09/2028 |
36 |
|
Australian Military Bank |
BBB+ |
0 |
2,000,000 |
4.05% |
0.64% |
16/09/2025 |
16/09/2027 |
24 |
|
Total Medium Term Deposits |
|
128,000,000 |
130,000,000 |
4.31% |
41.87% |
|
|
|
|
Floating Rate Notes - Senior Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newcastle Permanent |
BBB+ |
1,005,006 |
1,009,893 |
BBSW + 100 |
0.33% |
10/02/2022 |
10/02/2027 |
60 |
|
NAB |
AA- |
2,536,870 |
2,547,437 |
BBSW + 120 |
0.82% |
25/11/2022 |
25/11/2027 |
60 |
|
Suncorp |
AA- |
1,126,171 |
1,117,862 |
BBSW + 125 |
0.36% |
14/12/2022 |
14/12/2027 |
60 |
|
CBA |
AA- |
2,039,151 |
2,048,195 |
BBSW + 115 |
0.66% |
13/01/2023 |
13/01/2028 |
60 |
|
Bank Australia |
BBB+ |
1,919,471 |
1,928,435 |
BBSW + 155 |
0.62% |
22/02/2023 |
22/02/2027 |
48 |
|
Bendigo-Adelaide Covered |
AAA |
1,022,883 |
1,015,057 |
BBSW + 115 |
0.33% |
16/06/2023 |
16/06/2028 |
60 |
|
CBA |
AA- |
2,526,993 |
2,538,465 |
BBSW + 95 |
0.82% |
17/08/2023 |
17/08/2028 |
60 |
|
ANZ |
AA- |
2,139,476 |
2,124,309 |
BBSW + 93 |
0.68% |
11/09/2023 |
11/09/2028 |
60 |
|
Bank Australia |
BBB+ |
1,668,902 |
1,676,713 |
BBSW + 150 |
0.54% |
30/10/2023 |
30/10/2026 |
36 |
|
ANZ |
AA- |
2,531,576 |
2,543,763 |
BBSW + 96 |
0.82% |
5/02/2024 |
5/02/2029 |
60 |
|
Suncorp |
AA- |
1,016,891 |
1,010,449 |
BBSW + 98 |
0.33% |
19/03/2024 |
19/03/2029 |
60 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
507,427 |
503,617 |
BBSW + 95 |
0.16% |
22/03/2024 |
22/03/2027 |
36 |
|
BoQ |
A- |
1,679,007 |
1,688,676 |
BBSW + 128 |
0.54% |
30/04/2024 |
30/04/2029 |
60 |
|
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
806,608 |
809,950 |
BBSW + 100 |
0.26% |
14/05/2024 |
14/05/2027 |
36 |
|
ANZ |
AA- |
1,522,757 |
1,512,835 |
BBSW + 86 |
0.49% |
18/06/2024 |
18/06/2029 |
60 |
|
Teachers Mutual |
BBB+ |
916,438 |
909,842 |
BBSW + 130 |
0.29% |
21/06/2024 |
21/06/2027 |
36 |
|
ING Bank |
A |
2,220,801 |
2,232,178 |
BBSW + 102 |
0.72% |
20/08/2024 |
20/08/2029 |
60 |
|
CBA |
AA- |
1,511,287 |
1,518,915 |
BBSW + 87 |
0.49% |
22/08/2024 |
22/08/2029 |
60 |
|
Suncorp |
AA- |
2,431,153 |
2,416,693 |
BBSW + 92 |
0.78% |
27/09/2024 |
27/09/2029 |
60 |
|
Bendigo-Adelaide |
A- |
757,268 |
761,211 |
BBSW + 96 |
0.25% |
24/10/2024 |
24/10/2028 |
48 |
|
ANZ |
AA- |
1,306,940 |
1,313,229 |
BBSW + 81 |
0.42% |
18/02/2025 |
18/02/2030 |
60 |
|
Rabobank |
A+ |
1,304,806 |
1,311,163 |
BBSW + 85 |
0.42% |
20/02/2025 |
20/02/2030 |
60 |
|
The Bank of Nova Scotia |
A+ |
2,029,205 |
2,017,028 |
BBSW + 140 |
0.65% |
21/03/2025 |
21/03/2030 |
60 |
|
Suncorp |
AA- |
1,005,858 |
1,011,524 |
BBSW + 93 |
0.33% |
21/05/2025 |
21/05/2030 |
60 |
|
Macquarie Bank |
A+ |
1,409,169 |
1,417,446 |
BBSW + 82 |
0.46% |
17/07/2025 |
17/07/2030 |
60 |
|
Total Floating Rate Notes - Senior Debt |
|
38,942,113 |
38,984,884 |
|
12.10% |
|
|
|
|
Fixed Rate Bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ING Covered |
AAA |
731,167 |
732,763 |
1.10% |
0.24% |
19/08/2021 |
19/08/2026 |
60 |
|
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
3,000,000 |
3,000,000 |
1.50% |
0.97% |
24/08/2021 |
15/12/2026 |
64 |
|
BoQ |
A- |
1,871,898 |
1,875,825 |
2.10% |
0.60% |
27/10/2021 |
27/10/2026 |
60 |
|
BoQ |
A- |
2,097,975 |
2,097,027 |
5.30% |
0.68% |
30/04/2024 |
30/04/2029 |
60 |
|
ANZ |
AA- |
1,224,884 |
1,223,435 |
4.65% |
0.39% |
18/02/2025 |
18/02/2030 |
60 |
|
The Bank of Nova Scotia |
A+ |
2,081,076 |
2,031,241 |
5.23% |
0.65% |
21/03/2025 |
21/03/2030 |
60 |
|
Macquarie Bank |
A+ |
1,714,876 |
1,712,203 |
4.37% |
0.55% |
17/07/2025 |
17/07/2030 |
60 |
|
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.50% |
0.64% |
6/08/2021 |
15/12/2026 |
64 |
|
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.50% |
0.32% |
14/07/2021 |
15/12/2026 |
65 |
|
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.30% |
0.64% |
29/04/2021 |
15/06/2026 |
61 |
|
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.00% |
0.64% |
30/11/2020 |
15/12/2025 |
60 |
|
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
1,000,000 |
1,000,000 |
1.00% |
0.32% |
20/11/2020 |
15/12/2025 |
61 |
|
Northern Territory Treasury |
AA- |
2,000,000 |
2,000,000 |
1.00% |
0.64% |
21/10/2020 |
15/12/2025 |
62 |
|
Total Fixed Rate Bonds |
|
22,721,875 |
22,672,495 |
2.48% |
7.30% |
|
|
|
|
Managed Funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NSW Tcorp |
NR |
2,386,153 |
2,427,732 |
1.74% |
0.78% |
17/03/2014 |
1/09/2030 |
197 |
|
Total Managed Funds |
|
2,386,153 |
2,427,732 |
1.74% |
0.78% |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL CASH ASSETS, CASH |
|
310,358,958 |
310,479,508 |
|
100.00% |
|
|
|
Council’s investment portfolio is dominated by Term Deposits, equating to approximately 48% of the portfolio across a broad range of counterparties. Cash equates to 31%, with Floating Rate Notes (FRNs) around 13%, fixed rate bonds around 7% and growth funds around 1% of the portfolio.

Council’s investment portfolio is well diversified in complying assets across the entire credit spectrum. It is also well diversified from a rating perspective. Credit quality is diversified and is predominately invested amongst the investment grade Authorised Deposit-Taking Institutions (ADIs) (being BBB- or higher), with a smaller allocation to unrated ADIs.

All investments are within the defined Policy limits, as outlined in the Rating Allocation chart below:

Investment Portfolio Balance
Council’s investment portfolio balance increased slightly over the past month, up from $310.36M to $310.48M.

Monthly Investment Movements
Redemptions/Sales – Council redeemed/sold the following investment securities during September 2025:
|
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
|
AMP (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$2M |
9 months |
5.10% |
This term deposit was redeemed on maturity and these funds were reinvested in a new 2-year Australian Military Bank term deposit (as below). |
|
BoQ (A-) Term Deposit |
$1M |
5 years |
1.25% |
This term deposit was redeemed on maturity and these funds were reinvested in a new 3-year Australian Military Bank term deposit (as below). |
|
BoQ (A-) Term Deposit |
$2M |
5 years |
1.25% |
This term deposit was redeemed on maturity and these funds were reinvested in a new 3-year BankVic term deposit (as below). |
|
P&N Bank (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$1M |
3 years |
4.40% |
This term deposit was redeemed on maturity and these funds were reinvested in a new 2-year Police Credit Union term deposit (as below). |
New Investments – Council purchased the following investment securities during September 2025:
|
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
|
Police Credit Union (Unrated) Term Deposit |
$1M |
2 years |
4.06% |
The Police Credit Union rate of 4.06% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was 4.02%. |
|
Australia Military Bank (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$1M |
3 years |
4.08% |
The Australia Military Bank rate of 4.08% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was 4.06%. |
|
BankVic (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$2M |
3 years |
4.09% |
The BankVic rate of 4.09% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was 4.08%. |
|
Australia Military Bank (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$2M |
2 years |
4.05% |
The Australia Military Bank rate of 4.05% compared favourably to the rest of the market for this term. The next best rate for this term was 4.03%. |
Rollovers – Council rolled over the following investment security during September 2025:
|
Institution and Type |
Amount |
Investment Term |
Interest Rate |
Comments |
|
Australian Military Bank (BBB+) Term Deposit |
$2M |
3 years |
4.06% |
This term deposit was a 3-year investment earning 4.55% and was rolled at maturity into a new 3-year term deposit at 4.06%. |
Monthly Investment Performance
Interest/growth/capital gains/(losses) for the month totalled $1,047,252, which compares favourably with the budget for the period of $686,282 - outperforming budget for the month by $360,970.
Council’s outperformance to budget for September is mainly due to better than budgeted returns on Councils investment portfolio as well as a higher than anticipated investment portfolio balance – which is partly due to Council receiving upfront payment of $48.5M in AIF funding in June 2024.
Council experienced a positive return on its NSW T-Corp Managed Fund for the month of September, with the fund returning +1.74% (or $41,579) with domestic (-0.78%) shares detracting from performance and international (+3.31%) shares being the main contributor to performance, as global shares reached all-time highs again.

Over the past year, Council’s investment portfolio has returned 4.24%, marginally outperforming the AusBond Bank Bill index by 0.05%. Councils investment portfolio has continued to perform in line with the AusBond Bank Bill Index* over the longer-term time period, returning 3.84% per annum over the past 3 years – slightly underperforming the benchmark by -0.21% over this time.

* The AusBond Bank Bill Index is the leading benchmark for the Australian fixed income market. It is interpolated from the RBA Cash rate, 1 month and 3-month Bank Bill Swap rates.
Report by Responsible Accounting Officer
I hereby certify that all of the above investments have been made in accordance with the provision of Section 625 of the Local Government Act 1993 and the regulations there under, and in accordance with the Investment Policy adopted by Council on 24 June 2024.
Carolyn Rodney
Responsible Accounting Officer
Policy and Legislation
Budget variations are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 052 Budget Policy.
Investments are reported in accordance with Council’s POL 075 Investment Policy.
Local Government Act 1993
Section 625 - How may councils invest?
Local Government (General) Regulation 2021
Section 212 - Reports on council investments
Link to Strategic Plan
Community leadership and collaboration
Objective: Wagga Wagga City Council leads through engaged civic governance and is recognised and distinguished by its ethical decision-making, efficient management, innovation and quality customer service
Ensure transparency and accountability
Risk Management Issues for Council
This report is a control mechanism that assists in addressing the following potential risks to Council:
· Loss of investment income or capital resulting from ongoing management of investments, especially during difficult economic times
· Failure to demonstrate to the community that its funds are being expended in an efficient and effective manner
Internal / External Consultation
All relevant areas within Council have consulted with the Finance Division in relation to the budget variations listed in this report.
The Finance Division has consulted with relevant external parties to confirm Council’s investment portfolio balances.
|
1⇩. |
Capital Works Program 2025/26 to 2034/35 |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-17 |
RP-17 REQUEST FOR FEE WAIVER
Author: Carolyn Rodney
|
Summary: |
Council has received a request to waiver fees for a scoping proposal lodgement. Staff are supportive of this request for reasons outlined in this report. |
That Council:
a in accordance with Section 356 of the Local Government Act 1993, provide financial assistance in the form of a $6,918 fee waiver to MJM Consulting Engineers for the reasons outlined in this report
b approve the budget variation as detailed in the Financial Implications section of the report
Report
MJM, in their attached letter have requested Council’s consideration to waiving fees for their Southern Growth Area Zone 3 Scoping Proposal lodgement.
The fee waiver request is $6,918 based on this proposal being considered complex under the LEP Making Guidelines.
The scoping proposal fees were introduced by Council on 28 November 2022 which was after the original application was lodged (16 November 2022), hence no fee was originally paid.
Council staff support the fee waiver in recognition of the prior engagement undertaken and to ensure continuity of the proposal, noting its alignment with the strategic objectives of the draft Local Housing Strategy.
The current proposal represents a continuation and evolution of the original Scoping Proposal (LEPSP23/0005) submitted in November 2022. While that proposal did not progress due to limited merit at the time and then the exceptional circumstances that followed the submission, the revised proposal indicates stronger alignment to Council’s strategic planning outcomes with Executive support.
From a process point of view, Council staff advised that a new Scoping Proposal should be lodged rather than an addendum to ensure clarity of information, particularly given the change of consultant.
Facilitating the rezoning and development of Zone 3 aligns with Council’s broader objectives for the Southern Growth Area. Supporting the current proposal through a fee waiver will help progress strategic planning outcomes and unlock development potential consistent with Council's draft Local Housing Strategy.
Financial Implications
It is proposed for this fee waiver of $6,918 be funded from within the City Planning Various Studies annual $25K budget, which may result in a slight delay of other studies staff may have planned for this financial year.
Job number: 14528 – City Planning Various Studies
Policy and Legislation
POL 078 – Financial Assistance Policy
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Ethical Leadership
Deliver accountable and transparent leadership.
Risk Management Issues for Council
N/A
Internal / External Consultation
Cross Directorate consultation has been undertaken as required.
|
1⇩. |
MJM Request for Waiving Fees |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-18 |
RP-18 2025 National Local Roads, Transport and Infrastructure Congress
Author: Nicole Johnson
Executive: Scott Gray
|
Summary: |
Endorse representation and appointment of one Councillor to attend the 025 National Local Roads, Transport and Infrastructure Congress. |
|
That Council: a endorse sending a Council delegate to the 2025 National Local Roads, Transport and Infrastructure Congress to be held in Bendigo, Victoria from 11 and 12 November 2025 b appoint one Councillor as Council’s delegate to attend the 2025 National Local Roads, Transport and Infrastructure Congress |
Report
The Australian Local Government Association (ALGA) has extended an invitation to Council to attend the 2025 National Local Roads, Transport and Infrastructure Congress, themed “Driving National Productivity” to be held in Bendigo from 11 and 12 November 2025.
The Congress brings together local government leaders, policymakers, and industry experts to explore the policy settings shaping the future of Australia’s roads, transport, and infrastructure.
This year’s program will feature keynote presentations from:
· The Honourable Catherine King MP, Minister for Infrastructure, Transport, Regional Development and Local Government; and
· Senator the Honourable Bridget McKenzie, Shadow Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and Regional Development.
Over two days, delegates will hear from representatives across government and industry on issues central to local government, including:
· Sustainable investment in road networks
· Federal funding opportunities and partnership models
· Addressing the national road maintenance backlog and
· Building resilient and productive regional infrastructure
Attendance provides an opportunity for Council to contribute to national discussions, advocate for regional priorities, and strengthen partnerships with government and industry.
Financial Implications
The cost for attendance of one Councillor to attend the Conference is $1730 plus GST (standard full member rate). The conference and accommodation costs will be funded from the Councillors’ Conference, travelling, and professional development budget, which has $72,000 for the 2025/26 financial year. If any additional Councillors would like to attend the conference, the costs will be deducted from their professional development budget of $8,000 for the year.
Job consolidation number: 12080 – Councillor Development/Conferences/Travelling
Policy and Legislation
POL 025 Payment of Expenses and Provision of Facilities to Councillors
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Ethical Leadership
Deliver accountable and transparent leadership.
Risk Management Issues for Council
N/A
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
|
1⇩. |
2025 National Local Roads, Transport and Infrastructure Congress Program. |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-19 |
RP-19 RESOLUTIONS AND NOTICES OF MOTIONS REGISTERS
Author: Nicole Johnson
Executive: Scott Gray
|
Summary: |
This report provides Councillors with an update on the status of all resolutions of Council including Notices of Motion. |
|
That Council: a receive and note the following registers: i. Active Resolutions as of 10 October 2025 ii. Active Notice of Motions as of 10 October 2025 iii. Resolutions including Notice of Motions completed from 1 July 2025 to 10 October 2025 b authorise the formal closure of the resolutions detailed in the report c endorse the revised reporting timeframe for council resolutions |
Report
Council Resolution Registers provide an updated overview of all Council resolutions and Notices of Motion, incorporating revised target dates where appropriate. These dates will continue to be refined as the new monitoring and reporting processes become embedded across the organisation.
The attached registers present a snapshot as at 3 July 2025, detailing:
· 74 active resolutions
· 12 active Notices of Motion
· 127 resolutions, including Notices of Motion, completed between 1 July 2025 and 10 October 2025
Council currently has 12 active Notices of Motion and 74 active Council Resolutions. Each item has been reviewed with its adopted target date, current status, and where applicable, a proposed revised target date. The attached registers provide a comprehensive snapshot of progress across all active items, outlining the key actions undertaken during the reporting period, updated timeframes, and next planned steps to support completion. This consolidated overview ensures transparency in tracking Council’s decision implementation and provides a clear basis for ongoing monitoring and reporting to both the Executive Team and Council.
This is the second reporting period under the revised monitoring and reporting process introduced earlier in 2025. Monthly reporting on active Notices of Motion continues to be provided to Councillors to support ongoing oversight and accountability.
A significant proportion of active items relate to property matters, where a review of historical resolutions identified several that were previously assigned short, generic target dates that did not accurately reflect the complexity or lead times required for delivery. In the previous quarterly report, these property-related items were aligned to 30 September 2025 as an interim measure. Following further review and consultation with the Property team, revised and more realistic timeframes have now been established to reflect current progress, resourcing, and operational priorities.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
Section 335 – Functions of the General Manager
(b) to implement, without undue delay, the lawful decisions of the council
Council’s Code of Meeting Practice
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Ethical Leadership
Deliver accountable and transparent leadership.
Risk Management Issues for Council
Council must maintain a transparent and efficient system for tracking progress and implementing council decisions.
Failure to implement council decisions in a timely manner is a legislative compliance risk that could lead to reputational damage for Council.
Internal / External Consultation
Manager and Executive review and endorsement
|
1. |
Active resolutions - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
2. |
Active Notice of Motions - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
3. |
Completed resolutions from 1 July 2025 to 10 October 2025 - Provided under separate cover |
|
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
RP-20 |
RP-20 QUESTIONS WITH NOTICE
Author: Scott Gray
|
Summary: |
This report is to respond to questions with notice raised by Councillors in accordance with Council’s Code of Meeting Practice. |
|
That Council receive and note the report. |
Report
The following questions with notice were received prior to the meeting, in accordance with the Code of Meeting Practice.
|
Councillor K Subedi Could Council provide information regarding the construction of the roundabout at the intersection of Pine Gully Road, Cootamundra Avenue and Avocet Drive, including the proposed commencement date, schedule of works, and traffic flow arrangements during construction?
Could Council also advise how residents and road users will be informed of traffic changes and construction updates throughout the project? |
|
Council is delivering a multi-stage upgrade to Pine Gully Road to improve safety, traffic flow, and pedestrian access to the area. Upgrades include construction of a new roundabout, traffic islands, kerb and guttering and drainage improvements at the intersection of Pine Gully Road, Avocet Drive and Cootamundra Avenue.
The project is planned to be delivered in two stages. Stage 1 is scheduled to commence on 10 November 2025 and will involve the construction of an alternate access road. This stage will require lane closures along Coppabella Drive and Pine Gully Road. Stage 2 will consist of a new roundabout with construction scheduled from January to April 2026. During this period, there will be a full road closure at Pine Gully Road and Cootamundra Boulevard. Access will be maintained to the suburb via the alternate access at Coppabella Dr along with Muttama Parade for the duration of the works.
Council will conduct a letter box drop to all properties and businesses in the suburbs of Gobbagombalin and Estella 2 weeks before work commences. The letter boxes drop will inform people of the key details of the project such as timelines, any road/lane closures and detour routes. Further, there will be signage and VMS boards put in place at least 2 weeks before any works or road closures commence to assist with directing traffic and accessing the detour routes. |
|
Councillor T Koschel Can Council investigate repairing potholes or sealing the entrance road to the Wiradjuri Boat Ramp and consider installing signage and line marking at the turning circle to designate trailer parking and discourage vehicle parking on the circle. Could Council provide an update on the repair of potholes and the feasibility of line marking in this area? |
|
Council do not have a dedicated budget for sealing unsealed roads, however the Wiradjuri Boat Ramp is scheduled for re-sheeting in the 2025/2026 financial year, with delivery anticipated towards the end of this year. In addition, Council will investigate the feasibility of installing appropriate signage to designate trailer parking in the area. |
|
Councillor T Koschel Can Council confirm whether the hearing loop in the Council Meeting Room is currently active and functioning correctly? If a hearing loop is installed, could it please be checked to ensure it is operating as intended? |
|
The hearing loop in the Council Meeting Room was inspected recently and found to be active and functioning correctly. Council’s contractor will be engaged to undertake a further review of the system to ensure full functionality.
|
|
Councillor A Parkins Yanda Lane has been upgraded on one side of Morgan Street. Is the opposite side scheduled for maintenance or upgrade works? |
|
Council acknowledges the need for maintenance and work across multiple laneways in Wagga Wagga. Unfortunately, Council do not have a dedicated budget for laneway maintenance which limits our ability to manage ongoing damage and repair works within these roadways. Council will fill all potholes identified in Yanda Lane in the interim, until a dedicated budget for laneway maintenance is established through the Laneway Strategy Plan. |
|
In the vicinity of the water tower on Willans Hill, the area appears tired and in need of maintenance. Is there an opportunity for Council to undertake a general clean-up of the area and consider the installation of additional park furniture? |
|
Council will arrange an inspection of the site and undertake any necessary maintenance works including the removal of graffiti on the entrance sign. We will also assess the feasibility of installing additional park furniture to improve the usability of the area. |
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
Code of Meeting Practice
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Good governance
Provide professional, innovative, accessible and efficient services.
Risk Management Issues for Council
N/A
Internal / External Consultation
N/A
|
Report submitted to the Ordinary Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
M-1 |
Committee Minutes
M-1 FLOODPLAIN RISK MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE - 18 SEPTEMBER 2025
Author: Warren Faulkner
|
Summary: |
This report presents the minutes of the Committee meeting held on 18 September 2025 for Council’s information and noting.
It should be noted the FRMAC did not have sufficient time to review the draft Lake Albert Flood Mitigation Options-Feasability Study prior to the meeting, however they endorsed it to go to Public Exhibition pending their review and the report being updated. The committee have subsequently had the time to review the report and have not provided any comment/feedback.
Updates and presentations by consultants were provided to the FRMAC on all other current projects. Variations for extensions of time to complete all projects has been obtained from DCCEEW for all but the North Wagga Levee project. Apart from the North Wagga Levee project, all other projects will progressively be completed by April next year. |
That Council receive and note the minutes of the Floodplain Risk Management Committee Meeting held on 18 September 2025.
Report
The Minutes of the Floodplain Risk Management Advisory Committee (FRMAC) Meeting held on 18 September 2025 are presented to Council for consideration. Below is a summary of items considered at the meeting.
RP-1 2021-22-FM-0039 - Lake Albert Flood Mitigation Options - Feasibility Study
The Draft Feasibility Study Report for diverting additional flooding flows from Stringybark Creek and Crooked Creek into Lake Albert and using Lake Albert to provide additional flood mitigation to the broader area, referred to as the ‘Lake Albert Enhanced Flow Scheme’ in the Major Overland Flow Floodplain Risk Management Study and Plan (MOFFS), was provided to the FRMAC for review and comment.
Stantec provided a presentation that summarized all prior tasks of the project as well as the final option details and assessment including modelling, costing and damage benefit assessments. The final option incorporates the elements discussed at the previous Committee meeting, along with a flood protection berm for properties on Plunkett Drive which would have been affected by Lake Albert tailwater without this new protection measure.
To meet funding requirements and subject to workshop with the Council, public exhibition of the draft report is proposed for late October – November 2025, with the report finalisation planned prior to the next FRMAC meeting on December 4, 2025.
RP-2 2022-FMP-0103 Humula and Mangoplah Flood Studies
Council engaged WMAWater in late September 2023, to undertake the Humula and
Mangoplah Flood Study.
WMAWater have now completed the flood models for both towns and presented the outputs of the flood models for the project to the FRMAC.
The draft report on the flood is now being written and is proposed to be presented to the next FRMAC meeting for review and comment.
Public exhibition of the Flood Study is planned to be undertaken in February 2026.
RP-3 2021-22-FM-0024 - Glenfield Drain and Flowerdale Storage Flood Mitigation Works
The Glenfield Road Drain and Flowerdale Storage - Mitigation Works and Feasibility Study draft report was provided to the FRMAC for review and comment.
Lyall and Associates provided a presentation that summarized all of the basin improvement measures included in the assessment of the impact that the implementation of the individual PFMMs would have on flood behaviour (i.e. it assumes that the basin improvement works have been implemented prior to the implementation of the individual PFMM). This is the same for the Ultimate Flood Modification Scheme.
The draft report includes a benefit cost analysis for the basin improvement measures in isolation and then the basin improvement measures in combination with the Ultimate Flood Modification Scheme (i.e. we have not undertaken a benefit cost analysis for the basin improvement measures in combination with each individual PFMM). A benefit cost analysis of the individual PFMMs or the Ultimate Flood Modification Scheme absent the basin improvement measures was not undertaken as the flood model hasn’t been run for these conditions.
Based on the above understanding, the implementation of the basin improvement measures would reduce the number of above-floor inundated dwellings from 158 to 120, while the subsequent implementation of the measures comprising the Ultimate Flood Modification Scheme would reduce this number by an additional 11 dwellings.
Lyall & Associates will now finalise the report to conclude this study.
RP-4 17866- Levee System Upgrade - North Wagga
An updated indicative timeline for the implementation of the raised levee and third-party mitigation options was provided to the FRMAC.
|
Stage |
Duration |
Commencement |
|
Topographic Survey |
6 months |
August 2024 |
|
Environmental Assessment |
4 months |
November 2024 |
|
Floodgate Pipe Relining |
4 months |
September 2025 |
|
Civil Design including mitigation options for residents adversely affected by the levee raising |
6-12 months |
July 2025 |
|
Levee contractor procurement |
4 months |
July 2026 |
|
Levee construction |
24 months |
November 2027 |
For the North Wagga levee, Council currently has a funding pool of:
· $6.3M in SRV funding
· $1.1M in the original Commonwealth Development Grant (CDG) to be expended by December 2025.
The CDG will be utilised to fund the floodgate pipe relining and the detailed design of the levee.
There is a shortfall of approximately $5M for the construction of the levee and with the need to provide mitigation to the 20 buildings adversely affected by the levee raising, there is potentially the need to raise a further $3.75M on top of the $5M.
Council has applied for funding through Round 3 of the Disaster Ready Fund to finance the shortfall for this project. Council should be notified later this year if it has been successful. Council has also applied for funding through DCCEEW to fund the third-party mitigation component of the project as a separate stage.
The status of the project is:
· The detailed survey for the levee design has been completed.
· The Review of Environmental Factors has been completed and accepted by Council
· The tender for the detailed design of the levee has been awarded to GHD.
· Procurement for the relining of the existing 14 floodgates in the levee has been completed and Pipeline Watertech has been awarded the contract to complete this work. Pipeline Watertech have commenced on site this week and the project should be completed in approximately 6 weeks.
· Council’s preferred option is to move forward with a mix of outright ownership and easements for the land occupied by the increased levee footprint. An outline of the composition of the property solutions is provided below.
· The communication required for the property acquisition to be implemented will begin shortly. A communication plan for the entire project is in the process of being finalised and will be presented to FRMAC at the December meeting.
· A project steering committee will be engaged shortly to oversee this complex project.
RP-5 2021-22-FM-0032 - Uranquinty Levee Upgrade - Investigation and Design
Royal Haskoning DHV (RHDHV) provided an update and presentation on the feasibility of a re-aligned eastern levee along Connorton Street that renders land that is zoned the same as the village to become flood free up to the 1% AEP event
RHDHV have completed the 50% design and provided it to Council for review. Council provided the design and design report to Department of Climate Change, Environment, Energy and Water (DCCEEW) and PWD for further review and passed the feedback onto RHDHV.
RHDHV is now progressing to the 80% design stage. This project has a new completion date of April 2026.
RP-6 2023 FMP 0073 Early Warning System Model Development
An initial project was completed by Stantec, and this has been developed into a specific and targeted approach to improve accessibility to flood and river data for the Council, the State Emergency Service and the public.
The approach is to enhance and improve existing Council systems and work collaboratively with the SES and Bureau of Meteorology to improve access to data across the Local Government Area and the wider catchment.
Worley have been engaged to deliver the Early Warning and Flood Prediction project.
The following update was provided by Worley.
Status of project:
· Base Murrumbidgee River system operational
· Upstream lookup approach developed and to be integrated into WaterRIDE 11
· MOFFS flash flood base configuration almost complete
· Build URBS hydrology model (variation)
· Configuration of operational forecasting WaterRIDE projects
· Configuration of WaterRIDE LITE project
To be Completed:
· Present beta version
· Setup/Delivery/Training/Manual
Data needs from Council:
· GIS intelligence layers
· Any flood camera locations and image URL’s
A variation was approved by DCCEEW in August 2025 allowing the project to continue. Implementation and training for the final system has been tentatively booked in for late October.
Financial Implications
N/A
Policy and Legislation
The outcomes from the various studies will be critical in the terms of future amendments to the Council Local Environmental Plan and its Development Control Plan.
Link to Strategic Plan
Regional Leadership
Vision for the future
Adopt a sound approach to strategic planning to ensure that we are preparing for future growth requirements of the city.
Risk Management Issues for Council
No specific issues identified.
Internal / External Consultation
NSW Department of Planning and Environment (DPIE) (previously the Office of Environment and Heritage) has been heavily consulted throughout the process of planning and executing these projects. DPIE is the responsible funding body and receives quarterly status update reports
|
1⇩. |
Minutes Floodplain Risk Management Committee Meeting - 18 September 2025 |
|
|
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
CONF-1 |
Confidential Reports
CONF-1 RFT CT2026001 Digester Blowers Narrung Street Sewer Treatment Plant and Kooringal Sewer Treatment Plant
Author: Ray Graham
Executive: Henry Pavitt
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(d) (i) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.
|
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
CONF-2 |
CONF-2 Proposed sub-licence - 550 Flakney Road, Big Springs - Mount Flakney Telecommunications Tower
Author: Matthew Dombrovski
Executive: Fiona Piltz
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(d) (ii) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a competitor of the Council.
|
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
CONF-3 |
CONF-3 LAND ACQUISITIONS FOR ACCELERATED INFRASTRUCTURE FUND - PLUMPTON ROAD DUPLICATION PROJECT AFFECTING PRIVATE LAND
Author: Matthew Dombrovski
Executive: Fiona Piltz
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(c) information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
|
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
CONF-4 |
CONF-4 PROPOSED CROWN LAND ACQUISITIONS FOR ACCELERATED INFRASTRUCTURE FUND - PLUMPTON ROAD DUPLICATION PROJECT
Author: Matthew Dombrovski
Executive: Fiona Piltz
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(c) information that would, if disclosed, confer a commercial advantage on a person with whom the Council is conducting (or proposes to conduct) business.
|
Report submitted to the Confidential Meeting of Council on Monday 27 October 2025 |
CONF-5 |
CONF-5 RFT CT2026012 Specialist Signs & Services
Author: Michael Casey
Executive: Scott Gray
This report is CONFIDENTIAL in accordance with Section 10A(2) of the Local Government Act 1993, which permits the meeting to be closed to the public for business relating to the following: -
(d) (i) commercial information of a confidential nature that would, if disclosed, prejudice the commercial position of the person who supplied it.